Re: Apple Mac can't access NFS -

2013-06-07 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 07/06/13 00:02, poma wrote: Haha cats everywhere, Panthera pardus, Schrödinger's cat, Spherical Cow, … Bob you can literally try all options, http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/10.5/man8/mount_nfs.8.html poma I didn't know there were OSX man pag

Re: Apple Mac can't access NFS -

2013-06-07 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 07 June 2013, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA sent: > I didn't know there were OSX man pages! If we dropped the hint that OSX is a based on BSD (a real UNIX), would that help you? Of course what works on one doesn't necessarily mean that it'll work on the other in the sam

Re: Flash plugin RPM installed but not being used by Firefix

2013-06-07 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 07 June 2013, Michael Schwendt sent: > Does "nspluginwrapper.i686" still work with the Flash plugin on > x86_64? > > $ yum search wrapper firefox|grep 86 > nspluginwrapper.i686 : A compatibility layer for Netscape 4 plugins Mine has it installed. And I've been viewing

Re: Apple Mac can't access NFS -

2013-06-07 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 07/06/13 08:40, Tim wrote: If we dropped the hint that OSX is a based on BSD (a real UNIX), would that help you? No I am well aware of that but it never occurred to me to look for man pages since Apple seems to do their best to conceal everything [my impression]. I do know enough to root aro

Re: Firewalld - list tables?

2013-06-07 Thread Thomas Woerner
On 05/17/2013 01:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 17.05.2013 13:26, schrieb John Horne: However, 'firewall-cmd' offers both the '--get-chains' and '--get-rules' options, but these both require specifying which table is to be used. How do I know what the tables are? There is no '--get-tables' opt

Re: Firewall and DNS caching without NetworkManager

2013-06-07 Thread Thomas Woerner
On 05/18/2013 03:41 PM, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar wrote: Hello all, I've just installed Fedora 18 X86-64. I disabled and uninstalled networkmanager and use the standard networking stuff which seems to use dhclient. I'm using a standard ethernet connection. So I need to do two things

Re: Flash plugin RPM installed but not being used by Firefix

2013-06-07 Thread Rex Dieter
Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 06 June 2013, Gary Stainburn sent: >> [gary@gary ~]$ rpm -qa|grep firefox >> firefox-21.0-3.fc17.x86_64 > > x86_64 means 64-bit > >> [gary@gary ~]$ rpm -qa|grep flash >> flash-plugin-11.2.202.285-release.i386 > > i386 means 32-bit > > Probably isn't compatib

Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Jim
Fedora 18 I have installed ; Icedtea-web java-1.7.0-openjdk But http://gopro.com can't see any java installed. In Firefox plugins you can see the Icedtea plugin. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Frank Murphy
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:26:59 -0400 Jim wrote: > But http://gopro.com can't see any java installed. > In Firefox plugins you can see the Icedtea plugin. Where does it need the Java? -- Regards, Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorapr

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Jim
On 06/07/2013 05:40 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:26:59 -0400 Jim wrote: But http://gopro.com can't see any java installed. In Firefox plugins you can see the Icedtea plugin. Where does it need the Java? http://gopro.com/support/product-registration/hd-hero3-cameras -- user

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Frank Murphy
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:43:39 -0400 Jim wrote: > >> But http://gopro.com can't see any java installed. > >> In Firefox plugins you can see the Icedtea plugin. > > Where does it need the Java? > > > http://gopro.com/support/product-registration/hd-hero3-cameras Works fine here, if you click procee

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Jim
On 06/07/2013 05:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: if you click proceed to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. if you click proceed to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. Popup Where ?? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread antonio
Jim ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 07/06/2013 23:53: On 06/07/2013 05:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: if you click proceed to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. if you click proceed to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. Popup Where ?? I suppose that Frank has Selinux disable

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Fred Erickson
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 23:56:20 +0200 antonio wrote: > Jim ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 07/06/2013 23:53: > > On 06/07/2013 05:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > >> if you click proceed > >> to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. > > > > if you click proceed > > to "unsigned certific

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Germán A. Racca
On 06/07/2013 07:04 PM, Fred Erickson wrote: On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 23:56:20 +0200 antonio wrote: Jim ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 07/06/2013 23:53: On 06/07/2013 05:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: if you click proceed to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. if you click pro

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/08/13 05:56, antonio wrote: > Jim ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 07/06/2013 23:53: >> On 06/07/2013 05:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: >>> if you click proceed >>> to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. >> >> if you click proceed >> to "unsigned certificate" in a popup. >> >> >

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 08 June 2013, Ed Greshko sent: > FWIW, the link provided seems to be a process to upgrade the camera's > firmware. Not sure how well that will work under Linux > anyway :-) Unless they've changed their technique, the firmware update was done by putting a file onto a SD

Re: Website can't see Java

2013-06-07 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/08/13 08:57, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 08 June 2013, Ed Greshko sent: >> FWIW, the link provided seems to be a process to upgrade the camera's >> firmware. Not sure how well that will work under Linux >> anyway :-) > Unless they've changed their technique, the firmware update