On 06/10/2014 11:18 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Can it be configured to turn that functionality off if desired,
sometimes it is quicker to download packages individually rather than in
parallel.
If there is a specific situation when this is the case, experienced by a
nontrivial number of users,
On 11.06.2014 04:34, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:09 PM, poma wrote:
Firmware, kernel module or userspace? :)
# uname -r
3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64
No clue on firmware, I'm not exactly sure how to check which is being
loaded...
Did you mention an exact hardware in question
On 10.06.2014 18:36, Bill Murray wrote:
Dear Fedorians,
I am using F20 gnome on my laptop, and have great
suspend/resume
as I wander from meeting to meeting in different rooms. Except for the
wireless.
Maybe 1 time in 3 or 50-50 the wireless fails to connect on resume - it
On 11.06.2014 10:18, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 04:34, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:09 PM, poma wrote:
Firmware, kernel module or userspace? :)
# uname -r
3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64
No clue on firmware, I'm not exactly sure how to check which is being
loaded...
Did you me
On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel
Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules
(from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine.
Two comments:
1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new
kernel autom
On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel
> Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules
> (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine.
Yes. And mine have built just fine.
/usr/lib/
On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new
> kernel automatically. This has happened in the past but seems to have
> failed now. Why would this be and how can I fix it?
Ohand BTW you may want to check
/var/lib/dk
Thanks for tips!
I did a yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel\* iwl\* and got the
latest packages.
The connection definitely seems "better", it didn't take nearly as long to
remote in over ssh but I'm still not seeing the 108Mbit, does that require
a 5GHz connection instead of 2.4GHz?
On 06/11/2014 08:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel
> Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules
> (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine.
I have virtualbox installed and I also have
On Jun 11, 2014 6:13 PM, "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
>
> On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel
> Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules
> (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine.
>
> Two comments:
>
> 1) I thought DK
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2014, EGO-II.1 sent:
> A compromised WINDOWS machine?is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL!
> (Sorry!I just COULDN'T resist!)
I feel compromised if I ever have to use one... :-\
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 21:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new
> > kernel automatically. This has happened in the past but seems to have
> > failed now. Why would this be and how can I
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:01 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> Do you have RPMFusions's VB or the one from Oracle's repo? I found
> RPMFusion's build problematic as they provide modules through kmod.
> Akmod
> can automatically build modules for you.
>
> So I have switched to Oracle's version. It come
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:01 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> > Do you have RPMFusions's VB or the one from Oracle's repo? I found
> > RPMFusion's build problematic as they provide modules through kmod.
> > Akmod
> > can automatically bui
Overview of our setup
- Our webservers use the PHP plugin "ldap_mod_del" to execute ldap changes.
- Our 389 servers are master-master
- We are attempting to delete the displayName attribute from a user
Run from webserver in PHP:
- When performing a modify, everything works. changes are replicated
On 06/11/2014 10:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2014, EGO-II.1 sent:
A compromised WINDOWS machine?is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL!
(Sorry!I just COULDN'T resist!)
I feel compromised if I ever have to use one... :-\
I use a Windows machine for one reason only: becaus
On 11.06.2014 13:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:35:36PM +0200, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 10:18, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 04:34, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:09 PM, poma wrote:
Firmware, kernel module or userspace? :)
# uname -r
3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_6
On 11.06.2014 15:33, Richard Shaw wrote:
Thanks for tips!
I did a yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel\* iwl\* and got the
latest packages.
The connection definitely seems "better", it didn't take nearly as long to
remote in over ssh but I'm still not seeing the 108Mbit, does that req
On 11.06.2014 19:13, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:06 PM, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 13:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:35:36PM +0200, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 10:18, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 04:34, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:09 PM, pom
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, poma wrote:
> On 11.06.2014 15:33, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> Thanks for tips!
>>
>> I did a yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel\* iwl\* and got the
>> latest packages.
>>
>> The connection definitely seems "better", it didn't take nearly as long to
>> re
On 2014-06-11 18:16, Temlakos wrote:
On 06/11/2014 10:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2014, EGO-II.1 sent:
A compromised WINDOWS machine?is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL!
(Sorry!I just COULDN'T resist!)
I feel compromised if I ever have to use one... :-\
I use a Win
On 11.06.2014 21:39, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, poma wrote:
On 11.06.2014 15:33, Richard Shaw wrote:
Thanks for tips!
I did a yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel\* iwl\* and got the
latest packages.
The connection definitely seems "better", it didn't ta
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:31 PM, poma wrote:
> There are four "indoor" models, and basic one ain't 5 GHz.
>
Yes, I have the basic one, so it does support "n" but in 2.4GHz only.
> Besides there is no soft for the linux distros.
>
The discovery software is java based and does run, but I could
On 06/11/2014 08:16 AM, Alchemist wrote:
sync && du -hs /var/cache/yum /var/lib/yum && yum clean all && yum
makecache && du -hs /var/cache/yum /var/lib/yum
Hi,
I tried the commands you suggested, even though yum may have
recovered itself as subsequent regular cache refreshes seem to have
f
On 06/11/2014 07:51 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/10/2014 02:13 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm not saying there is any benefit of one over the other, all I am
saying is that the package manager I currently use seems to be using the
latter method when upgrades to the kmod.nvidia packages are requ
On 06/11/2014 05:38 PM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/10/2014 11:18 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Can it be configured to turn that functionality off if desired,
sometimes it is quicker to download packages individually rather than in
parallel.
If there is a specific situation when this is the case,
On 06/11/14 23:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 21:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new
>>> kernel automatically. This has happened in the past but seems to have
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 07:35 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Just as a side issue, you mentioned that kernel updates remove the
> older
> kernel, I have noticed the same thing and I have also had Smartpm
> tell
> me that a new kernel can't coexist with the previous kernel. Is there
> any way to ch
On 06/11/2014 03:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I have three kernels installed (current, previous and previous
previous :-) which I think is the default with yum though it can be
changed by editing installonly_limit in /etc/yum.conf. If smartpm says
that kernels can't coexist it's clearly wron
On 11.06.2014 22:48, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:31 PM, poma wrote:
There are four "indoor" models, and basic one ain't 5 GHz.
Yes, I have the basic one, so it does support "n" but in 2.4GHz only.
Besides there is no soft for the linux distros.
The discovery softwar
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 12:16 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> For that matter, I have yet to find any kind of file-sharing server
> that can compete with Samba. Which is one reason why I install samba
> even to share files with other Linux machines.
I found Samba to be a complete pain to use on Linux, so I
31 matches
Mail list logo
