I am using a network printer (NRG-MP-C3300) and I am noting that I can
choose format of paper (A3-A4) when printing from openoffice but when
I print from some application (Firefox, Eye of Gnome) I have only the
default format option (i.e. format choice is greyed).
Is this the correct behaviour?? or
Chen, Helen Y:
>> I am running Fedora 13 with the 2.6.33.5-112-2.2 kernel, and am
>> trying to make an ISO image of my hard disk for other use.
Rick Stevens:
> genisoimage -m "/proc/*" -m "/sys/*" -m "/dev/*" -m core ...
It's probably worth pointing this out: Do you really want an ISO image
of
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:12 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> I am using a network printer (NRG-MP-C3300) and I am noting that I can
> choose format of paper (A3-A4) when printing from openoffice but when
> I print from some application (Firefox, Eye of Gnome) I have only the
> default format option (i.e.
2010/7/13 Tim :
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:12 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
>> I am using a network printer (NRG-MP-C3300) and I am noting that I can
>> choose format of paper (A3-A4) when printing from openoffice but when
>> I print from some application (Firefox, Eye of Gnome) I have only the
>> defaul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2010 05:37 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday, July 12, 2010 17:26:52 Paul Smith wrote:
>> Could you please suggest a Fedora program to download the audio from a
>> mmhs address?
>
> Do you mean mms? I can suggest mplayer, it should be ab
Hi
We also have about 30 VMs running Centos 5 and 389 DS without any problem of
resources, with a directory of about 55000 entries (VMWare ESX Server), all
replicated. Also, real machines.
2010/7/13 Daniel Maher >
> On 07/13/2010 01:26 AM, Barry Sitompul wrote:
>
> > Has anyone had the experien
Il giorno lun, 12/07/2010 alle 14.45 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> Someone can show me, if exist, more better solution for a) and b)?
Thank to all, now I have a place to start.
--
Dario Lesca
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Actually, I have always found the Fedora Installation Guide
>> more or less useless.
>> I would have thought it would be much better just to list
>> the various ways in which one can install Fedora,
>> and describe for each one exactly what one has to do.
>
> Care to file a
I just did a yum update and now my cifs mount in my fstab no longer mounts
at boot automatically and messages contains no errors.
I recall the _nnetdev option from a while ago but removed it as it was no
longer used AFAIK and adding back in confirmed that, messages shows it as
unknown.
fstab is a
On 07/13/2010 02:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Jonathan Boulle wrote:
>
>> Is there a suggested/common way to work around it?
>>
> Not that I know of. Does vnc help? Suggestions are welcome.
>
I'll have a think about it, it's going to move down the priority list
now though. Just f
On 07/12/2010 07:43 PM, Dick Roark wrote:
> My main Linux box has suffered a motherboard failure. I am
> contemplating just moving the HDD to the XP machine and setting up
> dual boot. If this isn't satisfactory, then it's a new motherboard.
> I could boot by selecting the desired disk using
On 07/12/2010 09:12 PM, Harish Pillay wrote:
>> My main Linux box has suffered a motherboard failure. I am contemplating
>> just moving the HDD to the XP machine and setting up dual boot. If this
>> isn't satisfactory, then it's a new motherboard. I could boot by selecting
>> the desired disk u
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
> Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
> wifi.
>
I installed CentOS on this netbook. I went to pendrivelinux, grabbed
the iso to USB tool, then cr
On 07/12/2010 08:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
> Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
> wifi.
>
> Dave
>
Why don't tell us what problems you're having
trying it yourself?
--
users mailing list
users@li
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 08:24 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 08:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
> > Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
> > wifi.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> Why don't tell us what problems you're
--- On Tue, 7/13/10, Antonio M wrote:
> 2010/7/13 Tim :
> > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:12 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> >> I am using a network printer (NRG-MP-C3300) and I
> am noting that I can
> >> choose format of paper (A3-A4) when printing from
> openoffice but when
> >> I print from some applica
Hello all,
In these days I have to take a look to a student who's partecipating to
a stage, since my colleague, her tutor, is in vacations; her goal is to
develop a php script to let people change some of their attributes on
our LDAP; since we use a 389-directory running on a RH5 as LDAP, s
Hi folks,
This seems like de ja vu, but I can't find anything in the archives.
I've got F13 on my laptop, and also on a new virtual server.
I've copied my home directory from my old server to my new one and then tried
to ssh to the new server. However, I have a problem
If I ssh to root on the
On 07/13/2010 11:49 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
> I've copied my home directory from my old server to my new one and then tried
> to ssh to the new server. However, I have a problem
>
> If I ssh to root on the new server everything is fine, but if I ssh to my user
> I get errors and X forwarding d
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 16:51:57 Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> Try:
>
> restorecon -r ~/.ssh
>
> - Mike
Thanks Mike
The command ran without error but has made no difference.
Gary
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by int
On 07/13/2010 08:49 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This seems like de ja vu, but I can't find anything in the archives.
>
> I've got F13 on my laptop, and also on a new virtual server.
>
> I've copied my home directory from my old server to my new one and then tried
> to ssh to the new
On 07/13/2010 07:04 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I just did a yum update and now my cifs mount in my fstab no longer mounts
> at boot automatically and messages contains no errors.
>
> I recall the _nnetdev option from a while ago but removed it as it was no
> longer used AFAIK and adding back i
Hi All,
I just installed Fedora 13 x86_64 on Intel s4500sf server board with
hardware raid and 8Gb memory.
The installer did not report any error.
After installation completed and reboot I got the message:
“Error Loading Operating System”
I tried installation with no raid I doesn’t work.
I tried
>What happens if you manually enter this:
>
>mount -t cifs -o rw,uid=500,gid=500 username=xxx,password=xxx
>//10.0.0.5/Data /home/xxx/Samba
Hi,
That and/or `mount -a` works fine, seems like a timing issue wrt
to networking possibly?
Thanks!
jlc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
On 07/13/2010 10:09 AM, boaz shnapp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just installed Fedora 13 x86_64 on Intel s4500sf server board with
> hardware raid and 8Gb memory.
> The installer did not report any error.
> After installation completed and reboot I got the message:
> “Error Loading Operating System”
>
On 07/13/2010 10:10 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> What happens if you manually enter this:
>>
>> mount -t cifs -o rw,uid=500,gid=500 username=xxx,password=xxx
>> //10.0.0.5/Data /home/xxx/Samba
> Hi,
> That and/or `mount -a` works fine, seems like a timing issue wrt
> to networking possibly?
On 07/13/2010 10:10 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> What happens if you manually enter this:
>>
>> mount -t cifs -o rw,uid=500,gid=500 username=xxx,password=xxx
>> //10.0.0.5/Data /home/xxx/Samba
> Hi,
> That and/or `mount -a` works fine, seems like a timing issue wrt
> to networking possibly?
On 07/13/2010 09:49 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This seems like de ja vu, but I can't find anything in the archives.
>
> I've got F13 on my laptop, and also on a new virtual server.
>
> I've copied my home directory from my old server to my new one and then tried
> to ssh to the new s
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able
to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a
'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for
2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
Quoting JD :
> On 07/12/2010 08:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>> Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
>> Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
>> wifi.
>>
>> Dave
>>
> Why don't tell us what problems you're having
> trying it yourself?
well
Quoting Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 08:24 -0700, JD wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 08:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>> > Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
>> > Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
>> > wifi.
>> >
>> > Dave
>> >
Quoting Kwan Lowe :
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>> Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
>> Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
>> wifi.
>>
> I installed CentOS on this netbook. I went to pendrivelinux, grabbed
New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for file
/home/dhighley/.ssh/authorized_keys
We have checked and tried different modes until we are blue in the face.
Hav
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:43 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able
> to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a
> 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for
> 2.6.3
David Highley wrote:
> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
> we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
> Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for file
> /home/dhighley/.ssh/authorized_keys
Make sure .ssh/authorized_keys has 600 permissi
Hi
If this a new install I do believe you need to regenerate the key.
Try this..
Do a plain ssh using password.
Like
ssh m...@mydomain.com
and it should ask for password.
If that works. Then you know ssh link is working.
HTH
Marvin
On 7/13/10, David Highley wrote:
> New install of Fedo
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:43 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Dear List,
> >
> > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able
> > to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a
> > 'y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2010 10:49 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This seems like de ja vu, but I can't find anything in the archives.
>
> I've got F13 on my laptop, and also on a new virtual server.
>
> I've copied my home directory from my old server
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been
> able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update'
> after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the
> repositories for 2
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
David Highley wrote:
> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry
> when we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
> Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for
> file /home/dhighley/.ssh/authorized_keys
>
> W
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Quoting Kwan Lowe :
>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>>> Does anyone have experience or a pointer to installing F13 on a
>>> Samsung N220? Nice little computer, Atom cpu, 1 gig, 250 HD, realtek
>>> wifi.
>>>
>> I ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2010 01:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
> David Highley wrote:
>
>> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry
>> when we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
>> A
To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
setup provided by Gnome, the KDE one doesn't work. Surely there's got to
be an easier way to do this from KDE! I've not found one yet.
cpp4ever
--
users ma
On 7/13/2010 12:40 PM, Rick Sewill wrote:
>
>> If I ssh to root on the new server everything is fine, but if I ssh to my
>> user
>> I get errors and X forwarding doesn't work.
>>
>> Can anyone suggest things for me to look at / try.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> [g...@dcomp5 ~]$ ssh -Y -C lcomp3 -l root
>> r..
On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
> we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
> Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for file
> /home/dhighley/.ssh/authorized_keys
>
> We have checked an
"Rick Sewill wrote:"
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/13/2010 01:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
> > David Highley wrote:
> >
> >> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry
> >> when we ssh from a Fedo
On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
> we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
> Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for file
> /home/dhighley/.ssh/authorized_keys
>
> We have checked an
I've had very good luck running java application over the NX protocol (
http://nomachine.com/). It actually runs over SSH so it doesn't take extra
firewall ports to get going. I have used the 389 console over nx and it
works great. I actually just use the built in freenx libraries that are in
EP
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 20:15 +0100, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
> open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
> setup provided by Gnome, the KDE one doesn't work. Surely there's got to
> be an easier wa
D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> I have a shell script that I've been using for years to burn ISO
> images. I just tried it with Fedora 13, and it acted up in an odd
> way.
>
> It burnt a DVD+R with this command:
> growisofs -Z /dev/cdrw=/mnt/space-1500/tmp/08mythburn.iso
> -use-the-force-luke=notr
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This seems like de ja vu, but I can't find anything in the archives.
>
> I've got F13 on my laptop, and also on a new virtual server.
>
> I've copied my home directory from my old server to my new one and then tried
> to ssh to the new server. However, I h
On 07/13/2010 08:57 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 20:15 +0100, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
>> open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
>> setup provided by Gnome, the KDE o
"jack craig wrote:"
>
>
>
> On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
> > New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
> > we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
> > Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for file
> > /home/dhighley/.ssh/a
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
> open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
> setup provided by Gnome, the KDE one doesn't work. Surely there's got to
> be an easier way to do this from KDE! I've not fou
Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"?
Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
On 7/13/2010 3:49 PM, jack craig wrote:
>
>
> On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
>> User home directory is auto NFS mounted and we use NIS. This works
>> Fedora 12 to Fedora 12.
Have you tried this:
setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs1 1
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked
On 07/13/2010 01:36 PM, David Highley wrote:
> "jack craig wrote:"
>
>>
>>
>> On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
>>
>>> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
>>> we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to the Fedora 13 system:
>>> Authentication refus
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 16:01 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Recompiled them to use --dwis instead.
Or you could use a script.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: h
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been
> able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update'
> after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the
> repositories for 2
On 07/13/2010 01:46 PM, Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
> Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
> GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
>
> Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"?
>
> Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
>
>
Yes, unfortunately it is w
On 07/13/2010 09:44 PM, g wrote:
> n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
>> open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
>> setup provided by Gnome, the KDE one doesn't work. Surely there's got to
>> be an easie
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 21:17 +0100, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 08:57 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 20:15 +0100, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> >> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
> >> open Thunderbird for email links I have
On 07/13/2010 01:46 PM, Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
> Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
> GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
>
> Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"?
>
> Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
>
>
http://www.fixstars.com/en
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been
> able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update'
> after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the
> repositories for 2
Hello List,
I am running a server under F11. It is a remote machine which I have no
physical access to. It has a network connection. I wanted to upgrade to
F12 using preupgrade again, but this time I am afraid I'll run into
problems due to the size of /boot (194M, 153M free space).
Does anybody
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 09:44 PM, g wrote:
>> n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>>> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
>>> open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
>>> setup provided by Gnome, the KDE one doesn't work. Sur
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500
"Gregory P. Ennis" wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been
> able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update'
> after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the
> repositories for 2
Dear List,
I noticed a problem with an update of evolution on my laptop with
2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE. I thought the problem was with evolution
and made an entry on this list. Kevin Fenzi aptly pointed me in the
right direction.
I have done the following :
yum clean all
rm /var/lib/rpm/__d
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that
> are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start
> another one on yum.
OT, but you might want to check your quoting options. I'm finding this
thread
Quoting Peter Diercks :
> Hello List,
>
> I am running a server under F11. It is a remote machine which I have no
> physical access to. It has a network connection. I wanted to upgrade to
> F12 using preupgrade again, but this time I am afraid I'll run into
> problems due to the size of /boot (194
Hello
Fedora 12 x86_64
I did look this time and it seems the gods that have control did not
give a kmod for the new Nvidia driver 195.36.31 for the new kernel
2.6.32.16-141.
It has a kmod there for the old kernel 2.6.32.14-127
The metapackage is there to track in new kmod but if there is no km
--- On Tue, 7/13/10, Michael Miles wrote:
> Fedora 12 x86_64
>
> I did look this time and it seems the gods that have
> control did not
> give a kmod for the new Nvidia driver 195.36.31 for the new
> kernel
> 2.6.32.16-141.
> It has a kmod there for the old kernel 2.6.32.14-127
>
> The metapa
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 19:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that
> > are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start
> > another one on yum.
>
> OT
Hi Folks;
Every time I try to run KPackageKit to download a program it fails during the
download operation.
I am able to download files (large ISOs) from other programs but even relative
small downloads in KPK fail. I have no network problem otherwise.
I've tried downloading Kate (my favorite
Rick Sewill wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Having said the above, if you suspect an acpi or apic problem,
> the URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelCommonProblems
> says,
> "acpi=off is a big hammer, and if that works, narrowing dow
For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
updates.
I'm just re-learning Fedora after about five years in other distros and haven't
been able to find the source of this error. ~/.yumex.conf
On 07/13/2010 06:06 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>
>> Fedora 12 x86_64
>>
>> I did look this time and it seems the gods that have
>> control did not
>> give a kmod for the new Nvidia driver 195.36.31 for the new
>> kernel
>> 2.6.32.16-141.
>> It has a
"Rich wrote:"
>
>
> --===AVGMAIL-2B426D50===
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> On 7/13/2010 3:49 PM, jack craig wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
>
> >> User home directory is auto NFS mounted and we use
"jack craig wrote:"
>
>
>
> On 07/13/2010 01:36 PM, David Highley wrote:
> > "jack craig wrote:"
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote:
> >>
> >>> New install of Fedora 13 we get the following /var/log/secure entry when
> >>> we ssh from a Fedora 12 system to t
I installed the latest Firefox Beta on a 32-bit F11 box, and I'm really
impressed. So, I decided to install it on my 64-bit F13 box.
The problem - the F13 box is 64-bit only and the Firefox beta seems to
be 32-bit, so I need a set of 32-bit libraries. Since the Firefox
install isn't an RPM, I
There will be another Fedora Community Gaming session this weekend.
We will be playing Wesnoth which is a turn based fantasy strategy game.
We will be starting at:
UTC: 1700 Saturday July 17, 2010
EDT: 1pm Saturday July 17, 2010
We need people on time for this one as adding people late is diffic
On Tuesday, 13 July, 2010 @20:46 zulu, Jozsi Avadkan scribed:
> Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather
> uses the GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
>
> Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"?
>
> Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
Have you chec
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 07:57 PM, john wendel wrote:
> Is there and easy way to determine what libraries are required to run
> Firefox?
>
maybe use rpm or yum to find what the deps are for ur 64 bit firefox?
> John
>
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
On Wednesday, 14 July, 2010 @01:56 zulu Thomas Taylor scribed:
> Where else should I look?
Did you try
# yum update yumex
?
FWIW, I do not recall ever seeing that message from yumex,
even when I didn't have a connection to the network.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On 07/13/2010 08:26 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 07:57 PM, john wendel wrote:
>
>> Is there and easy way to determine what libraries are required to run
>> Firefox?
>>
>>
> maybe use rpm or yum to find what the deps are for ur 64 bit firefox?
>
>
>> John
>>
>>
Thomas Taylor wrote:
> For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
> network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
> updates.
i had same problems.
*yumex* is seeing the network connection as disabled because it is checking
for connection
Hi,
I have just installed FC13 on an AMD Phenom II 1090 six-core box using
the desktop system settings, and I have a few questions. I'm not sure
I like the configuration, and will probably reinstall.
- Is it possible to pass arguments to mkfs during install, so I can
limit the size of the reserve
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed FC13 on an AMD Phenom II 1090 six-core box using
> the desktop system settings, and I have a few questions. I'm not sure
> I like the configuration, and will probably reinstall.
>
> - Is it possible to pass arguments to m
On 07/13/2010 08:15 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> To setup Thunderbird 3 to open Firefox for web links, and Firefox to
> open Thunderbird for email links I have to use the default applications
> setup provided by Gnome, the KDE one doesn't work. Surely there's got to
> be an easier way to do
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I noticed a problem with an update of evolution on my laptop with
> 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE. I thought the problem was with evolution
> and made an entry on this list. Kevin Fenzi aptly pointed me in the
> right direc
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:27:26 -0400
"Darr" wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 July, 2010 @01:56 zulu Thomas Taylor scribed:
>
> > Where else should I look?
>
> Did you try
> # yum update yumex
> ?
>
> FWIW, I do not recall ever seeing that message from yumex,
> even when I didn't have a connection to t
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> When I try to update an rpm yum is not pulling the recent rpm's from the
> repository.
>
Hi,
I assume it is Fedora 13.
We have to do it methodically, jumping all over places does not do it.
Please post full output (uncut):
yum list all
yum clean all
92 matches
Mail list logo
