On 11.03.2015, stan wrote:
> I don't see why this is necessary. The system is showing 470%
> idle. So the kernel cpu scheduler shouldn't need to limit the job to a
> single core maximum usage.
I just tried a simple "make" on an 8-core machine. There was exactly one
compile process, and it's 10
On 10.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> I would always encourage separate physical disks as backup partitions.
> If the OP has flaky power, maybe having them offline when not in use,
> would also be a good idea.
I second that, this is a very important advice!
In addition, use a good lightning protect
Hi
I bout a new computer (Hewett Packard pavilion 500), but I have problems
with this computer when I try to install Fedora.
The first problem come with the HD: in this computer is mounted only one HD
with1TB of capacity, and it is not possible to mount another HD (there is
not the physical space
For me the following solved painlessly
yum --enablerepo updates-testing update vlc
L:
2015-03-10 20:23 GMT+01:00 casimiro barreto :
> vlc-core complains about broken dependency (libgpg-error) (looks for
> libgpg-error.so.0). libgpg-error is installed (x86_64 and i686)
> libgpg-error-devel is in
On 11.03.2015, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> I am not sure if 1 TB is enough for use Windows and Fedora.
It is more than enough.
> I encountered a problem also trying to run on this computer the
> SystemRescueCd
Choose an alternative kernel when booting sysresccd.
--
users mailing list
users@
On 03/11/2015 07:04 AM, Pál, László wrote:
> For me the following solved painlessly
>
> yum --enablerepo updates-testing update vlc
>
> L:
>
I do not want to add a testing repo to my stable install...
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587
--
users mailing l
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:18:11 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 07:04 AM, Pál, László wrote:
> > For me the following solved painlessly
> >
> > yum --enablerepo updates-testing update vlc
> >
> > L:
> >
>
> I do not want to add a testing repo to my stable install...
But that is exac
On 03/10/2015 01:00 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Some users experience login delays on 30-60 seconds after entering their
username/passwd in gdm (the "last login" time is shown, so it is not an
I've found that delays of this nature are often caused by reverse DNS
lookup issues. Have a good looksee
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:32:09 +0100
poma wrote:
> > 1. You still haven't provided basic information about the processor,
>thus 'lscpu' or a similar command.
$ lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:Little Endian
CPU(s):6
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:34:25 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> I just tried a simple "make" on an 8-core machine. There was exactly
> one compile process, and it's 100% load was distributed over 3 cores.
> So nothing wrong with that one. If you run 100% on one core or 100%
> distributed over multiple c
On 9 March 2015 at 19:03, stan wrote:
> I'm running Fedora 21 with a custom compiled kernel,
> 3.19.0-1.20150211.fc21.x86_64.
>
> I have a multi core system with 6 cores. All are recognized by the
> kernel.
>
> But, when I run a compile job with -j6, in order to allow all six cores
> to be used,
On 03/11/2015 04:38 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 11.03.2015, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
I am not sure if 1 TB is enough for use Windows and Fedora.
It is more than enough.
I agree. On my laptop (750GB hard drive, quad-core Intel, 8G RAM), I
run F21 (Xfce) and often run two virtual machines on it
On 03/11/2015 11:49 AM, stan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:34:25 +0100
> Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> It's the limiting to one process which causes what you observe. 1
>> process can not get more resources that 100%. The CPU scheduler
>> handles how they are distributed.
>
> I think this is the key.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Amazon Glacier is fairly inexpensive
Google announced Nearline option for Google Cloud Storage, priced
similar to Amazon Glacier but with faster retrieval. Storage price is
the same, but retrieval is more expensive from the looks of it. Amaz
On 11.03.2015, stan wrote:
> What is the point of -j6 or -j8 if the make
> can't spawn additional processes with their own limits, and thus take
> advantage of more resources that are available?
The point is simply that you can exactly determine how many processes should be
used.
> What is it t
On 11.03.2015 16:32, stan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:32:09 +0100
> poma wrote:
>
>>> 1. You still haven't provided basic information about the processor,
>>thus 'lscpu' or a similar command.
> $ lscpu
> Architecture: x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:
16 matches
Mail list logo
