Chris Murphy ha scritto il 24/07/2015 alle 16:47:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:36:05AM +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
* If a package maintainer appears to be totally unresponsive to bug
reports, follow the process here:
https://fedorapro
Hi,
I was reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide where it
mentions that one suggested way to use rawhide is to use it
"On a multiboot system, alongside a stable release of Fedora or another
operating system".
Is there a guide to convert a stable Fedora system into a multiboot
o
On 07/19/15 16:55, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 07/19/2015 02:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 07/19/2015 11:36 AM, g wrote:
Logical partitions within the extended partition will always be
> numbered consecutively starting with 5. If you delete or merge
> some logical partitions, all
On 07/25/15 05:05, R Mercado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide where it
> mentions that one suggested way to use rawhide is to use it
>
> "On a multiboot system, alongside a stable release of Fedora or another
> operating system".
>
> Is there a guide
Ah, fedora upgrades using fedup ...
Starting with Fedora 20, did
> yum update
and then
> fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
Took a while but there were no issues but
remember, as root
> export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin
or use
> su -
to become root otherwise fedup has an iss
You are assuming that the maintainers are employed/paid to maintain
that project. In quite a number of cases they are not paid for it, so
given that you may or may not get it fixed. And if I was a volunteer
for a project and my "supervisor" started harassing me, then you would
need a new maintai
There's a new getrandom call in the kernel since 3.19. When I look in
the /usr/include/linux/random.h, it is there, but commented out.
Since this call uses /dev/urandom or /dev/random, it is far better than
the rand () and random () calls, which are linear congruential and
repeat after only 2**31
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:37:10 -0700
Rich Emberson wrote:
> Ah, fedora upgrades using fedup ...
>
> Starting with Fedora 20, did
> > yum update
> and then
> > fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
> Took a while but there were no issues but
> remember, as root
> > export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/b
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:02:11 +0200
antonio montagnani wrote:
> I find really silly that when you are encharged of a bug, there is no
> kind of supervisor checking if you are are working on it and any
> problem arisingImagine it at Nasa, ehi guy, I have no time to
> check your bug and don't b
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:56:03 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/24/2015 12:36 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In Fedora 22 live, which version is "almost" a gnome 3 version?
>> Mate, LXDE, or ?
>
> IMHO, XFCE (at least that's what I use).
It's certainly what a lot of us who gave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
What wrong with cups/ghostscript? I am unable to print on my system
(fedora 21) message:
ghostscript quit unexpectedly
ghostscript-core 9.15.6.fc21.x86_64
Thank you.
- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNR
Roger Heflin ha scritto il 25/07/2015 alle 17:54:
You are assuming that the maintainers are employed/paid to maintain
that project. In quite a number of cases they are not paid for it, so
given that you may or may not get it fixed. And if I was a volunteer
for a project and my "supervisor" sta
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:18 AM, stan wrote:
> There's a new getrandom call in the kernel since 3.19. When I look in
> the /usr/include/linux/random.h, it is there, but commented out.
> Since this call uses /dev/urandom or /dev/random, it is far better than
> the rand () and random () calls, whi
On 07/25/2015 10:09 AM, Beartooth wrote:
It's certainly what a lot of us who gave up on Gnome3 are
running. Fwiw, one of us on another list posted that he had been running
xfce4 till his machine began to resemble cold molasses, then tried lxde
and was very pleased. It'll be interesting to
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:02:11AM +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
> I find really silly that when you are encharged of a bug, there is
> no kind of supervisor checking if you are are working on it and any
> problem arisingImagine it at Nasa, ehi guy, I have no time to
> check your bug and don
I just noticed that when accessing an NFS mount, the group is ignored.
For example, on the server that shares the files via NFS that lists from the
NFS client as:
$ ls -l/nfs/web
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root web_prog 491 Oct 16 2012 parse.php
$ mount
web:/ on /lvh1/web type nfs4
(rw,noatime,vers=4.0
Since I've upgraded to F22 x86_64, I haven't been able to access
serial ports from a user account in the dialout group. Doing an ls
/dev/ttyUSB0 shows that the device special file is there, but the
group is not set to dialout:
$ ls -l /dev/ttyUSB0
crw-rw-r--. 1 root root 188, 0 Jul 25 03:29 /dev/t
On 07/26/15 03:41, Emmett Culley wrote:
> I just noticed that when accessing an NFS mount, the group is ignored.
>
> For example, on the server that shares the files via NFS that lists from the
> NFS client as:
>
> $ ls -l/nfs/web
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root web_prog 491 Oct 16 2012 parse.php
>
> $ m
On 07/26/15 05:01, Ed Greshko wrote:
> What is the output of "ls -l /nfs/we" after you have performed the mount?
Too early for me to be answering questions... :-)
You probably want
ls -ld /lvh1/web
to make it easier to see.
--
If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere
--
users mai
On 07/25/2015 02:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/26/15 03:41, Emmett Culley wrote:
>> I just noticed that when accessing an NFS mount, the group is ignored.
>>
>> For example, on the server that shares the files via NFS that lists from the
>> NFS client as:
>>
>> $ ls -l/nfs/web
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 r
On 07/26/15 07:38, Emmett Culley wrote:
> On 07/25/2015 02:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/26/15 03:41, Emmett Culley wrote:
>>> I just noticed that when accessing an NFS mount, the group is ignored.
>>>
>>> For example, on the server that shares the files via NFS that lists from
>>> the NFS cli
On 07/26/15 07:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Does it help if you remove the sticky bit on the mounted directory?
Sorry, I meant the setgid bit.
But, FWIW, I'm trying to replicate a failure here and can't.
ds:/volume1/syntegra on /syntegra type nfs4
(rw,relatime,vers=4.0,rsize=131072,wsize=131072,nam
Hi
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
>
> no, I am not assuming that maintainers are paid, but when you are a
> volunteer you must be honest to you and other people to say when you cannot
> continue to be a volunteer
This is much more tricky than you apparently assume it
Again, fedora upgrades using fedup ...
Starting with Fedora 20, did
... stuff ...
> fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
... stuff ...
> fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
So, now rebooted and it started.
I have all my machines in multi-user mode just
in case there is an issue wit
On 07/26/15 09:51, Rich Emberson wrote:
> X starts but there is no mouse control (pointer on screen
> but the mouse does not move it) and after a minute or
> less I get an widget stating that the Plasma desktop
> closed unexpectedly.
>
> I have to login from another machine to do a reboot.
You're
On 26Jul2015 08:06, Ed Greshko wrote:
But, FWIW, I'm trying to replicate a failure here and can't.
My standard question in this situation is: how many groups is the user in on
the client machine?
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
Music journalism: People who can't write interviewing people who can'
On 07/26/15 10:34, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 26Jul2015 08:06, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> But, FWIW, I'm trying to replicate a failure here and can't.
>
> My standard question in this situation is: how many groups is the user in on
> the client machine?
>
Well, in my non-failing case, just 2.
Not hea
Hi there,
imagine a medium sized office room, where four engineers hack away (all of
them currently have Fedora 22 workstations, to stay on topic.) On that room
there's a fifth PC, hooked to a big TV on the wall (also running F22) that
has Firefox running full screen with some visualization of sor
On 26Jul2015 10:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/26/15 10:34, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 26Jul2015 08:06, Ed Greshko wrote:
But, FWIW, I'm trying to replicate a failure here and can't.
My standard question in this situation is: how many groups is the user in on
the client machine?
Well, in my
On 07/25/2015 07:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
After reboot, login from a different machine and create a fresh user. Then
login as that new user to see if you have the same issue.
Either that or simply change to a text console without logging in at the
GUI. And, while you're at it, activate the
30 matches
Mail list logo
