On 25.01.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> I've been using ssr-0.3.2-1.fc21.x86_64 screen recorder and it works very
> well.
Strange. I have all the standard Fedora repositories configured, but there is no
ssr package available.
[root@keera ~]# yum search ssr-
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Warning: No matches
On 01/26/2015 09:07 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 25.01.2015, jd1008 wrote:
>
>> I've been using ssr-0.3.2-1.fc21.x86_64 screen recorder and it works very
>> well.
>
> Strange. I have all the standard Fedora repositories configured, but there is
> no
> ssr package available.
>
> [root@keera ~]#
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> So what you're saying is, there's no longer any installation form that you
> can customize as you install it.
I think the way to do this is Fedora 21 Server netinstall, which
defaults to Server but has other products as options. The F21 Server
D
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/25/2015 09:17 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>
>> I remember the group selection, I did not remember that individual
>> packages were selectable.
>
>
> Once you'd selected a group, you could open up the list of programs.
That's Fedora 17 a
On 01/26/2015 12:54 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I don't understand the part about it not having what you need.
My understanding is that the Live version simply copies itself to your
disc. That means that what you get is what's included in the .iso;
nothing more, nothing less. If you want LibreO
On 01/26/2015 01:04 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
That's Fedora 17 and older. And the interface was unreliable. You'd
uncheck packages, but because something else actually required them
they'd still be installed. The whole package thing is beyond nutty for
users to be involved in anyway. Dealing with t
On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 21:50 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Live-based new installs appear to be the way to go, with fedup
> handling the upgrade path. The good thing about it is that this gives
> you a fairly good way to figure out whether or not you have a
> compatibility problem with your hardwa
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 12:54 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand the part about it not having what you need.
>
>
> My understanding is that the Live version simply copies itself to your disc.
> That means that what you get is what's included i
On Friday 23 January 2015 21:17:55 Pete Travis wrote:
> No, please don't do this. Be honest with yourself about how frequently
> you are willing to upgrade this server, and compare that to Fedora's
> release cycle. It doesn't match up. I'm all for using Fedora, even in
> apparently mission-criti
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> And that shows you how long it's been since I needed to do a fresh install.
> I have no problem with getting extra things installed for dependency, but I
> would have a problem with being forced to have every text editor Fedora
> offers installed
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Tim wrote:
> * That slowness isn't just down to disc drive speed, but the graphics
> seem painfully slow, and even applications that you've given time to
> fully load up.
How often are you booted from live media image on a hard drive or SSD
though? Usually it's o
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 00:17 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I remember that it took hours to install Fedora with a large package
> selection set. All the constant updating of the RPM database, with
> each installed package, burns up a lot of time.
I didn't think it updated/checked with each packag
Tim:
>> Until you come to repartitioning a disc when you want to keep some of
>> the stuff on it. I've had discs where I wanted to remove the extended
>> partition, and keep the first normal partition, then re-use the rest of
>> the disc. It refused to delete the extended partition because it
>>
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 09:49 +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Bear in mind that I'm replacing a Fedora 8 server. This is how often I
> update my servers. These are non-public facing servers, and perform
> internal services.
I've still got a Fedora Core 4 server running as the LAN's file server.
It d
On 26.01.2015 04:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:17:24PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 16:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are tryin
On Friday 23 January 2015 17:54:26 Philip Keogh wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > On Friday 23 January 2015 15:59:48 Gary Stainburn wrote:
> >> I'm now installing Fedora 16 on my server and am going to re-do the last
> >> 4 days work
> >
> > Of course, my next problem is that
On 01/26/2015 12:10 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/26/15 12:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/25/2015 11:09 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/25/2015 09:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/26/15 09:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What else should I try?
I don't use the command line interface to NM.
Bu
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Hmm well it's not the same problem probably if you're still getting a
>> hang with nomodeset. It'd be nice to know for sure this is not some
>> Btrfs regression though, but the fact that it's hanging the console
>> make
On 01/26/2015 07:53 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/26/2015 12:10 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/26/15 12:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/25/2015 11:09 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/25/2015 09:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/26/15 09:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What else should I try?
On 01/26/2015 04:49 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2015 21:17:55 Pete Travis wrote:
No, please don't do this. Be honest with yourself about how frequently
you are willing to upgrade this server, and compare that to Fedora's
release cycle. It doesn't match up. I'm all for using
On 01/26/2015 02:05 AM, jd1008 wrote:
..
> ffmpeg version N-51556-ge278500 Copyright (c) 2000-2013 the FFmpeg
> developers
>built on Apr 4 2013 05:11:43 with gcc 4.6 (Debian 4.6.3-1)
https://lists.debian.org/debian-esperanto/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
https://ffmpeg.org/documentation.html
$ ffmpeg -f x11grab -video_size hd1080 -i :0 -f pulse -i default x11grab.webm
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 26.01.2015 09:22, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 09:07 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> On 25.01.2015, jd1008 wrote:
>>
>>> I've been using ssr-0.3.2-1.fc21.x86_64 screen recorder and it works very
>>> well.
>>
>> Strange. I have all the standard Fedora repositories configured, but there
>> is
Anyone know if this works? Obviously the software would take WINE or
virtualization in Windows so I'm not worried about it, but is the hardware
compatible?
http://www.monoprice.com/Product?c_id=117&cp_id=11711&cs_id=1171101&p_id=11613&seq=1&format=2&cl=res
Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing list
u
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Anyone know if this works? Obviously the software would take WINE or
> virtualization in Windows so I'm not worried about it, but is the hardware
> compatible?
>
> http://www.monoprice.com/Product?c_id=117&cp_id=11711&cs_id=1171101&p_id=11613&
On 01/26/2015 01:51 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
If you're talking about live media pre-baking things you may not like,
that's not coming from the installer team. They'd prefer to get rid of
live media because the install environment can be made
non-deterministic the longer its used before an installa
On 01/26/2015 11:38 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/26/2015 01:51 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
If you're talking about live media pre-baking things you may not like,
that's not coming from the installer team. They'd prefer to get rid of
live media because the install environment can be made
non-determinis
This may or may not be the same device as I posted above, but at half the price:
http://www.amazon.com/Magnification-Microscope-Industrial-Biological-Inspection/dp/B00J9PBTLG/ref=sr_1_5?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1422297231&sr=1-5&keywords=5mp+microscope
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Dotan Cohen
On 01/26/2015 01:25 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Anyone know if this works? Obviously the software would take WINE or
virtualization in Windows so I'm not worried about it, but is the hardware
compatible?
http://www.monoprice.com/Product?c_id=117&
On 01/26/2015 01:43 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
This may or may not be the same device as I posted above, but at half the price:
http://www.amazon.com/Magnification-Microscope-Industrial-Biological-Inspection/dp/B00J9PBTLG/ref=sr_1_5?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1422297231&sr=1-5&keywords=5mp+microscope
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 01:51 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> If you're talking about live media pre-baking things you may not like,
>> that's not coming from the installer team. They'd prefer to get rid of
>> live media because the install environment can b
On 01/26/2015 11:31 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
There's no such option with Fedora's live media, never has been.
As I've said, I've never installed Fedora that way. I have helped
friends install Ubuntu, and you can go directly from the boot menu there
to installing.
--
users mailing list
users@
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 11:31 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> There's no such option with Fedora's live media, never has been.
>
>
> As I've said, I've never installed Fedora that way. I have helped friends
> install Ubuntu, and you can go directly from the
On 01/25/2015 11:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
...
pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
devices that support Linux from retail stores.
Help yourself with these two references to search:
http://wireless.kernel.org
https://wikidev
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Doug wrote:
> I have one of those. The mounting arrangement slips so much it is almost
> useless. With chrome-plate on chrome-pate at two
> wobble points, it is just a poor design. Maybe if you could etch the ball
> joints so they were not slippery it might work.
>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Doug wrote:
> I have one of those. The mounting arrangement slips so much it is almost
> useless. With chrome-plate on chrome-pate at two
> wobble points, it is just a poor design. Maybe if you could etch the ball
> joints so they were not slippery it might work.
>
On 01/25/2015 07:40 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 25.01.2015, Stephen Morris wrote:
Immediately after booting from the grub menu in F21 the first message I
get is 'Failure to start Load Kernel Modules'. Does anyone know what this
message means and how I rectify it?
Welcome to another systemd ma
On 01/27/15 05:30, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/25/2015 07:40 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> On 25.01.2015, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>
>>> Immediately after booting from the grub menu in F21 the first message I
>>> get is 'Failure to start Load Kernel Modules'. Does anyone know what this
>>> message m
On 26.01.2015 21:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/25/2015 11:46 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> ...
>>> pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get
>>> devices that support Linux from retail stores.
>> Help yourself with these two refere
On 01/24/2015 12:58 AM, g wrote:
On 01/23/2015 09:25 PM, Mickey wrote:
On 01/23/2015 08:45 PM, g wrote:
On 01/23/2015 01:50 PM, Mickey wrote:
FC20/KDE
Run Google Chrome or Firefox and it locks my Box up, can't execute or
shut anything down, It just freezes the desktop.
*SWAG*
1] with fir
I updated to java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.7.0.75-2.5.4.2.fc20 today
(along with the java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless and java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel
packages). After the upgrade, nothing java related would run. (not the
compiler, not the jar command, and I couldn't run any pre-built .jars.)
The error w
Can you tell me how to fix this. As I recall, I was able to access
getfedora.org in the past.
Thanks,
Don
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedor
On Fedora 20, I'm trying to play a bunch of opus files with opusdec,
which outputs to /dev/dsp. I tried padsp, but that doesn't work:
padsp opusdec test.opus
Decoding to 48000 Hz (2 channels)
Cannot open /dev/dsp: Connection refused
any help appreciated.
sean
--
users mailing list
users@li
On 01/26/2015 09:19 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On Fedora 20, I'm trying to play a bunch of opus files with opusdec,
which outputs to /dev/dsp. I tried padsp, but that doesn't work:
padsp opusdec test.opus
Decoding to 48000 Hz (2 channels)
Cannot open /dev/dsp: Connection refused
any help appreciated
44 matches
Mail list logo
