Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:28:59 +0800,
Lingxian Guo a écrit :
>Just but unfamiliar，I am using Fedora 18 64bit .The plugin of the Adobe
>Flash Player should be installed to Firefox,I do not know how to do?
Install adobe-release-x86_64, after : yum install flash-plugin.
--
M.B
--
users mailing lis
On 10.06.2013 03:39, poma wrote:
> On 06.06.2013 10:30, Gerhard Gappmeier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to get F18 installed on a server (x86_64). The setup is quiet
>> easy
>> and typical for a server:
>>
>> Partitions:
>> sda1: primary partition, 512M
>> sda2: primary partition, rest of th
On 10.06.2013 09:35, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Could you give here a hint about how to create such layout? I was trying
> to do LVM on RAID1 but I was only able to create file systems on RAID
> devices or on LVM volumes but not to combine them together. I must be
> missing something in GUI.
S
Few moments ago I report bug, but against wrong package (I report it
as x11vnc bug, but it seems be libvncserver bug). How I can change
to which component bug belongs to?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:17:13 +0200
poma wrote:
> Well then, does it work or not!? :)
> It seems that you are mixing up Nvidia blob and Nouveau, in a way the
Sorry - should have said nouveau gives no sound.
It was definitely not muted, the device really did
think it could talk HDMI, but "test spea
I am considering entering the tablet market with the upcoming Fedora 19
release and I like the features of the Dell Ultrabook XPS 12
(http://www.dell.com/us/p/xps-12-l221x/pd?&~ck=mn).
Could anyone share experiences with Fedora/KDE/Linux and the XPS 12 in
particular, or be able to point me to w
On 06/10/13 18:11, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Few moments ago I report bug, but against wrong package (I report it
> as x11vnc bug, but it seems be libvncserver bug). How I can change
> to which component bug belongs to?
Have you tried using the pull-down menu in the bugzilla for "component" ?
--
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/10/13 18:11, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> Few moments ago I report bug, but against wrong package (I report it
>> as x11vnc bug, but it seems be libvncserver bug). How I can change
>> to which component bug belongs to?
>
> Have you tried using the pull-down menu in the bug
On 06/10/13 19:05, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/10/13 18:11, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>>> Few moments ago I report bug, but against wrong package (I report it
>>> as x11vnc bug, but it seems be libvncserver bug). How I can change
>>> to which component bug belongs to?
>> Ha
Cannot get X to autostart
Have to append telinit 3 to kernel line,
(cannot login at prompt)
then alt+F2 at the command prompt.
startx
Have uploaded /var/log/Xorg.0.log:
http://fpaste.org/17645/
lspci:
http://ur1.ca/e9nlt
--
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
-Original Message-
From: Ranjan Maitra [mailto:maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:36 AM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Wireless networking degraded with Fedora 18
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:24:05 + "Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)"
wrote:
> I h
"T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, lee wrote:
>> Same result, no packages marked for sync. It doesn't do anything and
>> the packages from 17 remain installed along with the ones from 18.
>
> Hmm, maybe your repository configuration is still unhappy? What does
> `y
"T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
>> Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
>> seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>>
>> Dupes are all gone now, it didn't find any. I have orphaned packages:
>
>
> I wouldn
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
lee wrote:
d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>
> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
> However, I have now the two directories, "17" and "18", in
> /var/cache/yum/x86_64/. Shouldn't that somehow be cleaned?
>
I
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:29:37 +0200
lee wrote:
>
> When I attempt remove these, yum wants to remove packages from 18 as
> well due to dependencies. Are there packages in 18 that depend on
> packages from 17, and why would that be?
>
Not all pkgs marked *fc17* are from Fedora 17,
there can be a
> Try adding to the ServerArgsLocal line in /etc/kde/kdm/kdmrc. I'm assuming
> your running kdm and not gdm.
thank you, it worked!
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
G
Am 10.06.2013 16:34, schrieb lee:
>> This is exactly what `yum distro-sync` is supposed to do. Figuring
>> out why it's unhappy is the first step to getting your system back
>> into working order.
>
> Maybe there's nothing to sync because yum figures this is Fedora 18?
distro-sync does not car
Am 10.06.2013 16:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
> lee wrote:
> d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>>
>> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
>> However, I have now the two directories, "17" and "18", in
>> /var/cache
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:43 AM, lee wrote:
> "T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
>>> Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
>>> seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>>>
>>> Dupes are all gone now, it didn't
Frank Murphy writes:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
> lee wrote:
> d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>>
>> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
>> However, I have now the two directories, "17" and "18", in
>> /var/cache/yum/x86_64/. Shouldn
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 10.06.2013 16:34, schrieb lee:
>>> This is exactly what `yum distro-sync` is supposed to do. Figuring
>>> out why it's unhappy is the first step to getting your system back
>>> into working order.
>>
>> Maybe there's nothing to sync because yum figures this is Fedora
Frank Murphy writes:
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:29:37 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>
>>
>> When I attempt remove these, yum wants to remove packages from 18 as
>> well due to dependencies. Are there packages in 18 that depend on
>> packages from 17, and why would that be?
>>
>
> Not all pkgs marked *fc1
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 10.06.2013 16:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
>> lee wrote:
>> d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>>>
>>> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
>>> However, I have now the two directories, "
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2013, lee sent:
> Sounds good, but I don't know if that might remove files which are
> still needed ...
Nothing should need to be kept in the cache, if anything is needed in
the future, it will be redownloaded.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.8.13-100.fc
About installing the plugin of the Adobe Flash Player for Firefox,I know
the file of libflashplayer.so should be copied to
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugin.By Terminal,after I input the command of sudo
cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins,the result is username
is not in sudoers folder,this wil
On 06/10/2013 08:57 PM, Lingxian Guo wrote:
About installing the plugin of the Adobe Flash Player for Firefox,I know
the file of libflashplayer.so should be copied to
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugin.By Terminal,after I input the command of sudo
cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins,the result
On 06/10/2013 06:10 PM, Doug wrote:
You need to edit the sudoers file. You should find a copy that works
and make yours look like that. (Hint: you need to add a line with
your user name and the word ALL in it.) You can edit it with any
editor, or if you know vi, then you can use visudo. You will
"T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:43 AM, lee wrote:
>> "T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>>>
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 11.06.2013 01:43, schrieb lee:> Reindl Harald
> writes:
>>> distro-sync is supposed to upgrade/downgrade all packages to the exact
>>> versions in the online-repos and in case you had updates-testing
>>> enabled as example the way to go to revert this in a predictable
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:54:54 +0200
poma wrote:
> On 09.06.2013 00:46, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 08:14:34PM +, Beartooth wrote:
> >>Iirc, there has always been a way to do a fresh install
> >> off the Net, though I've never had the confidence to try it. But
> >> the
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:10:34 -0400
...snip
> You need to edit the sudoers file. You should find a copy that works
> and make yours look like that. (Hint: you need to add a line with
> your user name and the word ALL in it.) You can edit it with any
> editor, or if you know vi, then you can
31 matches
Mail list logo
