Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

Am 10.12.2014 um 04:17 schrieb Robin Laing: > In the past, using fedup was a disaster due to encrypted systems. > > Is this working in F21? > > Don't use LVM's and partitions are encrypted using LUKS. This includes /tmp > swap. /boot isn't encrypted. It worked for me, I upgraded from F20->F21 a

Re: pdftk

On 12/09/2014 09:48 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:01:46 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: What is the story with pdftk? $ sudo yum list pdftk . Installed Packages pdftk.x86_641.44-11.fc19

RE: Samba 4 support

Indeed, At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to samba4, and back. All major distro's fail to do so, because of the HEIMDAL / MIT issue ... It looks like this issue is more difficult to s

Re: pdftk

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > What is the story with pdftk? As pointed out by others, it used a really old Java stack that is no longer supported. There is a more modern replacement called mcpdf. It supports the same command line syntax but has much more modern underpin

Rpmfusion

Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. Jarmo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines:

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working > before. > > Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are > blank > pages. Could it be this?: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Re: Rpmfusion

On 12/10/2014 05:01 AM, jarmo wrote: Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. Jarmo That's what I'm waiting for: for RPMfusion, the google repo, and the Adobe repo to catch up with the new release. How long would anyone suggest I wait? Temlakos -- users mailing list users

Re: Rpmfusion

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote: > Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one that targets Fedora 21. There even is a fresh -release-21 package in it since yesterday. Whether the repo is comp

Re: Rpmfusion

On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote: Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one that targets Fedora 21. There even is a fresh -release-21 packag

Re: Rpmfusion

On Dec 10, 2014 4:38 AM, "Temlakos" wrote: > > On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote: >> >>> Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. >> >> Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one >>

Re: Rpmfusion

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:38:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote: > > > >> Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. > > Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the o

Re: Rpmfusion

On 12/10/2014 06:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:38:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote: On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote: Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. Due to their different developmen

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

Tim Waugh wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> I have 2 machines that have both been updated f20->f21. Printing was working >> before. >> >> Now, when I try to print pdf using either okular or evince, all I get are >> blank pages. > > Could it be this?: > https://

Re: Samba 4 support

On 10 December 2014 at 08:38, wrote: > Indeed, > > At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they > say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to > samba4, and back. > All major distro's fail to do so, because of the HEIMDAL / MIT issue ..

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 07:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > The problem occurs with evince and with okular, but not with adobe acroread. > I'm taking a wild guess that evince and okular use system libraries to > render, > while acroread is probably self-contained, and the problem is some library >

Re: Samba 4 support

On 12/10/2014 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 10 December 2014 at 08:38, wrote: Indeed, At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to samba4, and back. All major distro's fail to do so,

network vs network manager wait online

I was trying to change from NetworkManager to network on a fresh install of f21 workstation, and it sort of works, but the boot hangs for a long time with a start job running for NetworkManager Wait Online. There doesn't seem to be any service with a name like that that I can disable. How do I ma

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

Hi Marko, I made all you suggested : yum localinstall --nogpgcheck yum install kmod-nvidia shutdown ... Nothing was change however . is there anything that I can still try ? On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:05:53 +0200 > Angelo More

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

I ran into a hang like BZ 1160079 while upgrading from F20 on a similar setup yesterday. I didn't have any issues with disk space but the reboot did get stuck on the LUKS container when trying to unmount sysroot. Power cycling at that point was a bit frightening but the system came back up without

Re: network vs network manager wait online

El 2014-12-10 15:17, Tom Horsley escribió: I was trying to change from NetworkManager to network on a fresh install of f21 workstation, and it sort of works, but the boot hangs for a long time with a start job running for NetworkManager Wait Online. There doesn't seem to be any service with a na

Raid 1 and Anaconda -

I want to install Fedora 21 Server. I have two "750G" drives, both formatted for raid, type "fd." boot 2G, / 30G, home/ whatever the remainder. I did not create a file system, assuming that would be created by the installer? Anyway, Raid is not being offered as an option. I've had this proble

Re: network vs network manager wait online

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:33:31 +0100 Juan Orti wrote: > NetworkManager-wait-online.service is disabled by default, if you > enabled it in the past, you should disable it: This was a fresh install from scratch. I never enabled it (but something did). > # systemctl disable NetworkManager-wait-onlin

Re: Rpmfusion

Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:55:50 +0100 Michael Schwendt kirjoitti: > What error/problem do you see? Anything with their own mirror manager? > The repo tree for '21' is available, at least: I get no more mirrors available... And looking at http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration There's not yet any 21...

Network problem. Is this a fedora issue?

I'm trying to figure out a networking issue, and I can't tell if it is a fedora thing or not. Here's the issue: I work at a place where the wired network has very strict security. One can go to very few web pages, one has very limited access to applications, every box has a keystroke logger

Re: network vs network manager wait online

El 2014-12-10 15:43, Tom Horsley escribió: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:33:31 +0100 Juan Orti wrote: NetworkManager-wait-online.service is disabled by default, if you enabled it in the past, you should disable it: This was a fresh install from scratch. I never enabled it (but something did). # sy

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 07:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> The problem occurs with evince and with okular, but not with adobe acroread. >> I'm taking a wild guess that evince and okular use system libraries to >> render, while acroread is probably self-contained, and the problem i

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 10:35 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Thanks! I found > lp -o landscape -o fit-to-page xxx.pdf > > printed just fine! > > But printing from evince produced blank pages. Almost blank, there are 2 > tiny > blue letters at the bottom of each page. So now you can try to isolat

Re: pdftk

On 12/10/2014 04:23 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ranjan Maitra > wrote: >> What is the story with pdftk? > > As pointed out by others, it used a really old Java stack that is no > longer supported. > > There is a more modern replacement called mcpdf. Thanks fo

21 beta -> 21

Following suggestions in this list, I'm trying to use yum distro-sync to update a Fedora 21 beta laptop to Fedora 21, but yum wants to remove my running kernel (3.17.4-302.fc21.x86_64) and downgrade 87 packages. Should I go ahead with this? Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: 21 beta -> 21

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Andras Simon wrote: Following suggestions in this list, I'm trying to use yum distro-sync to update a Fedora 21 beta laptop to Fedora 21, but yum wants to remove my running kernel (3.17.4-302.fc21.x86_64) and downgrade 87 packages. Should I go ahead with this? Andras I d

Re: 21 beta -> 21

On 12/10/2014 11:21 AM, Andras Simon wrote: > Following suggestions in this list, I'm trying to use yum distro-sync > to update a Fedora 21 beta laptop to Fedora 21, but yum wants to > remove my running kernel (3.17.4-302.fc21.x86_64) and downgrade 87 > packages. Should I go ahead with this? > > An

Re: Samba 4 support

On Dec 9, 2014 6:44 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > So what is the story? Does Fedora work for a Samba AD? As others have mentioned, not presently. But if you're adventurous: http://negativo17.org/samba-4-active-directory-with-bind-dlz-zones-dynamic-dns-updates-windows-static-rpc-2/ -T.C. --

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 10:35 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> Thanks! I found >> lp -o landscape -o fit-to-page xxx.pdf >> >> printed just fine! >> >> But printing from evince produced blank pages. Almost blank, there are 2 >> tiny blue letters at the bottom of each page. > > S

fedup on a vicious cycle

So I tried the stuff below. Got the magic message: reboot. Reboot into fedup and it keeps throwing me back into grub and the same reboot into fedup after a while of text on the screen. How do I get out of it? Many thanks, Ranjan sudo fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct setting up repos..

Re: 21 beta -> 21

2014-12-10 17:35 GMT+01:00, Bill Oliver : > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Andras Simon wrote: > >> Following suggestions in this list, I'm trying to use yum distro-sync >> to update a Fedora 21 beta laptop to Fedora 21, but yum wants to >> remove my running kernel (3.17.4-302.fc21.x86_64) and downgrade 87 >

Re: 21 beta -> 21

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Andras Simon wrote: 2014-12-10 17:35 GMT+01:00, Bill Oliver : On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Andras Simon wrote: Following suggestions in this list, I'm trying to use yum distro-sync to update a Fedora 21 beta laptop to Fedora 21, but yum wants to remove my running kernel (3.17.4-3

Re: Rpmfusion

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:33:41 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote: Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21.. Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one that targets Fedora 21. There even is a fresh

core_pattern

I see the systemd fungus has grown over the /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern file now. Can I make it stop changing it? Or do I have to make an rc.local script to reset it to just plain old 'core'? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: htt

Re: Samba 4 support

On 12/10/2014 11:41 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Dec 9, 2014 6:44 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" > wrote: > So what is the story? Does Fedora work for a Samba AD? As others have mentioned, not presently. But if you're adventurous: http://negativo17.org/samba-4-activ

Re: nf_conntrack helpers?

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > Should this message mean anything to an ordinary mortal? > > nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will be > removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers instead. > > It comes out a few seconds after th

how to get rid of failed fedup

So, as you can see from my other post, one of my fedups failed: how do I get rid of everything that it did (and the boot option at startup)? Many thanks, Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropr

Re: printing broken by f20->f21 update

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 11:47 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Are the files in /var/spool/cups the original output from evince? Yes, it is. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscri

Re: core_pattern

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:31:50 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > I see the systemd fungus has grown over the > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern file now. This is to allow core dumps to get handled by systemd and info to go to the journal. Abrt also overrides it to handle crashes (and has for a long time) >

Re: core_pattern

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I see the systemd fungus has grown over the > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern file now. > > Can I make it stop changing it? > > Or do I have to make an rc.local script to reset it > to just plain old 'core'? From rawhide so I'm not sure whether

Re: core_pattern

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:55:56 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Abrt also overrides it to handle crashes (and has for a > long time) Yea, but disabling the abrt* services made core files "normal" previously, now it hangs around even with them disabled :-); > > Can I make it stop changing it? > > ln -sf

Re: core_pattern

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:24:32 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > > ln -sf /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf /dev/null > > Thanks! Though come to think of it, shouldn't /dev/null be the 1st arg? :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: ht

Re: core_pattern

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:31:50 -0500 > Tom Horsley wrote: > >> I see the systemd fungus has grown over the >> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern file now. >> >> Can I make it stop changing it? > > ln -sf /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf /dev/null

Re: 21 beta -> 21

2014-12-10 18:21 GMT+01:00, Bill Oliver : >> Transaction check error: >> file /usr/lib/firewalld/services from install of >> firewalld-0.3.12-1.fc21.noarch conflicts with file from package >> firewalld-filesystem-0.3.13-1.fc21.noarch >> file /usr/lib/firewalld from install of >> firewalld-0.3.12

Re: core_pattern

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:39:57 -0500 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:24:32 -0500 > Tom Horsley wrote: > > > > ln -sf /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-coredump.conf /dev/null > > > > Thanks! > > Though come to think of it, shouldn't /dev/null be the 1st arg? :-). Indeed it should. ;) Sorry

Re: pdftk

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:28:57AM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be > missed. Given that Fedora isn't going to continue, I understand it > is a bit useless to make

Re: Raid 1 and Anaconda -

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > I want to install Fedora 21 Server. > > I have two "750G" drives, both formatted for raid, type "fd." boot 2G, / > 30G, home/ whatever the remainder. I did not create a file system, assuming > that would be created by the

Fedora 21 64bit ram usage

I installed 21 yesterday and I seen that I was using 1.5 g of ram. I didn't have anything running but the os it self I have a Dell I7 3.9 g and 8 g of ram . Has anyone else ham this problem and no how to fix it . When I opened my mail and open Firefox I go up to 3.6g of ram . All the fans pick

Re: how to get rid of failed fedup

2014-12-10 11:49 GMT-06:00 Ranjan Maitra : > So, as you can see from my other post, one of my fedups failed: how do I get > rid of everything that it did (and the boot option at startup)? If you have a /home partition and a / one, you just can to format the root one and make a fresh installation.

libiguanaIR?

I'm installing gazillions of rpms to get everything on my fedora 21 partition I had on fedora 20, and the massive dnf install is printing this every time anyone runs ldconfig: /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libiguanaIR.so.0.3 is not a symbolic link Is a package busted somewhere? -- users mailing list us

Re: Fedora 21 64bit ram usage

On 12/10/2014 01:52 PM, kc8...@ohioham.com wrote: > I installed 21 yesterday and I seen that I was using 1.5 g of ram. I > didn't have anything running but the os it self I have a Dell I7 3.9 g > and 8 g of ram . Has anyone else ham this problem and no how to fix it . > When I opened my mail and op

Re: how to get rid of failed fedup

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:54:44 -0600 Isaac Cortés González wrote: > 2014-12-10 11:49 GMT-06:00 Ranjan Maitra : > > So, as you can see from my other post, one of my fedups failed: how do I > > get rid of everything that it did (and the boot option at startup)? > > If you have a /home partition an

Re: fedup - luks encrypted system

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Morgan wrote: > I ran into a hang like BZ 1160079 while upgrading from F20 on a similar > setup yesterday. I didn't have any issues with disk space but the reboot > did get stuck on the LUKS container when trying to unmount sysroot. > Power cycling at that

Re: Raid 1 and Anaconda -

On 12/10/14 14:15, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: I want to install Fedora 21 Server. I have two "750G" drives, both formatted for raid, type "fd." boot 2G, / 30G, home/ whatever the remainder. I did not create a file system, assu

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:18:10 +0200 Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > I made all you suggested : >yum localinstall --nogpgcheck >yum install kmod-nvidia >shutdown ... > > Nothing was change however . > > is there anything that I can still try ? Send me again the latest version of /v

Re: pdftk

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:04:12 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:28:57AM -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that > > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be > > missed. Given that Fedora

Re: pdftk

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that > > > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be > > > missed. Given that Fedora isn't going to continue, I understand it > > > is a bit usel

Re: pdftk

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that > > > > Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and will be > > > > missed. Given that

Re: pdftk

On 12/10/2014 07:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and wil

Re: pdftk

> I'm running pclos-kde, and I had not heard of pdftk, but my system has it > available in > the repos, so I looked up the description. It seems to be a very useful, > competent tool > with a lot of features, so I really don't understand why Fedora would drop > it. However, > it is available fr

why does distro-sync find packages to downgrade after fedup

On a system not fed up from fedup -- not the one that is hosed for now -- I do the following: sudo yum --releasever=21 distro-sync Dependencies Resolved Package Arch Version

Re: pdftk

On 12/10/2014 04:31 PM, Doug wrote: On 12/10/2014 07:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that Fedora had would do

Re: Raid 1 and Anaconda -

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA < bobgood...@wildblue.net> wrote: > >> All of that looks ok except "Device Type" is always grayed out and I > never get to select raid. I'm going to guess this is because you didn't use mdadm -C to create the raid array in advan

Re: pdftk

On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: It would be good if someone who could pick it up w/o the issues that Fedora had would do it -- pdftk was a good package and wi

Re: why does distro-sync find packages to downgrade after fedup

Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes: > On a system not fed up from fedup -- not the one that is hosed for now -- I do the following: > > sudo yum --releasever=21 distro-sync > > Dependencies Resolved > > > Packag

Re: pdftk

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:49:55 -0800 Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > It would be good if someone who could pi

Re: pdftk

On 12/10/2014 08:02 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:49:55 -0800 Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 12/10/2014 04:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:55:10 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:51:59PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: It would be good

Re: Fedora 21 64bit ram usage

If I'm reading this right under mem I see 1.9 for gnome shell and virt I have 1947724 . And for evolution calen men is 1.0 and virt is 1568376 and up top I see kib mem 80472 free is 679272 used is 546188 dose that help Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Steven Stern" To: "Commun

Re: Network problem. Is this a fedora issue?

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 15:06 +, Bill Oliver wrote: > Over the past few weeks, basically since I moved to Fedora21, there > are extended periods where I simply cannot get to web pages using > http. Things will work fine for hours, and then stop for hours, and > then come back up. > > During th

Re: fedora 20, on my system, actually works only to line command.

OK thank you On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:18:10 +0200 > Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > > > I made all you suggested : > >yum localinstall --nogpgcheck > >yum install kmod-nvidia > >shutdown ... > > > > Nothing was change howev