Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 19:19 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > Is there a package of Linux which contains this? No idea what this is, but "yum search" can be useful. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 00:13 -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote: > print is a function in python. Its arguments must appear inside ()'s, > just like the error messages tell you. > > ie not: > > print input['name'] > > but instead: > > print(input['name']) AFAIK the former would be va

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On 05/22/2015 12:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 19:19 -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Is there a package of Linux which contains this? > > No idea what this is, but "yum search" can be useful. > > poc > Usage of the LINUX command "calendar"? (dnf install calendar) -- Fedor

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:13:53AM -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote: > On 05/21/2015 05:44 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > *** Error compiling > > '/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pdf-stapler-0.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/staplelib/stapler.py'... You are building with python 3.

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > > *** Error compiling > > > '/home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pdf-stapler-0.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/staplelib/stapler.py'... > You are building with python 3. Maybe the default python on F22 has > changed fro

Re: Biting the bullet?

Once you do get this working, I highly encourage you to submit it for package review and become an official Fedora Packager. That way, all your hard work will benefit everyone. (And this is clearly a tool for which there is a lot of pent-up demand.) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- u

Re: Biting the bullet?

Hi again, I had tried with python2 but also got errors (btw, PyPDF2 compiled fine without any errors on Python3): Here is the file: $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec Uploading (2.2KiB)... http://ur1.ca/mlixm -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/224663/43230299 $ rpmbuild -bb pdf-stapler.spec Executing(%p

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:59:15AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/stapler-0.3.0-py2.7.egg-info/PKG-INFO >/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/stapler-0.3.0-py2.7.egg-info/SOURCES.txt > > /usr/lib/python2.7/sit

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 05/22/2015 12:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 19:19 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > >> Is there a package of Linux which contains this? > > > > No idea what this is, but "yum search" can be useful. > > > > poc > > >

Re: Biting the bullet?

Thanks! OK, I think I got this to package: not completely clear why the latter stuff (involving site-packages) could not be automated. Anyway, here we go: $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec Uploading (2.3KiB)... http://ur1.ca/mlk1u -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/224688/30572714 However, it "crashes"

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec > Uploading (2.3KiB)... > http://ur1.ca/mlk1u -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/224688/30572714 Hmmm, first thing here — you're asking for python3-devel but calling %{__python} (which is currently %{__pytho

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 05/22/2015 12:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 19:19 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > >> Is there a package of Linux which contains this? > > > > No idea what this is, but "yum search" can be useful. > > > > poc > > >

Re: Biting the bullet?

Matthew, Thanks! Btw, I was under the impression that I needed to have PyPDF2 (which is why I packaged it). That has version 1.24. Can I still use that? In that case what do I do? Same as below. Many thanks, Ranjan On Fri, 22 May 2015 11:22:47 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On 05/22/2015 04:54 PM, Doug H. wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 12:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 19:19 -0600, jd1008 wrote: Is there a package of Linux which contains this? >>> >>> No idea what this is, but "yum s

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 17:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > Not sure if calendar takes command line > It does: > > man calendar ... > > NAME > calendar — reminder service > > SYNOPSIS > calendar [-ab] [-A num] [-B num] [-f calendarfile] [-t > [[[cc]yy]mm]dd] Ah, not bad. But I am n

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On 05/21/2015 09:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: gcc -D__COPYRIGHT\(x\)= -D__RCSID\(x\)= leave.c -o leave Thanx. That does it. Cheers, JD -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users F

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:46:02AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Thanks! Btw, I was under the impression that I needed to have PyPDF2 > (which is why I packaged it). That has version 1.24. Can I still use > that? Possibly? > In that case what do I do? Same as below. It should be transparent, acc

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On 05/22/2015 08:54 AM, Doug H. wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: On 05/22/2015 12:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 19:19 -0600, jd1008 wrote: Is there a package of Linux which contains this? No idea what this is, but "yum search" can be

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On 05/21/2015 09:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:41:19PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: {1149-jd@localhost}$ make Check the `rules` file. We're in alternate-universe land here; the actual build doesn't use make. Try gcc -D__COPYRIGHT\(x\)= -D__RCSID\(x\)= leave.c -o leave

Re: Biting the bullet?

Thanks again! > > I would suggest seeing if pdf-stapler works fine with pypdf 1.13, and > hopefully it does, and then following (or helping with, since it seems > stuck!) , which > suggests that Fedora replace pyPdf with PyPDF2 completely. I ca

UUID label format -

Fstab as it is now: UUID=9c997a90-52d5-43c5-8ecf-b2eddc651a26 / ext4defaults,noatime 0 0 UUID=8c07c357-e688-40de-87f7-1b6d0c30a879 /boot ext3 defaults,noatime 0 0 UUID=f750dde3-d92c-4709-80e8-82054a448952 swap swap defaults,noatime 0 0 I am instructed to change the /boot UUID: Edit t

Re: UUID label format -

On 05/22/2015 10:55 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: I am instructed to change the /boot UUID: Who/what is telling you this, and why? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/u

Re: Firewalld, IPv6, no forwarding happening

It turns out there are two problems. (1) You must manually assign a public IPv6 address to at least one of your router's interfaces. This is because when sending an IPv6 packet, the kernel chooses a source address by looking at the addresses of all interfaces. If none of them has a public addres

Re: UUID label format -

On 22/05/15 14:06, Joe Zeff wrote: On 05/22/2015 10:55 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: I am instructed to change the /boot UUID: Who/what is telling you this, and why? . Joe: I am at step "9" in these instructions and would like to get it right first time around. http://jon

Re: UUID label format -

On 05/22/2015 11:10 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 22/05/15 14:06, Joe Zeff wrote: On 05/22/2015 10:55 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: I am instructed to change the /boot UUID: Who/what is telling you this, and why? . Joe: I am at step "9" in these instructio

FC21 system-config-services

Hi, I have recently upgraded from FC20 to FC21 using fedup - it was a pleasantly smooth upgrade.. However. I do not appear to be being notified of any pending package updates (maybe there arent any? - doubtfull!).. And so (using KDE) I am trying to run system-config-services to c

Re: FC21 system-config-services

On 05/22/2015 11:48 AM, Andrew R Paterson wrote: Is this a dbus problem? have I got some other problem with my system config? Am I just being stupid? Any clues? I don't use package-kit, so I can't help with that. However, it's probably a good idea to open a terminal and run this: yum check-

Re: FC21 system-config-services

On Friday 22 May 2015 12:04:52 Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/22/2015 11:48 AM, Andrew R Paterson wrote: > > Is this a dbus problem? > > have I got some other problem with my system config? > > Am I just being stupid? > > Any clues? > > I don't use package-kit, so I can't help with that. However, it's >

Re: FC21 system-config-services

On 05/22/2015 12:25 PM, Andrew R Paterson wrote: Hi, Thanks for that - I know of yumex (and agree - its very nice). yum check-update however demonstrates why I get the feeling there is a dbus related problem. Good! If nothing else, you've confirmed your suspicions. Alas, I don't know eno

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:29:08AM -0600, jd1008 wrote: > On 05/21/2015 09:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>{1149-jd@localhost}$ make > >Check the `rules` file. We're in alternate-universe land here; the > >actual build doesn't use make. Try > > gcc -D__COPYRIGHT\(x\)= -D__RCSID\(x\)= leave.c -o

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:46:31AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > I would suggest seeing if pdf-stapler works fine with pypdf 1.13, and > > hopefully it does, and then following (or helping with, since it seems > > stuck!) , which > > suggests th

Re: The "leave" command of FreeBSD

On 05/22/2015 01:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:29:08AM -0600, jd1008 wrote: On 05/21/2015 09:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: {1149-jd@localhost}$ make Check the `rules` file. We're in alternate-universe land here; the actual build doesn't use make. Try gcc -D__COPYRI

Re: FC21 system-config-services

Hi Again, just found an existing bug report - so I will just wait for a fix. Bug 1177395 - [abrt] system-config-services: connection.py:584:call_async:ValueError: Unable to guess signature from an empty dict Thanks Andy On Friday 22 May 2015 12:28:57 Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/22/2015 12:

Re: FC21 system-config-services

On Fri, 22 May 2015 19:48:23 +0100 Andrew R Paterson wrote: > Hi, > I have recently upgraded from FC20 to FC21 using fedup - it > was a pleasantly smooth upgrade.. > However. I do not appear to be being notified of any pending > package updates (maybe there arent any? - doubtfull!)

Re: Biting the bullet?

On 05/22/2015 06:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 00:13 -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote: >> print is a function in python. Its arguments must appear inside ()'s, >> just like the error messages tell you. >> >> ie not: >> >> print input['name'] >> >> but instead: >> >>

Re: Biting the bullet?

Never mind, I read your comment backwards. Indeed, this looks like a python2 vs python3 problem. On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: > On 05/22/2015 06:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 00:13 -0400, Kevin Cummings wrote: >>> print is a function in python. Its a

Re: UUID label format -

On 05/22/2015 12:19 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 05/22/2015 11:10 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 22/05/15 14:06, Joe Zeff wrote: On 05/22/2015 10:55 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: I am instructed to change the /boot UUID: Who/what is telling you this, and why? .

Re: UUID label format -

On 22/05/15 17:45, Ronal B Morse wrote: UUID="5215-6D07" without the quote marks. The UUIDs for VFAT partitions are two quads (2 X 4 char alphanumerics). RBM That's what I thought after googling UUID. It helps a lot to have it verified ... Thank you, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Vi

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:36:37 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:46:31AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > I would suggest seeing if pdf-stapler works fine with pypdf 1.13, and > > > hopefully it does, and then following (or helping with, since it seems > > > stuck!)

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 06:25:21PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > What I do not quite understand is what is going on on that bug list. > It appears to me that there is an active effort there in the form of > a src.rpm and a spec file. Should I just add mine there in addition > to this effort? A lot

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, 22 May 2015 20:19:03 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 06:25:21PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > What I do not quite understand is what is going on on that bug list. > > It appears to me that there is an active effort there in the form of > > a src.rpm and a spec fil

Re: Biting the bullet?

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:30:55PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > So, does this mean that there should be two versions of PyPDF2? So this gets to an advanced RPM packaging topic -- subpackages. The same source RPM can produce two (or more) separate binary (or noarch) RPMs, one python2 and one pytho