Il giorno ven, 02/06/2017 alle 10.24 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> Yesterday I have update my fedora 25 and after reboot VPN l2tp+ipsec
> do not work anymore.
Solved with kernel update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458222
Thanks
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 25
Allegedly, on or about 05 June 2017, Walter H. sent:
> I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
> on my DNS - so no problem ...
If somewhere on your LAN are things using ZeroConf, Bonjour, or other
similar autonomous psuedo-DNS software (client or server), then
using
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> .lan meets your requirements and I have seen that used. Or you could
> make up something random. Since it's just your private network, if the
> one you choose gets used later, you will have to change it again, but
> you'll have lots of warning.
I
On 06/05/2017 11:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
As far as I know, there are no TLDs reserved for private networks. All users
should use properly registered domains for all DNS zones, private and public.
Swell. Happen to know of a registrar that will let me register a domain that
has no public
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:38:39AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> Swell. Happen to know of a registrar that will let me register a
> domain that has no public facing DNS server? (At pretty much zero
> cost, of course)
Almost any registrar should let you do this.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Projec
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda <
ca...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 4 June 2017 at 20:45, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > Has anyone been able to get the free version of Starcraft up and
> running? I
> > ran into the issue where ClientSdk.dll won't initialize (
> > https://bu
On 06.06.2017 16:43, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:38:39AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
Swell. Happen to know of a registrar that will let me register a
domain that has no public facing DNS server? (At pretty much zero
cost, of course)
Almost any registrar should let you do t
On 06/05/2017 11:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local dom
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:38:39 -0500
Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 11:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > As far as I know, there are no TLDs reserved for private
> > networks. All users should use properly registered domains for all
> > DNS zones, private and public.
>
> Swell. Happen to
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:32 PM, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:38:39 -0500
> Robert Nichols wrote:
>
> > On 06/05/2017 11:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > > As far as I know, there are no TLDs reserved for private
> > > networks. All users should use properly registered domains for all
>
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:32 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:38:39 -0500
> Robert Nichols wrote:
>
> > On 06/05/2017 11:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > > As far as I know, there are no TLDs reserved for private
> > > networks. All users should use properly registered domains for all
On 06/06/2017 10:28 AM, Doug wrote:
was made by Murata. Now the problem: yesterday and today it is inaccessible
by any means--ping by ip or name, or by nmap. I have tried connecting
and disconnecting
the lan cable, the power cable, and rebooted the router, but nothing
works. And since
I can't a
On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
the replied with the following:
Regarding your private network, if it will not be published on Internet,
you can use whatever you want. You may avoid to uses existing TLD's and
reserved ones (such as .test, .example, .lan etc.) just in case. You can
use f
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
p.s. in case the phenomenas of the OP won't change these are true bugs.
I don't understand what you're saying here.
the system/Firefox has to take e.g. proxy.my
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I had .home., but when I noticed that the pre-registration of .home.
has started, I changed this to .local.;
And that's when your problems started.
at work we have company.local.
You should warn them that they are going to run into the same problem a
On 06.06.2017 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
p.s. in case the phenomenas of the OP won't change these are true
bugs.
I don't understand what you're saying here.
the s
On 06.06.2017 20:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I had .home., but when I noticed that the pre-registration of .home.
has started, I changed this to .local.;
And that's when your problems started.
no. it startet with this Fedora box, or to say it differently I'
On 06/06/2017 11:22 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 06.06.2017 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
p.s. in case the phenomenas of the OP won't change these are true
bugs.
I don't u
Hi,
running F25 GNOME on Wayland and have 2 mice.
One on the left and one on the right of the keyboard.
I would like to set the left as left handed and the right as right handed.
In GNOME settings I cannot change it per mouse, rather for all of the at the
same time.
I read that this is a libi
Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been
using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with
something more modern and "responsive" on mobile.
Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the
others, I thought I would ask this list if they have
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:28:03 +0100
andrea wrote:
> Any suggestions?
As near as I can tell Wayland was foisted off on everyone
without providing most of the user level control you
formerly had with X11, so step one is probably to stop
using Wayland.
Then you'll probably be able to use the xinput c
On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been
using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with
something more modern and "responsive" on mobile.
Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the
others, I thou
On 06/06/2017 11:28 AM, andrea wrote:
running F25 GNOME on Wayland and have 2 mice.
One on the left and one on the right of the keyboard.
I would like to set the left as left handed and the right as right handed.
In GNOME settings I cannot change it per mouse, rather for all of the at
the same
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:44:07PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> As near as I can tell Wayland was foisted off on everyone
> without providing most of the user level control you
Tom, this attitude like "foisted off" and similar (from other recent
messages) really isn't welcome on this list. Please
Hi,
>> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been
>> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with
>> something more modern and "responsive" on mobile.
>>
>> Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the
>> others, I thought I would ask
On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote:
Before I start installing and testing roundcube, rainloop, and the
others, I thought I would ask this list if they have a preference for
users on mobile?
I've gotten to be pretty impressed with SOGo.
They maintain a yum repo for customers. If you want to b
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:27:51 -0400
Alex wrote:
> > Why wouldn't you just use an IMAP client on the phone?
>
> Yes, I agree, and that's what I've asked them to do, but they still
> prefer the webmail client.
Then that means they prefer squirrelmail, right? So you might
as well keep using it or t
On 06.06.2017 20:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
the replied with the following:
Regarding your private network, if it will not be published on Internet,
you can use whatever you want. You may avoid to uses existing TLD's and
reserved ones (such as .test, .exampl
On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 06.06.2017 20:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
So .lan. can't be used.
> It can be used, just be aware that maybe someday in the future it
will have a different meaning.
you're kidding;
as it seems there is no define
On 06.06.2017 20:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 11:22 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 06.06.2017 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
p.s. in case the phenomenas of the OP won't
On 06/06/2017 12:36 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:27:51 -0400
Alex wrote:
Why wouldn't you just use an IMAP client on the phone?
Yes, I agree, and that's what I've asked them to do, but they still
prefer the webmail client.
Then that means they prefer squirrelmail, right? So
On 06/06/2017 12:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:44:07PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
As near as I can tell Wayland was foisted off on everyone
without providing most of the user level control you
Tom, this attitude like "foisted off" and similar (from other recent
message
On 06/06/2017 12:49 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 06.06.2017 20:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Either you've been lucky or those other systems don't support MDNS yet.
given the possibility that the strange phenomens mentioned in the OP are
really caused by using .local as my intranet-TLD,
then why doesn't ns
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:28:03 +0100
andrea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running F25 GNOME on Wayland and have 2 mice.
> One on the left and one on the right of the keyboard.
>
> I would like to set the left as left handed and the right as right
> handed.
I can't answer your question, but I also use two inpu
On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I replied to this mail with:
if I interpret your reply correctly, I could also use just .waldi or
.waldinet?
and their reply was:
If it's only for internal network, you can use .waldi or .waldinet.
If you really want to make sure it's unique, why do
On 6 June 2017 at 20:53, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> Then that means they prefer squirrelmail, right? So you might
>> as well keep using it or they'll hate the replacement just
>> as irrationally :-).
>
>
> I would second this. Someone that prefers webmail *on a phone* over a
> native app is likely to
On 06/06/2017 12:58 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:44:07PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
As near as I can tell Wayland was foisted off on everyone
without providing most of the user level control you
Tom, this attitude like "foisted of
On 06/06/2017 12:27 PM, Alex wrote:
Yes, I agree, and that's what I've asked them to do, but they still
prefer the webmail client.
Maybe you could point out to them that all the major webmail (and forum)
providers don't expect you to use the web interface on your phone. They
provide alternat
On 06.06.2017 21:59, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:49 PM, Walter H. wrote:
so when renaming my local domain to something different, this must be
sure, that not any other future bug
makes me renaming it again ...
There are no guarantees, but at this point .lan is not likely to have
any
On 06/06/2017 01:01 PM, Andy Blanchard wrote:
"No, it's just you... The IMAP client is perfectly fine, here, look!"
*evil grin*
Have you been taking lessons from Simon the BOFH?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 06/06/2017 01:04 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you don't have a helpful comment, then just don't comment.
That's my attitude as well. However, not everybody follows that
practice and on the whole the list just regards it as blowing off steam
and ignores it. What I don't understand is, why is
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:47:49 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
>
> [...]
> [...]
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:59:07 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 12:49 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
>
> [...]
>
> [...]
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to us
On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been
> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with
> something more modern and "responsive" on mobile.
Just to clarify for others reading this thread, Squirrelmail is a
web-based m
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote:
>> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been
>> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with
>> something more modern and "responsive" on mobile.
>
> Just to cla
On 06/06/2017 02:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Just to clarify for others reading this thread, Squirrelmail is a
web-based mail _server_, not a client. It pulls mail off an MTA (mail
transport agent like sendmail) by either behaving like an MDA (mail
delivery agent) or by using a real MDA such as do
On 06/06/2017 01:47 PM, Bob Marcan wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:47:49 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 06/06/2017 01:19 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/06/2017 01:04 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you don't have a helpful comment, then just don't comment.
That's my attitude as well. However, not everybody follows that
practice and on the whole the list just regards it as blowing off steam
and ignore
On 06/06/2017 02:14 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 11:42 AM, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi, we have fedora25 set up with apache and dovecot and have been
>>> using squirrelmail. We're looking to replace squirrelmail with
>>> something more mode
On 06/06/2017 02:17 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 02:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Just to clarify for others reading this thread, Squirrelmail is a
>> web-based mail _server_, not a client. It pulls mail off an MTA (mail
>> transport agent like sendmail) by either behaving like an MDA (ma
On 06/06/2017 03:01 PM, stan wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:28:03 +0100
andrea wrote:
Hi,
running F25 GNOME on Wayland and have 2 mice.
One on the left and one on the right of the keyboard.
I would like to set the left as left handed and the right as right
handed.
I can't answer your questio
On 06/06/2017 03:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
I think of Squirrelmail as a remote MUA or an MUA proxy. The MUA
functionality remains on the Squirrelmail server--not on the client as
in a classic MUA. It simply uses the browser to do the GUI part of the
job. You have to explicitly request downloadin
On 06/06/2017 03:11 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> On 06/06/2017 03:01 PM, stan wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:28:03 +0100
>> andrea wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> running F25 GNOME on Wayland and have 2 mice.
>>> One on the left and one on the right of the keyboard.
>>>
>>> I would like to set the left as left
On 06/06/2017 03:19 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 03:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> I think of Squirrelmail as a remote MUA or an MUA proxy. The MUA
>> functionality remains on the Squirrelmail server--not on the client as
>> in a classic MUA. It simply uses the browser to do the GUI part o
On 2017-06-06 15:20, Rick Stevens wrote:
Wait, isn't that the same philosophy that IBM had for their floppy
drives where they couldn't be bothered to put the correct drive select
jumpers in, wired them all up so drive select 1 was active and required
you to split and put a weird twist in the rib
Thanx, JoAnne! --doug
On 06/06/2017 05:24 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2017-06-06 15:20, Rick Stevens wrote:
Wait, isn't that the same philosophy that IBM had for their floppy
drives where they couldn't be bothered to put the correct drive select
jumpers in, wired them all up so drive select 1 was activ
56 matches
Mail list logo
