Dear Thunderbird for Linux Users,
Please apply the following recommended solution. This is the only real
solution to the missing folder pane in Thunderbird for Linux. All the
other solutions do not work.
In /home/,
$ nano delete-all-msf.sh
Type in the following 2 lines:
#!/bin/sh
find . -type
On 12/07/2016 12:38 AM, turritopsis.dohrnii@gmail.com wrote:
$ su -
# chmod +x delete-all-msf.sh
# exit
There's no reason in the world for you to need root access for that one
command, and using su - will log you in completely as root, making the
working directory /root. And, as the sh
Dnf wants to install bash-completion on my system.
(A package I remove before I even boot because it
is the world's most useless pile of trash).
I let it install it to make it happy, then
go ahead and remove it to see what dependency
dragged it in.
When I remove it, dnf doesn't try to remove
any
On 7 December 2016 at 10:18, Tom Horsley wrote:
> When I remove it, dnf doesn't try to remove
> any other packages, so apparently nothing
> depends on it.
>
> Why on earth does it want to install it then?
My guess is that dnf itself is wanting to install it:
$ rpm -q --whatrecommends bash-comple
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:34:19 +
Andy Blanchard wrote:
> It doesn't *need* it, but apparently the packager thinks dnf is easier
> to use with it installed which seems a bit arbitary.
Actually, dnf is one of the commands that is most screwed
up by bash-completion. The completion algorithm for dnf
2016-12-07 12:27 GMT+01:00, Tom Horsley :
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:34:19 +
> Andy Blanchard wrote:
>
>> It doesn't *need* it, but apparently the packager thinks dnf is easier
>> to use with it installed which seems a bit arbitary.
>
> Actually, dnf is one of the commands that is most screwed
> u
On 7 December 2016 at 11:39, Andras Simon wrote:
> Are you sure about this? It seems to work here with
> bash-completion-2.1-8.20150513git1950590.fc23.noarch
Working here with bash-completion-2.4-1.fc24.noarch too, with and
without paths before the package.
--
Andy
The only person to have all
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:39:13 +0100
Andras Simon wrote:
> Are you sure about this? It seems to work here with
> bash-completion-2.1-8.20150513git1950590.fc23.noarch
I suppose they could have fixed it at some point, but
dnf (or maybe it was still yum at the time) was actually
the final straw that le
Meanwhile, the important bit is that I found the
"install_weak_deps" dnf.conf config option in the
man page, so I can make it ignore merely recommended
packages in the future.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
2016-12-07 13:48 GMT+01:00, Tom Horsley :
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:39:13 +0100
> Andras Simon wrote:
>
>> Are you sure about this? It seems to work here with
>> bash-completion-2.1-8.20150513git1950590.fc23.noarch
>
> I suppose they could have fixed it at some point, but
> dnf (or maybe it was still
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 15:48:06 +0200
> Ahmad Samir wrote:
> > Which sounds to me like their highest priority is
> inventing an excuse to do it anyway, but they
> are desperately searching for an excuse that
> isn't lame :-).
Exactly. Reading the upstream bug report, I get exactly this impression: T
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:12:57PM -0700, stan wrote:
> Well, architecture in the abstract is one thing — it's gotta hit the
> real world for feedback at some point.
The bug we're discussing now - not reading ~/.profile - has been known for 2
years. Nobody had to wait for "real world feedback"
Hi,
Since upgrading my desktop to fedora25, my terminal type while using
GNU screen has changed to screen.xterm-256color. This is apparently
unknown to previous versions of fedora. When connecting to a
fedora22/23/24 system remotely using ssh, it reports the following
when trying to use less, or e
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since upgrading my desktop to fedora25, my terminal type while using
> GNU screen has changed to screen.xterm-256color. This is apparently
> unknown to previous versions of fedora. When connecting to a
> fedora22/23/24 system remotely usi
On 12/07/2016 03:38 AM, turritopsis.dohrnii@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Thunderbird for Linux Users,
Please apply the following recommended solution. This is the only real
solution to the missing folder pane in Thunderbird for Linux. All the
other solutions do not work.
In /home/,
$ nano delete-
On 12/07/2016 12:38 AM, turritopsis.dohrnii@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Thunderbird for Linux Users,
>
> Please apply the following recommended solution. This is the only real
> solution to the missing folder pane in Thunderbird for Linux. All the
> other solutions do not work.
>
> In /home/,
>
On 12/07/2016 02:38 AM, turritopsis.dohrnii@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Thunderbird for Linux Users,
>
> Please apply the following recommended solution. This is the only real
> solution to the missing folder pane in Thunderbird for Linux. All the
> other solutions do not work.
>
> In /home/,
>
On 07Dec2016 10:34, Alex wrote:
How do I either add the new terminal type to the remote system, or
change my terminal type locally so it corresponds with one that's
available on the remote system?
# echo $TERM
screen.xterm-256color
I should have added that I'm aware that I can just change the
On 25/11/16 07:44, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
From:
Greg Woods
Date:
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 22:12:53 -0700
To:
freddog...@yahoo.co.uk, Community support for Fedora users
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, DB mailto:freddog...@yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
I've recently bought an Epson
On 25/11/16 22:42, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/16 03:49, Samuel Sieb wrote:
That looks like a nice addon, I'll probably add it shortly. :-)
If you got it from there, I don't see any reason it wouldn't work. I
don't have FF50 yet so I can't test it myself. There are no open
issues about that
On 25/11/16 22:42, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/16 03:49, Samuel Sieb wrote:
That looks like a nice addon, I'll probably add it shortly. :-)
If you got it from there, I don't see any reason it wouldn't work. I
don't have FF50 yet so I can't test it myself. There are no open
issues about that
Am I the only person seeing the following:
> v = 18.487/19.290/20.489/0.863 ms
> [root@kjclap4 ~]# dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:27:15 ago on Wed Dec 7 15:39:19 2016.
> Dependencies resolved.
> ==
On 12/07/2016 01:18 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention in my previous mail that for the time being
Mozilla are still supporting the NPAPI Flash plugin, but given that
Flash seems to be dying in favour of HTML 5, its probably debatable how
long that support will last.
Unfortunat
On 12/08/16 06:08, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> What is wrong with the dependencies? What can I do to fix it?
Not really running F23 since it will go EOL soon. But I had a VM and tested
and verified
the issue you're seeing.
You can do "dnf --best update" to determine what the broken dependency is
On 12/07/16 19:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 12/08/16 06:08, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>> What is wrong with the dependencies? What can I do to fix it?
>
> Not really running F23 since it will go EOL soon. But I had a VM and tested
> and verified
> the issue you're seeing.
>
> You can do "dnf -
Hi all,
Playing with Fedora 25. I'm shocked to see the terminal is still hidden
away in the utilities group.
I'm pretty sure near 100% of users add Terminal to the favorites
immediately after install.
Surely the #1 use case of Fedora on the desktop IS the terminal?
Cheers,
D
__
On 12/07/2016 06:00 PM, Dan Irwin wrote:
Playing with Fedora 25. I'm shocked to see the terminal is still hidden
away in the utilities group.
I presume that you're using Gnome. Remember, Fedora != Gnome, just as
Linux != Ubuntu. In Xfce, not only does it have a launcher on my panel,
it's av
On 12/07/2016 07:00 PM, Dan Irwin wrote:
Hi all,
Playing with Fedora 25. I'm shocked to see the terminal is still
hidden away in the utilities group.
I'm pretty sure near 100% of users add Terminal to the favorites
immediately after install.
Surely the #1 use case of Fedora on the deskto
That's the problem - just who do these developers cater for?
Answer: The mythical beast of the newbie converting from Windows or OS X.
They aren't coming in droves, especially not to Fedora.
No love for the actual user base - skilled/technical users doing
development or administration tasks.
I w
On 12/07/2016 09:49 PM, Dan Irwin wrote:
That's the problem - just who do these developers cater for?
Answer: The mythical beast of the newbie converting from Windows or OS
X. They aren't coming in droves, especially not to Fedora.
No love for the actual user base - skilled/technical users d
On 12/07/2016 06:00 PM, Dan Irwin wrote:
Playing with Fedora 25. I'm shocked to see the terminal is still hidden
away in the utilities group.
I'm guessing you must be using the Gnome classic layout if you have a
utilities group somewhere. But in that case, it's still easily
available. I do h
31 matches
Mail list logo
