On 12/04/2013 11:14 PM, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Subject:
Fedora's audience
From:
Beartooth
Date:
Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:25:02 + (UTC)
Hi all,
Going on 72, worked with computors(!) before they became computers
(started 1963) using Fedora since FC6, both on desktop & lapto
> On 12/04/2013 10:25 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> > By this time, at an informed guess, the Boomers must be retiring
> > in spates and floods. My subjective impression is that I see more fellow
> > retirees than before, but I can't guess numbers. Does anyone here have
> > such numbers, or know of a
Hi,
>>> By this time, at an informed guess, the Boomers must be
retiring
>>> in spates and floods. My subjective impression is that I
see more
>>> fellow
>>> retirees than before, but I can't guess numbers.
Does anyone here
>>> have
>>> such numbers, or know of a source from
whence to get the
Hi all,
i've recently reinstalled my previous distro with fc20-beta and observing
strange ssh tunels disconnection. i'm establishing tunels in this way:
ssh -2fCN -p ${non-default port} -L ${local_port}:${endpoint}:{$endpoint_port}
${login}@${gatE}.
after some time (mostly few minutes) all unus
On 5 December 2013 11:59, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i've recently reinstalled my previous distro with fc20-beta and observing
> strange ssh tunels disconnection. i'm establishing tunels in this way:
>
> ssh -2fCN -p ${non-default port} -L ${local_port}:${endpoint}:{$endpoint_port}
> ${logi
On 05.12.2013 16:04, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 11:59, Paweł Sikora wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i've recently reinstalled my previous distro with fc20-beta and observing
>> strange ssh tunels disconnection. i'm establishing tunels in this way:
>>
>> ssh -2fCN -p ${non-default
On 04.12.2013 23:35, Jehan Procaccia wrote:
>
> would remove gnome-initial-setup package be a solution without bad side
> effect ?
Yes, you can safely remove this package without any negative
consequences. I did it in the past on some network managed boxes and all
those systems work perfectly. I
On 05.12.2013 16:24, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 04.12.2013 23:35, Jehan Procaccia wrote:
>>
>> would remove gnome-initial-setup package be a solution without bad side
>> effect ?
>
> Yes, you can safely remove this package without any negative
> consequences. I did it in the past on some net
Quoting "Carlos \"casep\" Sepulveda" :
On 5 December 2013 11:59, Paweł Sikora wrote:
Hi all,
i've recently reinstalled my previous distro with fc20-beta and observing
strange ssh tunels disconnection. i'm establishing tunels in this way:
ssh -2fCN -p ${non-default port} -L
${local_port}:$
On 5 December 2013 12:22, poma wrote:
> Are you able to direct people to the proper lists!?
Well, the ConnectTimeout parameter in ssh_config is by default 1, (and
he need to set it ot 0), in any Fedora, so it isn't a "Fedora 20"
issue. Unless he already has it on 0 and it's not working, then cou
On 05.12.2013 16:31, poma wrote:
> On 05.12.2013 16:24, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 04.12.2013 23:35, Jehan Procaccia wrote:
>>>
>>> would remove gnome-initial-setup package be a solution without bad side
>>> effect ?
>>
>> Yes, you can safely remove this package without any negative
>> conse
On 05.12.2013 16:33, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 12:22, poma wrote:
>> Are you able to direct people to the proper lists!?
>
>
> Well, the ConnectTimeout parameter in ssh_config is by default 1, (and
> he need to set it ot 0), in any Fedora, so it isn't a "Fedora 20"
> i
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM, wrote:
> if you want numbers, you should setup a web pool. E-mail replies, no
> matter how nice they are, won't give you numbers.
And any such numbers will be self-selecting and hence unreliable. I don' t
know how many people are on this list, but regular poste
On Thursday 05 of December 2013 12:04:07 Carlos casep Sepulveda wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 11:59, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i've recently reinstalled my previous distro with fc20-beta and observing
> > strange ssh tunels disconnection. i'm establishing tunels in this way:
> >
> >
On Thursday 05 of December 2013 10:34:02 John Aldrich wrote:
> Quoting "Carlos \"casep\" Sepulveda" :
> > On 5 December 2013 11:59, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> i've recently reinstalled my previous distro with fc20-beta and observing
> >> strange ssh tunels disconnection. i'm estab
I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be
able to install Fedora-20 on it from an exiting F-20-beta iso file
already on this same computer. I can't seem to find any instructions for
doing this. No matter what I have asked Google it keeps telling me how
to make an
On 05.12.2013 20:20, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be
> able to install Fedora-20 on it from an exiting F-20-beta iso file
> already on this same computer. I can't seem to find any instructions for
> doing this. No
On 05/12/13 14:30, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Maybe this will help you (section: How to test):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_repository_Hard_drive_variation
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
Well I couldn't make that work, after messing for a while I figured
dvd's are cheaper t
On 05.12.2013 19:13, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> here's example debug log from short web session (firefox+ 2x page reload
> +quit) via tunnel.
>
> (... authorization cut ...)
https://fpaste.org
&
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
poma
--
users mailing
On 05.12.2013 20:20, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be
> able to install Fedora-20 on it from an exiting F-20-beta iso file
> already on this same computer. I can't seem to find any instructions for
> doing this.
On 12/5/2013 9:15 PM, poma wrote:
> On 05.12.2013 20:20, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>
>> I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be
>> able to install Fedora-20 on it from an exiting F-20-beta iso file
>> already on this same computer. I can't seem to f
On 05/12/13 21:15, poma wrote:
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
poma
But the problem is that Fedora-19 wont boot, forget F-20b! Got to fix
F-19's grub.
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
Box 10 Fedora-19/64 XFCE Linux
--
users mailing list
users@
On 12/5/2013 10:02 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 05/12/13 21:15, poma wrote:
>> F20 ain't an official, so
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>>
>>
>> poma
>
> But the problem is that Fedora-19 wont boot, forget F-20b! Got to fix
> F-19's grub.
>
Can't s
On 05/12/13 22:11, David wrote:
>
> But the problem is that Fedora-19 wont boot, forget F-20b! Got to fix
> F-19's grub.
>
Can't say about Fedora 19 so this is a 'try this' and I really don't
like 'try this' suggestions.
But... In the past I have booted the *same version* disk and told it to
*
On 12/06/2013 02:20 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 05/12/13 22:11, David wrote:
>
> But the problem is that Fedora-19 wont boot, forget F-20b! Got to fix
> F-19's grub.
>
Can't say about Fedora 19 so this is a 'try this' and I really don't
like 'try this' suggestions.
But...
On 12/5/2013 10:20 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 05/12/13 22:11, David wrote:
>>> >
>>> > But the problem is that Fedora-19 wont boot, forget F-20b! Got to fix
>>> > F-19's grub.
>>> >
>> Can't say about Fedora 19 so this is a 'try this' and I really don't
>> like 'try this' sug
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:27:01PM -0500, David wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 9:15 PM, poma wrote:
> > On 05.12.2013 20:20, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> >>
> >> I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be
> >> able to install Fedora-20 on it from an exiting F-20-b
On 05/12/13 22:33, Roger wrote:
I thought Fedora Linux was a friendly install, didn't overwrite other
systems like Windows does? Something has changed ...
Bob
Doesn't usually overwrite unless told to.. hope nothing's changes with
the install?
roger
I thought I knew how to deal with the in
On 12/5/2013 10:49 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:27:01PM -0500, David wrote:
>> On 12/5/2013 9:15 PM, poma wrote:
>>> On 05.12.2013 20:20, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be
able
On 06.12.2013 04:02, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> But the problem is that Fedora-19 wont boot, forget F-20b! Got to fix
> F-19's grub.
Roger that.
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:20 PM, "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA"
wrote:
>
> I thought Fedora Linux was a friendly install, didn't overwrite other systems
> like Windows does?
No installer should overwrite itself or another system without it being clear
it's doing so, or ideally only possible
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:41 PM, David wrote:
>
> A Live-CD (DVD) will, all that I know of, *always* over write an
> existing install.
That's definitely not the default behavior with the Fedora installer since
Fedora 18. With Fedora 17 and older, the default option was to replace existing
Linux, a
On 12/06/2013 02:48 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 05/12/13 22:33, Roger wrote:
I thought Fedora Linux was a friendly install, didn't overwrite
other systems like Windows does? Something has changed ...
Bob
Doesn't usually overwrite unless told to.. hope nothing's changes
w
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Roger wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 02:48 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> On 05/12/13 22:33, Roger wrote:
I thought Fedora Linux was a friendly install, didn't overwrite other
systems like Windows does? Something has changed ...
B
34 matches
Mail list logo
