On 27/05/15 22:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/27/15 23:18, Christopher Ross wrote:
On the one machine I've updated to Fedora 22 (using fedora-upgrade) so far I've
noticed that uptime/who/w and friends report, wrongly, that no-one is logged
in. Is anyone else seeing this?
root@nellie 16:10:27
On 28 May 2015 at 02:35, Mickey wrote:
>
>
> On 05/27/2015 05:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> xdg-settings get default-web-browser
>>
>
>
> xdg-settings get default-web-browser
> google-chrome.desktop
>
>
>
You need to change the mime handler for x-scheme-handler/https and
x-scheme-handler/https; T
On 05/28/15 15:44, Christopher Ross wrote:
> On 27/05/15 22:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/27/15 23:18, Christopher Ross wrote:
>>>
>>> On the one machine I've updated to Fedora 22 (using fedora-upgrade) so far
>>> I've noticed that uptime/who/w and friends report, wrongly, that no-one is
>>> log
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:06 AM, bitlord wrote:
> fedup [1] which is officially supported,
Why isn't fedup shipped by default in all Fedora installs?
--
Regards,
Sudhir Khanger,
sudhirkhanger.com,
github.com/donniezazen,
5577 8CDB A059 085D 1D60 807F 8C00 45D9 F5EF C394.
--
users mailing lis
On 28/05/15 09:15, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/28/15 15:44, Christopher Ross wrote:
On 27/05/15 22:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/27/15 23:18, Christopher Ross wrote:
On the one machine I've updated to Fedora 22 (using fedora-upgrade) so far I've
noticed that uptime/who/w and friends report, wrongl
On 2015-05-28 08:37, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Most likely you're using software acceleration (due to poorly
supported [by F20] graphics card) with a heavy desktop environment
(E.g. GNOME 3).
Thanks Gilboa for the quick answer. As I understand it, the behavior
I reported is the SAME with any deskto
Ed Greshko:
>> xdg-settings get default-web-browser
Kevin Cummings:
> For me it returns: "xdg-settings: unknown desktop environment"
>
> B^) I run MATE desktops.
Likewise, on both counts. While I don't use Thunderbird, other things
do open the right web browser (for my personally set preferenc
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Does anyone know if nVidia's Optimus technology is supported natively in
> F22? Or do we still need to go with Bumblebee? And what's the status
> of Bumblebee for F22?
>
> I booted the Live DVD and it loaded the nouveau driver on my Lati
I have f21 installed into btrfs:
sudo btrfs subvolume list /
ID 256 gen 1818195 top level 5 path home
ID 259 gen 1818195 top level 5 path root
Now I want to install f22 into a subvolume. I assume that I need to create
the subvolume 1st (while running f21), and then I can get anaconda to
instal
- Original Message -
> From: "Isaac Cortés González"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:08:44 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf issues in f22
>
> > What problems exactly?
>
> This:
>
> .
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/bin/dnf", line 36, in
- Original Message -
> From: "antonio montagnani"
> To: "Fedora List"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:33:19 PM
> Subject: F22 - DNF migrate
>
> if I issue the command dnf-2 migrate I get:
>
>
> vim-minimal-7.4.475-2.fc20.x86_64 found in DNFDB; skipping
> vlc-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_6
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:15:24 AM
> Subject: Re: dnf has no command to check all
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:02:55PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> > I had to use
> > # /bin/yum-deprecated chec
On 28 May 2015 at 13:06, Tim wrote:
> Ed Greshko:
> >> xdg-settings get default-web-browser
>
> Kevin Cummings:
> > For me it returns: "xdg-settings: unknown desktop environment"
> >
> > B^) I run MATE desktops.
>
> Likewise, on both counts. While I don't use Thunderbird, other things
> do open
- Original Message -
> From: "jd1008"
> To: "Fedora Community Users Support"
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates
>
> # dnf distro-sync
> Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:13
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free -
>
On 05/28/15 19:06, Tim wrote:
> Ed Greshko:
>>> xdg-settings get default-web-browser
> Kevin Cummings:
>> For me it returns: "xdg-settings: unknown desktop environment"
>>
>> B^) I run MATE desktops.
> Likewise, on both counts. While I don't use Thunderbird, other things
> do open the right web b
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:17:24AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
> > > # dnf check all
> > > No such command: check. Please use /bin/dnf --help
> > > It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command(check)'"
> Any idea how to make it smarter without a need to (re)download metadata?
Sure
On 27 May 2015 15:58, "Frank Pikelner" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone successfully using SSSD to authenticate user logins into Fedora
22 against Active Directory. More specifically using AD provider (versus
LDAP) in their SSSD config?
>
> If possible, please share your config (less any confidenti
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Radek Holy"
> Cc: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:29:23 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf has no command to check all
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:17:24AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
> > > > # dnf check all
On 05/28/15 05:55, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> xdg-settings get default-web-browser
> For me it returns: "xdg-settings: unknown desktop environment"
>
> B^) I run MATE desktops.
>
Oh, and FWIW, I installed MATE desktop on my KDE system which is working as
On 05/28/2015 04:03 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
On 2015-05-28 08:37, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Most likely you're using software acceleration (due to poorly
supported [by F20] graphics card) with a heavy desktop environment
(E.g. GNOME 3).
Thanks Gilboa for the quick answer. As I understand it, the beh
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:40 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > Does anyone know if nVidia's Optimus technology is supported natively in
> > F22? Or do we still need to go with Bumblebee? And what's the status
> > of Bumblebee for F22?
> >
Greetings,
I just realized that if,under Fedora (20, btw), you set up your gnome
or cinnamon desktop sessions to use ssh-agent, so you can automatically
ssh without typing passwords from any terminal you open in those
sessions...
this setting does not "transfer" to openbox. The solutions menti
On May 28, 2015 7:36 AM, "Matthew Saltzman" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:40 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Matthew Saltzman
wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if nVidia's Optimus technology is supported natively
in
> > > F22? Or do we still need to go with Bu
On 2015-05-28 14:43, Dan Mossor wrote:
Well, one way to check if it is indeed the video driver is to stop the
service utilizing it. issue 'systemctl stop kdm' from your ssh session
(or sddm if you've switched it to that, kdm was still default in F20).
This will stop the desktop processes and dro
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:20:25PM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:06 AM, bitlord wrote:
> > fedup [1] which is officially supported,
> Why isn't fedup shipped by default in all Fedora installs?
When it's time to upgrade, you want to make sure to have the latest
version
On 05/28/2015 06:56 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
don't seem to do anything under Fedora. What is the fedora way to
do make Openbox start ssh-agent every time, then? the old .startx
of yore, or what?
I'm not familiar with openbox, so I can't comment on the "environment"
setup to which you linked. I
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:25 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "jd1008"
> > To: "Fedora Community Users Support" > >
> > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> > Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates
> >
> > # dnf distro-sync
> > Fedora 22
64-bit issue? I've had no issues with 32-bit.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:25 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "jd1008"
> > > To: "Fedora Community Users Support" > > >
> > > Sent: Thursday, Ma
On 2015-05-28 17:02, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/28/2015 06:56 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
don't seem to do anything under Fedora. What is the fedora way to
do make Openbox start ssh-agent every time, then? the old .startx
of yore, or what?
I'm not familiar with openbox, so I can't comment on the "
On 05/28/2015 10:52 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:20:25PM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:06 AM, bitlord wrote:
>>> fedup [1] which is officially supported,
>> Why isn't fedup shipped by default in all Fedora installs?
>
> When it's time to upgr
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:39 -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 10:52 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:20:25PM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:06 AM, bitlord
> > > wrote:
> > > > fedup [1] which is officially supported,
> > > Why isn'
Forgive me - it's been awhile. Are we reporting issues upstream, Fedora
or both?
--
David C. Hart - South Beach
http://www.slowlyboiledfrog.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/user
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:23 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> 64-bit issue? I've had no issues with 32-bit.
Seems to have been fixed now.
[Please don't top-post. See the list Guidelines]
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://a
On 05/28/2015 06:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:17:24AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
# dnf check all
No such command: check. Please use /bin/dnf --help
It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command(check)'"
Any idea how to make it smarter without a need
On 05/28/2015 09:23 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:25 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "jd1008" mailto:jd1...@gmail.com>>
> >
On 05/28/2015 08:36 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
Like in the old times then? OK, thanks. Will try it as soon as I've
finished something I cannot interrupt right now. Besides, I still
have one question: won't this confuse/break the way ssh agent is
started/used by other WM/DEs???
I'm not sure why it w
On 05/27/2015 10:03 PM, Dan Mossor wrote:
On 05/27/2015 05:09 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/27/2015 11:22 AM, Mickey wrote:
Fedora 21/KDE
I have in KDE Settings the Google-Chrome as default Web Browser.
How do I setup that when I'm reading my Emails in Thunderbird and I
click on a Web Link in
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:57 -0400, David Cary Hart wrote:
> Forgive me - it's been awhile. Are we reporting issues upstream,
> Fedora
> or both?
>
Depends, try to describe the problem, and someone will help you with a
decision where to report it. If you don't know where, it is good to ask
downst
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:39:09AM -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> Seems like silly reasoning to me. Why not just install it, so that it
> gets updated during the normal lifetime of that release, so that when it
> comes time to upgrade to the next release, it is already there and updated?
What's t
One of the reasons why users wince at the prospect of upgrading is the
numerous problems being encountered.
Some of these problems seem to stem from the fact that not all installed
rpms of the current release (let's say 21) are made available in f22.
Now the user mosies on thinking all is well.
Sorry my phone top posts. Ugh. Biggest problem is custom shortcuts don't
work at all. I use these for HTML code. I suspect that the daemon isn't
running.
David Hart - South Beach
http://www.slowlyboiledfrog.com
Via my Android
On May 28, 2015 12:53 PM, "bitlord" wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 1
David Cary Hart wrote:
> Forgive me - it's been awhile. Are we reporting issues upstream, Fedora
> or both?
If you think it's something Fedora-specific, bugzilla.redhat.com
Otherwise, upstream bugs.kde.org is preferable.
If in doubt, go with bugzilla.redhat.com, and we can diagnose and triage
Hi
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Radek Holy wrote:
>
> Sounds good. Would you mind filing an RFE?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226009
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
I tried it. It was not easy to figure out how to use anaconda gui to setup
install into a subvolume - but I got it done. I now have 3 subvolumes:
sudo btrfs subvolume list /
[sudo] password for nbecker:
ID 256 gen 1818627 top level 5 path home
ID 259 gen 1818478 top level 5 path root
ID 487 gen
On 05/28/2015 01:25 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:39:09AM -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>> Seems like silly reasoning to me. Why not just install it, so that it
>> gets updated during the normal lifetime of that release, so that when it
>> comes time to upgrade to the next
clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to work
to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have
X11Forwarding yes
and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hangs.
--
Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
--
users mailing list
users@
On 05/28/2015 01:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to work
to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have
X11Forwarding yes
and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hangs.
Silly question, but does the server have an X server
Dan Mossor wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 01:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to
>> work
>> to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have
>> X11Forwarding yes
>>
>> and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hangs.
>>
> Silly question
On Thu, 28 May 2015 11:26:12 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
[snip]
> Some of these problems seem to stem from the fact that not all
> installed rpms of the current release (let's say 21) are made
> available in f22.
[snip]
> So, I am wondering if the thought has even crossed the minds of the
> fedora projec
On 28/05/2015 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to
work
to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have
X11Forwarding yes
and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hangs.
Hi,
what does "ssh -v" say?
--
users mailing list
2015-05-28 21:50 GMT+03:00 Neal Becker :
> Dan Mossor wrote:
>
> > On 05/28/2015 01:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to
> >> work
> >> to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have
> >> X11Forwarding yes
> >>
> >> and ssh -v -X
During todays update of 21 I got several warnings from Yum:
Updating : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.45-39.b14.fc21.i686
3/28
warning:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-39.b14.fc21.i386/jre/lib/security/US_export_policy.jar
created as
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-ope
On 05/28/2015 01:07 PM, stan wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015 11:26:12 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
[snip]
Some of these problems seem to stem from the fact that not all
installed rpms of the current release (let's say 21) are made
available in f22.
[snip]
So, I am wondering if the thought has even crosse
Neal Becker wrote:
> I tried it. It was not easy to figure out how to use anaconda gui to
> setup
> install into a subvolume - but I got it done. I now have 3 subvolumes:
>
> sudo btrfs subvolume list /
> [sudo] password for nbecker:
> ID 256 gen 1818627 top level 5 path home
> ID 259 gen 18184
On Thu, 28 May 2015 11:26:12 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> One of the reasons why users wince at the prospect of upgrading is the
> numerous problems being encountered.
Well, lots and lots of people aren't having any problems at all too.
Of course no matter how we strive there's not going to be any so
On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:46:05 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> >> Another failure:
> >> Error: package image-analyzer-3.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
> >> libmirage.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> >> installed.
>
On 05/28/2015 02:11 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
What should I do about these ?
They are harmless. It's notifying you that the Java security policy files you have
are not being overwritten.
If you choose to do anything about it you can delete any old java directory in
/usr/lib/jvm and overwr
On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:13:38 -0500, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> I've just switched to Fedora from Ubuntu (my first distro switch in
> seven years!). I have multiple operating systems on my machines, and use
> a small dedicated GRUB parition to boot them. When I switched to Fedora,
> I re-installed the c
On 28/05/15 04:18 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 05/28/2015 02:11 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
What should I do about these ?
They are harmless. It's notifying you that the Java security policy
files you have are not being overwritten.
If you choose to do anything about it you can delete an
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Frank McCormick
wrote:
> During todays update of 21 I got several warnings from Yum:
>
> Updating : 1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.45-39.b14.fc21.i686
>3/28
> warning:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-39.b14.fc21.i386/jre/lib/securit
On 28/05/15 04:29 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Frank McCormick mailto:bea...@videotron.ca>> wrote:
During todays update of 21 I got several warnings from Yum:
 Updating  :
1:java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.45-39.b14.fc21.i686Â Â Â Â
  Â
Hi all, Ive been looking into a way to run rsync from server1 to server2 using
ssh-keys
but not allowing the user from server 1 to login to server2 or to run any other
commands
only rsync. Ive seen a few postings of how to do it, where they add a
command=“some command” line in the .ssh/authori
On 05/28/2015 03:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:13:38 -0500, Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
>> I've just switched to Fedora from Ubuntu (my first distro switch in
>> seven years!). I have multiple operating systems on my machines, and use
>> a small dedicated GRUB parition to boot
google "ssh-keygen". You will find things like:
http://www.linuxproblem.org/art_9.html and similar.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Dustin Kempter wrote:
> Hi all, Ive been looking into a way to run rsync from server1 to server2
> using ssh-keys
> but not allowing the user from server 1 to logi
On 05/28/2015 12:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Before Fedora 22 was released all packages with broken dependencies
were fixed or retired/removed. It's part of the release process now.
When released, there were no known broken dependencies.
jd1008's message was difficult to interpret, but I *think*
On 05/28/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:46:05 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
Another failure:
Error: package image-analyzer-3.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
libmirage.so.10()(64bit), but none of the p
Help!
I had a dual boot box using Kubuntu and Windows 8. In GRUB, the Windows
option was listed as "Windows Boot Loader". When Fedora 22 came out
yesterday, I jumped to it. I installed it without a problem, but the
Windows option is no longer listed.
The Windows partitions are still there(th
On 05/28/2015 03:09 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I don't have a good example, so let's illustrate that hypothetically.
Let's say Fedora includes a terminal application written with boost
libraries, "boost-terminal". That application requires boost version
1.53, which was included in the release wit
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:16:27PM +, Bill Oliver wrote:
>
> Help!
>
> I had a dual boot box using Kubuntu and Windows 8. In GRUB, the Windows
> option was listed as "Windows Boot Loader". When Fedora 22 came out
> yesterday, I jumped to it. I installed it without a problem, but the
> Wind
On Thu, 28 May 2015 16:10:27 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:46:05 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >>> Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> Another failure:
> Error: package image
Hi Alan,
Please do not top post (please read the mailing list guidelines at the
bottom of each message).
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Dustin Kempter > wrote:
>
> > Hi all, Ive been looking into a way to run rsync from server1 to
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26:12AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> One of the reasons why users wince at the prospect of upgrading is the
> numerous problems being encountered.
> <>
Fedora is not a normal Linux distro. It's "bleeding edge". Updates come
fast and furious; there's no such thing as LTS.
If
On 05/28/2015 03:38 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Alan,
Please do not top post (please read the mailing list guidelines at the
bottom of each message).
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Dustin Kempter
wrote:
Hi all, Ive been looking int
On 05/27/2015 08:41 PM, Mickey wrote:
On 05/27/2015 06:16 PM, stan wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 14:15:39 -0400
Mickey wrote:
Will Adobe Reader work in Fedora-21-I386 ?
It should. But since I don't use reader, that's just a supposition.
You could enable the adobe repository, and install i
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Fred Smith wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:16:27PM +, Bill Oliver wrote:
Help!
I had a dual boot box using Kubuntu and Windows 8. In GRUB, the Windows
option was listed as "Windows Boot Loader". When Fedora 22 came out
yesterday, I jumped to it. I installed it wi
On 05/28/2015 07:02 PM, Mickey wrote:
On 05/27/2015 08:41 PM, Mickey wrote:
On 05/27/2015 06:16 PM, stan wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 14:15:39 -0400
Mickey wrote:
Will Adobe Reader work in Fedora-21-I386 ?
It should. But since I don't use reader, that's just a supposition.
You could e
On 05/28/2015 04:02 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:38 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Alan,
Please do not top post (please read the mailing list guidelines at the
bottom of each message).
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Dustin Ke
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:21:14PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> What you're saying is, in effect, that boost 1.54 breaks backward
> compatibility and boost-terminal isn't going to get upgraded. Isn't
> it up to boost's maintainer to see to it that this doesn't become an
> issue? (Yes, we all know of
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:43:48PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> Fedora is not a normal Linux distro. It's "bleeding edge". Updates come
> fast and furious; there's no such thing as LTS.
>
> If you want more stability, use another distro. Accept that you won't have
> the latest'n'greatest releases
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:02:19PM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:38 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >Hi Alan,
> >
> >Please do not top post (please read the mailing list guidelines at the
> >bottom of each message).
> >
> >On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
> >>On T
On 05/28/2015 04:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Some things to consider:
A. If someone packages software into Fedora, are they obligated to
maintain all current and future software which might depend on it
in perpetuity?
B. If so, should that maintainer be allowed to veto the ad
On 05/28/2015 04:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Other distros are certainly_more_ bleeding edge. Our goal is to be
leading, but to avoid that blood. It's a delicate balance!
Really? Which ones are you thinking of? Enquiring minds want to *Know!*
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject
On 29May2015 01:40, suvayu ali wrote:
I think the magic incantation for me was command="somecommand" is
actually the whole command, with all the arguments. From the man page,
this wasn't clear to me. I was trying to setup passwordless root login
with PermitRootLogin set to forced-commands-only
On 28 May 2015 at 23:02, Bill Oliver wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 28 May 2015 23:02:40 + (UTC)
From: Bill Oliver
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:Re: I lost Windows boot option on installation of
Fedora 22
Send repl
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:44:31PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> >Other distros are certainly_more_ bleeding edge. Our goal is to be
> >leading, but to avoid that blood. It's a delicate balance!
> Really? Which ones are you thinking of? Enquiring minds want to *Know!*
I was thinking specifically of
On 05/28/2015 04:40 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:02:19PM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:38 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Alan,
Please do not top post (please read the mailing list guidelines at the
bottom of each message).
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:14:16PM -0700,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > A. If someone packages software into Fedora, are they obligated to
> > maintain all current and future software which might depend on it
> > in perpetuity?
> I vote no to both. A is clearly a straw-man argument. If you are
On 05/28/2015 04:40 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Btw, to allow multiple commands from the same host, I guess I should
have multiple lines for the same public key?
No. command="" is run instead of whatever was requested. It's not
conditional. sshd isn't executing that command or allowing that key
On 05/28/2015 02:07 PM, Todor Petkov wrote:
> On 28/05/2015 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> clean installed f22 onto server (was f21). Now ssh -X doesn't seem to work
>> to this server. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config I do have
>> X11Forwarding yes
>>
>> and ssh -v -X doesn't give any error - just hang
On 05/28/2015 03:21 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
What you're saying is, in effect, that boost 1.54 breaks backward
compatibility and boost-terminal isn't going to get upgraded.
Yes.
Isn't it
up to boost's maintainer to see to it that this doesn't become an issue?
How? boost-terminal isn't in the h
On 05/28/2015 04:43 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
If you are
maintaining package Foo, which is a dependency of Bar, you have no
obligation to support Bar. You do, however, have an obligation to make
an effort to support backward compatibility in Foo
You're already mixing several different roles into th
On 2015-05-28 21:15, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:21 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
What you're saying is, in effect, that boost 1.54 breaks backward
compatibility and boost-terminal isn't going to get upgraded.
Yes.
Isn't it
up to boost's maintainer to see to it that this doesn't become an
On 2015-05-28 08:16, Pete Travis wrote:
On May 28, 2015 7:36 AM, "Matthew Saltzman" wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:40 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Matthew Saltzman
wrote:
Does anyone know if nVidia's Optimus technology is supported natively
in
F22? Or d
On 05/28/2015 05:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Listed? Where? And again, why obligated?
In the package itself. Back when I first installed an nVidia card,
akmod-nvidia depended on kernel-devel (or maybe kernel-headers; I forget
which) but that wasn't part of the rpm's list of dependencies. Y
On 05/28/2015 08:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
How? boost-terminal isn't in the hypothetical current release, so
there's nothing to check.
How? maintain some sort of backward compatibility so that you don't
need to check package-by-package to find out what you're breaking.
--
users mailing
On 05/28/2015 08:50 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
You started out with an example of Foo, a dependency of Bar, or in other
words Bar depends on Foo. You now are talking about things that Foo
depends on. Rather than change the relationship you started with, I'm
going to pretend that you meant that
96 matches
Mail list logo
