On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
>> FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
>> and a Vnc Server on the Linux side...
>>
>> That being said
> how do I this?
Install https:
On 06/05/17 15:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
> You may also want to check to see if you have any errors reported in you
> ~/.vnc directory.
You would also want to check ~/.xsession-errors.
I just restated my VM that is running xrdp and the connection to the
server failed the first time and there were
On 4 June 2017 at 20:45, Dave Johansen wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get the free version of Starcraft up and running? I
> ran into the issue where ClientSdk.dll won't initialize (
> https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42741 ). Any ideas on how I can get
> it working?
> Thanks,
> Dave
Hi,
Anyone know what this gibberish that shows up in my
logwatch means?
Dependency failed for Session 10084 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
Dependency failed for Session 10363 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
...
Dependency failed for User Manager for UID 25130.: 59 Time(s)
session-10084.scope: J
On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
and a Vnc Server on the Linux side...
That being said
how do
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
> On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
and
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
Sorry It is late in my part of the world and I didn't scroll down
far enough...
> e.g.
> my older mail server shows this when I restart postfix
>
> [root@mail ~]# service postfix restart
> Shutting down postfix: [ OK ]
On 05.06.2017 16:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client o
On 06/05/17 22:40, Walter H. wrote:
> it is running now as expected due to permissive instead of enforcing
OK
As I mentioned in a later post, to get back to enforcing you may need to
run...
ausearch -c 'systemd' --raw | audit2allow -M my-systemd
semodule -X 300 -i my-systemd.pp
twice sinc
On 06/05/2017 04:35 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Anyone know what this gibberish that shows up in my
> logwatch means?
>
> Dependency failed for Session 10084 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
> Dependency failed for Session 10363 of user nvtest.: 1 Time(s)
> ...
> Dependency failed for User Mana
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 09:56:34 -0700
Rick Stevens wrote:
> > What new nonsense hath systemd wrought?
>
> Is this stuff running in a container of some sort? There have been
> issues with systemd, selinux and containers in the past and CGROUP
> errors often point at container creation/promotion issu
On 05.06.2017 16:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is documentation from F14 and is way out of date.
of course and didn't meet my needs as there must be a user logged on ...
Again, late hour, I should have also mentioned that the AVC messages are
held in /var/log/audit/audit.log
You can grep on type=
Hello,
as this is the first time I'm using Fedora, I noticed the following ...
(a) when open a SSH connection, it tells e.g.
Last login: Mon Jun 5 20:14:37 2017 from 192.168.1.1
all other Linux VMs and/or the Router box show there
Last login: Sat Jun 3 21:41:45 2017 from winpc.local
(b) when
On 06/05/2017 11:25 AM, Walter H. wrote:
as this is the first time I'm using Fedora, I noticed the following ...
(a) when open a SSH connection, it tells e.g.
Last login: Mon Jun 5 20:14:37 2017 from 192.168.1.1
all other Linux VMs and/or the Router box show there
Last login: Sat Jun 3 21:41:4
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
on my DNS - so no problem ...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_
On 06/05/2017 02:09 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 16:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is documentation from F14 and is way out of date.
of course and didn't meet my needs as there must be a user logged on ...
Again, late hour, I should have also mentioned that the AVC messages are
held in /var/
On 05.06.2017 21:01, Daniel Walsh wrote:
On 06/05/2017 02:09 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I did it this way: stored the following to e.g. bugfix.tt
module systemd_vnc_bugfix 1.0.0;
require {
type user_home_t;
type init_t;
class file { open read unlink };
}
#= in
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
on my DNS - so no problem ...
Actually, that *IS* a proble
On 06/05/2017 01:25 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a
ZONE on my DNS - so no
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
>> On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
>>> be a problem.
>> I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
>
On 06/05/2017 09:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local doma
On 06/05/2017 09:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
Actually, that*IS* a problem. You should not be doing that. That is
quite likely the source of all your problems. That domain name is
reserved for a specific purpose and putting it in DNS will cause
conflicts.
Sorry, you're telling*BULLSHIT*; the TLD
On 06/05/2017 09:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local doma
On Tue, June 6, 2017 06:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 .local is reserved for
> MDNS use and is not supposed to be DNS resolvable.
exact this RFC says in "Appendix G. Private DNS Namespaces"
"We do not recommend use of unregistered top-level
domains at a
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
.intranet.
.internal.
.private.
.corp.
.home.
.lan."
and the TLD .home. is just in a pre-registration phase ...
tell me a TLD I can use instead, and which meets the following 3 criterias:
(1) it will never been used officially
(2) it is not .test., .cor
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
>> .intranet.
>> .internal.
>> .private.
>> .corp.
>> .home.
>> .lan."
>>
>> and the TLD .home. is just in a pre-registration phase ...
>>
>> tell me a TLD I can use instead, and which meets the following 3
>>
26 matches
Mail list logo
