Hello
I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to
Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed
This script:
- cut --
export LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8
if [ -n "$PASSPHRASE" ] ; then
/usr/bin/expect -f - << EOF
spawn rpmsign --addsign $RPMS_TO_SIGN
- Original Message -
> From: "Antonio M"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:02:45 AM
> Subject: kernel number in dnf
> I switched from yumex to umex-dnf. This morning a new kernel was found, but I
> got 4 kernels installed, even if my dnf,conf sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I have a debian installed and I want to install on the same disk a
fedora21.
Of course GRUB2 is installed to boot the debian install.
What will happen with GRUB during the fedora install:
will anaconda detect the debian install and ask me
Hello everybody.
I have read the mails about enabling lightdm and disabling gdm.
I have also tried it and what I found out was, it sets display manager
via and ln which it modifies by creating a new one for the one which is
enabled and removed the one which is disabled.
Dnf says that kde and gdm
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:27:16 +0200, Pavel Lisý wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to
> Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed
>
> This script:
> - cut --
> export LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8
> if [ -n "$PASSPHRASE" ]
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:20:28 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I'd suggest two utilities.
> One would record the current names and
> their mac addresses in a plain text file.
> The other would take such a file and update a configuration
> file to associate the names and mac addresses.
> The for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/2015 03:58 AM, François Patte wrote:
> I have a debian installed and I want to install on the same disk a
> fedora21.
>
> Of course GRUB2 is installed to boot the debian install.
>
> What will happen with GRUB during the fedora install:
>
>
On 01/06/2015 05:26 PM, Todor Petkov wrote:
On 01/06/2015 05:03 PM, Todor Petkov wrote:
My bad, the version for Centos5 is "OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL
0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008".
Also, I noticed something else: when I log in Centos5 as root, the
display is correct, but when I log with my LDAP
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hennebry
Sent: dinsdag 2 juni 2015 7:20
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: RE: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 02/06/2015 12:39, Paul Cartwright a écrit :
>
> On 06/02/2015 03:58 AM, François Patte wrote:
>> I have a debian installed and I want to install on the same disk
>> a fedora21.
>
>> Of course GRUB2 is installed to boot the debian install.
>
>> Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/02/2015 09:55 AM, François Patte wrote:
> As far as I understand what you
say, anaconda will re-install GRUB on
> the MBR, will make fedora21 the default system and will write
an entry
> i
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 23:53 -0400, William Biggs wrote:
> When I try to add copr repo . I type sudo dnf copr enable
> user/project
> . and When I get y I get this error . How do I get this to work
> Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> '/etc/yum.repos.d/_copr_user-project.repo
You need
I am a happy amphibian.
--
David C. Hart - South Beach
http://www.slowlyboiledfrog.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:12 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 08:50 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> > It seems that my GDM is hosed also; I see that both gdm and lightdm
> > are installed (per fedup); how do I make the adjustment?
> >
> > Thank you.
> http://ask.systutorials.com/524/how-to-
I just got a new UPS at work which has a USB cable connection.
If I look at the power settings in gnome-control-center,
it claims to know I'm on a UPS, so I guess it knows how to
talk to it.
I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical, but
I'm wondering who the heck recognizes that. I don
On 06/02/2015 10:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just got a new UPS at work which has a USB cable connection.
> If I look at the power settings in gnome-control-center,
> it claims to know I'm on a UPS, so I guess it knows how to
> talk to it.
>
> I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical,
Bob:
What does the flashing notification say?
It doesn't seem to be an exact match for what you are describing, but
I get a confirmation dialog asking me if I want to use FireFox or
another web browser when I flip this setting:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.protocol-handler.warn-external-def
On 06/02/2015 07:55 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 08:08 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> On 01.06.2015, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody has similar problems?
>>
>> Could be a permission problem. You could try an udev rule to set it
>> accordingly. Put this in a file under /etc/udev/rules
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom Horsley
Sent: dinsdag 2 juni 2015 16:54
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: UPS shutdown happens how?
I just got a new UPS at work which has a USB cab
On 02/06/15 11:19, Ted Roche wrote:
Bob:
What does the flashing notification say?
.
A flashing text window containing the URL subject name. I find it really
annoying, it would be tolerable if it didn't blink/flash?
.
It doesn't seem to be an exact match for what you are describing, but
I
On 06/02/2015 07:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical, but
I'm wondering who the heck recognizes that. I don't run
a gnome session, so is there some daemon that needs to
be working for it to actually shutdown cleanly?
If you're not running a GNOME sessi
On 06/02/2015 05:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:27:16 +0200, Pavel Lisý wrote:
Hello
I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to
Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed
/snip/
Pardon my stupidity, but what the heck is an rpmsign?
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:52:50 -0700
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> If you're not running a GNOME session, I don't think the GNOME power
> settings will be relevant to you. GNOME manages power in
> gnome-settings-daemon.
That doesn't seem reasonable. It wouldn't shut down the system
unless someone was
On 06/02/2015 01:56 AM, Rene Harder Olsen wrote:
Hello everybody.
I have read the mails about enabling lightdm and disabling gdm.
I have also tried it and what I found out was, it sets display manager
via and ln which it modifies by creating a new one for the one which is
enabled and removed th
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:12:05 -0400, Doug wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2015 05:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:27:16 +0200, Pavel Lisý wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to
> >> Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) some
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:36:31AM -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> Reboot (not sure just logging off works) and should be using the one
> you chose.
The following sequence should be enough:
# systemctl isolate multi-user.target
# systemctl isolate graphical.target
Or maybe just stop the old
I have f21 installed on btrfs. I wonder what's a good procedure to use
fedup along with btrfs snapshot, so that I can backout to f21 if I don't
like it?
Right now I have:
sudo btrfs sub list /
ID 257 gen 67442 top level 5 path root
ID 318 gen 67442 top level 5 path home
-- /etc/fstab
UUID=93
On 06/02/2015 09:34 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
That doesn't seem reasonable. It wouldn't shut down the system
unless someone was actually logged in if gnome-settings-daemon
were responsible for noticing the power failure.
gdm also runs a GNOME session, and gnome-settings-daemon. I believe
that co
Neal Becker wrote:
> I have f21 installed on btrfs. I wonder what's a good procedure to use
> fedup along with btrfs snapshot, so that I can backout to f21 if I don't
> like it?
>
> Right now I have:
>
> sudo btrfs sub list /
> ID 257 gen 67442 top level 5 path root
> ID 318 gen 67442 top leve
Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but
none fixed the problem.
This is the link to bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278
And now I am officially confused.
To recap:
This computer is used for Mythtv.
The computer was build by me in 2007 u
On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
> Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but
> none fixed the problem.
> This is the link to bug report:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278
>
> And now I am officially confused.
> To recap:
> This computer is
Il giorno mar, 02/06/2015 alle 13.22 -0400, Neal Becker ha scritto:
> so that I can backout to f21 if I don't
> like it?
Curiosity, how do you know that f22 work worse respect f21, unless you
do not try it for a while?
For example, if you want to try Evolution (or some other local
application wit
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:03:34 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
> > Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments
> > but none fixed the problem.
> > This is the link to bug report:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278
> >
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 13:48 -0400, Digimer wrote:
> I dealt with this by setting names I want in
> /etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-net.rules to match MAC to device names
> (and then the name to IP in the usual ifcfg-X files).
Yup, did that one long ago. Now where do I lock down the names of my
dis
$ a=0; ps axfu | grep ^gdm| awk '{print $6}' | \
(while read x ; do a=$(( a + x )) ; done ; echo $a )
400760
Does anyone else notice that gdm's session takes up 300-400MB of RAM? I
typically defend GNOME, but this is kind of ridiculous.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
i need add module in boot kernel in the install ? it's possible ?
The module is megasr for lsi raid driver.
Thanks for regards
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of
On 06/02/2015 03:03 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but
none fixed the problem.
This is the link to bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278
And now I am officially confus
On 06/02/15 07:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I'm not a GNOME user, but I need to check what it does. If I recall, it
> downloads updates in the background and installs on reboot. I wonder if that
> is true for non-wheel users as well.
FWIW, the default GNOME way is also to allow non-privileged users
On 06/03/15 10:48, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> $ a=0; ps axfu | grep ^gdm| awk '{print $6}' | \
> (while read x ; do a=$(( a + x )) ; done ; echo $a )
> 400760
>
> Does anyone else notice that gdm's session takes up 300-400MB of RAM? I
> typically defend GNOME, but this is kind of ridiculous.
I sh
Allegedly, on or about 03 June 2015, Ed Greshko sent:
> FWIW, the default GNOME way is also to allow non-privileged users to
> apply updates.
I can see pluses and minuses to that, but mostly minuses. I hope it's
administratable.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1
40 matches
Mail list logo
