On 11/23/2012 03:16 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:39:21 +0800 Ed Greshko
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2012 12:27 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> sudo blkid -p /dev/sdb
>>> error: /dev/sdb: No medium found
>>>
>>> sudo blkid -p /dev/sdc
>>> error: /dev/sdc: No medium found
>>>
>>>
>>> B
-Saw an update for my motherboard[1]. Cool!
-Downloaded the update and applied it.
-System wouldn't boot. Cannot find a boot drive. Hard drive
is detected... but won't boot?
-Downgrade to old UEFI, play with settings. Still won't boot.
-Google.
-Find http://www.rodsbooks.com/efi-bootloaders/insta
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:45:17AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> -Saw an update for my motherboard[1]. Cool!
> -Downloaded the update and applied it.
> -System wouldn't boot. Cannot find a boot drive. Hard drive
> is detected... but won't boot?
> -Downgrade to old UEFI, play with settings. S
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 14:32:56 PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Use --modify-window=1
this seems enough to make the problem disappear, without mounting the
file system Harald suggested. (I prefer not to do that because
sometimes I have to do this on boxes on which I have no root password
and/or c
Gary Kline wrote:
> Question: will new brand new fedora CD have this "efibootmgr"
> or do I have to goto the rodsbooks.com url and fmess around?
Yes, it should have it.
The alternative is to try and copy the /boot/efi/EFI/redhat folder to
/boot/efi/EFI/boot and inside of the new folde
Hi,
I am trying to build my own rpm for mutt. I am using the spec file from
the Fedora srpm. During the build it fails on the following command.
if test -f $BUILDROOT/usr/bin/mutt_dotlock && test xmail != x ; then \
chgrp mail $BUILDROOT/usr/bin/mutt_dotlock && \
chmod 2755 $BUILDR
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:16:46PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> I am trying to build my own rpm for mutt. I am using the spec file from
> the Fedora srpm. During the build it fails on the following command.
>
>
> if test -f $BUILDROOT/usr/bin/mutt_dotlock && test xmail != x ; then \
> chgrp
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:42:10 +0800 Ed Greshko
wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 03:16 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:39:21 +0800 Ed Greshko
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/23/2012 12:27 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> sudo blkid -p /dev/sdb
> >>> error: /dev/sdb: No medium found
> >>>
> >>>
Hi Matthew,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:23:27AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:16:46PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > I am trying to build my own rpm for mutt. I am using the spec file from
> > the Fedora srpm. During the build it fails on the following command.
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> This is part of the Makefile generated by configure in the %config
> section. Does that mean I have to patch the Makefile after it is
> generated and then do as you suggest in the %files section?
Looks like the Fedora package has a pat
I am debating getting a netbook to replace my ee701 as a sometime
machine or a tablet. There are a number of options but basically it
comes down to what this second device is for.
What is the progress of Fedora on 'cheap' tablets, as I would like this
effort to come in under $100? I did see
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:36:41 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am debating getting a netbook to replace my ee701 as a sometime
> machine or a tablet. There are a number of options but basically it
> comes down to what this second device is for.
>
> What is the progress of Fedora on 'cheap' ta
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:23:34AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > This is part of the Makefile generated by configure in the %config
> > section. Does that mean I have to patch the Makefile after it is
> > generated and then do as you
On 11/23/2012 11:57 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:36:41 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am debating getting a netbook to replace my ee701 as a sometime
machine or a tablet. There are a number of options but basically it
comes down to what this second device is for.
What is the
> Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
> better than you report.
With a keyboard permanently attached ...
> I might as well stay with Android. I actually have to start working
> with it for my day job. I work for Verizon Enterprise Systems and my
> research is
On 11/23/2012 01:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
better than you report.
With a keyboard permanently attached ...
I might as well stay with Android. I actually have to start working
with it for my day job. I work for Verizon Enterpri
On 11/23/2012 01:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/23/2012 01:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
better than you report.
With a keyboard permanently attached ...
I might as well stay with Android. I actually have to start working
wit
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
> > better than you report.
>
> With a keyboard permanently attached ...
>
> > I might as well stay with Android. I actually have to start working
> > with it for my day job.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Fulko Hew wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>> > Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
>> > better than you report.
>>
>> With a keyboard permanently attached ...
>>
>> > I might as well stay with Android.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> There is a default location for the EFI loader that Fedora is not using (but
> is for USB/CD).
While we are on the subject of boot loaders:
I have been wiping hard disks from systems that are no longer in use.
One disk, which had bee
On 11/23/2012 02:56 PM, JD wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
better than you report.
With a keyboard permanently attached ...
I might as well stay w
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:27:55AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Gary,
Installing a desktop environment & unistalling other shouldn't have had to
screw up your boot sector. I think what you did is inadvertdly changed your
bios settings. If it was working before and after that no. Do you reme
I have an ancient Intel Pro/Wireless WUD2011BWW USB device
which works fine under Windows XP,
and which I'd like to get working under Fedora.
As far as I can see, this requires the linux-wlan-ng module,
which doesn't appear to be included with the kernel any more.
If anyone has any suggestions how
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2012 02:56 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Fulko Hew wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Alan Cox
>>> wrote:
>
> Fedora 17? The page I reference seems to have F17 working somewhat
>>
Edik Landaveri wrote:
> Installing a desktop environment & unistalling other shouldn't have had to
> screw up your boot sector. I think what you did is inadvertdly changed your
> bios settings. If it was working before and after that no. Do you remember
> having played with the BIOS settings? Yo
I have an ancient Intel Pro/Wireless WUD2011BWW USB device
which works fine under Windows XP,
and which I'd like to get working under Fedora.
As far as I can see, this requires the linux-wlan-ng module,
which doesn't appear to be included with the kernel any more.
If anyone has any suggestions how
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:28:24 -0800 Geoffrey Leach
wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 08:21:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:39:20 -0800 Geoffrey Leach
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/22/2012 06:41:21 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > >
> > > > > On 11/22/2012 02:38 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
Ed wrote
On 11/22/2012 12:29 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>
>I have turned off 'Desktop Search' in Settings. I have deleted all executables
in /usr/bin with 'nepomuk' in the name (and virtuoso). I have nuked the nepomuk
folders hiding down in ~/.kde.
>But after I rebooted I*still* ended up with a
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have an ancient Intel Pro/Wireless WUD2011BWW USB device
> which works fine under Windows XP,
> and which I'd like to get working under Fedora.
> As far as I can see, this requires the linux-wlan-ng module,
> which doesn't appear to be inc
Gents,
note that I'm still having a bit of trouble with "mutt-under-fedora."
Not intended as a joke or smiley, but worth mentioning. I used red hat
when it was free; rather that switch to fedora as a desktop, I eventually
chose Ubuntu. AFAIC, no distro of linux is 'perfect' -- I have had to d
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:32:25PM -0800, Edik Landaveri wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:27:55AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Installing a desktop environment & unistalling other shouldn't have had to
> screw up your boot sector. I think what you did is inadvertdly changed yo
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:49:57PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:32:25PM -0800, Edik Landaveri wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:27:55AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Gary,
> >
> > Installing a desktop environment & unistalling other shouldn't have had to
> > s
32 matches
Mail list logo
