On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John Horne wrote:
> I may take a stab at rebuilding the
> F20 source RPMS of evolution and evolution-data-server on my F19 system,
> but it may be too dependent on other things for it to work.
>
It depends on large parts of Gnome, so I wouldn't expect it to be eas
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:42:38 +0100
John Horne wrote:
and I see that F20/21
> will be using branches 3.9 and 3.10. I may take a stab at
> rebuilding the F20 source RPMS of evolution and
> evolution-data-server on my F19 system, but it may be too dependent
> on other things for it to work.
>
why n
Hi all,
having a (smaller) problem: during booting with grub2, I see some grub2
(error) messages disappearing before the grub menu appears on the screen.
How to keep these messages or how to delay grub if these messages appear?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
Ke
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:45:33 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having a (smaller) problem: during booting with grub2, I see some
> grub2 (error) messages disappearing before the grub menu appears on
> the screen.
>
Maybe?
journalctl | grep grub2
sudo /cat/var/log/messages | grep grub2
> Are you sure, should not be '-smp 4,sockets=1,cores=2,threads=4' for
> dual core / quad thread CPU?
sockets=1,cores=2,threads=4 will emulate a non existing (in the x86
world) dual core / 8 threads CPU.
If you want to emulate a 6 core Xeon CPU, you'll need
sockets=1,cores=6,threads=2.
- Gilboa
-
On 20 October 2013 12:45, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having a (smaller) problem: during booting with grub2, I see some grub2
> (error) messages disappearing before the grub menu appears on the screen.
>
> How to keep these messages or how to delay grub if these messages appear?
>
> Kind r
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> I was locked out and was able to get back in by going to a VT and killing
> the cinnamon-screensaver process.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019405
The updates-testing packages from
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote:
> rpm -qa | wc -l
Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible?
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.
--
users mailing
On 10/20/2013 11:45 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>
>> rpm -qa | wc -l
>
> Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible?
>
I would say yes. This is what I got on my system.
[mlapier@mushroom ~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l
1594
[mlapier@m
On 20/10/13 11:45, Beartooth wrote:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote:
rpm -qa | wc -l
Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible?
[bobg@box10 ~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l
1618
and 1561 on another similar system both running F-19 64 bit installed
from XF
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:00:11 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>> Is there a FedDown lurking out
>> there somewhere?
>
> You can always try `yum --releasever=18 distro-sync'. But it goes
> without saying, there are no guarantees whatsover.
Hi,
An upgrade to Thunderbird 24 (Fedora 19) broke integration with Gnome
Shell notification mechanism. Currently the notification are displayed
using the default Thunderbird notification mechanism instead of the
Gnome Shell one (as it has worked with Gnome 3 since I remember).
I wonder if it is
On 10/20/2013 12:04 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:00:11 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>> Is there a FedDown lurking out
>>> there somewhere?
>>
>> You can always try `yum --releasever=18 distro-sync'. But it goes
>> w
# yum abracadabra *poof!*
:-P
On 10/20/2013 1:16 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
H? I wonder if there's a yum command that will change a i686
system to a x86_64 system of the same release.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https:/
On 10/20/2013 02:28 PM, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> # yum abracadabra *poof!*
>
> :-P
>
> On 10/20/2013 1:16 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> H? I wonder if there's a yum command that will change a i686
>> system to a x86_64 system of the same release.
>
LOL!!!
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark
Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An upgrade to Thunderbird 24 (Fedora 19) broke integration with Gnome
> Shell notification mechanism. Currently the notification are displayed
> using the default Thunderbird notification mechanism instead of the
> Gnome Shell one (as it has worked with Gnome
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:45:05 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>
> > rpm -qa | wc -l
>
> Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible?
>
[fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l
2351
[fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ uname -r
3.11.4-101.fc
You may try rpmreaper, it's like aptitude for RPM based systems, for easier
package management.
2013/10/19 Beartooth
>
> I'm sitting here watching F19 try to downgrade itself to F18,
> with screenful after screenful flashing by. I know that, if/when it
> completes, it will tell me how m
On 10/20/2013 05:36 PM, Fred Erickson wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:45:05 + (UTC)
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>>
>>> rpm -qa | wc -l
>>
>> Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible?
>>
>
> [fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ rpm -qa
2013/10/21 Doug
> On 10/20/2013 05:36 PM, Fred Erickson wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:45:05 + (UTC)
> > Beartooth wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:36:01 +0100, John Horne wrote:
> >>
> >>> rpm -qa | wc -l
> >>
> >> Thanks! That told me 2377; does this number seem plausible?
>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Doug wrote:
> I don't know what this is counting--I must have missed the first post.
> Anyway, I ran it in my pclos-kde-32, and go this:
>
> [doug@linux1 ~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l
> 2352
>
> So what is it that I have 2352 of?
>
"rpm -qa" lists all installed packages
21 matches
Mail list logo
