On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> ok, I am running fedora 22, along with ubuntu & Windows 10. a new kernel
> got installed last night, and I rebooted, but grub doesn't show it, and
> still defaults to the ubuntu OS. I am new to this efibootmgr, and google
> is letting me
On 08/27/2015 11:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> not exactly sure which part is UEFI & which is grub, but I will reboot &
>> try that...
>
> UEFI is everything before the grub2 menu, essentially.
well it changed now, booting from fedora, the original screen ( before
grub?) when it booted ubuntu def
On 08/27/2015 11:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 06:02 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>>
>> wow, not exactly sure what happened...
>
> Neither am I, but you've duplicated several of your UEFI boot items.
> Fedora is now 2 and 5. Ubuntu is now 4, 8, and 10.
I read(Googled) that you can d
On 08/28/2015 04:22 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Paul Cartwright
> wrote:
>
>
> grub2-mkconfig works, but grub2-install /dev/sda gives me an error
> grub2-install /dev/sda
> grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist.
> Please specify --target
I tried one year ago to setup a multi seat on my box. By that time,
the setup was impossible as:
- I didn't use lightdm to log sessions
- I didn't have any two monitor hub.
- my distro was not Fedora and the systemd seat configuration was very tricky.
I am back now to this setup with everything ne
When I run
[tim@william ~]$ sudo dnf -v update
I get a number of warnings like
---
repo: using cache for: fedora
not found deltainfo for: Fedora 22 - x86_64
not found updateinfo for: Fedora 22 - x86_64
repo: using cache for: adobe-linux-x86_64
not found deltainfo for: Ado
On 08/28/2015 08:00 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> When I run
>
> [tim@william ~]$ sudo dnf -v update
>
> I get a number of warnings like
>
> ---
> repo: using cache for: fedora
> not found deltainfo for: Fedora 22 - x86_64
> not found updateinfo for: Fedora 22 - x86_64
> re
On 08/28/2015 09:19 AM, SternData wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with the RPMFusion mirrors. Do you have
> rpmfusion in your list of repos?
looks like ALL repos..
dnf -v update
cachedir: /var/cache/dnf
Loaded plugins: Query, reposync, builddep, migrate, langpacks,
protected_package
s, needs-r
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 09:19 AM, SternData wrote:
>> There seems to be a problem with the RPMFusion mirrors. Do you have
>> rpmfusion in your list of repos?
> looks like ALL repos..
> dnf -v update
> cachedir: /var/cache/dnf
> Loaded plugins: Query, reposync,
Hello,
When I open Accessories -> Files, the size of the icons is very big.
How can I manage the icon size?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie d
On 08/28/2015 10:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> When I open Accessories -> Files, the size of the icons is very big.
> How can I manage the icon size?
what happens when you hit CONTROl-"-" (minus) control-+ makes them
bigger.. control-"-" minus should make them smaller.. works in browser
also..
--
On 08/27/2015 11:19 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
The client give me just a "mount fail" due to "data loss".
Can you post the log contents, rather than paraphrasing?
Where do I find the logs on the server side? (it a Fedora 22 system)
As far as I know, "messages" still gets a copy of stuff sent to
Hi,
I've installed Enlightenment on an arm device, if I configure it as
mobile device with touchscreen it says "No module named illume2/linux
-gnu...blah../module.so".
Does anyone saw this behavior?
Does anyone knows a good desktop environment for a small touchscreen
device?
Best regards,
Alexis
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> I installed my new drive, and everything was fine. I added another OS,
> and now I can't do the grub2-install anymore. What am I missing??
>
> # grub2-install /dev/sda
> grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exi
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:28:54 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> xfconf-query -lv -c keyboards
[btth@Hbsk4 ~]$ xfconf-query -lv -c keyboards
/Default/Numlock true
[btth@Hbsk4 ~]$
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I have precious (very precious!) little idea
>
> On 08/28/2015 10:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > When I open Accessories -> Files, the size of the icons is very big.
> > How can I manage the icon size?
> what happens when you hit CONTROl-"-" (minus) control-+ makes them
> bigger.. control-"-" minus should make them smaller.. works in browse
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 04:22 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Paul Cartwright
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> grub2-mkconfig works, but grub2-install /dev/sda gives me an error
>> grub2-install /dev/sda
>> grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/gru
I'm confused. My keyboard doesn't have a numlock key at all. The
keypad works fine in OS X and Windows, but it doesn't work at all in
Fedora and I can't figure out how to make it work.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 08/28/2015 09:25 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
On 08/28/2015 10:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
When I open Accessories -> Files, the size of the icons is very big.
How can I manage the icon size?
what happens when you hit CONTROl-"-" (minus) control-+ makes them
bigger.. control-"-" minus should
On 08/28/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
> used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
>
thanks, I got some other replies that mentioned efibootmgr, and that did
the trick.
my default grub was ubuntu, but I want
Hello,
gnome (fedora 22)
and probably metacity. How can I check?
> >>
> >> On 08/28/2015 10:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >>> When I open Accessories -> Files, the size of the icons is very big.
> >>> How can I manage the icon size?
> >> what happens when you hit CONTROl-"-" (minus) control-+ ma
On 08/28/2015 12:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> When UEFI Secure Boot is enabled, which it should be if available,
> especially on a system with Window on it, you need the distro signed
> shim.efi and grubx64.efi on the EFI system partition. If you use
> grub-install the signed copy is wiped out, and
On 08/28/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
> used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
>
ok, I wasn't aware of this shim package, but I see how that works now...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
yum insta
On 08/28/2015 10:01 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
gnome (fedora 22)
and probably metacity. How can I check?
Try:
xprop -id $(xprop -root _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK | cut -d\# -f2) WM_NAME
as the logged in user. On my XFCE system:
[rick@prophead ~]$ xprop -id $(xprop -root _NET_SUPP
On 08/28/2015 03:02 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
well it changed now, booting from fedora, the original screen ( before
grub?) when it booted ubuntu default, had a line on the screen before
anything else happened.. something about booting insecure.. then the
grub menu came up. Now that the default
On 08/28/2015 01:19 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Have another look. Boot002 and Boot005 are Fedora, and they are
> identical. They identify \EFI\FEDORA\shim.efi on partition 8.
> Notably, they don't refer to a kernel at all.
ok, so UEFI loads grub which loads grub.cfg which knows about the
diffe
On 08/28/2015 10:33 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
ok, so UEFI loads grub which loads grub.cfg which knows about the
different kernels ?
Essentially, yes. UEFI has its own list, which normally isn't displayed
and is only available with the F12 key. It identifies different boot
loaders (such as
xprop -id $(xprop -root _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK | cut -d\# -f2)
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK(WINDOW): window id # 0x102
_MUTTER_VERSION(UTF8_STRING) = "3.16.3"
_GNOME_WM_KEYBINDINGS(UTF8_STRING) = "Mutter,GNOME Shell"
_NET_WM_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = "GNOME Shell"
On 08/28/2015 01:46 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> ok, so UEFI loads grub which loads grub.cfg which knows about the
>> different kernels ?
>
> Essentially, yes. UEFI has its own list, which normally isn't
> displayed and is only available with the F12 key. It identifies
> different boot loaders (s
On 08/28/2015 10:47 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
xprop -id $(xprop -root _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK | cut -d\# -f2)
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK(WINDOW): window id # 0x102
_MUTTER_VERSION(UTF8_STRING) = "3.16.3"
_GNOME_WM_KEYBINDINGS(UTF8_STRING) = "Mutter,GNOME Shell"
_NET_WM_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = "GNOM
Given one's current installation is a workstation,
What is the consequence of running
fedup with the option |--product=nonproduct|
|
|The wiki at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
says:
.
.
.
.
Upgrading from Fedora 20 or earlier: Products
In order to select one of the new Fedora flavors, Fe
On 08/28/2015 11:30 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>Yeah, you will typically have just one system partition. In your
>case, it has different directories for the Fedora and Ubuntu shim and
>grubx64.efi, and grub.cfg.
but now I don't see the ubuntu folder, but the fedora folder.. do these
folders get
Looking for experience with upgrading Win 7 to Win 10 on a dual-boot system.
My Lenovo T530 came with Win 7 pre-installed. I shrunk the Windows
partition and installed F21 (subsequently upgraded via fedup to F22).
Grub2 boot menu offers both Fedora and Win 7.
Does the Win 10 upgrade leave th
Hello,
It says:
To configure the layout of the application icons in the GNOME Shell, you have
to modify /usr/share/gnome-shell/theme/gnome-shell.css
I do not have this file.
Is something missing?
Thank.
>
> On 08/28/2015 10:47 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > xprop -id $(xprop -root _NET_SUPPORTIN
On Friday, August 28, 2015 05:38:37 PM Tim Evans wrote:
> Looking for experience with upgrading Win 7 to Win 10 on a dual-boot system.
>
> My Lenovo T530 came with Win 7 pre-installed. I shrunk the Windows
> partition and installed F21 (subsequently upgraded via fedup to F22).
> Grub2 boot menu
On 08/28/2015 05:18 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>
> My mistake.
>
> From your first message, efibootmgr printed:
>
> Boot0002* Fedora
> HD(8,GPT,ac2fc695-5de9-47d0-a19b-01e236404130,0x5ae5d800,0x2f800)/File(\EFI\fedora\shim.efi)
>
> ...
> Boot0004* ubuntu
> HD(1,GPT,4cc2fdac-58ea-400c-8ef9-11e1349
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 12:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> When UEFI Secure Boot is enabled, which it should be if available,
>> especially on a system with Window on it, you need the distro signed
>> shim.efi and grubx64.efi on the EFI system partiti
On 08/28/2015 03:22 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
oh, I get it.. but still I don't get it... /boot/efi is a separate
partition.. how can /EFI/ubuntu & /EFI/fedora be different... when they
are both under /boot/efi..
In the same way that "/" is a different partition or logical volume for
Ubuntu an
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 01:19 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>> Have another look. Boot002 and Boot005 are Fedora, and they are
>> identical. They identify \EFI\FEDORA\shim.efi on partition 8.
>> Notably, they don't refer to a kernel at all.
> ok, s
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 11:30 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>>>
>>> >Yeah, you will typically have just one system partition. In your
>>> >case, it has different directories for the Fedora and Ubuntu shim and
>>> >grubx64.efi, and grub.cfg.
>>
>> but no
> [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022316
Actually...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022316#c13
--
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/use
On 08/28/2015 06:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > my system originally came with windows 10. I seem to recall that from
>> > what I read, you needed to disable secure boot to install linux & grub..
> That's incorrect, and it's bad advice to continue to propagate.
> Assertions is should be disabled s
On 08/28/2015 06:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Due to many things, including UEFI, and GRUB being overly complicated,
> and each distro forking GRUB, and also not always keeping it up to
> date with upstream, there are many variations in GRUB behavior
> possible. So it's not necessarily the case a g
Hi!
Since yesterday (not sure when was my last restart, but at most 3-4 days
before) my T60 gives me a "Failed to find cpu0 device node" right at
boot and stay there.
I have tried to boot with previous kernel (4.1.5, 4.1.2 I think) but I
get the same results.
The recovery mode also doesn't work.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 06:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> > my system originally came with windows 10. I seem to recall that from
>>> > what I read, you needed to disable secure boot to install linux & grub..
>> That's incorrect, and it's bad advice
On 08/29/15 11:44, Frederic Muller wrote:
> ince yesterday (not sure when was my last restart, but at most 3-4 days
> before) my T60 gives me a "Failed to find cpu0 device node" right at
> boot and stay there.
>
> I have tried to boot with previous kernel (4.1.5, 4.1.2 I think) but I
> get the same
On 08/29/2015 12:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/29/15 11:44, Frederic Muller wrote:
>> ince yesterday (not sure when was my last restart, but at most 3-4 days
>> before) my T60 gives me a "Failed to find cpu0 device node" right at
>> boot and stay there.
>>
>> I have tried to boot with previous k
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 06:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Due to many things, including UEFI, and GRUB being overly complicated,
>> and each distro forking GRUB, and also not always keeping it up to
>> date with upstream, there are many variations in
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
>> used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
>>
> ok, I wasn't aware of this shim package, but I see how th
49 matches
Mail list logo
