On 11 January 2016 at 01:35, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 10 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
>> however, in a couple of very simple steps, this gives me a very usable
>> multimedia system on my default fedora workstation without having to
>> install any additional repos. which for me is aw
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 20:37 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
> yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Apparently it's not just mine.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 10:48 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 11 January 2016 at 01:35, Tim
> wrote:
> > Allegedly, on or about 10 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
> > > however, in a couple of very simple steps, this gives me a very
> > > usable
> > > multimedia system on my default fedora workstatio
On 01/11/2016 11:48 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 11 January 2016 at 01:35, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 10 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
however, in a couple of very simple steps, this gives me a very usable
multimedia system on my default fedora workstation without having to
install any a
On 11 January 2016 at 11:42, Philip Brown wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 11:48 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 11 January 2016 at 01:35, Tim wrote:
>>>
>>> Allegedly, on or about 10 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
however, in a couple of very simple steps, this gives me a very usable
multi
On 01/11/2016 01:21 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 11 January 2016 at 11:42, Philip Brown wrote:
On 01/11/2016 11:48 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 11 January 2016 at 01:35, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 10 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
however, in a couple of very simple steps, this gives me a
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:57:21 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> For the academic sake only, does a facility exist to defer evaluation
> for this use case?
It would get kinda ugly, but you could re-expand the macro body:
%global foo-bar_dir %{expand:%(ls -d
%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/foo-bar-
>> For the academic sake only, does a facility exist to defer evaluation
>> for this use case?
>
>It would get kinda ugly, but you could re-expand the macro body:
>
>%global foo-bar_dir %{expand:%(ls -d
>%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/foo-bar-*-baz |grep -o '[^/]*$')}
Thanks Michael,
jlc
--
use
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> And a "dnf install gstreamer1-plugins\*" here wants to install
> "35 Packages", while some dependencies probably are installed already.
>
That's why I mentioned mpg123 earlier in the thread. Most mp3 players in
the Linux world require a
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:43:38 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
> > And a "dnf install gstreamer1-plugins\*" here wants to install
> > "35 Packages", while some dependencies probably are installed already.
> Ok Michael, I can see you don't like this.
>
> however, in a couple of very simple steps, this
On 01/11/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:43:38 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
And a "dnf install gstreamer1-plugins\*" here wants to install
"35 Packages", while some dependencies probably are installed already.
Ok Michael, I can see you don't like this.
however, in
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:11:13 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
> > What is your concern about RPMFusion? You seem to imply you have
> > something against it.
> >
> bad past experience, could have been livna, it was a long time ago and I
> never used it since. I imagine it should be a lot better now, h
Allegedly, on or about 11 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
> bad past experience, could have been livna, it was a long time ago and
> I never used it since. I imagine it should be a lot better now,
> however seeing as I only need these few files I prefer just to
> download them rather than having a
Allegedly, on or about 11 January 2016, Fernando Cassia sent:
> Call me old fashioned, but I prefer a static, single binary to perform
> a simple task like playing a mp3 file - you know, the Unix way, do one
> thing and do it self-cointained.
There's some logic to that, but all some illogic. Woul
On 01/11/2016 05:35 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 11 January 2016, Philip Brown sent:
bad past experience, could have been livna, it was a long time ago and
I never used it since. I imagine it should be a lot better now,
however seeing as I only need these few files I prefer just to
down
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 17:59 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
> > They're installed properly, then. And if other files are needed at
> the
> > same time, yum will get them, too. The files are in the database
> so
> > that other things are aware of their presence. And they're easily
> > removed, without
On 11 January 2016 at 16:41, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 11 January 2016, Fernando Cassia sent:
>> Call me old fashioned, but I prefer a static, single binary to perform
>> a simple task like playing a mp3 file - you know, the Unix way, do one
>> thing and do it self-cointained.
>
> There'
On 09/01/16 09:58, Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephen Morris wrote:
Can anyone tell me what has happened to the KDE System Settings addin
that allows customization of the Display Manager login interface in F23?
Do you have sddm-kcm package installed? (if not, get it)
-- Rex
I already had the sddm-kc
18 matches
Mail list logo
