Missing node0 under /sys/devices/system/node

Hi all, On a Fedora 23 machine running the original kernel from distro, I see /sys/devices/system/node/node1 but I **do not** see /sys/devices/system/node/node0. On other Fedora 23 machines I do see **both** /sys/devices/system/node/node0 and /sys/devices/system/node/node1 Any idea what can be th

Re: Slightly OT - connecting from Fedora to Windows 7 sftp/ssh using public keys

On Wednesday 23 March 2016 18:35:22 George N. White III wrote: > Cygwin has become pretty robust, but there are some fundamental problems > with file permissions/attributes. There is a technical document that goes > into > the gory details, but the basic rule of thumb is that you are safe if you

Re: Slightly OT - connecting from Fedora to Windows 7 sftp/ssh using public keys

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Gary Stainburn < gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 March 2016 18:35:22 George N. White III wrote: > > Cygwin has become pretty robust, but there are some fundamental problems > > with file permissions/attributes. There is a technical documen

Re: Missing node0 under /sys/devices/system/node

On 24/03/2016 08:16, Kevin Wilson wrote: Any idea what can be the reason for this ? I've been a bit concerned about this, too. I get this on a notebook running F23/XFCE (upgraded from F22 using dnf). Missing node0 under /sys/devices/system/node On my m/c, this appears at F23 load time, a

Re: VDQ : Aaarrrghghghhh : Gnome 3

On 23/03/2016 23:33, François Patte wrote: > Le 23/03/2016 22:38, Joe Zeff a écrit : >> On 03/23/2016 02:30 PM, Bear Tooth wrote: >>> Very Dumb Question : >>> >>> I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it to use xfce; how >>> do I fix that?? (I seem doomed never to find anything in Gnom

Re: Missing node0 under /sys/devices/system/node

Thanks! Sorry for my ignorance, what is m/c? Rami On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Ron Leach wrote: > On 24/03/2016 08:16, Kevin Wilson wrote: >> >> >> Any idea what can be the reason for this ? >> > > I've been a bit concerned about this, too. I get this on a notebook running > F23/XFCE (upgra

Re: philosophy

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:06 PM Rick Stevens wrote: > On 03/23/2016 04:31 PM, George N. White III wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:57 PM, François Patte > > > > wrote: > [snip] > This is a security issue. Automatically opening your firewall to per

Re: philosophy

I'm pretty sure this actually gets taken care of for you by system-config-printer or the gnome control center printer pref. It's been a long time since I setup a printer, but I think it asks you if you wish to modify your firewall and does so if you approve? kevin pgp8RLgoMtgFz.pgp Description

Re: VDQ : Aaarrrghghghhh : Gnome 3

On 03/24/2016 04:33 AM, Diogene Laerce wrote: On 23/03/2016 23:33, François Patte wrote: Le 23/03/2016 22:38, Joe Zeff a écrit : On 03/23/2016 02:30 PM, Bear Tooth wrote: Very Dumb Question : I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it to use xfce; how do I fix that?? (I seem doome

Re: philosophy

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 03/23/2016 04:31 PM, George N. White III wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:57 PM, François Patte >> > > wrote: >> >> Bonsoir, >> >> I am wondering what is in mind of packagers I h

Re: philosophy

On 03/24/2016 09:54 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Rick Stevens mailto:ri...@alldigital.com>> wrote: On 03/23/2016 04:31 PM, George N. White III wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:57 PM, François Patte mailto:francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.

Re: VDQ : Aaarrrghghghhh : Gnome 3

On 03/24/2016 05:41 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 03/24/2016 04:33 AM, Diogene Laerce wrote: On 23/03/2016 23:33, François Patte wrote: Le 23/03/2016 22:38, Joe Zeff a écrit : On 03/23/2016 02:30 PM, Bear Tooth wrote: Very Dumb Question : I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it t

Re: Security of netinstall?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:43:36PM +, Troels Arvin wrote: > When I install Fedora from a netinstall image: > Given that I initially > - check the SHA256 checksum of the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso >file > - check the GPG signature of the file which contained the checksum >(the

Re: philosophy

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:57:24PM +0100, François Patte wrote: > I am wondering what is in mind of packagers I have just fought for a > couple of days to have the printing service working on a fresh fc23 > install. What Fedora 23 edition or spin did you use? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Proj

Re: philosophy

Le 24/03/2016 23:24, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:57:24PM +0100, François Patte wrote: >> I am wondering what is in mind of packagers I have just fought for a >> couple of days to have the printing service working on a fresh fc23 >> install. > > What Fedora 23 edition

OT: S..d by ATT and S..d by Google

My ISP, att.com, has blocked a number of European IP addresses, including two, which I badly need to contact.  Here's the skinny from the KDE forum, one of these addresses: ...[the blacklist] covers entire datacenters as our servers are all in completely different IP blocks, even at the /8

Re: OT: S..d by ATT and S..d by Google

On 03/24/2016 06:33 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: My ISP, att.com, has blocked a number of European IP addresses, including two, which I badly need to contact. Here's the skinny from the KDE forum, one of these addresses: ...[the blacklist] covers entire datacenters as our servers are all in c

Re: OT: S..d by ATT and S..d by Google

On 03/24/2016 05:33 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: My ISP, att.com, has blocked a number of European IP addresses, including two, which I badly need to contact. Here's the skinny from the KDE forum, one of these addresses: ...[the blacklist] covers entire datacenters as our servers are all in compl

Re: philosophy

On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 16:01 +, Christopher wrote: > I certainly wouldn't want any package to automatically open any ports > when I install or start a service. I lean towards the opposite. If I'm installing a server, I want to actually use it. So, if the firewall needs modifying, it makes sen