On 05/23/2012 02:46 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Okay, that's a good question that I hadn't considered. So do you happen to
> know how
> to change the names?
No. Not something that I've needed or wanted to do.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
Am 23.05.2012 08:17, schrieb Paul Allen Newell:
> With all due respect, its become clear to me that ifconfig is obsolete and a
> solution which uses it doesn't have a
> future. Can you try to get the ip address with command "ip" on a i686 and
> x86_64 system without having to run a
> different
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 15:59:40 +0100
> Pedro Francisco wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if after yesterday's update it is expected that
>> Bugzilla's mail no longer has a "list id"/mailing list tag?
>
> bugzilla never would put that on a mail, it wo
Am 23.05.2012 10:30, schrieb Pedro Francisco:
> Apparently bugzilla in the past added "mailing list:
> bugzilla.redhat.com" and now it does not. Is this a "feature" or a
> bug?
i can not confirm that it ever had
if it had and now missing than it is more a bugfix
than a bug - bugzilla is NOT a
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:04 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 03:12 PM, John Horne wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, JD wrote:
> >> Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
> >>
> >> iwconfig wlan0
> >> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
> >> Mode:Managed
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:27 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 10:02 AM, JD wrote:
> > On 05/22/2012 02:56 PM, John Horne wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:19 -0700, JD wrote:
> >>> When I take my laptop to starbucks or McDonalds hot spot, even when
> >>> sitting outside, bitrate never
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:02 -0700, JD wrote:
> I found no settings on the router which
> would set the bitrate per wifi client. The other 3
> clients are all at 54 Mb/s.
>
Hi,
Ah. I don't think you mentioned that other clients were working fine.
Are these 802.11b/g cards or are they 802.11n but f
On 05/23/2012 02:25 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:02 -0700, JD wrote:
I found no settings on the router which
would set the bitrate per wifi client. The other 3
clients are all at 54 Mb/s.
Hi,
Ah. I don't think you mentioned that other clients were working fine.
Are these 802
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:43 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> # iwconfig wlan1 rate 54G
^^^
'54M' not 'G'.
John.
--
John Horne Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287
Plymouth University, UK Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 05/23/2012 02:15 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:04 -0700, JD wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:12 PM, John Horne wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
On 05/23/2012 02:50 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:43 -0700, JD wrote:
# iwconfig wlan1 rate 54G
^^^
'54M' not 'G'.
John.
Sorry, no effect:
# iwconfig wlan1 rate 54M
# iwconfig wlan1
wlan1 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed
Hello, Everyone
For quite a while now, Emacs has ceased being useable on our system.
For example, if I run "emacs .bashrc" in a terminal, Emacs starts up as
expected, but the file cannot be edited. I can use the mouse to select
text in the portion of the file that is actually displayed in the
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello, Everyone
> For quite a while now, Emacs has ceased being useable on our system. For
> example, if I run "emacs .bashrc" in a terminal, Emacs starts up as
> expected, but the file cannot be edited. I can use the mouse to select text
On 05/23/2012 05:55 PM, JD wrote:
> The link quality (signal strength) came back up
> after a few minutes, but bit rate remains fixed.
>
> Bit Rate=18 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
> Power Management:off
> Link
I just started Documents but I am lost..
I don't see the search window, I don't have the list of different choices
on the left side.
Running F17 and latest Gnome-documents, cross-posting as Fedora 17 is close
to be released
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
Linux Fedora 17 Beefy Miracle
-
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:59:25PM -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> The first sync was to queue up the blocks to be written. That sync(1)
> call would not block. The second call would block until the flush
> finished. The third one was just for luck. Or something.
"Just to be sure."
Sync
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Antonio M wrote:
> I just started Documents but I am lost..
>
> I don't see the search window, I don't have the list of different choices on
> the left side.
> Running F17 and latest Gnome-documents, cross-posting as Fedora 17 is close
> to be released
>
just star
Hi Steven,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> alias emacs="unset DISPLAY && emacs"
You can always use "emacs -nw" for nox.
Now to your problem, can you replicate it with "emacs -Q" if not, is it
reproducible by "emacs -q"? If the problem can only be reproduced by
invoki
Hi people, where I can find the configuration file for the repositories list
in F16??
--
10 de octubre del 2012: Aniversario 65 de la UO
http://simbolodevida.uniblog.uo.edu.cu
--
Participe en:
*- CIIME 2012. Ingenieria Mecanica y Energia. Mayo 2012.
http://eventos.uo.edu.cu/?p=190
--
--
users
Hello,
This what I have in my .bash_profile file:
USRLOCAL=/usr/local
USRLOCALINTEL=$USRLOCAL/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.9.293
ROOTSYS=$USRLOCAL/root_v528
MN2SYS=$USRLOCAL/Minuit2.5.28
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$USRLOCAL/lib
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$ROOTSYS/lib/root
LD_LIBRARY_P
On 05/23/2012 11:23 PM, Osmanys Fuentes Lomba wrote:
> Hi people, where I can find the configuration file for the repositories list
> in F16??
>
>
man yum.conf
reposdir
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everag
On 05/23/2012 11:23 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> It this normal?
man bash
Read the section on INVOCATION
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On Mon, 21 May 2012 16:21:32 -0400, Greg Woods wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:07 -0400, Brian Wood wrote:
Yesterday the desktop
was fine, but today the bar across the top of the screen is no
longer legible. I can't read the time in the center top or the
stuff on the right or left. When I p
Steven Ulrick writes:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>> Hello, Everyone
>> For quite a while now, Emacs has ceased being useable on our system. For
>> example, if I run "emacs .bashrc" in a terminal, Emacs starts up as
>> expected, but the file cannot be edited. I ca
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:42 -0400, Andre Goree wrote:
> I currently have this same issue on a laptop I use for work running
> F16/KDE4, so perhaps this has something to do with graphics drivers (shot
> in the dark). Do you happen to be running Intel graphics?
In my case, no; it's an Nvidia c
Hi community, one question: why the main edition of Fedora is with
Gnome desktop? the KDE desktop is for me a better choice, what do
you think about??
--
10 de octubre del 2012: Aniversario 65 de la UO
http://simbolodevida.uniblog.uo.edu.cu
--
Participe en:
*- CIIME 2012. Ingenieria Mecan
On 23/05/12 17:36, Osmanys Fuentes Lomba wrote:
Hi community, one question: why the main edition of Fedora is with
Gnome desktop? the KDE desktop is for me a better choice, what do
you think about??
Then download and use the KDE Desktop,
yum install @kde-desktop.
or use the KDE LiveCD
--
On Mon, 21 May 2012 15:38:14 -0400, Michael Cronenworth
wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Unsure if a testing\general error:
~$ sudo crontab -e
/bin/sh: /bin/vi: No such file or directory
crontab: "/bin/vi" exited with status 127
It has been reported. Feel free to follow the bug:
https://bugzil
On 05/23/2012 10:27 AM, Russell Beall wrote:
Hi,
I've been doing a lot more testing to try to flesh out the issue here.
I upgraded to the latest stable version from the rmeggins repo, but
found the same memory growth behavior in that instance.
I have a few more details which clarify much be
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 12:36 -0400, Osmanys Fuentes Lomba wrote:
> Hi community, one question: why the main edition of Fedora is with
> Gnome desktop?
You will find after not much time on this list that this is a religious
issue. I suspect the real reason is that many (but by no means all) of
On 05/23/2012 04:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I looked back through the posts in this thread and, while I may have missed it
due to
the number of posts, I did not see a mention of what make/model of wireless AP
you
have.
My sample size is small...but the AP's that I've worked with all had a "Statu
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 23:24:04 +0800,
Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/23/2012 11:23 PM, Osmanys Fuentes Lomba wrote:
Hi people, where I can find the configuration file for the repositories list
in F16??
man yum.conf
That is the main config file and I think can override others, but by default
Am 23.05.2012 19:22, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 23:24:04 +0800,
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/23/2012 11:23 PM, Osmanys Fuentes Lomba wrote:
>>> Hi people, where I can find the configuration file for the repositories list
>>> in F16??
>>>
>>>
>>
>> man yum.conf
>
> That
On 05/23/2012 09:17 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
In my case, no; it's an Nvidia card.
What driver are you using? Nouveau, the binary blob or kmod-nvidia?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 19:27:33 +0200,
Reindl Harald wrote:
remains the question why you killed "reposdir" in the quote?
I should have read the original response more carefully. I missed that
part as it was covered much later than I expected. I think it would
have made more sense to give
Original Message
Subject: gnome terminal
Date: 23.05.2012 17:23
From: Patrick Dupre
To: fedora
Hello,
This what I have in my .bash_profile file:
USRLOCAL=/usr/local
USRLOCALINTEL=$USRLOCAL/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.9.293
ROOTSYS=$USRLOCAL/root_v528
MN2SYS=$USRLOCAL/Minuit
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:39 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 12:36 -0400, Osmanys Fuentes Lomba wrote:
> > Hi community, one question: why the main edition of Fedora is with
> > Gnome desktop?
>
> You will find after not much time on this list that this is a religious
> issue
On 5/23/2012 1:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
edit "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules" (ONE LINE, replace MAC with
yours)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:50:56:bd:00:27",
ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
_
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:31 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 09:17 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> > In my case, no; it's an Nvidia card.
>
> What driver are you using? Nouveau, the binary blob or kmod-nvidia?
kmod-nvidia-3.2.10-3.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.4.x86_64
Installed via the akmod rpmfus
All,
I'm having an issue with encrypted disk setup on my Dell M6600 laptop.
During boot of Fedora 17 (originally installed from alpha, yum updated
current ever since), I get prompted for the password but the device
shown in the prompt changes. If it ends up picking md127p1 the boot
device is
On 05/23/2012 11:09 AM, Peter A wrote:
All,
I'm having an issue with encrypted disk setup on my Dell M6600 laptop.
During boot of Fedora 17 (originally installed from alpha, yum updated
current ever since), I get prompted for the password but the device
shown in the prompt changes. If it ends up
Am 23.05.2012 20:19, schrieb Rick Stevens:
> On 05/23/2012 11:09 AM, Peter A wrote:
> Technically, this doesn't belong on this list as F17 hasn't been
> released yet. It belongs on the fedora test list
> (t...@lists.fedoraproject.org).
>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 14:09:59 -0400,
Peter A wrote:
All,
I'm having an issue with encrypted disk setup on my Dell M6600
laptop. During boot of Fedora 17 (originally installed from alpha,
yum updated current ever since), I get prompted for the password but
the device shown in the prompt
fc16 - with latest updates.
Running lsof, I see a plethora of output like:
systemd 1 root cwd unknown/proc/1/cwd (readlink:
Permission denied)
systemd 1 root rtd unknown/proc/1/root (readlink:
Permission denied)
systemd 1 root txt unkn
On 05/23/2012 11:09 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
kmod-nvidia-3.2.10-3.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.4.x86_64
Installed via the akmod rpmfusion package.
Thank you. I'm no expert on this, but at least we've eliminated some
possibilities, and that's always good.
I am aware this system is not fully up
Am 23.05.2012 20:38, schrieb JD:
> fc16 - with latest updates.
>
> Running lsof, I see a plethora of output like:
>
> systemd 1 root cwd unknown/proc/1/cwd (readlink:
> Permission denied)
> systemd 1 root rtd unknown/proc/1/root (readlink:
> Permissio
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 09:15:54PM +0100, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Mike Wright wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There was a thread not too far back that explained how to type
> > characters not on a keyboard by using the key but for the life
> > of me I can not find it.
> >
> > e.g. to type a Spanish
On 5/22/2012 1:05 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
From part of my firewall startup, a few LOG calls wehich might help.
# LOG and REJECT anything which looks like a probe
iptables -N PROBE
iptables -A PROBE -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix PROBE:
iptables -A PROBE -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-ho
On 5/22/2012 12:56 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
tail -0f /var/log/messages
You get the existing lines you ask for, ten by default. And there is a
buffering option in syslogd, I just don't recall where I used to set
it. I believe by default it's line buffered, output at newline.
Bill:
Thanks
On 5/22/2012 1:01 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
/etc/rsyslog.conf and it's man page. Define a debug.log and have debug
stuff go there, by setting the level to debug.
Bill:
Once again, thanks for the link
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
On 05/23/2012 12:59 PM, Chris Cawley wrote:
Hello,
I went through some of the docs/emails; however, it still seems like
The NSS is not working correctly.
Not sure what you mean.
On a separate, but related issue, it seems like you cannot use
the GUI to generate a key with
On 05/23/2012 11:43 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.05.2012 20:38, schrieb JD:
fc16 - with latest updates.
Running lsof, I see a plethora of output like:
systemd 1 root cwd unknown/proc/1/cwd (readlink:
Permission denied)
systemd 1 root rtd unknown/p
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:40 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I doubt that updating the system will help, but if you've the
> time, it shouldn't hurt.
It's not so much a matter of time, as not wanting to hose things up for
my wife. We geeks are used to having updates occasionally break things;
it is the
Am 23.05.2012 21:13, schrieb JD:
>>> The full output of lsof | sort | uniq is at
>>> http://www.sendspace.com/file/0v2lgb
>>>
>>> what is the consequence of these failures on the rest of the system?
>>
>> have you considered calling such commands as root instead
>> as normal user? it is logical
On 05/23/2012 12:27 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
It's not so much a matter of time, as not wanting to hose things up for
my wife.
Well, as I said, updating your system probably won't help, so if you'd
rather not take the risk of b0rking something, don't worry about it.
And, if it's only affecting Gn
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>> alias emacs="unset DISPLAY && emacs"
>
> You can always use "emacs -nw" for nox.
Just tried that, and I still have the problem. Cursor will not move,
and the file cann
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
wrote:
>
> Steven Ulrick writes:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>>> Hello, Everyone
>>> For quite a while now, Emacs has ceased being useable on our system. For
>>> example, if I run "emacs .bashrc" in a termina
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 12:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> (I take it, BTW, that simply switching to a different DE
> isn't an option.)
In fact, that is the option we took. We switched her from Gnome to XFCE,
which works around the problem.
--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 05/22/2012 09:12 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hello:
As I continue dealing with iptables, another issue has come up that I
can't tell is a mis-understanding on my part or a potential problem
I have three F16 machines, one x86_64 and two i383/686. If I run
/sbin/ifconfig on them, I get (sh
[comments inline]
On 5/23/2012 1:53 PM, Phil Meyer wrote:
Just to add fuel to the fire:
Soon more and more systems will have UEFI as well as, or instead of
the old BIOS. On most newer sever class systems, the traditional BIOS
is *emulated* in the EUFI.
The EUFI, and, therefore, newer BIOS
On 05/24/2012 12:41 AM, JD wrote:
> It's a 2-wire brand router, rebranded as AT&T
> And yes, it does have the status page to see
> every connected client, it's IP address, ...etc
> However, it has no info about each client's
> bit rate.
Then, it leads me to ask the following.
1. Do you know
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:41 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 04:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I looked back through the posts in this thread and, while I may have missed
> > it due to
> > the number of posts, I did not see a mention of what make/model of wireless
> > AP you
> > have.
> >
> > My s
On 23May2012 12:13, JD wrote:
| Why would I be denied access to info of files opened by processes
| running with my uid?
| This is a bug.
|
| To wit:
| COMMAND PID TIDUSER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF
| NODE NAME
| gnome-key 1707jd cwd unknown
On 23May2012 19:46, Patrick Dupre wrote:
| This what I have in my .bash_profile file:
|
| USRLOCAL=/usr/local
| USRLOCALINTEL=$USRLOCAL/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.9.293
| ROOTSYS=$USRLOCAL/root_v528
| MN2SYS=$USRLOCAL/Minuit2.5.28
|
| LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$USRLOCAL/lib
| LD_LIBRARY_P
Bruno,
my /etc/cryptotab consists of the following 3 entries.
luks-6fbe3ef9-b08b-4d59-92fa-c4a4746c6817
UUID=6fbe3ef9-b08b-4d59-92fa-c4a4746c6817 none
luks-d1122665-ef96-4731-8745-31a1dd8aed09
UUID=d1122665-ef96-4731-8745-31a1dd8aed09 none
luks-a417a2f6-988b-49bf-be2e-e2cf34dcc160
UUID=a417a2f
On 05/24/2012 01:46 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>
> USRLOCAL=/usr/local
> USRLOCALINTEL=$USRLOCAL/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.9.293
> ROOTSYS=$USRLOCAL/root_v528
> MN2SYS=$USRLOCAL/Minuit2.5.28
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$USRLOCAL/lib
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$ROOTSYS/lib/root
> L
On 05/23/2012 02:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 12:41 AM, JD wrote:
It's a 2-wire brand router, rebranded as AT&T
And yes, it does have the status page to see
every connected client, it's IP address, ...etc
However, it has no info about each client's
bit rate.
Then, it leads me to ask t
On 05/24/2012 09:02 AM, JD wrote:
>
> The model number printed on the router (which
> doubles up as tv signal decoder) is 3800HGV-B.
> Router was supplied by att.
> Yes I do have admin access.
Did you try what was suggested by Aaron, as far as status goes?
>
> I was not present at the time they h
On 05/23/2012 02:56 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:41 -0700, JD wrote:
On 05/23/2012 04:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I looked back through the posts in this thread and, while I may have missed it
due to
the number of posts, I did not see a mention of what make/model of wireless
On 05/23/2012 02:59 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 23May2012 12:13, JD wrote:
| Why would I be denied access to info of files opened by processes
| running with my uid?
| This is a bug.
|
| To wit:
| COMMAND PID TIDUSER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF
| NODE NAME
| gnome-key 1707
On 05/23/2012 06:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:02 AM, JD wrote:
The model number printed on the router (which
doubles up as tv signal decoder) is 3800HGV-B.
Router was supplied by att.
Yes I do have admin access.
Did you try what was suggested by Aaron, as far as status goes?
Yes!
On 05/24/2012 09:50 AM, JD wrote:
> I'm sorry if this has been asked/answered, but the Fedora systemis it a
> laptop
> that you can take to another location and connect to another AP?
And the answer to my second question?
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be mis
On 05/23/2012 06:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'm sorry if this has been asked/answered, but the Fedora systemis it a
laptop
that you can take to another location and connect to another AP?
Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
Yes, the question was asked and
On 05/24/2012 09:52 AM, JD wrote:
> Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
> Yes, the question was asked and I replied moving the laptop right
> next to the router has no effect on the bit rate.
Sorry if my question wasn't clear.
I'm not asking about moving it cl
On 05/23/2012 06:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:52 AM, JD wrote:
Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
Yes, the question was asked and I replied moving the laptop right
next to the router has no effect on the bit rate.
Sorry if my question wasn't cle
On 23May2012 18:46, JD wrote:
| On 05/23/2012 02:59 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > On 23May2012 12:13, JD wrote:
| > | Why would I be denied access to info of files opened by processes
| > | running with my uid?
| > | This is a bug.
| > |
| > | To wit:
| > | COMMAND PID TIDUSER FD
On 05/24/2012 10:02 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Sigh. Which is why I asked you to run some ls commands, to _inspect_ the
> permissions. What do they show?
I don't know about you, but I'm not sure that things involving the /proc file
system
act in quite the same manner as a real file system.
Tak
On 05/23/2012 07:02 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 23May2012 18:46, JD wrote:
| On 05/23/2012 02:59 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
|> On 23May2012 12:13, JD wrote:
|> | Why would I be denied access to info of files opened by processes
|> | running with my uid?
|> | This is a bug.
|> |
|> | To
On 05/23/2012 07:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 10:02 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Sigh. Which is why I asked you to run some ls commands, to _inspect_ the
permissions. What do they show?
I don't know about you, but I'm not sure that things involving the /proc file
system
act in quite th
On 05/24/2012 10:40 AM, JD wrote:
> Yes Ed, I do see this behavior.
> But I am puzzled as to how such resources were
> somehow accessed by a process that has no root privs?
The /proc file system is not a real file system. It is a "pseudo-file system",
see
"man proc". AFAIK, it is under the con
On 05/23/2012 07:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
The /proc file system is not a real file system. It is a "pseudo-file system",
see
"man proc". AFAIK, it is under the control of the kernel and doesn't or may
not act
as one may expect.
I'm not into kernel development. So, the what is and wherefores
On 23May2012 19:37, JD wrote:
| So what there are entries there that are root owned,
| and some of them have root only access perms:
| -r 1 root root 0 May 23 11:48 auxv
| --w--- 1 root root 0 May 23 11:48 clear_refs
| -r 1 root root 0 May 23 11:48 environ
| dr-x-- 2 root r
On 05/23/2012 11:22 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/23/2012 07:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
The /proc file system is not a real file system. It is a
"pseudo-file system", see
"man proc". AFAIK, it is under the control of the kernel and doesn't
or may not act
as one may expect.
So, the /proc file system all
83 matches
Mail list logo
