On 03/19/2012 12:21 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> I need to use Ports 27177 and 27178 but, every Port Checker I can find says
> they
> are blocked.
>
> My iptables setup ( for ) now is:
>
> Incoming Packages- Accept
> Forwarded Packets- Accept
> Outgoing Packets- Accept
>
> The way I understan
This takes a restart from scratch!
My base Network setup was a wired Network which got it's DHCP from a Linksys
Wireless gateway. The WAN connection to the Linksys was through a Fedora 14
Server.
I have two Servers both of which have a Fixed Routeable address from my ISP. I
was working just
Hi Bruno and Cameron,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:04, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 18Mar2012 20:19, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> | On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 23:46:17 +0100,
> | suvayu ali wrote:
> | >
> | >I'm trying to write a regular expression that matches function and class
> | >definitions in C
On 03/19/2012 05:02 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> This takes a restart from scratch!
>
> My base Network setup was a wired Network which got it's DHCP from a Linksys
> Wireless gateway. The WAN connection to the Linksys was through a Fedora 14
> Server.
>
> I have two Servers both of which have a Fi
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Michael D. Setzer II
wrote:
> Just did an update and it included a new kernel, but then on
> reboot after running grub2-mkconfig noticed that the newest one
> was not first. Seems to be sorting the 9 before the 10?
>
> Is this a bug?
> I use the default="0", so thi
On Mon, 03/19/2012 02:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 05:02 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> > This takes a restart from scratch!
> >
> > My base Network setup was a wired Network which got it's DHCP from a Linksys
> > Wireless gateway. The WAN connection to the Linksys was through a Fedora
On 03/19/2012 05:42 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> It started as trying to access inbound for the two ports in question. It has
> now
> morphed into connecting either way on anything. I am about to the point that
> I am
> going to start saving website and Apache configs and rebuild the darn server!
On 18/03/2012 21:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.03.2012 22:24, schrieb Aero Maxx:
On 18/03/2012 13:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.03.2012 14:34, schrieb Aero Maxx:
[Sun Mar 18 03:48:31 2012] [error] [client 192.168.0.103] ModSecurity: Warning.
Operator GE matched 15 at
TX:outbound_anomaly_sc
On 03/19/2012 06:10 PM, Aero Maxx wrote:
> But I am still getting the same problem as before in that it will start at
> boot,
> but I cant access it until I have killed the process and have to start it
> again myself.
>
> I get this error aswell sometimes, but a restart of apache fixes this also,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Pedro Francisco
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Pedro Francisco
> wrote:
> > ...
> > Any ideas why it is not running? /var/log/pm-powersave.log is a empty
> file.
> >
> > Running /etc/pm/power.d/00script manually works .
>
Ok, found the issue. The file
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> Hi!
> "pm-powersave" isn't running the script I have on /etc/pm/power.d .
>
> If someone can do the following test and post the results, I'd be grateful:
>
>
Ok, found the issue. The file /etc/pm/power.d/* scripts were owned by me
and not
Am 19.03.2012 11:10, schrieb Aero Maxx:
> On 18/03/2012 21:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.03.2012 22:24, schrieb Aero Maxx:
>>> On 18/03/2012 13:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.03.2012 14:34, schrieb Aero Maxx:
> [Sun Mar 18 03:48:31 2012] [error] [client 192.168.0.103] ModSecurity:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I now have a machine that is "a brick". There is no operating system on it
> as that got destroyed and any attempts to do a fresh install come back with
> "No usable disks have been found" and I can't make any progress. Nothing
> could be
On 3/19/2012 6:54 AM, William Hooper wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I now have a machine that is "a brick". There is no operating system on it
as that got destroyed and any attempts to do a fresh install come back with
"No usable disks have been found" and I ca
On 18 March 2012 15:00, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Just did an update and it included a new kernel, but then on
> reboot after running grub2-mkconfig noticed that the newest one
> was not first. Seems to be sorting the 9 before the 10?
>
> Is this a bug?
I have been using Grub2 built from upst
> Aaron wroteL
For what you are doing all you need is a LiveCD and fdisk applied to a
unmounted disk. There is a option inn fdisk to clear all partitions from
the disk which will leave you in a position to partition the disk from
scratch. parted and/or partitionmagic are not needed. I assume that
On 03/19/2012 02:52 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/19/2012 05:42 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
It started as trying to access inbound for the two ports in question. It has
now
morphed into connecting either way on anything. I am about to the point that I
am
going to start saving website and Apache
I downloaded the 32 bit desktop "Fedora-16-i686-Live-Desktop.iso" and was
able to boot from CD. I downloaded the full version,
"Fedora-16-i386-DVD.iso" twice and burned DVDs. This version will not boot.
The processor is a 32bit AMD Athlon XP 2400. Do I have the correct iso?
Thanks,
Sam
--
users
On 03/19/2012 10:57 AM, 86vfr750 wrote:
> I downloaded the 32 bit desktop "Fedora-16-i686-Live-Desktop.iso" and
> was able to boot from CD. I downloaded the full version,
> "Fedora-16-i386-DVD.iso" twice and burned DVDs. This version will not
> boot. The processor is a 32bit AMD Athlon XP 2400.
Durring boot-up I press a key to boot from CD, the DVD drive starts, then
stops after 1 second and then I boot from the HD. No boot recoard found.
The Live Desktop iso works fine. The downloaded and burned the DVD iso
twice withthte same results.
-Sam
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Scott Doty
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:01:22PM -0400, 86vfr750 wrote:
> Durring boot-up I press a key to boot from CD, the DVD drive starts, then
> stops after 1 second and then I boot from the HD. No boot recoard found.
> The Live Desktop iso works fine. The downloaded and burned the DVD iso
> twice withtht
On Mar 19, 2012 2:04 PM, "fred smith" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:01:22PM -0400, 86vfr750 wrote:
> > Durring boot-up I press a key to boot from CD, the DVD drive starts,
then
> > stops after 1 second and then I boot from the HD. No boot recoard
found.
> > The Live Desktop iso works fine
Please don't top post.
On 03/19/2012 12:01 PM, 86vfr750 wrote:
Durring boot-up I press a key to boot from CD, the DVD drive starts,
then stops after 1 second and then I boot from the HD. No boot recoard
found. The Live Desktop iso works fine. The downloaded and burned the
DVD iso twice withth
On 19 Mar 2012 at 17:39, Piscium wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:39:43 +
Subject:Re: grub2-mkconfig with 3.2.10 kernels?
From: Piscium
To: Community support for Fedora users
Send reply to: Community support fo
On 19 March 2012 19:53, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> I have had some messages on the grub list, and they confirmed
> the bug, and a fix seems to be to modify the
> /usr/lib/grub/grub_mkconfig_lib by changing one line from sort -n
> to sort -V. Note: That is an unofficial patch in this case does
This an addition to the earlier solution that I had mentioned about
the grub-mkconfig issue with sorting issue, but here seems to be
the solution in the process.
Did remove a lot of the header lines from the list.
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From: Jordan Uggla
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2
On 19.03.2012, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Maybe others have had different experiences, but if
> not, this may point to some possibilities?
3.2.10, .11 and .12 vanilla work(ed) fine here. I guess this problem
is related to a Fedora patch?!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 03/20/2012 01:56 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Good summation. I also did not think I had made any changes at all but
> somehow I
> must have inadvertently done so. The point being that I do not know what if
> any
> changes I may have stumbled into!
For the case of not being able to access th
On 3/19/2012 6:54 AM, William Hooper wrote:
I don't believe anyone has suggested it, but are your sure your hard
drive is still functioning? The file you attached doesn't detect any
hard disks, just two optical drives:
Well, this seems to be it. I found my xw8000 diagnostic cd and it says
t
It's time to buy another laptop. I've got my choices narrowed down to:
http://laclinux.com/en/42763JU
and
http://www.linuxcertified.com/linux-laptop-lc2430sb.html
One is the Nvidia Quadro 1000M chipset, the other one is GeForce GTX 560M.
Both of these are the NVC0 family, which are listed in
Hello,
I have an onboard nVidia graphics chip, and so am using the nVidia
drivers from rpmfusion.
I have noticed that usually once I start to browse the web (no
particular sites), the cpu usage for the X process goes up to around
100%. I have an AMD dual-core processor, so I can still do things,
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:03:39 +0100 suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi Ranjan,
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 18:22, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >> Actually I think I have spotted a big mistake.
> >>
> >> cat > /etc/xdg/autostart << FOE
> >> /usr/libexec/gam_server
> >> @stalonetray
> >> @nm-applet
> >> @pcmanfm -d
Users,
I had no messages about bad sectors on F11. Recently right after upgrade
to F16 I got a message about bad sectors. Hence the following question:
Since F11 what changes have been made to F16 allowing better bad sectors
detection?
Thank you,
Marek
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>> Since you use fvwm, you would have to figure out what is used by fvwm.
>> As far as I recall, one of the Tim-s or Tom-s on this list is an fvwm
>> user. He has a webpage describing his setup. It has been posted to the
>> list several times. Yo
34 matches
Mail list logo
