On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 12:43 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Cristian Sava wrote:
>
> > I feel more comfortable with Fedora than with Centos and I run Fedora
> > servers for many years with great success.
>
> Why?
> To me it would be irrational to run Fedora rather than CentOS on a server,
> since
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 20:22 -0400, Jim wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 12:53 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
>
> >
> I had this same problem.
> I install F20 on a second drive, Like sdb instead of sda ??
> I put a second drive in computer sdb and installed F20 on it but i
> couldn't boot into F20 sdb it kept goi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:03:05PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
Reposted from
> Fedora Workstation, and an alternate view — both part of Fedora!
>
> Fedora Workstation developer Christian Schaller wrote a long blog post
> explaining
Cristian Sava wrote:
>> To me it would be irrational to run Fedora rather than CentOS on a
>> server, since the chances of problems arising would be higher,
>> and I don't see any compensating advantages.
>> I run Fedora on laptops because there is a wider range of apps available,
>> but they are
I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well
except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving
me a pile of weird permission errors and disk space errors. There is
215GB free space, so I know that is not the problem. Obviously this has
somethign
Hi,
the 0.5.0 is out today, Rawhide only for the moment. See also:
dnf.baseurl.org/2014/04/23/dnf-0-5-0-released/
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html#id31
Cheers,
Ales
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.f
On 04/23/2014 06:40 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
> I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well
> except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving
> me a pile of weird permission errors and disk space errors. There is
> 215GB free space, so
On 04/23/14 19:40, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
> I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well
> except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving me a
> pile of weird permission errors and disk space errors. There is 215GB free
> space, so I
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 16:03 -0500, Chris Kottaridis wrote:
> However, is there a graphical admin tool that will do it ?
Didn't you get to set it with the installation routine? Mine did, just
installed Fedora 20 a short while ago, tonight, using the live DVD. It
suggests you set up the network u
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 11:59 +, Bill Oliver wrote:
> I think being comfy with a distro is a big deal
>
> Then Mandriva collapsed. I had to get used to Fedora. When Mageia
> came out, I was tickled pink and immediately installed it -- only to
> find that now I was in the exact opposite posi
In Gnome, if you go to Settings > Details > Overview there is a Device name
field which is the same as using
hostnamectl set-hostname blah
I've only ever ended up with a mess whenever I explicitly set --pretty
--transient hostnames. Maybe related, Adamw was building/rebuilding a server
the wh
Fedora 20 question.
I have noticed that the Host command is always returning first IPv4
addresses, and then IPv6 addresses. So I asked on the BIND list can got
the following:
/ Does bind order address class on queries? That is does it, say
On 04/23/2014 03:50 AM, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 20:22 -0400, Jim wrote:
On 04/22/2014 12:53 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
I had this same problem.
I install F20 on a second drive, Like sdb instead of sda ??
I put a second drive in computer sdb and installed F20 on it but i
couldn't
Once upon a time, Robert Moskowitz said:
> I have noticed that the Host command is always returning first IPv4
> addresses, and then IPv6 addresses. So I asked on the BIND list can
> got the following:
You asked the BIND list a different question than you are asking here.
BIND returns the record
On Apr 10, 2014, at 8:42 AM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone tried a tiering filesystem like one of these?
>
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=113529
> http://www.lessfs.com/wordpress/?p=776
I haven't seen much recent work with lvmts when I google it. I'm seeing
Without more information, i.e. the grub install command from
anaconda.program.log for Fedora 20 and Fedora 16, it's hard to say what the
difference is. Since Fedora 16 isn't support anymore I don't know that it
matters.
What I can say about Fedora 18/19/20 though is that it only installs grub o
On Apr 22, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:52:52 +0200 Heinz Diehl wrote:
>
>> On 22.04.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
>>
>>> Okular
>>> lets you read, alter and add comments (I think, in the English version they
>>> are called "Reviews")
>>
>> I receive q
Chris,
Thank you for the detailed reply. This is what I was striving to learn
and did not now enough to ask it right.
On 04/23/2014 01:31 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Robert Moskowitz said:
I have noticed that the Host command is always returning first IPv4
addresses, and then
HI
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm not quite clear why you would want to run virtual machines on a server?
> To me, the basic requirement for a server is that it should provide
> the services that are required by laptops, phones and other machines.
>
VM's on a serve
is there any package that I'd need to develop for android in Qt 5? or I
just use Qt Creator as it is in the repos?
I know I'll need the sdk and ndk.
-Isaac C.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Hi
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> The cost of a "managed language" is that it affects performance.
>
Not necessarily but even in that case, it might have better to trade off
some speed for better security in such cases. We are talking about
millions and millions of a
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 16:47:01 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/20/14 16:28, M. Fioretti wrote:
> > ok that's why then. So the only thing I need, if anything, is further
> > confirmation that increasing it on F17 would not cause problems. I'll
> > wait until tomorrow for further comments and then
22 matches
Mail list logo
