links, mc, lynx, etc. No console mouse support.

I cannot seem to get console mouse support working. GPM works for copy/paste, but Lynx, Midnight Commander, and Links will not use the mouse unless I run them as root or with sudo. Can anyone help me get mouse access without having to be root? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: size discrepancy

JD gmail.com> writes: > I burned Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso to blank dvd. > One time I used wodim, and 2nd time I used growisofs. > After each burn, I would dd the dvd back in: > > dd if=/dev/sr0 of=f14.iso bs=2k > > In both cases the size of f14.iso was 10240 bytes larger than > Fedora-14-Be

Re: F13 DNS (client) not working

On 2 October 2010 05:28, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 06:20 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > > > > # chkconfig --list NetworkManager > > > NetworkManager 0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off > > > > > > # chkconfig --list network > > > network 0:off 1:

Re: size discrepancy

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > JD gmail.com> writes: > > > I burned Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso to blank dvd. > > One time I used wodim, and 2nd time I used growisofs. > > After each burn, I would dd the dvd back in: > > > > dd if=/dev/sr0 of=f14.iso bs=2k > > > > In bot

LibreOffice Install Process.

I download and setup the 64 bit version of the Fedora 13 machine using the following process. Extract the gz file cd en-US cd RPMS rpm -Uvh *.rpm that went fine with no problems cd desktop-integration ran the redhat rpm It gave conflicts with openoffice remove openoffice reran redhat rpm, and

Re: size discrepancy

Gregory Woodbury gmail.com> writes: > One can also tell dd to read by single physical layer sectors using the "bs=2048"option. This may increase the read time a bit, but generally results in s more consistent > chance of getting the correct size.-- G.Wolfe Woodbury  The rawread script does this

Re: Allow telnet to only one IP using host.deny or host.allow

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 19:06 +0530, Jatin K wrote: > what is the perfect way > > only host.allow or host.deny file > > or only iptables ?? One could argue that this is no "perfect" way. And that multiple efforts to protect yourself is the best way. Personally, I'd deny all, and just allow the

Re: F13 DNS (client) not working

JD: >> Since you have a static IP address, then you need to >> populate /etc/resolv.conf. > Aaron Gray: > I have done that but as soon as I do a "service network restart" it is > blanked again. I would try: Stop the network service. Edit the configuration files. Start the network serv

Re: F13 DNS (client) not working

On 10/02/2010 09:23 AM, Tim wrote: > > I would try: Stop the network service. Edit the configuration files. > Start the network service. > > If you're modifying the files while the service is running, it could be > reverting to backups when stopping/restarting. > > Looking over what he di

Re: F13 DNS (client) not working

On 2 October 2010 15:42, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/02/2010 09:23 AM, Tim wrote: > > > > > I would try: Stop the network service. Edit the configuration files. > > Start the network service. > > > > If you're modifying the files while the service is running, it could be > > reverting to bac

Re: links, mc, lynx, etc. No console mouse support.

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:17:36 -0700 Silent-Hunter wrote: > > I cannot seem to get console mouse support working. GPM works for > copy/paste, but Lynx, Midnight Commander, and Links will not use the > mouse unless I run them as root or with sudo. Can anyone help me get > mouse access without h

Re: Kernel 2.6.35 Receive packet steering for F13 ?

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:41:37 -0700 Robert Arkiletian wrote: > kernel 2.6.35 comes with RPS (Receive packet steering ) > http://lwn.net/Articles/362339/ > > wondering if F13 already has this in 2.6.34? > You could download the source rpm for the kernel you are running yumdownloader --source kern

Re: Converting ext4 to xfs

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:02:32 -0700 suvayu ali wrote: > > Apart from a howtoforge article and a couple of pages on the btrfs > wiki I couldn't find beginner level documentation to get familiar with > the command line tools for btrfs. Could you point me to some resources > to get started? There a

Re: Converting ext4 to xfs

Just a PS for anyone else interested in possibly running btrfs, an article written last year by a filesystem developer about btrfs. http://lwn.net/Articles/342892/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

SSH can't connect

Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no matter what host I try to connect to. And on the host servers SSHd is running. And so is the Client box. Running NX Error message: ssh: connect to host 70.236.39.98 port 22: Connection timed out Running $ ssh j...@70.236.

Re: SSH can't connect

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jim wrote: >  Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no > matter what host I try to connect to. > > And on the host servers SSHd is running. > And so is the Client box. > > Running  NX > Error message:   ssh: connect to host 70.236.39.98 p

software RAID info

Hi, How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID type and sizes. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fed

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: >Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no > matter what host I try to connect to. > > And on the host servers SSHd is running. > And so is the Client box. > > Running NX > Error message: ssh: connect to host 70.236.39.98 port 22

Re: software RAID info

On 2 October 2010 17:44, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID type > and sizes. > > Got it :- cat /proc/mdstat Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.

Re: software RAID info

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:44 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > > How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID > type and sizes. # cat /proc/mdstat # man mdadm --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: h

Seperate audio outputs for fedora- is this limited by my soundcard or the number of outputs on my motherboard?

Hello Another audio question: I want to be able to play one audio source through my headphones (say from one application) and then play another audio source through my line out port (from another application). Is this possible? I have an integrated soundcard. The computer is a Hewlett-Packard DC7

Re: SSH can't connect

Jim wrote: > On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: >>Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no >> matter what host I try to connect to. >> >> And on the host servers SSHd is running. >> And so is the Client box. >> >> Running NX >> Error message: ssh: connect to host

Re:[RESOLVED] sound-level activated recording

Hello All I would like to thank Mike and another person who replied to me personally who will remain anonymous for your help in solving this for me. \ sox should be a fantastic resource and I look forward to receiving the source code suggested by anonymous. I will give credit to anonymous for his

Re: software RAID info

On 2 October 2010 17:55, Greg Woods wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:44 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID > > type and sizes. > > # cat /proc/mdstat > > # man mdadm > > Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lis

Re: links, mc, lynx, etc. No console mouse support.

On 10/02/2010 01:17 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote: >I cannot seem to get console mouse support working. GPM works for > copy/paste, but Lynx, Midnight Commander, and Links will not use the > mouse unless I run them as root or with sudo. Can anyone help me get > mouse access without having to be roo

Re: size discrepancy

On 10/02/2010 01:40 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > JD gmail.com> writes: > >> I burned Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso to blank dvd. >> One time I used wodim, and 2nd time I used growisofs. >> After each burn, I would dd the dvd back in: >> >> dd if=/dev/sr0 of=f14.iso bs=2k >> >> In both cases the s

RE: LibreOffice Install Process.

/snip >reran redhat rpm, and it worked in the installation, >but the links did not work. Turned out they were running >libreoffice instead of the libreoffice3 from the /usr/bin. >So, I just created a link using ln -s libreoffice3 libreoffice Yeah, I used kmenuedit to add a "3" to fix that for now.

Re: size discrepancy

On 10/02/2010 04:03 AM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Andre Robatino > mailto:robat...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > JD gmail.com > writes: > > > I burned Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso to blank dvd. > > One time I used wodim, and 2nd

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 01:11 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Jim wrote: >>On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: >>> Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no >>> matter what host I try to connect to. >>> >>> And on the host servers SSHd is running. >>> And so is the Client box.

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:59 -0700, JD wrote: > I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found > that AMD released them or announced back in March. > The price is steep of course. > What I would like to know is the degree of granularity > of the SMP implementation in Linux. > Does anyone have an

Re: Allow telnet to only one IP using host.deny or host.allow

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Tim wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 19:06 +0530, Jatin K wrote: > > what is the perfect way > > > > only host.allow or host.deny file > > > > or only iptables ?? > > One could argue that this is no "perfect" way. And that multiple > efforts to protect yourself is t

Re: Converting ext4 to xfs

On 10/02/2010 09:15 AM, stan wrote: > Just a PS for anyone else interested in possibly running btrfs, an > article written last year by a filesystem developer about btrfs. > > http://lwn.net/Articles/342892/ Thanx for the link Stan. Very interesting article. -- users mailing list users@lists.fe

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 01:11 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Jim wrote: >>On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: >>> Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no >>> matter what host I try to connect to. >>> >>> And on the host servers SSHd is running. >>> And so is the Client box.

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jim wrote: >Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no > matter what host I try to connect to. > > And on the host servers SSHd is running. > And so is the Client box. > > Running NX > Error message: ssh: connect to host 70.236.39.98 port 22

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:26 -0700, JD wrote: > Granularity applies to the locking scheme in the kernel. > It is how the kernel must prevent different cors/cpus from > clobberig the same kernel global data at the same time. > > Some locking schemes are coarser than others. There is > an optimal po

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:59 AM, JD wrote: > I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found > that AMD released them or announced back in March. > The price is steep of course. > What I would like to know is the degree of granularity > of the SMP implementation in Linux. > Does anyone have a

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 10/02/2010 10:54 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:59 -0700, JD wrote: >> I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found >> that AMD released them or announced back in March. >> The price is steep of course. >> What I would like to know is the degree of granularity >> of

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 10/02/2010 11:09 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:26 -0700, JD wrote: > >> Granularity applies to the locking scheme in the kernel. >> It is how the kernel must prevent different cors/cpus from >> clobberig the same kernel global data at the same time. >> >> Some locking sch

RE: SSH can't connect

Yep, this sounds like a firewall, I have FC13 and working with Putty from Windows/7 locally and across the net. Scott Ford Senior Systems Engineer [mobile] 609-346-0399 [direct] 678-266-3399 x304 identityforge.com http://identityforge.com This message is for the designated recipient onl

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 10/02/2010 11:11 AM, Samuel Kidman wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:59 AM, JD > wrote: > > I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found > that AMD released them or announced back in March. > The price is steep of course. > What I would lik

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 02:09 PM, JD wrote: > > On 10/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jim wrote: >> Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no >> matter what host I try to connect to. >> >> And on the host servers SSHd is running. >> And so is the Client box. >> >> Running NX >> Error messa

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, JD wrote: > > Not to be mean or anythingSo please take it lightly: > Did I say linux has issues in supporting large smp? NO! > You are answering your own question. not mine. ... > Did I say anything about application support? No! > Again, you are answering

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 11:28 AM, Jim wrote: >On 10/02/2010 02:09 PM, JD wrote: >> On 10/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jim wrote: >>> Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no >>> matter what host I try to connect to. >>> >>> And on the host servers SSHd is running. >>> And so is the

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jim wrote: >> Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no >> matter what host I try to connect to. >> >> And on the host servers SSHd is running. >> And so is the Client box. >> >> Runn

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 02:34 PM, JD wrote: > sudo iptables -L -n Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination [r...@acer mickey]# iptables -L -n Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/00

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: > ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp > dpt:22 OK, So port 22 is open. Is this on the server where sshd is running or is this on the client where you are invoking /usr/bin/ssh ?? If on the server, then take a look at the

Re: Seperate audio outputs for fedora- is this limited by my soundcard or the number of outputs on my motherboard?

On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:11:01 +0800 Samuel Kidman wrote: > > I want to be able to play one audio source through my headphones (say > from one application) and then play another audio source through my > line out port (from another application). Is this possible? Short answer, no. I think there a

Re: SSH can't connect

On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:53:32 -0400 Jim wrote: > What is the -n -n After eth0 mean ? man tcpdump -n Don’t convert host addresses to names. This can be used to avoid DNS lookups. -nnDon’t convert protocol and port numbers etc. to names either. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedo

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: > > On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: >> ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp >> dpt:22 > OK, So port 22 is open. > Is this on the server where sshd is running or is this > on the client where you are invoking /usr/bin/ssh

Re: [RESOLVED[ Seperate audio outputs for fedora- is this limited by my soundcard or the number of outputs on my motherboard?

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:04 AM, stan wrote: > On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 01:11:01 +0800 > Samuel Kidman wrote: > > > > > I want to be able to play one audio source through my headphones (say > > from one application) and then play another audio source through my > > line out port (from another applicati

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: > > On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: >> ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp >> dpt:22 > OK, So port 22 is open. > Is this on the server where sshd is running or is this > on the client where you are invoking /usr/bin/ssh

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:54:27 +0200 Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:59 -0700, JD wrote: > > I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found > > that AMD released them or announced back in March. > > The price is steep of course. > > What I would like to know is the degree of gra

Re: SSH can't connect

Jim wrote: > On 10/02/2010 01:11 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> Jim wrote: >>>On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no matter what host I try to connect to. And on the host servers SSHd is running. And so

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Yorvyk wrote: > On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:54:27 +0200 > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:59 -0700, JD wrote: > > > I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found > > > that AMD released them or announced back in March. > > > The price is steep

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 04:02 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Jim wrote: >>On 10/02/2010 01:11 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >>> Jim wrote: On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: > Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no > matter what host I try to connect to.

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 04:44 PM, Jim wrote: >On 10/02/2010 04:02 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> Jim wrote: >>> On 10/02/2010 01:11 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: Jim wrote: > On 10/02/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote: >> Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

To be honest your bigger problem is finding enough application parallelism and enough parallel user space apps. That and memory or I/O bandwidth on servers. The kernel will run on supercomputers with over 1000 processors. Not all workloads are handled well at that scale so if you threw 1000 random

Re: SSH can't connect

What is the 6749 in this command ? # netstat -nltp | grep 22 tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 6749/sshd tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:8822 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1666/smfpd tcp0 0 :::22

Re: SSH can't connect

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:42 -0400, Jim wrote: > What is the 6749 in this command ? > > > # netstat -nltp | grep 22 > tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 > 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 6749/sshd > tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:8822 > 0.0.0.0:*

VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not install VSFTPD with it. On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to function. [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost Trying ::1... ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to loc

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not install > VSFTPD with it. > > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to > function. > > [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost > Trying ::1... > ftp: connect to

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 06:19 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:42 -0400, Jim wrote: >> What is the 6749 in this command ? >> >> >> # netstat -nltp | grep 22 >> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 >> 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 6749/sshd >> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:8822 >> 0.0.0.0

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 Aaron Gray wrote: > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not > install VSFTPD with it. > > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to > function. > > [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost > Trying ::1... > ftp: conne

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On 2 October 2010 23:46, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not install >> VSFTPD with it. >> >> On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to >> function. >> >>

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not > > install VSFTPD with it. > > > > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to > > function. > > > > [r...

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 12:14 PM, Jim wrote: >On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: >> On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: >>> ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp >>> dpt:22 >> OK, So port 22 is open. >> Is this on the server where sshd is running or is this >> on the

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 12:21 PM, Jim wrote: >On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: >> On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: >>> ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp >>> dpt:22 >> OK, So port 22 is open. >> Is this on the server where sshd is running or is this >> on the

Re: Seperate audio outputs for fedora- is this limited by my soundcard or the number of outputs on my motherboard?

On 2 October 2010 12:04, stan wrote: > I think there are some very high end audio cards that have more than > one processing pipeline, but I have never owned one. I think the "very high end" comment is probably not true anymore. I used to own an Intel HDA integrated chip couple of years back capa

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 07:05 PM, JD wrote: > > On 10/02/2010 12:14 PM, Jim wrote: >> On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22 >>> OK, So port 22 is open. >>> Is this on the serv

Re: size discrepancy

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, JD wrote: > The actual physical size on the DVD seems to have been padded by 10240 > bytes (not sure if that is done during dvd burn, or during dvd read), When one uses features like "burnproof" so that the burning process can pad out buffer underruns, and keep o

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On 2 October 2010 23:58, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: > >> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 >> Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not >> > install VSFTPD with it. >> > >> > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it instal

Re: SSH can't connect

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim wrote: > On 10/02/2010 07:05 PM, JD wrote: >> On 10/02/2010 12:14 PM, Jim wrote: >>> On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: > ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW >

Re: Re: links, mc, lynx, etc. No console mouse support.

On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, JD wrote: > > > On 10/02/2010 01:17 AM, Silent-Hunter wrote: >>I cannot seem to get console mouse support working. GPM works for >> copy/paste, but Lynx, Midnight Commander, and Links will not use the >> mouse unless I run them as root or with sudo. Can anyone help

Re: Re: links, mc, lynx, etc. No console mouse support.

On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, stan wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:17:36 -0700 > Silent-Hunter wrote: > >>I cannot seem to get console mouse support working. GPM works for >> copy/paste, but Lynx, Midnight Commander, and Links will not use the >> mouse unless I run them as root or with sudo. Ca

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's (OT)

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 20:49 +0100, Yorvyk wrote: > On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:54:27 +0200 > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:59 -0700, JD wrote: > > > I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found > > > that AMD released them or announced back in March. > > > The price is stee

Re: SSH can't connect

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/02/2010 11:32 AM, Jim wrote: > Wether I run NX (nomachine) or SSH I get the same error message, no > matter what host I try to connect to. > > And on the host servers SSHd is running. > And so is the Client box. > > Running NX > Error messa

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 10/02/2010 01:05 PM, Samuel Kidman wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Yorvyk > wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:54:27 +0200 > Gilboa Davara mailto:gilb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:59 -0700, JD wrote: > >

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 10/02/2010 02:41 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > To be honest your bigger problem is finding enough application > parallelism and enough parallel user space apps. That and memory or I/O > bandwidth on servers. > > The kernel will run on supercomputers with over 1000 processors. Not all > workloads are h

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 02:42 PM, Jim wrote: >What is the 6749 in this command ? > > > # netstat -nltp | grep 22 > tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 > 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 6749/sshd > tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:8822 > 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1666/smfpd > tcp0

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On 3 October 2010 00:41, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 2 October 2010 23:58, Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 >>> Aaron Gray wrote: >>> >>> > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not >>> > install VSFTPD with

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 00:41:57 +0100 Aaron Gray wrote: > Its not iptables, thats exactly the same across the two machines. It's strange it isn't working. What responses do you get if you type ftp -v That should show you the flow from the client side and give you a hint about where it is failing

Re: SSH can't connect

On 10/02/2010 04:35 PM, Jim wrote: >On 10/02/2010 07:05 PM, JD wrote: >> On 10/02/2010 12:14 PM, Jim wrote: >>> On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: > ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW > tcp dpt:22 OK

Re: size discrepancy

On 10/02/2010 04:40 PM, Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, JD wrote: >> The actual physical size on the DVD seems to have been padded by 10240 >> bytes (not sure if that is done during dvd burn, or during dvd read), > When one uses features like "burnproof" so that the burning proces

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 10/02/2010 11:30 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, JD wrote: >> Not to be mean or anythingSo please take it lightly: >> Did I say linux has issues in supporting large smp? NO! >> You are answering your own question. not mine. > ... > >> Did I say anything about

Installing F14 Beta

Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. When I got to the stage where the user is presented with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. On the left are storage partitions that will be mounted and on the right (labeled for installation targets) is empty. in the vertical centre bar there is a larg

Re: Seperate audio outputs for fedora- is this limited by my soundcard or the number of outputs on my motherboard?

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:21:01 -0700 suvayu ali wrote: > On 2 October 2010 12:04, stan wrote: > > I think there are some very high end audio cards that have more than > > one processing pipeline, but I have never owned one. > > I think the "very high end" comment is probably not true anymore. I >

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 -0700, JD wrote: > Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. > When I got to the stage where the user is presented > with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. > On the left are storage partitions that will be mounted > and on the right (labeled for installation targets)

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On 10/02/2010 07:01 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 -0700, JD wrote: >> Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. >> When I got to the stage where the user is presented >> with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. >> On the left are storage partitions that will be mounted >>

Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl

On 3 October 2010 01:35, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 3 October 2010 00:41, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On 2 October 2010 23:58, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> > >> On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 > >>> Aaron Gray wrote: > >>> > >>> > I have installed a fresh ve

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On 10/2/10 7:01 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 -0700, JD wrote: >> Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. >> When I got to the stage where the user is presented >> with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. >> On the left are storage partitions that will be mounted >> and

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 19:26 -0700, JD wrote: > >> Anaconda got stuck there for a long time. Even the disk activity LED > >> went quiescent. So I rebooted. > >> > >> Anyone experience this? > > > > upgrades take a long time > > > > there is a fedora-test list for questions about pre-release ve

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 19:43 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > On 10/2/10 7:01 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 -0700, JD wrote: > >> Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. > >> When I got to the stage where the user is presented > >> with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle.

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On 10/02/2010 07:43 PM, James McKenzie wrote: >On 10/2/10 7:01 PM, Craig White wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 -0700, JD wrote: >>> Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. >>> When I got to the stage where the user is presented >>> with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. >>> On the

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On 10/02/2010 07:56 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 19:43 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: >> On 10/2/10 7:01 PM, Craig White wrote: >>> On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 -0700, JD wrote: Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. When I got to the stage where the user is presented with a

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:58 PM, JD wrote: > Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. > When I got to the stage where the user is presented > with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. > On the left are storage partitions that will be mounted > and on the right (labeled for installation targets)

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On 10/02/2010 10:46 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:58 PM, JD > wrote: > > Tried to upgrade to F14 Beta. > When I got to the stage where the user is presented > with a screen, that is vertically split in the middle. > On the le

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:49 AM, JD wrote: > > ? > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/test/14-Beta/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso > > hmm, should be up to date, but it sure sound like anacond 14.2 instead of 14.4.17. Goto fedoraproject.org, select "

Re: Installing F14 Beta

On 10/02/2010 10:59 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:49 AM, JD > wrote: > > > ? > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/test/14-Beta/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-14-Beta-i386-DVD.iso > > > > hmm, should be up t

a sound problem

Hi,everyone, I'm not sure why this happens, but the problem is when I'm in the GUI(Gnome),the sound works pretty good. And if I play a music and change to the console, while Login into the system,the sound is also works good. But when I first changed into the console and Login before the