Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals.
Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20.
Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month
intervals, or is the long interval for Fedora 21 only (or whatever)?
Will Fedora 20 be suppor
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 18:46:26 Brian Johnson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was recently gifted an old Dell Latitude E6400 laptop and, given its age
> and what I've read, I thought getting Fedora 20 going on it would be
> smooth.
>
> And, to some extent, it was. I was primarily concerned with the
On 08/26/14 19:33, Roger Heflin wrote:
I had to go find the CD I had with dicom files on it.
I was not able to get anything selecting the diacomdir file...I had to
go into dicom dir and go down to where there were real files (select
show all files) and then was able to display the image by sele
On 28 August 2014 09:34, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
>
> On 08/26/14 19:33, Roger Heflin wrote:
>>
>> I had to go find the CD I had with dicom files on it.
>>
>> I was not able to get anything selecting the diacomdir file...I had to
>> go into dicom dir and go down to where there were
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
> It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all.
Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider,
itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a
toothpick into the glue, and use that to put a dot on the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:02:44AM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> On Thursday, August 28, 2014 06:31:23 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
> > It will come back
>
> Again see the problem exist in unstable version and if it does file a bug.
> That is the best possible solution.
If the GNOME solution I already
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:48:06 -0700
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals.
> Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20.
> Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month
> intervals, or is the lon
hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been
compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose? if it is
something that poses a large concern is it possible to change the
encryption method from md5 to crypt? or another method that is not
compromised?
thank
Hi!
I tried to set up a system using four 3TB disks as a raid6. The disks
are new, no old partitions laying around. I used a USB stick as install
media (Fedora 20 x86_64 Gnome Live).
I chose manual partitioning to get everything as I wanted. When this was
ready I got the error message that I
On 08/28/2014 10:48 AM, Lars E. Pettersson issued this missive:
Hi!
I tried to set up a system using four 3TB disks as a raid6. The disks
are new, no old partitions laying around. I used a USB stick as install
media (Fedora 20 x86_64 Gnome Live).
I chose manual partitioning to get everything as
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:10:54 -0700,
Rick Stevens wrote:
I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and
with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder
as your RAID, and let the system put the boot partition in that reserved
space on the primary
On 08/28/14 20:21, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:10:54 -0700,
Rick Stevens wrote:
I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and
with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder
as your RAID, and let the system put the boot par
On 28.08.2014, dustin kempter wrote:
> hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been
> compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose?
MD5 is not used for encryption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5
for further details and for what md5 actually is.
Note my day job IS data communications and security. I am NOT a
cryptographer. I am in a different select group that often refer to
ourselves as the crypto-plumbers. We know how to carefully use the
crypto blocks to build whole systems.
On 08/28/2014 11:34 AM, dustin kempter wrote:
hi all,
On 08/28/2014 06:32 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all.
Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider,
itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a
toothpick into the g
This is on a F20 arm system. It SHOULD follow F20 rules...
first: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# Added by 'write_udev' for detected device 'eth0'.
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="02:67:15:00:01:78", NAME="eth0"
First IP address is:
/etc/sysco
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include
IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file
rather than creating a eth0:0 file (at least that worked
On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
DEVICE="eth0:0"
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT="yes"
TYPE="Ethernet"
NAME="System eth0"
MTU=1500
GATEWAY="208.83.67.161"
IPADDR="208.83.67.164"
NETMASK="255.255.255.240"
I think you need to add
ONPARENT=yes
to m
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 15:29:58 -0400,
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Today you might STILL use sha1; it has had tremendous resiliency. NIST
was expecting it to fall as badly as md5 by this point. Most use at
least sha256, and sha3 is now out there. Choose your poison.
sha3 isn't really ready
On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include
IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file
rather than
On 08/28/2014 04:35 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
DEVICE="eth0:0"
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT="yes"
TYPE="Ethernet"
NAME="System eth0"
MTU=1500
GATEWAY="208.83.67.161"
IPADDR="208.83.67.164"
NETMASK="255.255.
> 29 aug 2014 kl. 00:12 skrev Robert Moskowitz
> Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change.
>
> :(
Ok. Another difference I see is that my interface is named :1, i.e. in my case
wan:1 Not sure if that makes any difference though, was years since I set this
up :)
Lars
--
users mailing list
use
On 08/28/2014 06:23 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
29 aug 2014 kl. 00:12 skrev Robert Moskowitz
Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change.
:(
Ok. Another difference I see is that my interface is named :1, i.e. in my case
wan:1 Not sure if that makes any difference though, was years since I set t
On 08/29/14 06:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
>> These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include
>> IPAD
On 08/29/14 07:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
> And from a second system
>
> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ping 192.168.1.19
> PING 192.168.1.19 (192.168.1.19) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.337 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.290 ms
> 64 by
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:20:18 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> You may be getting confused by using "ifconfig".
Yea, I forgot that bit, my aliases didn't show up
in ifconfig, but I could ping them from another
computer on the same network.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On 08/28/2014 07:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/29/14 06:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you a
It is all ifconfigs fault :)
I just assumed that in f20 it was still good enough until F21.
# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# Added by 'write_udev' for detected device 'eth0'.
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="02:67:15:00:01:78", NAME="eth0"
On 08/28/2014 01:48 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month
intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months
after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule future releases at
roughly 12 month intervals, or is the long interval fo
Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release schedule,
the number of bugs has been higher.
I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all
the bugs
of a new release every 6 months.
Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel subsystems
a
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release
> schedule, the number of bugs has been higher.
> I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all
> the bugs
> of a new release every 6 months.
> Simply put, n
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600 jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 08/28/2014 01:48 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month
> > intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months
> > after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule future r
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:27:44 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600
> jd1008 wrote:
>
> > Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release
> > schedule, the number of bugs has been higher.
> > I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron ou
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
>
> On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
>> [snipped]
>> ONBOOT="yes"
> I think you need to add
> ONPARENT=yes
> to make it start when its parent does.
ONPARENT=yes is indeed
On 29 Aug 2014 01:32, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote:
>
> you are right. ifconfig USE to be able to do this, but now it is just a
shell? over ip and so...
>
Your memory isn't quite accurate... ifconfig has never handled multiple IP
addresses on an interface with aliases being used to create separate
greetings,
i have 3 drives i need to recover that have damaged boot tracks. on the
3rd drive are boot track back ups that i need to recover.
within the past year, a poster was needing to recover a file. a replier
suggested a boot iso that recovered files and labeled them with a file
label of
36 matches
Mail list logo
