On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:19:44 +1100, Roger wrote:
> > I run x86-64 bit Fedora 19. Have used sudo yum update for years
> > all versions of Fedora, but since a couple of days ago I get an
> > error:
> > --You have an upgrade for openssl-libs which is missing some
> > dependency,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> It's not OK to multipost. You should have crossposted.
It's not OK to crosspost, for the reasons you cite and because replies to
one list aren't generally visible from the other.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:14:48 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> systemd debug is rather verbose. First remove 'rhgb quiet' from the
> linux line,
Never liked a graphical both have been removed for many releases.
//* Daft, I like looking at the text going up. */
found in the grub menu. Highlight t
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing issues with scriptlet failures when installing packages?
happening with every package I install!
Running transaction
Installing : libvirt-daemon-config-network-1.1.3.2-1.fc20.x86_64
1/3
w
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:01:11 +
"s.oreilly" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else seeing issues with scriptlet failures when installing
> packages?
>
> happening with every package I install!
>
Asked and Answered:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/thread.html
___
Reg
That's brilliant. All fixed, thanks very much for your help
Regards
Sean O'Reilly
On Fri 17/01/14 11:03 AM , "Frank Murphy" frankl...@gmail.com sent:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:01:11 +
> "s.oreilly" <
> s.orei...@linnovations.co.uk> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing issues with scr
Hi all,
I've encountered something that seems a little weird and wondering if
anyone has any ideas...
My home server has an ext4 root with a btrfs pool mounted at /data (with a
number of subvolumes in there).
Within /data I am able to do cp --reflink=always between
subvolumes and COW works as
Hi,
After running yum update I got the message below.
I think I am some more hints how to solve this:
Thanks.
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root
cause is something else and multilib version checking is just
p
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:22:28 +0100
Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
> 2. You have multiple architectures of wine-openal installed,
> but yum can only see an upgrade for one of those
> architectures.
I'm guessing option 2,
sort of in that both arches may not have hit the mirror
Allegedly, on or about 15 January 2014, Robert Moskowitz sent:
> Using the Gnome 3.10 settings > sound, all I see is HDMI, Speakers -
> built-in Audio, and Analog Output - Built-in Audio. Speakers is how it
> comes up. The profile is only Analog Stereo Output. The test results
> in no sound from
I got a hold of an old Sony All-in-one I'm trying to refurbish for someone
who could still put an old P4 to use. I've upgraded the memory to 1GB and
the HD from 120GB to 250GB so I think I've got enough horsepower and
storage but the one problem I haven't been able to fix is it seems X REALLY
doesn
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:01:34 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Any ideas? Or should I just scrap it?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
http://w3.sis.com/support/support_faqs_16.htm
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:27:53 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:22:28 +0100
> Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
>
> > 2. You have multiple architectures of wine-openal installed,
> > but yum can only see an upgrade for one of those
> > architectures.
>
>
> I'm g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure I've ever seen this problem before doing updates, but
here it is. I just ran my usual morning yum update on my primary
server at home and I get 3 packages bomb with scriptlet errors during
the update.
Virtually every update in the clean
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
>
> My question is, WTF happened? My system is pretty clean. I never
> install packages by hand, only by either the standard Fedora repos or
> RPMFusion. These were all Fedora repo updates, FWIW. Did anyone else
> see this?
https://lists.fedor
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:49:59 -0500
Mark Haney wrote:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/445569.html
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
So I picked the wrong time to upgrade my laptop from F19 to F20 via yum!
The result was a very large number of RPM scriptlet failures. I've
worked around the fatal errors (with 'setenforce 0'), and I've since
updated my SELinux policy to the updates-testing version that does not
have the problem.
updating my F20 I get this kind of messages!!! with the failure to update
Downloading packages:
nfs-utils-1.2.9-2.1.fc20.i686.rpm | 356 kB
00:01
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
error: %pre(nfs-utils-1:1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/17/2014 10:55 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mark Haney
> wrote:
>>
>> My question is, WTF happened? My system is pretty clean. I
>> never install packages by hand, only by either the standard
>> Fedora repos or RPMFus
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:47:29 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
> updating my F20 I get this kind of messages!!! with the failure to
> update
>
Check the archives for today.
Full details are there.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:46:26 -0500
Mark Haney wrote:
>
> Geez. NEITHER of the two replies I received were useful in any
> meaningful way. That's just lazy, people. If it hadn't been for
> Ian's just posted message, I'd still not know WTF was going on.
It's called reading, this list is archi
Appears to be complaining about changelog date.
But am probable missing something.
wget
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/gnome-bluetooth/3.11.3/1.fc21/src/gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
mock -r fedora-20-x86_64 rebuild gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
build.log:
http://u
Frank Murphy ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 17/01/2014
17:54:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:47:29 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
updating my F20 I get this kind of messages!!! with the failure to
update
Check the archives for today.
Full details are there.
___
Regards,
Frank
www
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:46:26 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 1/17/2014 10:55 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Mark Haney
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> My question is, WTF happened? My system is pretty clean. I
> >> never install packages by hand, only by either th
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:05:58 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
> I saw archive just after sending the message (shame on me): I updated
> to selinux policy in updates-testing, that seems to solve the
> problem: any action to do toclean the system or the system will be
> cleared by itself??
>
I don
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:39:34AM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> So I picked the wrong time to upgrade my laptop from F19 to F20 via yum!
>
> The result was a very large number of RPM scriptlet failures. I've
> worked around the fatal errors (with 'setenforce 0'), and I've since
> updated my SELinu
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:05:58PM +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
> Frank Murphy ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 17/01/2014
> 17:54:
> >On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:47:29 +0100
> >antonio montagnani wrote:
> >
> >>updating my F20 I get this kind of messages!!! with the failure to
> >>u
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:01:03PM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Appears to be complaining about changelog date.
> But am probable missing something.
>
> wget
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/gnome-bluetooth/3.11.3/1.fc21/src/gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
>
> mock -r fedora-20
On 01/17/2014 06:01 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Appears to be complaining about changelog date.
But am probable missing something.
Yes, it fails due to the compilation missing symbols.
C.f. lines 221-300 of your build.log
You'll see plenty of "implict decl" warnings and "undefined reference"
erro
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:53:36PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:01:03PM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > Appears to be complaining about changelog date.
> > But am probable missing something.
> >
> > wget
> > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/gnome-bluetooth/3.11.3
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:05:58 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
> I saw archive just after sending the message (shame on me): I updated to
> selinux policy in updates-testing, that seems to solve the problem: any
> action to do toclean the system or the system will be cleared by itself??
Hard to
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:55:22 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 06:01 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > Appears to be complaining about changelog date.
> > But am probable missing something.
>
> Yes, it fails due to the compilation missing symbols.
>
> C.f. lines 221-300 of your build.log
>
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Murphy"
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, 17 January, 2014 10:07:01
Subject: Re: mock fail under F20
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:55:22 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 06:01 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > Appears to be complaining abou
# yum install x2go\*
…
Running transaction
Installing : nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc20.i686
1/47
warning: %post(nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc20.i686) scriptlet failed, exit
status 127
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package
nx-libs-3
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote:
> To X2Go or not to X2Go!?
>
>
Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I
installed it fine a few weeks ago. There have been several reports of
failed scriplets among various packages.
Richard
--
users mailing list
use
On 01/15/2014 04:40 PM, Quicksort wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed Fedora 18, 19 or 20 in dual boot
with Windows 8/8.1 ?
How does the installation process differ from setting up a
Fedora/Windows 7 or XP dual boot ?
Are there pitfalls one should know about ?
I have install F19 on a sy
On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote:
>
>> To X2Go or not to X2Go!?
>>
>>
> Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I
> installed it fine a few weeks ago. There have been several reports of
> failed scriplets among
Hi,
I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
$ ip neigh | grep REACHABLE | grep
But this seems rather unrealiable. Often the reported addresses are not
up to date (e.g. offline devices sti
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote:
> >
> >> To X2Go or not to X2Go!?
> >>
> >>
> > Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I
> > installed it fine a few
On 01/17/2014 01:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
> assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
>
> $ ip neigh | grep REACHABLE | grep
>
> But this seems rather unrealiable. Often the repor
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Can someone point me in the right direction?
Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
Get a better router that allows configuration of
permanent mac <-> ipaddr mapping so you can just
put the names in a hosts file?
I've got a
On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote:
>>>
To X2Go or not to X2Go!?
>>> Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a proble
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > Can someone point me in the right direction?
>
> Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
My landlord owns the router. I think the easiest setup for me would
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:39:00PM +0100, poma wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote:
> >> On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote:
> >>>
> To X2Go or not to X2Go!?
>
>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:26:40PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 01:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
> > assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
> >
> > $ ip neigh | grep REACHA
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:42:17 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> My landlord owns the router.
You could connect another router to it and run all your
stuff on a different subnet with a helpful router.
> I was under the impression all the ip commands were supposed to be
> replacements for arp, am I wrong?
On 17.01.2014 20:44, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:39:00PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote:
On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote:
>
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote:
> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux.
Not really. You might want to run
semodule -B
instead.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
I just ran yum update and, when the updater tries to install the
new/uninstall the old nfs-utils, I see this message:
error: %pre(nfs-utils-1:1.2.9-2.1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit
status 127
Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package 1:nfs-utils-1.2.9-2.1.fc20.x86_64
1:nfs-utils-1.2.8-6.0.f
On 17.01.2014 21:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote:
>
>> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux.
>
> Not really. You might want to run
>
> semodule -B
>
> instead.
# semodule -v -B
Committing changes:
Ok: transaction number 0.
# yum --enabl
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> I just ran yum update and, when the updater tries to install the
> new/uninstall the old nfs-utils, I see this message:
>
> error: %pre(nfs-utils-1:1.2.9-2.1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit
> status 127
>
Follow the steps outlined
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:53:50 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 21:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote:
> >
> >> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux.
> >
> > Not really. You might want to run
> >
> > semodule -B
> >
> > instead.
>
> # se
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Follow the steps outlined in the answer at
>
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/39213/known-issue-scriptlet-errors-while-installingupgrading-packages-using-yumdnfrpm/
Thanks. That solved it ;-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 20:42 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
> > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone point me in the right direction?
> >
> > Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
>
Allegedly, on or about 17 January 2014, Suvayu Ali sent:
> I can't setup my computers to use fixed ip as they are portables and
> leave the house.
Theoretically, you can. You're in the realms of customising something
like NetworkManager, here. Which some people have no troubles with,
while othe
On 01/17/2014 02:05 PM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Follow the steps outlined in the answer at
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/39213/known-issue-scriptlet-errors-while-installingupgrading-packages-using-yumdnfrpm/
Thanks. That solved it ;-)
It didn't solve mine. I foll
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Frank:
>
> When I tried to wget the file, I get the following, after which there
> it would be pointless to follow with the mock command:
>
> bash:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/gnome-bluetooth/3.11.3/1.fc21/sr
On 17.01.2014 21:59, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:53:50 +0100, poma wrote:
>
>> On 17.01.2014 21:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote:
>>>
This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux.
>>>
>>> Not really. You might want to run
>>
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> It didn't solve mine. I followed all the instructions and it still will
> not install.
Please provide more details about your problem. What was the commands you
ran and what was the problem?
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lis
# yum reinstall x2go\* libXcomp\* libssh libNX\* nx\*
No hay errores! :)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-condu
On 01/17/2014 02:25 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
It didn't solve mine. I followed all the instructions and it still
will not install.
Please provide more details about your problem. What was the commands
you ran and what wa
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Lawrence E Graves < wrote:
>
>
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/39213/known-issue-scriptlet-errors-while-installingupgrading-packages-using-yumdnfrpm/The
> commands located in this site. I am trying to install nfs-utils update.
>
You aren't still pro
Hi Richard,
Two comments:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:28:25AM -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
>
> --
^^
Lately all your posts seemed like accidental sends before completely
composing the whole message to me. Today I realised why.
You are using "-- " to separate your response from the quote a
On 01/17/2014 02:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Lawrence E Graves < wrote:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/39213/known-issue-scriptlet-errors-while-installingupgrading-packages-using-yumdnfrpm/
The commands located in this site. I am trying t
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> [root@Jehovah ~]# yum -y update
>
This isn't the set of commands outlined in the link I provided earlier.
# setenforce 0
# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy
# setenforce 1
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@
On 01/17/2014 03:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
[root@Jehovah ~]# yum -y update
This isn't the set of commands outlined in the link I provided earlier.
# setenforce 0
# |yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy
|
On 01/17/2014 03:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
[root@Jehovah ~]# yum -y update
This isn't the set of commands outlined in the link I provided earlier.
# setenforce 0
# |yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy
|
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
>
> On 01/17/2014 03:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
>
>
>
>> [root@Jehovah ~]# yum -y update
>>
>
> This isn't the set of commands outlined in the link I provided
Hello,
I updated my machine to fc20 and now my praphics application fails:
Even the example:
use PDL;
use PDL::Graphics::PLplot;
my $pl = PDL::Graphics::PLplot->new (DEV => "png", FILE => "test.png");
my $x = sequence(10);
my $y = $x**2;
$pl->xyplot($x, $y);
$pl->close;
fails:
Se
On 01/17/2014 03:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
|yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy|
[root@Jehovah ~]# setenforce 0
[root@Jehovah ~]# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
updates-testing/20/x86_64/m
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:27:48 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> [root@Jehovah ~]# setenforce 0
> [root@Jehovah ~]# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
> updates-testing/20/x86_64/metalink | 16 k
On 01/17/2014 04:34 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:27:48 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
[root@Jehovah ~]# setenforce 0
[root@Jehovah ~]# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update selinux-policy
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
updates-testing/20/x
Hi Suvayu, and anybody else who cares - assuming that Suvayu cares - about the
issue:
This is originally how this server has set the return mail as; I can possibly
talk to the university computer people about fixing the program so that I can
have the option of bottom-post correctly, such that i
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Quicksort wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed Fedora 18, 19 or 20 in dual boot with
> Windows 8/8.1 ?
> How does the installation process differ from setting up a Fedora/Windows 7
> or XP dual boot ?
> Are there pitfalls one should know about ?
I started m
On 01/17/2014 11:46 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> You should reinstall all the packages that had a scriptlet failure but
> were able to install. I had the same issue, in my case however I was
> trying to install a few new packages. So I simply did yum history undo,
> and repeated the original command.
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 11:46 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > You should reinstall all the packages that had a scriptlet failure but
> > were able to install. I had the same issue, in my case however I was
> > trying to install a few new packages. So I
Allegedly, on or about 17 January 2014, Richard Vickery sent:
> If anyone knows of an email server I can use until I get a break, can
> find and read my Linux books on setting up an old Pentium Celeron box
> that at the moment has Microsoft's shit on it with a mail server, or
> can pick a Linux ser
On 17 January 2014 22:45, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> I just ran yum update and, when the updater tries to install the
> new/uninstall the old nfs-utils, I see this message:
>
> error: %pre(nfs-utils-1:1.2.9-2.1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit
> status 127
> Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package
On 01/17/2014 08:13 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
Hi Suvayu, and anybody else who cares - assuming that Suvayu cares -
about the issue:
This is originally how this server has set the return mail as; I can
possibly talk to the university computer people about fixing the
program so that I can have
Hello,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212#c24
Being hit by the mysteriously appearing /var/run/nologin (Thanks,
systemd...). Keen for a fix, seems one should be available now.
Is anyone else actually seeing systemd-208-11 showing up? I only see
systemd-208-9, which is broken. Do
Hi
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Dan Irwin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212#c24
>
> Being hit by the mysteriously appearing /var/run/nologin (Thanks,
> systemd...). Keen for a fix, seems one should be available now.
>
> Is anyone else actually seeing
81 matches
Mail list logo
