People,
I have got a script that quickly sets up iptables for me - firewalld is
too complicated so I have been uninstalling firewalld and activating
iptables for the last couple of versions - this worked fine for F20 but
although I have done:
systemctl enable iptables.service
the service
On 01/03/15 17:18, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> I have got a script that quickly sets up iptables for me - firewalld is too
> complicated so I have been uninstalling firewalld and activating iptables for
> the last couple of versions - this worked fine for F20 but although I have
> done:
>
> system
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:44:49 PM CS DBA wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I want to run an xrandr command at startup.
>
> I Tried these solutions with no luck:
>
> 1) added command it to /etc/rc.d/rc.local (as a script with #!/bin/bash
> as the first line)
> created a soft link from /etc/rc.d/rc.
Hello,
I have my hands on five slightly older (circa 2009-top-of-the-line) dual
quad-cores, one of them has 16GB memory, the others have 8GB. All of them are
otherwise identical. I want to try my hand at making a cluster out of them
using Fedora 21 or CentOS 7. Are there any comprehensive docum
Hello,
Last time I tried this combination it was either f19 or f20 I was
unable to get it to work as firewalld was new. On f21 is anyone using
firewalld to manage their firewall and fail2ban to protect services
against bots?
Thanks.
Dave.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
what do you want to the cluster to do?
how much management do you want to do?
do you want to slap VM/virtual machines on each box?
more data from you might get more useful comments!
thanks
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have my hands on five slightly older
Yes, of course! Sorry about that.
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:48:49 -0500 bruce wrote:
> what do you want to the cluster to do?
MPI (Message Passing Interface) using OpenMPI perhaps and also the ability to
run jobs from the headnode in a queue.
> how much management do you want to do?
Some, I gues
If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on
the LAN? There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock
updated but it looks like the server is not? I haven't found the answer
in the man pages ... I was looking for a configuration setting perhaps.
Bob
--
Works fine here. Any concern getting it up and running?
> Am 03.01.2015 um 17:47 schrieb David Mehler :
>
> Hello,
>
> Last time I tried this combination it was either f19 or f20 I was
> unable to get it to work as firewalld was new. On f21 is anyone using
> firewalld to manage their firewall
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:28 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 15:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > 755 -
> > VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82Q35 Express Integrated
> > Graphics Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
> >
> > Also, it should be no
On 01/04/15 01:27, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on the
> LAN? There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock updated
> but it looks like the server is not? I haven't found the answer in the man
> pages ... I was looking
On 01/03/15 16:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/15 01:27, Bob Goodwin wrote:
If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on the LAN?
There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock updated but it
looks like the server is not? I haven't found the answer in
On 01/04/15 06:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/03/15 16:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 01/04/15 01:27, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on the
>>> LAN? There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock updated
>>> but it looks l
On 01/03/15 17:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
My read of your request is this
You have a system for which WAN access is blocked. So it can't contact an ntp
server on outside of your LAN for time synchronization.
In that case,*if* you have a local system server as a time source you need to set th
On 01/04/15 07:30, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/03/15 17:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> My read of your request is this
>>
>> You have a system for which WAN access is blocked. So it can't contact an
>> ntp server on outside of your LAN for time synchronization.
>>
>> In that case,*if* you have a
On 01/03/15 19:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/15 07:30, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>On 01/03/15 17:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>My read of your request is this
>>
>>You have a system for which WAN access is blocked. So it can't contact an
ntp server on outside of your LAN for time synchronization.
Hi,
No, any tricks I have to do to get the two working well with each
other? As I said last time I tried it I needed to get two files which
were in svn and even then I never got it going.
I'll take sshd although you can substitute smtp as an example, ports
22 or 25, port knocking bots I want them
On 01/03/2015 06:42 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 01/03/15 19:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
<<>>
>> So, you need a local ntp server.
>>
>> You have 2 workstations getting their time sync from the internet
>> as their access is enabled. One of those could act as a time
>> server.
<<>>
>> -- If you c
A brief update,
You nailed it: I went with a basic install (I don't know to which group
httrack belongs to) and this time were able to finish the process as
expected.
Cheers.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
> Thanks Jim, will do!
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Jim
I just noticed that I am getting my logwatch email dropped off as
dead.letter under /root.
And that my personal cron rsync is also coming as dead.letter under
/home/rgm/
It seems that postfix is not running by default:
# systemctl status postfix
postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Age
20 matches
Mail list logo
