Hi,
I have some problem to boot my fedora. Those problems was come up with
an upgrade to the last version.
The following is one of the error I find on messages log.
As I understand I need of the setroubleshoot user on passwd... I have
reinstalled some packages about setroubleshoot but none has adde
hello, i'm currently using libvirt for my win10 gaming vm and i wanted to
activate hugepages for it to improve performances.
It seems that my system will allow 1G hugepages however i failed to
activate it for libvirt, anyone here add the same issue and could point me
to a tutorial or something? I f
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:13 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
>
> eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally
> offer?
>
> i miss mplayer so i am interested to see, after moving to a current
> fedora,
> what are the remaining players stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:28:28 + "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:13 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> > may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
> >
> > eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally
> > offer?
> >
> > i miss mplayer so i am interested t
On 12/10/2015 06:13 PM, Jack Craig wrote:
may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally offer?
i miss mplayer so i am interested to see, after moving to a current
fedora,
what are the remaining players standing,...
tia, jackc..
On 12/10/2015 06:52 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 10 December 2015, Jack Craig sent:
may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally
offer?
I may be wrong, but I think the two use different sets of codec
libraries. I've ce
On 12/11/2015 05:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:13 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally
offer?
i miss mplayer so i am interested to see, after moving to a current
fedo
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 08:40 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2015 05:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:13 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> > > may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
> > >
> > > eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally
> > > off
Hi,
an other error I have is the following:
Dec 3 13:27:21 localhost kernel: Switched to clocksource tsc
Dec 3 13:27:30 localhost systemd-tty-ask-password-agent: Invalid
password file /run/systemd/ask-password/ask.x3yhfv
Dec 3 13:27:30 localhost systemd-tty-ask-password-agent: Failed to
show pas
On 12/11/2015 09:10 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 08:40 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
On 12/11/2015 05:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:13 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has?
eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 09:27 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2015 09:10 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 08:40 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
> > > On 12/11/2015 05:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:13 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
> > > > > may i ask wha
/var/log/messages-20151116:Nov 9 09:21:35 localhost
org.gtk.Private.UDisks2VolumeMonitor: bluray.c:1347: No device path
provided!
/var/log/messages-20151116:Nov 9 09:45:59 localhost
org.gtk.Private.UDisks2VolumeMonitor: bluray.c:1347: No device path
provided!
/var/log/messages-20151116:Nov 9
Hi
Since I have upgraded to Fedora 23, I am unable to communicate with the remote
mercurial repo that I work from. All the local commands I have tried work fine,
and I am even able to clone my local repo to another machine, but everytime I
try to communicate with the base repo, I get the follo
I see kernel 4.3.1 has been officially released:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1512.1/01644.html
Will it show up in the repos soon for fedora 23 (or 22)?
(I'd really like to have the bugfix is is supposed to
include for intel video).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:43:46PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I see kernel 4.3.1 has been officially released:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1512.1/01644.html
> Will it show up in the repos soon for fedora 23 (or 22)?
We actually posted an article about this to Fedora Magazine just
On 12/11/2015 10:56 AM, jd1008 wrote:
But, /dev still has no device named blueray or br or br0. Ditto with dvd.
I have had to manually create dvd link to sr0.
Interestingly, cdrom is there.
since what user creates disappears at reboot, I have added the creation of
/dev/dvd in rc.local.
So, what
Thanks for the info. Maybe we will see a 4.3.1 or .2 sometime
soon then.
I'd thought about testing rawhide, but at the moment, I'm
able to solve my Intel video problems by staying on fedora 22
and continuing to run the older 4.1 kernel (and that's easier
and less risky than rawhide :-).
--
users
On 12/11/2015 12:35 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 12/11/2015 10:56 AM, jd1008 wrote:
But, /dev still has no device named blueray or br or br0. Ditto with
dvd.
I have had to manually create dvd link to sr0.
Interestingly, cdrom is there.
since what user creates disappears at reboot, I hav
[0:root@elmo shorewall]$ grep trouble /etc/{passwd,group}
/etc/passwd:setroubleshoot:x:990:300::/var/lib/setroubleshoot:/sbin/nologin
/etc/group:setroubleshoot:x:300:
[0:root@elmo ~]$ rpm -qf /var/lib/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_database.xml
setroubleshoot-server-3.2.24-1.fc22.x86_64
HTH,
Bill
Dear friends,
I wanted to provide an update with my experience on this (last week).
Recall that I had a few machines with separate /home partitions which needed to
be encrypted without erasing them and writing them from backup. I was not that
concerned about reinstalling because it takes me a f
20 matches
Mail list logo
