Re: xfce without a mouse

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:59:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > So I have only a bluetooth mouse, and GNOME lets me navigate by > keyboard only to get to Settings well enough I can then pair with the > mouse. I can't figure out how to do this at all on xfce (granted this > is Fedora 20 bec

Re: MP4 video on F23

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:02:31PM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > I.e. you have other repos in addition to these active and now likely > > are facing compatiblity issues between them. > > I see no indication of that. Compatibilit

Re: Why was YUM removed

Tim wrote: >> As acronyms go, I think it's an odd one, too. DNF in sporting parlance >> means did not finish. To other people, it might mean do not f**k. Joe Zeff: > Why couldn't you spell out fork properly. Or were you referring to fsck? I left it so people could use whatever f**k word they w

Re: Why was YUM removed

Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2015, Ralf Corsepius sent: > My view: The only thing that was wrong with yum, was it being > work-in-progress, when its maintainer passed away. One hopes that something as central as the updating/installing tool would be (a) worked on by more than one person, a

Re: Why was YUM removed

On 10. 12. 2015 at 22:21:42, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2015, Ralf Corsepius sent: > > My view: The only thing that was wrong with yum, was it being > > work-in-progress, when its maintainer passed away. > > One hopes that something as central as the updating/installing tool >

Re: MP4 video on F23

On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 16:55 +0530, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:02:31PM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > I.e. you have other repos in addition to these active and now > > > likely > > > are facing compatiblit

Re: F23 Server: unexpected network problem

On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 09:36 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote: > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:39 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 12/09/2015 12:41 AM, Cristian Sava wrote: > > > I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating > > > that > > > it > > > got an automatic one. Why that? > > ... >

Re: Why was YUM removed

On 10 December 2015 at 11:51, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2015, Ralf Corsepius sent: >> My view: The only thing that was wrong with yum, was it being >> work-in-progress, when its maintainer passed away. > > One hopes that something as central as the updating/installing tool >

Re: Why was YUM removed

On 10 December 2015 at 14:44, Ian Malone wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 11:51, Tim wrote: >> Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2015, Ralf Corsepius sent: >>> My view: The only thing that was wrong with yum, was it being >>> work-in-progress, when its maintainer passed away. >> >> One hopes that

Re: Why was YUM removed

On 12/10/2015 04:51 AM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2015, Ralf Corsepius sent: My view: The only thing that was wrong with yum, was it being work-in-progress, when its maintainer passed away. One hopes that something as central as the updating/installing tool would be (a) wo

SMPlayer's latest (15.11.0.7247) source tarball

Been googling for it, but I only find old outdated source tarballs, such as: http://sourceforge.net/projects/smplayer/files/MPlayer%20Sources/ which are from back in 2012. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: SMPlayer's latest (15.11.0.7247) source tarball

2015-12-10 19:44 GMT+02:00 jd1008 : > Been googling for it, but I only find old > outdated source tarballs, such as: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/smplayer/files/MPlayer%20Sources/ > which are from back in 2012. > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/smplayer/files/SMPlayer/15.11.0/ > -- > us

opening xxx.pat files

Hi, I got a file with suffix .pat (the extension is a Pattern Image file) and, for what I could know, this kinde of files are used with photoshop... II haven't photshp, so I looked for knowing how to open this file, and the only suggestion that I found was to try (in Linux environment) with GIMP

Re: Issues with install F23 MATE desktop

On 12/09/2015 10:59 AM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Matthew Miller said: On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:52:12AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: I started with Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-23 on a thumb drive. I booted, selected automatic partitioning and MATE, and it started downloading R

Re: opening xxx.pat files

Not knowing where you got the .pat file, I have to say that pat files can mean many things. for example some logic analyzers use the .pat extension for their capture files. Many mainframe and PXI bus testers use .pat as the extension on digital files used to represent the 1's and 0's sent to a de

Re: SMPlayer's latest (15.11.0.7247) source tarball

On 12/10/2015 10:51 AM, Alchemist wrote: 2015-12-10 19:44 GMT+02:00 jd1008 >: Been googling for it, but I only find old outdated source tarballs, such as: http://sourceforge.net/projects/smplayer/files/MPlayer%20Sources/ which are from back in 2012.

Re: opening xxx.pat files

On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:05:44 +0200, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > Hi, > > I got a file with suffix .pat (the extension is a Pattern Image file) and, > for what I could know, this kinde of files are used with photoshop... > > II haven't photshp, so I looked for knowing how to open this file, and th

Re: opening xxx.pat files

On 11/12/15 05:05, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I got a file with suffix .pat (the extension is a Pattern Image file) > and, for what I could know, this kinde of files are used with photoshop... Examine the contents by installing ghex2 hexdump and Also try: file myfilename Quite often markers are fo

Re: F23 Server: unexpected network problem

On 12/09/2015 11:36 PM, Cristian Sava wrote: We are in stable stage so I do not expect NIC name changes without consistent reason. I've never noticed it before, but this does look like a bug in Fedora. On my workstation, for instance, /var/log/anaconda/anaconda.journal.log contains: Jul 21 2

Re: Why was YUM removed

On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 15:06 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > > It's a terrible name for anyone who knows motor racing: it > > indicates > > a total failure. > What is wrong with the Linux world that prevents it from using human > readable packag

Re: SMPlayer's latest (15.11.0.7247) source tarball

may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has? eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally offer? i miss mplayer so i am interested to see, after moving to a current fedora, what are the remaining players standing,... tia, jackc... On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:17 AM, jd1008 wr

Re: SMPlayer's latest (15.11.0.7247) source tarball

Allegedly, on or about 10 December 2015, Jack Craig sent: > may i ask what 'claim to fame' smplayer has? > > eg, if i have vlc working fine, what does smplayer additionally > offer? I may be wrong, but I think the two use different sets of codec libraries. I've certainly come across cases where

Re: opening xxx.pat files

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:05:44PM +0200, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > Hi, > > I got a file with suffix .pat (the extension is a Pattern Image file) and, > for what I could know, this kinde of files are used with photoshop... > > II haven't photshp, so I looked for knowing how to open this file, a

Re: opening xxx.pat files

I downloaded this file (in the .zip format) looking for resources to use in HTML pages. In this way, I am sure that this file contains "textures and backgrounds" to use for building web sites. *Inside this file should to be stored "in some way" some graphic components...* On Internet I read tha

Re: F23 Server: unexpected network problem

On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 16:49 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/09/2015 11:36 PM, Cristian Sava wrote: > > We are in stable stage so I do not expect NIC name changes without > > consistent reason. > > I've never noticed it before, but this does look like a bug in > Fedora. > > On my workstation,