On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 18:03 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Love it!! First three responses are:
>
> 1. Yes, designed to work that way
> 2. Not recommended
> 3. Better do a fresh install
What's wrong with that? It contains all the answers that different
people want to hear. ;-)
--
All mail
I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
in the past).
After trying lots of different USB ports, I finally
did a "dnf update" and rebooted the system just
to make sure everything was totally up to date.
After the reboot, it recogn
On 08/13/2016 12:22 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/12/2016 05:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
This good info for me - but one needs 2 computers for the vnc, and
a working lan for vnc to work.
The text mode seems terrible because it pretty much will not let user
have a multi boot HD.
I think the developers
On 08/11/2016 12:59 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
After literally decades of counting on good ole 'dump' for backups, I
find it failing and dumping core this morning, right after dnf upgrade
to the latest version (1:0.4-0.28.b45.fc24.x86_64). Downgrading to
prior version (1:0.4-0.27.b44.fc24.x86_64) fixe
On 08/13/2016 07:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make
sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics.
Nvidia graphics work fine for me, much better than other graphics.
Dual graphics (intel+nvidia) need specific support, Optimus. It'll b
On 08/13/2016 08:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
in the past).
After trying lots of different USB ports, I finally
did a "dnf update" and rebooted the system just
to make sure everything was t
On 08/13/2016 11:43 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make
sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics.
Nvidia graphics work fine for me, much better than other graphics.
Dual graphics (intel+nvid
On 08/13/2016 08:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 08/13/2016 11:43 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make
sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics.
Nvidia graphics work fine for me, much better than ot
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
> recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
> in the past).
>
> After trying lots of different USB ports, I finally
> did a "dnf update" and rebooted the system just
> to make s
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:52:59 -0600
Greg Woods wrote:
> I have had this issue off and on ever since the introduction of MTP.
I did get a lot of log messages saying "This isn't an MTP device",
but it never seemed to take the extra step of recognizing it
as a USB drive till after the reboot.
--
user
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:59:07 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I did get a lot of log messages saying "This isn't an MTP device",
> but it never seemed to take the extra step of recognizing it
> as a USB drive till after the reboot.
Actually after doing some googling, there may be something to
this. App
Hello,
I guess that it is going to work; I must now be able to make an install.
I am able to run gparted by setting vesa 1280x1024 which is
actually turned to 1920x1080 !!
Then, I was able to run the fc24 fedora installer.
Thank for all the suggestions
===
Hi Patrick,
Not sure what exactly you did to make it work.
Please elaborate which of tghe many suggestions you
received, worked.
Cheers,
JD
On 08/13/2016 02:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I guess that it is going to work; I must now be able to make an install.
I am able to run gparted by
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 12:52 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> >
> > I just tried to plug in my old kindle, and f24 wouldn't
> > recognize it as a disk device (it has always worked
> > in the past).
> >
> > After trying lots of different USB ports
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB,
and I got the following warning message:
The folder Inbox.Bkup is full,
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>
> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
> which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB,
> and I got the followi
On 08/13/2016 08:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
>
>
> On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
>> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>>
>> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
>> which would have increa
On 08/13/2016 07:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
which would have increased the size of th
On 08/13/2016 08:00 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
On 08/13/2016 08:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a back
On 08/13/16 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> AFAIK Kindles don't run on Android.
Yes they do, its just a severely limited version of the OS heavily
modified by Amazon to directly support Amazon apps. Amazon has replaced
the default app store with their own, uses the Silk browser, etc.
> poc
>
On 08/14/16 08:45, jd1008 wrote:
> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>
> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into a backup inbox,
> which would have increased the size of the backup by 30+ MB,
> and I got the following war
On 08/13/2016 09:51 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> On 08/13/2016 07:52 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
>>
>> On 08/13/2016 07:45 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>> Here we are in the 21st century, and the TB
>>> still cannot handle folder sizebigger then 4GB.
>>>
>>> I just tried to move contents of a small old inbox into
22 matches
Mail list logo
