Re: broken packages

Le 26/09/2015 14:45, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : > On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 14:15 +0200, Diogene Laerce wrote: >> Le 26/09/2015 14:00, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : >>> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 11:46 +0200, Diogene Laerce wrote: A precision if possible : I saw "dnf list extras" which list a

Re: broken packages

On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 10:37 +0200, Diogene Laerce wrote: > BZ ? A hive nickname ? :) Common shorthand for Bugzilla, the standard bug reporting procedure. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: set the tmp file for sed??

On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 16:25 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > Nothing wrong with the trailing g. > Nor did I say it was the error. > The trailing g says make the change on every match in the line. Apologies. You were talking about the missing 's'. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

firefox?

I saw where firefox is now at version 41, but dnf shows: dnf list|grep firefox firefox.x86_64 40.0.3-1.fc22 @System firefox.x86_64 41.0-4.fc22 updates what does this mean? how do I install 41.0.4 ? -- Pau

Re: firefox?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:16:20 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: > I saw where firefox is now at version 41, but dnf shows: > > dnf list|grep firefox > firefox.x86_64 40.0.3-1.fc22 > @System > firefox.x86_64 41.0-4.fc22

Re: firefox?

yes, me too, i have this problem : http://paste.fedoraproject.org/271950/33536921/ On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:16:20 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: > > > I saw where firefox is now at version 41, but dnf shows: > > > > dnf list|grep firefox

Re: firefox?

you have to wait 41.9-6 otherwise sqile updates are required. Pick it in bohdi 2015-09-27 13:35 GMT+02:00 Hossein Aghaie : > yes, me too, i have this problem : > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/271950/33536921/ > > > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 S

Re: firefox?

I went back and found those lines.. didn't realize there were dependency issues.. > yes, me too, i have this problem : > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/271950/33536921/ > > > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:

Re: firefox?

I will wait, I just didn't realize there were dependency issues.. it didn't say WHAT dependencies.. Skipping packages with broken dependencies: firefox x86_64 41.0-4.fc22 updates 72 M > you have to wait 41.9-6 otherwise sqile updates are required. Pick i

Re: firefox?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 07:16:20 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: > > > I saw where firefox is now at version 41, but dnf shows: > > > > dnf list|grep firefox > > firefox.x86_64 40.0.3-1.fc22 > > @System > > fi

Re: firefox?

> > > > Yum used to show the dependency breakage. DNF hides those details, > > unfortunately. And why would it choose to do that? > > dnf update --best will tell you the problem however, which is an sqlite > dependency. Amusing choice of option: I would have thought --verbose or -v would hav

Re: firefox?

Paul Cartwright gmail.com> writes: > what does this mean? how do I install 41.0.4 ? Firefox needs sqlite-3.8.11 which is currently in updates-testing but will go to stable in the next push. The bodhi link is https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16569 and you can download it from h

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 08:52 AM, M A Young wrote: >> > Skipping packages with broken dependencies: >> > firefox x86_6441.0-4.fc22 updates >> > 72 M >> > >> > Yum used to show the dependency breakage. DNF hides those details, >> > unfortunately. > dnf update --best

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 09:24 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: >> > what does this mean? how do I install 41.0.4 ? > Firefox needs sqlite-3.8.11 which is currently in updates-testing but will > go to stable in the next push. The bodhi link is > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16569 and you can >

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: Paul Cartwright gmail.com> writes: what does this mean? how do I install 41.0.4 ? Firefox needs sqlite-3.8.11 which is currently in updates-testing but will go to stable in the next push. The bodhi link is https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Re: firefox?

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 01:56:39 PM Antonio M wrote: > you have to wait 41.9-6 otherwise sqile updates are required. Pick it in > bohdi > > 2015-09-27 13:35 GMT+02:00 Hossein Aghaie : > yes, me too, i have this problem : > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/271950/33536921/ > > > > On Sun,

Re: firefox?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:10:34 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > In other words, some maintainer pushed a built with broken deps, > Fedora's automated dep checkers and rel-eng also missed these. As far as I know they only have a planned automated dep checker intended to be the be-all, end-all of dep c

Time Machine filesystem

I have an external USB drive created on a (now-defunct) Mac, which contains a Time Machine backup set among other things. I can mount the drive under Fedora (read-only, but that's fine) and manually explore it to get my files back. Manually because Apple does tricks with the usual Unix conventions

Re: Text Console (vty ??)

Works for me on F21 On 09/24/15 15:05, jd1008 wrote: > Fresh install of F22. > After login, and desktop (mate) comes up, > Cntrl-Alt-F[234567] do not work. > What is with Mate DT that I need to tweak? > -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 07:44 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: something that would be easy and fix 99% of all problems like this. Would it? The people who pushed the update to stable definitely knew that it required a version of sqlite that hasn't been released yet. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED

Is there an app in Fedora that will grab an image from an webcam and use it as wallpaper?

There's a site with lots of webcams from all over the world, http://www.webcamgalore.com . I would like to use periodic grabs of some of those webcams as a wallpaper. Say, every 10 seconds the app goes and grabs an image from the cam, and puts it as wallpaper. If offline, or the cam is not avail

Re: firefox?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:14:08 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > What would stop them from doing the same thing under any other system? I don't care what "they" do, "stable" doesn't become visible to the world till the update on the virtual machine works. It doesn't matter what kind of dependency nig

Re: Time Machine filesystem

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:31:22PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > There's a project on github to deal with this: > https://github.com/abique/tmfs and I've made some progress in compiling > it under Fedora (basically installing C++ and the devel packages for > Boost and Fuse), however at th

Re: Time Machine filesystem

On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 20:42 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > I think these are the only packages you need: > - gcc-c++ > - cmake > - boost-filesystem > - fuse-devel I have all of those. I deleted the tmfs directory and started again. This time it worked. I'm guessing my previous incremental attempts (g

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 11:39 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: I don't care what "they" do, "stable" doesn't become visible to the world till the update on the virtual machine works. It doesn't matter what kind of dependency nightmare exists behind it. Sounds hand-wavy. Circular dependencies do happen, and handli

Re: firefox?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:19:47 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > Sounds hand-wavy. What on earth is hand-wavy about saying "dnf update" on a virtual machine to test an updated repo? The update either works with no conflicts or it doesn't. If it doesn't work, the new repo doesn't go public. -- users m

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 12:19 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Sounds hand-wavy. Circular dependencies do happen, and handling them in an automatic fashion is difficult. The problem, as far it exists, was caused by a choice that was made by a person. bodhi already requires that multiple people approve an updat

Re: Time Machine filesystem

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 08:02:11PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 20:42 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > I think these are the only packages you need: > > - gcc-c++ > > - cmake > > - boost-filesystem > > - fuse-devel > > I have all of those. > > I deleted the tmfs directory

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 10:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 09/27/2015 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: >> Paul Cartwright gmail.com> writes: >> >>> what does this mean? how do I install 41.0.4 ? >> >> Firefox needs sqlite-3.8.11 which is currently in updates-testing but will >> go to stable in the next pus

Loss of legitimate emails in evolution 3.12.11 / F21

Yesterday and today I'd had the a curious experience with Evolution 3.12.11 on my F21 machine. Friday and Saturday I was cleaning through my email inbox, triaging various accumulated emails to the trash and various subfolders, such as "such&such's wedding", "emails regarding the cottage", etc. I

Re: Loss of legitimate emails in evolution 3.12.11 / F21

On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 16:36 -0400, Donald Buchan wrote: > Yesterday and today I'd had the a curious experience with Evolution > 3.12.11 on my F21 machine. [trim] You don't say what kind of email account this is (POP, IMAP, Exchange, etc.) which could be important. Also, I would suggest you take t

Re: Loss of legitimate emails in evolution 3.12.11 / F21

On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 21:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 16:36 -0400, Donald Buchan wrote: > > Yesterday and today I'd had the a curious experience with Evolution > > 3.12.11 on my F21 machine. > > [trim] > > You don't say what kind of email account this is (POP, IMAP

Re: xmgrace in fc21

=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12

Re: firefox?

Gordon Messmer gmail.com> writes: > Sounds hand-wavy. Circular dependencies do happen, and handling them in > an automatic fashion is difficult. The problem, as far it exists, was > caused by a choice that was made by a person. bodhi already requires > that multiple people approve an update

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 02:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/27/2015 07:44 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> something that would be easy and fix 99% of >> all problems like this. > > Would it? The people who pushed the update to stable definitely knew > that it required a version of sqlite that hasn't been rele

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 04:32 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> > It's nice to see, how well Fedora's infrastructure works and how reliable >> > it is ;) >> > > Maybe you should ask for a refund? Oh, wait... :-) > > Ironically, I really do mean "wait". It will get sorted (and actually is now > for me) and in the

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 04:01 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: Most of those people have the updates-testing repo enabled by default, so they tend not to notice broken deps like this. Some kind of automation is necessary to reliably prevent it. Looking at bodhi, it doesn't appear that anyone was unaware that th

Re: firefox?

Gordon Messmer gmail.com> writes: > On 09/27/2015 04:01 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > > Most of those people have the updates-testing repo enabled by default, so > > they tend not to notice broken deps like this. Some kind of automation is > > necessary to reliably prevent it. > > Looking at bodhi

Re: firefox?

Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes: > Gordon Messmer gmail.com> writes: > > > On 09/27/2015 04:01 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > > > Most of those people have the updates-testing repo enabled by default, so > > > they tend not to notice broken deps like this. Some kind of automation is > > >

Re: firefox?

On 09/27/2015 10:32 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 09/27/2015 10:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 09/27/2015 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: Paul Cartwright gmail.com> writes: what does this mean? how do I install 41.0.4 ? Firefox needs sqlite-3.8.11 which is currently in updates-testing but will

Re: Loss of legitimate emails in evolution 3.12.11 / F21

On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 16:36 -0400, Donald Buchan wrote: > Friday and Saturday I was cleaning through my email inbox, triaging > various accumulated emails to the trash and various subfolders, such > as "such&such's wedding", "emails regarding the cottage", etc. I > began suspecting that the occasi