On 06/02/2012 11:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 02:15 PM, JD wrote:
D: Using legacy gpg-pubkey(s) from rpmdb
error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
D
On 06/03/2012 02:36 PM, Edward M wrote:
>does rpm still has the option to resign, like rpm --resign, if it does
> that may
> help?
>However i still a think along the way a security update to rpm is blocking
> for a
> reason or
>the src package in question has problems and a fix is ne
On 06/03/2012 03:07 PM, JD wrote:
> Well, of course I had to copy the file into the
> mounted fc14 image in order for me to use
> it's rpm command while chrooted.
>
> In chrooted env (i.e. fc14):
> $ cd /tmp
> $ sha256sum xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm
> 2b3a033030f39ae790d790202fe6df9b096a00df05e6a830dee8655
On 06/03/2012 03:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I'd go with the --resign option.
Or even --delsign
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On 06/03/2012 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'd go with the --resign option.
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not
do wonders on the package?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
> And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do
> wonders on
> the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse key. But, I could not find
anything on xfdr or xfde.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yoursel
On 06/03/2012 12:46 AM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'd go with the --resign option.
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not
do wonders on the package?
Yeah... After I setup my gpg sig properly.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do wonders
on
the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse key. But, I could not find
anything on xfdr or xfde.
On 06/03/2012 04:33 PM, JD wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
>>> And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do
>>> wonders on
>>> the package?
>> Yep
>>
>> FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse k
On 06/03/2012 04:31 PM, JD wrote:
> Yeah... After I setup my gpg sig properly
You don't need that to --delsign
rpm -qpvv zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686.rpm gives
D: zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID
a82ba4b7: OK
then
rpmsign --delsign zzuf-0.13-4.20100
On 06/03/2012 01:33 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not
do wonders on
the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse key. But, I
could n
On 06/03/2012 05:26 PM, Edward M wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 01:33 AM, JD wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do
wonders on
the package?
>>> Yep
>>>
>>> FWI
On 06/03/2012 02:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 05:26 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/03/2012 01:33 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do wonders
on
the package?
Hi,
after successfully upgrading from F16 to F17 via anaconda/DVD, I get
this after a "yum update". Does anybody know a solution?
[]
Total size: 635 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
libcups.so.2 is needed by gtk2-2
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 11:57:48 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after successfully upgrading from F16 to F17 via anaconda/DVD, I get
> this after a "yum update". Does anybody know a solution?
>
> []
> Total size: 635 M
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> Running Transaction Check
Il 03/06/2012 11:57, Heinz Diehl ha scritto:
Hi,
after successfully upgrading from F16 to F17 via anaconda/DVD, I get
this after a "yum update". Does anybody know a solution?
[]
Total size: 635 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction chec
On 06/03/2012 02:57 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Hi,
after successfully upgrading from F16 to F17 via anaconda/DVD, I get
this after a "yum update". Does anybody know a solution?
[]
Total size: 635 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check
On 06/02/2012 11:00 PM, Tim wrote:
I'm curious about other differences that might occur while you're
running the system in the non-secured mode. Are we going to find that
bank sites can detect your running mode, and refuse access, for
instance?
if the menu can be reached to disabled secure
On 03.06.2012, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Try "yum remove awesome ; yum distro-sync".
Taht didn't work. Besides, awesome is my main desktop environment
(with XFCE as a backup).
> Alternatively, since this is on x86_64, you could "yum remove …"
> the i686 packages and reinstall them if necessary
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:41:11 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 03.06.2012, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Try "yum remove awesome ; yum distro-sync".
>
> Taht didn't work. Besides, awesome is my main desktop environment
> (with XFCE as a backup).
That was based on this:
# yum list awesome
Load
A very elementary question, I assume:
Why are 32-bit applications (as well as 64-bit)
downloaded on a 64-bit system?
Are they essential, ie would the system run without them?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, T
Am 03.06.2012 13:57, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> A very elementary question, I assume:
> Why are 32-bit applications (as well as 64-bit)
> downloaded on a 64-bit system?
> Are they essential, ie would the system run without them?
you do not need any i686 crap on your system
yun can even specify "
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> Hello,
> My F16 system seems to have gotten to a very strange state.
>
> This is where the strangeness started. I was able to boot it back, but
> then it
> keeps rebooting after the boot process is done. It would get to the state
> where I
Dear All,
How to know what is the device corresponding to a certain external
disk? I would like to format it and avoiding any undesirable
formatting of other disks.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https:/
Reindl, you might want to rethink that wrong answer, seeing as you don't
know what he does with the system.
Tim, if you run 32-bit dynamically linked applications, you're going to
need the 32-bit libraries, configs, etc. That 32-bit application list
includes some games, some browser plugins, a gr
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:04:51 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> How to know what is the device corresponding to a certain external
> disk? I would like to format it and avoiding any undesirable
> formatting of other disks.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
The traditional linux hacker way to
Reindl Harald wrote:
>> A very elementary question, I assume:
>> Why are 32-bit applications (as well as 64-bit)
>> downloaded on a 64-bit system?
>> Are they essential, ie would the system run without them?
>
> you do not need any i686 crap on your system
>
> yun can even specify "exclude=*.i68
On 03.06.2012, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> A very elementary question, I assume:
> Why are 32-bit applications (as well as 64-bit)
> downloaded on a 64-bit system?
In a 64-bit only system, they are not needed. However..
> Are they essential, ie would the system run without them?
..it can happen th
On 06/03/2012 09:04 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
How to know what is the device corresponding to a certain external
disk? I would like to format it and avoiding any undesirable
formatting of other disks.
Thanks in advance,
lsscsi is a handy alternative to running dmesg or checking
/var/lo
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Ian Chapman wrote:
>> How to know what is the device corresponding to a certain external
>> disk? I would like to format it and avoiding any undesirable
>> formatting of other disks.
>
> lsscsi is a handy alternative to running dmesg or checking
> /var/log/messages.
David Highley highley-recommended.com> writes:
>
> After power cycle on system the line drivers for the network interface
> seemed to die, no link connection and no light. This is a mother board
> interface and dmesg still shows hardware discovery.
>
> Bought a PCI Express card and installed it
We've made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our
space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back.
Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!
http://www.coreboot.org/Welcome_to_coreboot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
what is wrong in that answer?
the question was
"Are they essential, ie would the system run without them?"
no, they are not ESSENTIAL
yes, the system would run without them
Am 03.06.2012 15:13, schrieb John Mellor:
> Reindl, you might want to rethink that wrong answer, seeing as you don't
> know
On 06/03/2012 02:04 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 04:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do wonders
on
the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it
hello all! and thanks for fedora,
I got a bog from firefox that keeps freezing my computer it goes like this..
cannot open fon file true
firefox : corrupted page table at address 7f99bb15900c
PGD 147E04067 PUD 18f767047 PMD 168675067 PTE ff959b95ff959b95
bad pagetable : 000d [[#1] SMP
anything I
"David G. Miller wrote:"
>
> David Highley highley-recommended.com> writes:
>
> >
> > After power cycle on system the line drivers for the network interface
> > seemed to die, no link connection and no light. This is a mother board
> > interface and dmesg still shows hardware discovery.
> >
>
Hello
I've found strange problem
I have home PC with multiboot instalation of 2 versions of Fedora
distro: F15 and F17.
There is one ext4 filesystem for data on LVM mounted from both systems
When I've copied some files to it in F15 I don't see them in F17.
I've never experienced this on lin
On 06/02/2012 04:43 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
The firmware already has this.
Yes, now my mental cobwebs are getting cleaned out. I do recall reading
about this, a while ago.
Much of it is there for network booting (PXE etc) and in fact a fair bit
of it is there in the modern old style BIOS too.
I think people are forgetting that ARM is an important platform also. It
will become more important as time goes on. If there is a big push to
tablet or netbook computers towards ARM, then this is a huge problem.
ARM will not allow the ability to disable or re-provision keys like the x86
counterpar
HI
Is there a possibility to build with open hw an complete desktop
system, that using coreboot?
If the community can provide an fairly strong platform that can be
cheaply produced as SOC, and SBC - no one can stand against us...
Zoltan
2012/6/3 x414e54 :
> I think people are forgetting that AR
On 06/03/2012 12:03 PM, x414e54 wrote:
Even my friends, I tell them about linux, and they are very skillful
with computers but have no intention to use anything that is not
pre-installed on their system.
Yes. I tell friends that it's free and they're interested, but afraid
to try it because t
On 06/02/2012 11:08 PM, Tim wrote:
Yes, I saw you use a different command line in your post, but was using
your experience as a general example.
I don't know if yum-complete-transaction asks for verification and I
wasn't about to wait and find out. Still, I agree with your point:
using -y is
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 12:43:16 -0430
Dokuro wrote:
> hello all! and thanks for fedora,
>
> I got a bog from firefox that keeps freezing my computer it goes like this..
> cannot open fon file true
> firefox : corrupted page table at address 7f99bb15900c
> PGD 147E04067 PUD 18f767047 PMD 168675067 P
On 06/03/2012 12:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:03 PM, x414e54 wrote:
Even my friends, I tell them about linux, and they are very skillful
with computers but have no intention to use anything that is not
pre-installed on their system.
Yes. I tell friends that it's free and they're in
On 6/3/2012 3:27 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 11:08 PM, Tim wrote:
>> Yes, I saw you use a different command line in your post, but was using
>> your experience as a general example.
>
> I don't know if yum-complete-transaction asks for verification and I
> wasn't about to wait and find out
On 06/03/2012 03:28 PM, David wrote:
yum-complete-transaction does just that. No it does not ask for your
okay. You already broke the install by aborting it.
Yum-complete-transaction is designed to be smarter than you and finish
what you broke when you halted in mid stride.
In this case, yum b
On 6/3/2012 6:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 03:28 PM, David wrote:
>> yum-complete-transaction does just that. No it does not ask for your
>> okay. You already broke the install by aborting it.
>> Yum-complete-transaction is designed to be smarter than you and finish
>> what you broke whe
On 06/03/2012 04:20 PM, David wrote:
I can assume that it boots to an older kernel? Boot to level 3.
Do that and run the command.
You assume wrong. After it crashed, it came right back up. (There
wasn't a kernel update this time to mung.) It updated this morning,
Just Fine, TYVM. I just
On 6/3/2012 8:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 04:20 PM, David wrote:
>> I can assume that it boots to an older kernel? Boot to level 3.
>>
>> Do that and run the command.
>
> You assume wrong. After it crashed, it came right back up. (There
> wasn't a kernel update this time to mung.) It
On 06/03/2012 06:09 PM, David wrote:
Run the tranaction.
Run the transaction that was going to remove half the package I need to
run my system, including, among other things, cups and all of its
dependencies? No thanks!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
On 06/03/2012 06:09 PM, David wrote:
Your choice. Fix it now or live with the later disaster.
Yes. Sooner or later, I'm going to need to complete a transaction
again, and I don't want that munged file messing me up. After checking
with man, I ran (as root)
yum history new
to create a new
On 6/3/2012 10:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 06:09 PM, David wrote:
>> Run the tranaction.
>
> Run the transaction that was going to remove half the package I need to
> run my system, including, among other things, cups and all of its
> dependencies? No thanks!
The people that wrote the
On 06/03/2012 07:29 PM, David wrote:
The one that will
probably fix what you broke.
That *I* broke? What kind of crack are you smoking? This whole mess
started when yumex HUNG MY SYSTEM during a routine update and
yum-complete-transaction wanted to remove several hundred packages.
Either r
On 6/3/2012 10:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 06:09 PM, David wrote:
>> Run the tranaction.
>
> Run the transaction that was going to remove half the package I need to
> run my system, including, among other things, cups and all of its
> dependencies? No thanks!
it just occurred to that
On 6/3/2012 10:32 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 07:29 PM, David wrote:
>> The one that will
>> probably fix what you broke.
>
> That *I* broke? What kind of crack are you smoking? This whole mess
> started when yumex HUNG MY SYSTEM during a routine update and
> yum-complete-transaction wan
On 06/03/2012 07:35 PM, David wrote:
it just occurred to that you are Newbie enough that you don't understand
the way that this works.
Excuse me, but I don't think you realize that I've been using Fedora
since FC6, and was using various RedHat versions since around 1998. I'm
well aware how y
On 06/03/2012 07:37 PM, David wrote:
Be nice. You broke the script complete when you did not let it finish.
Don't be more of a phule than you have to be. If you can't contribute
anything that's relevant, simply stop posting.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 6/3/2012 11:18 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 07:35 PM, David wrote:
>> it just occurred to that you are Newbie enough that you don't understand
>> the way that this works.
>
> Excuse me, but I don't think you realize that I've been using Fedora
> since FC6, and was using various RedHat ve
On 6/3/2012 11:18 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 07:35 PM, David wrote:
>> it just occurred to that you are Newbie enough that you don't understand
>> the way that this works.
>
> Excuse me, but I don't think you realize that I've been using Fedora
> since FC6, and was using various RedHat ve
On 06/04/2012 11:18 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 07:35 PM, David wrote:
>> it just occurred to that you are Newbie enough that you don't understand
>> the way that this works.
>
> Excuse me, but I don't think you realize that I've been using Fedora since
> FC6, and
> was using various RedHa
On 06/03/2012 08:29 PM, David wrote:
Enjoy what you broke and what you refuse to fix by following the
standard instructions.
In case you haven't noticed, luser, everything on my system is working
fine, and yumex updated it this morning without the slightest difficulty.
I'm done here.
It'
On 6/3/2012 11:40 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 08:29 PM, David wrote:
>> Enjoy what you broke and what you refuse to fix by following the
>> standard instructions.
>>
>
> In case you haven't noticed, luser, everything on my system is working
> fine, and yumex updated it this morning without
On 06/03/2012 08:51 PM, David wrote:
So 'me' was the only person that tried to help you while you were when
you had this self-inflected disaster.
What self-inflicted disaster? My system crashed during an update.
Then, yum-complete-transaction tried to go berserk and trash my system
so I kill
Well, it happened with me once in F16 when the system went down without
being attached to a UPS & updating.
I also cringed when I opted for yum complete transaction & it showed a
number of packages to be deleted.
I did it & found that the packages to be deleted were the older versions
which had n
On 06/03/2012 10:00 PM, Vikram Goyal wrote:
Well, it happened with me once in F16 when the system went down
without being attached to a UPS & updating.
I also cringed when I opted for yum complete transaction & it showed a
number of packages to be deleted.
I did it & found that the packages
On 11/27/2011 01:41 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Howdy All -
I have Gigabyte EP43-UD3L motherboard with a single PCI Express 2.0 x16
slot. It currently has a decent NVidia card - a GeForce 7300 GT. I've
got two monitors attached, one via the VGA port and one via the digital
video port. It works wel
Tim:
>> I'm curious about other differences that might occur while you're
>> running the system in the non-secured mode. Are we going to find that
>> bank sites can detect your running mode, and refuse access, for
>> instance?
Edward M:
> if the menu can be reached to disabled secure boot. Appare
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 20:03 +0100, x414e54 wrote:
> Stop wasting time in the replacing the Windows market
I tend to agree. It's quite rare that something different can actually
be a replacement, only an alternative. Sometimes an alternative is
better, sometimes not. There are usually drawbacks
On 06/03/2012 11:00 PM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I'm curious about other differences that might occur while you're
running the system in the non-secured mode. Are we going to find that
bank sites can detect your running mode, and refuse access, for
instance?
Edward M:
if the menu can be reached to dis
I've tried updating F16 to F17 with yum again today,
#yum -v --releasever=17 repolist
Loading "langpacks" plugin
Loading "presto" plugin
Loading "show-leaves" plugin
Adding zh_CN to language list
Adding C to language list
Config time: 0.011
Yum Version: 3.4.3
Setting up Package Sacks
pkgsack time:
On 06/03/2012 11:35 PM, Zhangsan wrote:
I've tried updating F16 to F17 with yum again today,
#yum -v --releasever=17 repolist
Loading "langpacks" plugin
Loading "presto" plugin
Loading "show-leaves" plugin
Adding zh_CN to language list
Adding C to language list
Config time: 0.011
Yum Ver
On 06/03/2012 10:00 PM, Vikram Goyal wrote:
I did it & found that the packages to be deleted were the older versions
which had not been deleted after update since the transaction had been
stopped in the middle itself.
I'd reviewed the update before starting it, and most if not all of the
packa
72 matches
Mail list logo
