On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 19:22 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > (Sorry for the subject line but it's the best I could come up with)
> >
> > I recently installed F20 on a new system with a 120GB SSD and 1TB hard
> > drive. I'm using the SS
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 00:05 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > I think you've stumbled into a bug. Since Btrfs directly supports multiple
> > devices, it's like LVM or raid in this respect, and for LVM and RAID,
> > anaconda might be eager to con
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:17:13 -0500
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > ATI is known to have a notoriously lousy support for Linux in
> > general and Fedora in particular. For their low-end and oldish
> > cards, they provide specs on which the Linux community has built the
> > open-sourc
Allegedly, on or about 13 March 2014, Ian Chapman sent:
> I was having similar issues with GDM, where it would set up the order
> of the monitors incorrectly, despite what was in the X configuration
> or the desktop settings. Interestingly enough, the order was correct
> when I logged in.
*Your*
recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
which appeared to update well over 200 packages (including a slightly
newer kernel), after which, when i booted, i had no graphical desktop
anymore, just the littl
On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
> was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
> which appeared to update well over 200 packages (including a slightly
> newer kernel), after which, when i
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Kevin Martin wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
> > was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
> > which appeared to update well over 200 packages (includi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been using DNF pretty regularly since upgrading to F20 and so far
I'm not sure I see any real big difference between them. Although, I
may not be supposed to see a difference.
The one thing I have noticed is that DNF quite often shows no updates
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:12:04 -0400
Mark Haney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've been using DNF pretty regularly since upgrading to F20 and so far
> I'm not sure I see any real big difference between them. Although, I
> may not be supposed to see a difference.
>
On 03/13/2014 07:48 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But what I remember is that this was not the case in recent years
> (until last October, that is). Some years back when ATI announced the
> release of the specs, there was a lot of hype about ATI supporting the
> Linux community etc., but the actual
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> > On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
> > > was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
> >
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:17:12 -0400
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> so, what should I install? I removed the catalyst software using the
> uninstall.sh and now have the radeon driver in xorg.conf. At least
> now I can move windows around without a lag.. should I install fglrx
> drivers?
No, you should no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/14 09:16, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-results-with-dnf-update-vs-yum-update
>
>
So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
metadata when I call 'sudo dn
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
> So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
> metadata when I call 'sudo dnf update'? That's how I'm reading this.
> If that's true, why the devil not?
At a guess, for marketing reasons. People see apt as being quicker
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:35:59 -0400
Mark Haney wrote:
> So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
> metadata when I call 'sudo dnf update'?
It's the size of the metadata some people complained against yum.
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@l
On 13. 3. 2014 at 13:41:48, Tethys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mark Haney
wrote:
> > So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
> > metadata when I call 'sudo dnf update'? That's how I'm reading this.
> >
> > If that's true, why the devil not?
>
> At a gu
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> The metadata are quite large and downloading them every single time is
> time consuming.
I can't think of an occasion on which I'd want to say "update this
package, but not to the latest version". For installing new software,
maybe. But updati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/14 09:52, Tethys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jan Zelený
> wrote:
>
>> The metadata are quite large and downloading them every single
>> time is time consuming.
>
> I can't think of an occasion on which I'd want to say "updat
On 03/13/2014 09:04 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
>
>
> On 03/13/14 09:52, Tethys wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jan Zelený
>> wrote:
>
>>> The metadata are quite large and downloading them every single
>>> time is time consuming.
>
>> I can't think of an occasion on which I'd want to say
I got this error report today:
A kernel problem occurred, but your kernel has been tainted (flags:GW).
Kernel maintainers are unable to diagnose tainted reports.
not sure where to look in /var/log, nothing in messages.
what does it mean?
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #367800 and ne
On 03/13/2014 10:17 AM, Kevin Martin wrote:
> I'm with you Mark...CLi all the way with the updates. And I like what DNF
> does with skipping repos it can't find. BTW, if you set
> "metadata_expire=-1" in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf then the metadata *always downloads
> from the repo. One thing I don't
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I got this error report today:
>
> A kernel problem occurred, but your kernel has been tainted (flags:GW).
> Kernel maintainers are unable to diagnose tainted reports.
>
> not sure where to look in /var/log, nothing in messages.
>
> what does it mean?
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Kevin Martin wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
> > was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
> > which appeared to update well over 200 packages (includi
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
> recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide
Wrong list. You want the Fedora Test list.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On 13. 3. 2014 at 10:04:04, Mark Haney wrote:
> On 03/13/14 09:52, Tethys wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jan Zelený
> >
> > wrote:
> >> The metadata are quite large and downloading them every single
> >> time is time consuming.
> >
> > I can't think of an occasion on which I'd want
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> > recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide
>
> Wrong list. You want the Fedora Test list.
ah, quite so, i'd forgotten there was a separate ML for rawhide.
apologies
On 03/13/2014 10:23 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
>> I got this error report today:
>>
>> A kernel problem occurred, but your kernel has been tainted (flags:GW).
>> Kernel maintainers are unable to diagnose tainted reports.
>>
>> not sure where to look
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 10:23 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >
> >> I got this error report today:
> >>
> >> A kernel problem occurred, but your kernel has been tainted (flags:GW).
> >> Kernel maintainers are unable
On 03/13/2014 08:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
dmesg | grep -i taint
root@JesusChrist ~]# dmesg | grep -i taint
[3.320975] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
[3.320980] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[3.363461] nvidia: module verification failed: signature
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
>
> On 03/13/2014 08:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > dmesg | grep -i taint
> root@JesusChrist ~]# dmesg | grep -i taint
> [3.320975] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
> [3.320980] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
> [
Hi,
For some reason I need kinit which is included in krb5-workstation
(I'm using fc20)
Unfortunately there is some broken dependency in the repo
Do you have any idea how to solve it?
[vlad@tohuvabohu git]$ sudo yum install krb5-workstation-1.11.3-33.fc20.x86_64
Loaded plugins: aliases, changel
When I installed my Fedooa, I had a partion for /, /home, swap, and a
boot. Now, I need to grow my / partition, but when I go to Gparted, I
see /sda4. When I expand that, I have /sda5 and 6. But they don't have
no labels, so it is hard to discern which is which. Help would be
appreciated.
--
users
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:26:17PM +0100, Pal, Laszlo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some reason I need kinit which is included in krb5-workstation
> (I'm using fc20)
>
> Unfortunately there is some broken dependency in the repo
>
> Do you have any idea how to solve it?
>
> [vlad@tohuvabohu git]$ sudo yu
On 03/13/2014 10:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> cat tainted
>> > 512
> that bitmask corresponds to a kernel warning having occurred. i
> would just grep thusly:
>
> $ dmesg | grep -i taint
>
> which might identify the module that tainted the kernel when it was
> loaded.
>
> rday
dmesg | grep
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 11:27 -0400, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> When I installed my Fedooa, I had a partion for /, /home, swap, and a
> boot. Now, I need to grow my / partition, but when I go to Gparted, I
> see /sda4. When I expand that, I have /sda5 and 6. But they don't have
> no labels, so it is har
If you check my output you can see this is what I did exactly :)
Somehow in fc20 krb5-workstation requires a different version of
krb5-libs than other part of the system
L:
On 13 March 2014 16:33, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:26:17PM +0100, Pal, Laszlo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
more room. I went to the correct partition, clicked resize/move, and
that's where I found the current size. Is it because I am booted in to
Fedora that I can
On 13 March 2014 16:20, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Is it because I am booted in to
> Fedora that I can't modify the size?
Probably, yes. It is safest to use a LiveCD or Live USB stick to do
partition manipulation.
--
Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lpro...@cix.
I just rebooted, and got another error with selinux. The error says:
if you want to allow python to have execte access on the file-
You need to change the label on $FIX_TARGET_PATH
# semanage fcontext -a -t FILE_TYPE '$FIX_TARGET_PATH'
where FILE_TYPE is one of the following: abrt_helper_exec_t, bi
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 12:20 -0400, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
> assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
> more room. I went to the correct partition, clicked resize/move, and
> that's where I found th
On 03/13/2014 01:09 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I just rebooted, and got another error with selinux. The error says:
> if you want to allow python to have execte access on the file-
> You need to change the label on $FIX_TARGET_PATH
> # semanage fcontext -a -t FILE_TYPE '$FIX_TARGET_PATH'
> where
On 03/13/2014 10:26 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan issued this missive:
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 12:20 -0400, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
more room. I went to the correct
Hi All;
My shiny new Thinkpad W540 is due to arrive tomorrow. I'm preparing what
I think I might need for the Fedora 20 install.
Nvidia support question, the W540 is equipped with this card:
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 2GB
Anyone have any thoughts on the best video packages that would support
this
Am 13.03.2014 17:20, schrieb Hunter Jozwiak:
Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
more room. I went to the correct partition, clicked resize/move, and
that's where I found the current size. Is
On 03/13/2014 10:39 AM, CS DBA issued this missive:
Hi All;
My shiny new Thinkpad W540 is due to arrive tomorrow. I'm preparing what
I think I might need for the Fedora 20 install.
Nvidia support question, the W540 is equipped with this card:
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 2GB
Anyone have any thoughts o
On 03/13/2014 07:04 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
Making RPMs and yum more efficient is great, don't get me wrong.
Making them faster != making them more efficient if they end up not
updating everything because they're using obsolete metadata. That's
just pushing the time needed for the upgrade into
Quoting CS DBA :
Hi All;
My shiny new Thinkpad W540 is due to arrive tomorrow. I'm preparing
what I think I might need for the Fedora 20 install.
Nvidia support question, the W540 is equipped with this card:
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 2GB
Anyone have any thoughts on the best video packages that wou
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Kevin Martin wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
> > was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
> > which appeared to update well over 200 packages (includi
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> LVM isn't a filesystem, Pat, it's a storage container that holds a
> filesystem. To grow a filesystem on an LVM, you grow the LVM first (if
> it needs more space), then grow the filesystem on it.
Yes, I was aware of a certain lack of precisio
On 03/13/2014 11:58 AM, Robert P. J. Day issued this missive:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum update",
which
On Mar 13, 2014 12:58 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> > On 03/13/2014 07:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > recently, i upgraded my ASUS G74S laptop to fedora rawhide and it
> > > was running nicely. then this morning, i did another "yum upd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/2014 12:00 PM, Pal, Laszlo wrote:
> If you check my output you can see this is what I did exactly :)
> Somehow in fc20 krb5-workstation requires a different version of
> krb5-libs than other part of the system
>
No, you did
sudo yum inst
On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 19:22 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (Sorry for the subject line but it's the best I could come up with)
>>>
>>> I recently installed F20 on a new
On 03/13/2014 12:20 PM, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
more room. I went to the correct partition, clicked resize/move, and
that's where I found the current size. I
On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> $ sudo btrfs fi df /
> ERROR: couldn't get space info - Inappropriate ioctl for device
> ERROR: get_df failed Inappropriate ioctl for device
Right that should have been /home but you already provided that info.
>>
>> So if yours is co
On Mar 13, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 12:20 -0400, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
>> Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
>> assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
>> more room. I went to the corr
On Mar 13, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Am 13.03.2014 17:20, schrieb Hunter Jozwiak:
>> Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
>> assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
>> more room. I went to the correct partitio
On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Doug wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 12:20 PM, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
>> Okay, found it. Now, it says that it is at 20006 megabytes, which I am
>> assuming is it's size. But, I can't move the number upwards to give it
>> more room. I went to the correct partition, clicked resi
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:09:31 -0700
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 07:04 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> > Making RPMs and yum more efficient is great, don't get me wrong.
>
> Making them faster != making them more efficient if they end up not
> updating everything because they're using obsolete metadata
Lawrence E Graves writes:
On 03/13/2014 08:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
dmesg | grep -i taint
root@JesusChrist ~]# dmesg | grep -i taint
[3.320975] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
[3.320980] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[3.363461] nvidia: module ve
Jan Zelený writes:
On 13. 3. 2014 at 13:41:48, Tethys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mark Haney
wrote:
> > So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
> > metadata when I call 'sudo dnf update'? That's how I'm reading this.
> >
> > If that's true, why the dev
On 03/13/2014 05:44 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Lawrence E Graves writes:
On 03/13/2014 08:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
dmesg | grep -i taint
root@JesusChrist ~]# dmesg | grep -i taint
[3.320975] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
[3.320980] Disabling lock debugging due
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 14:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> btrfs fi df /home #this is short for btrfs filesystem df /home
> >
> > $ sudo btrfs fi df /home
> > Data, single: total=78.01GiB, used=73.44GiB
> ^
>
> So this means the data profile is single, which means it's allocating
> i
Yesterday my Fedora 20 automatic updater installed 178 items; one of which
seems to have been KMail.
KMail now says 4.12.3. I believe it was 4.12.2.
Since then,the KMail behaviour has been decidedly strange.
I can read mail, reply to mail and send mail but I cannot delete mail nor save
it to fol
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 14:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > $ sudo btrfs fi df /
> > ERROR: couldn't get space info - Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > ERROR: get_df failed Inappropriate ioctl for device
>
> Right that should have
On Mar 13, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 14:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> And metadata is raid1 so it's mirrored on both devices.
>
> Absolutely no idea how that happened. I definitely did not
> (intentionally at least) ask for RAID1.
It's the defa
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> For what it's worth, if you experience Btrfs problems, using a newer kernel
> is often one of the first steps for solving it. It comes even before running
> btrfs check (a.k.a. btrfsck).
Yes, word on the street is that btrfsck is a last re
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Jan Zelený writes:
>
>> On 13. 3. 2014 at 13:41:48, Tethys wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mark Haney
>> wrote:
>> > > So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
>> > > metadata when I call 'sudo dnf up
Hi
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Making technical decisions for admittingly marketing reasons is, like
> someone else put it, retarded.
>
Have you thought about the possibility that there is a set of tradeoffs
either way and it is a configurable choice for that reaso
On 2014-03-12 08:17, Rex Dieter wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
ATI is known to have a notoriously lousy support for Linux in general
and Fedora in particular. For their low-end and oldish cards,
they provide specs on which the Linux community has built the
open-source radeon driver (which works
I'm the maintainer of the G4L disk imaging project, and have been contacted
by a user that has these machine, but they are freezing on the kernel load
process. I build the kernel on Fedora systems, but the kernels are build from
the kernel.org code. There isn't a panic or anything, it just stops
On 13 March 2014 16:17, Kevin Martin wrote:
[]
> Oh, and one other thing I noticed recently is that something has changed
> in the regex handling. From time to time I would "sudo dnf
> --enablerepo=fedora*testing upgrade" and that worked for awhile but now I
> get an error that the repo fe
On 13 March 2014 16:23, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 10:17 AM, Kevin Martin wrote:
> > I'm with you Mark...CLi all the way with the updates. And I like what
> DNF does with skipping repos it can't find. BTW, if you set
> > "metadata_expire=-1" in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf then the metadata *a
73 matches
Mail list logo