On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Michael Smith
wrote:
> I am new to this and want some help/ideas. I recently installed Fedora
> 12 and now cannot download updates.
Please be more specific. What did you try. What happened?
Usually I get updates using yum, like this:
yum -y update
Mike
--
On 16 June 2010 01:30, Paul Otheim wrote:
> hadn't seen anything on the list about this, I don't know if Fedora even
> has a package available for this but for all you gamers out there beware.
> https://infosecurity.us/?p=15207 (Google Chrome throws a fit about this page
> being a security proble
On 06/16/2010 01:44 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 10:36 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> I wrote the absurd blurb below. Forget what I said. I was confused
>> on what command I was talking about
>>
> That makes 3 times so far :-)
>
Yes... Dragon Boat Fest
Hi,
I have tried to find information about fedoras evolution but haven't
find an answer to the following question:
How long will fedora 12 be supported with security updates?
I'm coming from ubuntu and used to the idea with LTS-versions (long time
support) but I like some of the security philospoh
On 16/06/10 08:47, Mats wrote:
> How long will fedora 12 be supported with security updates?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/Schedule
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
On 16 June 2010 04:27, L wrote:
> this is the output of xrandr at console.
>
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 8192 x 8192
> LVDS1 connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
> axis) 331mm x 207mm
> 1280x800 60.0*+
> 1024x768 60.0
> 800x60
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Actually, in the only criteria that counted, VHS was infinitely
> superior to Beta: You could record a whole 2 hour movie on VHS and
> watch it later. You couldn't do that at all on Beta.
And for those of us outside of America, VHS had better
(1).
my etc/event.d/control-alt-delete file (fc11) is like that:
# control-alt-delete - emergency keypress handling
#
# This task is run whenever the Control-Alt-Delete key combination is
# pressed. Usually used to shut down the machine.
start on control-alt-delete
exec /sbin/shutdown -r now "
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:57 +1000, Michael Smith wrote:
> I am new to this and want some help/ideas. I recently installed Fedora
> 12 and now cannot download updates.
Please copy the exact error message. Regards,
--
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo - nosp...@gm
On 06/16/2010 03:47 AM, Mats wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried to find information about fedoras evolution but haven't
> find an answer to the following question:
> How long will fedora 12 be supported with security updates?
> I'm coming from ubuntu and used to the idea with LTS-versions (long time
> sup
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 02:15 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Can one place a script somewhere to be read on resumption from hibernation?
> If so, where?
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d
There are several already there, they are very similar to
the /etc/rc.d/init.d scripts. I have a couple I use to do thi
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:40 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> my etc/event.d/control-alt-delete file (fc11) is like that:
>
> # control-alt-delete - emergency keypress handling
> #
> # This task is run whenever the Control-Alt-Delete key combination is
> # pressed. Usually used to shut down the mac
On 06/16/2010 08:49 PM, Tim wrote:
> By the way, on this list we don't top post (writing replies above the
> message you're replying to), nor do we quote the entire prior message,
> just the bits that need seeing to make sense of the reply. As I've done
> with my replies. The list guidelines (a l
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 20:38:56 -0500,
Richard Shaw wrote:
> 3iso_size = math.ceil(file_size/(2*1024))*2*1024
With loose typing the about might be doing the division as integer division.
One possible fix would be:
iso_size = ((file_size + ((2*1024)-1))/(2*1024))*(2*1024)
--
users mail
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> When my son tries to connect to our LAN with his Blackberry,
>> the request is first refused and then accepted.
> ...
>>Unable to add forward map from BLACKBERRY-4A9A.gayleard.com
>>to : not authorized
>
> It is trying to update the DNS server, setting the name
> B
On 06/16/2010 03:00 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
...
>> Do you need this?
>
> No, I'm sure I don't.
> I should have said that the only reason this slightly annoys me
> is that these warnings come up several times a day
> in the logwatch on the server.
>
> I guess the simplest sol
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 20:38:56 -0500,
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> 3 iso_size = math.ceil(file_size/(2*1024))*2*1024
>
> With loose typing the about might be doing the division as integer division.
> One possible fix would be:
> iso_
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I think I would also make the point that it isn't a good idea to
> starting adding additional questions/issues into an existing thread.
> I feel it would have been better to start a new message/thread with
> "How to download videos" as the Subj
This security update has just been released:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for_Linux_(.rpm)
This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-release.i386.rpm. I don't yet
know how stable this will be with 64-bit Fedora or other Linux
distributions.
--Doc Savage
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Just updated the kernel so I might have another go if I feel
> > adventurous. There should be no way a user-space app such as
> growisofs
> > can possibly freeze or reboot the system(1), so I'm assuming it's a
> > driver bug.
> >
> Maybe u
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 03:47 AM, Mats wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have tried to find information about fedoras evolution but haven't
> > find an answer to the following question:
> > How long will fedora 12 be supported with security updates?
> > I'm co
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 23:19:19 +0930,
Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I think I would also make the point that it isn't a good idea to
> > starting adding additional questions/issues into an existing thread.
> > I feel it would have been better to start a
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:55 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> This security update has just been released:
>
> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for_Linux_(.rpm)
>
> This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-release.i386.rpm. I don't yet
> know how stabl
The hard drive on my F12 system recently failed, and I decided it was
easiest to simply start from scratch. So what I'm dealing with now is
a clean install of F13 from DVD, updated. The printer in our office is
shared from a well-established Windows machine. It is the same machine
that was used whe
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Alan Evans wrote:
> The hard drive on my F12 system recently failed, and I decided it was
> easiest to simply start from scratch. So what I'm dealing with now is
> a clean install of F13 from DVD, updated. The printer in our office is
> shared from a well-establish
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Agreed, but it's worth mentioning that CentOS tracks RHEL releases and
> is available at no cost (and consequently no paid support).
As my boss said it when I presented the budget forecast for my RHEL
licenses; "It's less than the rou
On 06/15/2010 02:39 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 02:35 PM, g wrote:
>
>>> ok, take thunderbird out of as much background mode as possible.
>>>
>>> next time you are going to be composing emails, put thunderbird offline,
>>> disable auto save, then start composing.
>>>
>>> if you stil
Unless RedHat has cleaned up their act, RH support is a, well, joke.
The CentOS forums are a much better way to go.
It has been a couple of years since I tried to do so, but setting up a
central CentOS updates repository is trivial. Setting up one with RH is
a bit of a chore and one has to won
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:37 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
> I go to System->Administration->Printing and select Add. Then I'm
> asked to provide my root password twice -- what's up with that?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Printing/ConfigurationTool#P
On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> This security update has just been released:
>
> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for_Linux_(.rpm)
>
> This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-release.i386.rpm. I don't yet
> know how stable this will b
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Did you remember to poke a hole in your firewall?
Sorry, forgot to mention: Firewall is disabled.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, William John Murray wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> I run openafs on my Fedora laptop. Works very nicely.
> However, there is one problem: the startup scripts come up before NM has
> had a chance to open any interfaces, so it seems no internet and
> switches off at boot ti
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> It didn't find any SMB shares there. Did you apply the package updates
> first? I ask because an updated F-13 system-config-printer package can
> adjust the firewall appropriately for you.
The system is fully updated. FIrewall is disabled.
>
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> I should have said that the only reason this slightly annoys me
>> is that these warnings come up several times a day
>> in the logwatch on the server.
>>
>> I guess the simplest solution would be to give a fixed address
>> on my LAN to this blackberry, in /etc/dhcpd.conf on
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:21 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
> "Windows Printer via SAMBA" is not on the list of options.
Perhaps that's the problem. Install the 'samba-client' package and try
again.
There's an open bug report about installing that package automatically:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On 06/15/2010 07:20 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed with, "yum -y install 389-ds"
>
> I have started the console with, /usr/bin/389-console
>
> under the Server group folder I have "Administration Server" and "Directory
> Server" (hostname)
>
> Clicking on either of these gives me a
> There are "download helper" plug-ins that you can install in the Firefox
> web browser, and for other browsers, too, that let you save content from
> some sites, such as YouTube. There's one that's actually called
> "DownloadHelper" which does that, as well as offering to convert
> downloaded me
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:21 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
>> "Windows Printer via SAMBA" is not on the list of options.
>
> Perhaps that's the problem. Install the 'samba-client' package and try
> again.
That did it. Thanks!
-Alan
--
users mailing
>
> One possible issue is that some stuff moved from /etc/event.d to /etc/init
> relatively silently at one of the upgrades. It looks like
> /etc/init/control-alt-delete.conf now controls what to do after a c-a-d
> is trapped. I don't know what controls whether or not c-a-d gets trapped
> in the fi
On 06/16/2010 11:52 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> that's correct, but if it possible to get /download that video from the
> terminal? like by typing the URL containing the video or fetch video id.
> or something like that and than downloading, though GUI downloader
> plugin does that.
>
> thx tim.
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>This security update has just been released:
>
>http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for
>_Linux_(.rpm)
>
>This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-release.i386.rpm. I don't yet
>know how stable this will
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>> This security update has just been released:
>>
>> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_f
>>or_Linux_(.rpm)
>>
>> This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 21:33:28 +0530,
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> http://www.fedoraguide.info/index.php?title=Fedora11#How_to_disable_Ctrl.2BAlt.2BDel_from_restarting_computer_in_Console_mode
>
> says something wrong, becoz the line:
>
> ca:12345:ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -t1 -a -r now
>
> does
Hi all,
Problem: on F13 icons for links and files are wrong.
I did a fresh install of F13 x86_64 and updated it. I copied back some
links that I had on my F12 Desktop. Links are URL's dragged from the
Firefox address bar to the Desktop. The problem is that the icon for the
links is a blank she
On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>>
>> This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>> effort to date.
>>
>> Steve
>>
> I believe this may be a newer build.
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
> >effort to date.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> I believe this may be a newer build. Not extensively checked, but it played
> a c
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>>>
>>> This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>>> effort to date.
>>
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>> >This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>> >effort to date.
>> >
>> >Steve
>>
>> I believe this may b
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Now, other things seem to be misbehaving with Thunderbird.
> First, I've had top running and when it seems to freeze, I'm seeing
> Thunderbird taking about 100% of the CPU. So it seems that T-Bird gets
you are starting to see reasons i am glad i am still running 2.0.0.24.
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release
Candidate 1 of version 1.2.6. This release a couple of bug fixes.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a
release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it has been tested
for regressions and fo
On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
This is what they released last week, an
mark benschop wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> Thanks for your reply.
> Please find the logging from the problems below.
> The serverb55 is one of 2 servers in a multiple masters configuration
> that consists of serverb55 and serverb05.
>
> The problem I inititially had was that I had 2 entries that could not
On 06/16/2010 11:50 AM, g wrote:
> solutions to your problems have been disabling "features" to upgrading.
> because of various problems with 3.0.x versions, an upgrade to 3.1 or
> higher is better.
>
> i know this can be a problem under linux, but there are ways.
>
Thanks for suggestion, I'
On 06/15/2010 10:24 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martin
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On 06/16/2010 02:50 PM, g wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>
>
>> Now, other things seem to be misbehaving with Thunderbird.
>> First, I've had top running and when it seems to freeze, I'm seeing
>> Thunderbird taking about 100% of the CPU. So it seems that T-Bird gets
>>
>
>
> you are sta
"Robert G. (Doc) Savage" writes:
> I can't imagine what has prompted Adobe to pack up their proverbial bat
> & ball and go home, abandoning 64-bit Flash development for all
> platforms. I hope there's another explanation, because this is just
> beyond dumb.
I was reading an article about llvm, t
On 06/16/2010 01:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> On 06/15/2010 10:24 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martin
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>>
On 06/16/2010 01:29 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" writes:
>
>> I can't imagine what has prompted Adobe to pack up their proverbial bat
>> & ball and go home, abandoning 64-bit Flash development for all
>> platforms. I hope there's another explanation, because t
Hi,
I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it,
so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS
shuts down automatically.
Is there a way to enable this and if so, please tell me how
I am using Xfce but I could switch to Gnome.
Thank you,
Edmon
--
use
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
> to use a 32bit browser.
Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-bit Flash works with it. In fact
I'm guessing that any browser that sandboxes plugins in separate
processes s
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On 6/14/10, Curt Stauffer wrote:
> I haven't seen any responses to this one, I hope that it made it out
> to the list ;-{
>
> If anyone can help I'd really appreciate it.
>
> -Curt
in lieu of _real_ help,
1) maybe anaconda was just taking a lon
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 13:37 -0700, JD wrote:
> I hope someone comes up with a different way other than flash for
> playing video content within the browser
There are lots, but the sites people want to visit generally use Flash,
and Flash is not just a video player. That's the whole problem.
poc
On 06/16/2010 01:43 PM, Edmon Begoli wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it,
so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS
shuts down automatically.
Is there a way to enable this and if so, please tell me how
I am using Xfce but I
On 06/17/2010 02:03 AM, JD wrote:
>
> Seems to me this is a moot point.
> Each distro, and in fact each repo, builds it's packages which end up in
> some or many cases with different required dependencies from same
> package built on some other repo or distro - depending on what was
> installed
On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
>> to use a 32bit browser.
>
> Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-bit Flash works with it. In fact
> I'm guessing that
--- On Wed, 6/16/10, Mats wrote:
> I have tried to find information about fedoras evolution
> but haven't
> find an answer to the following question:
> How long will fedora 12 be supported with security
> updates?
Approximately 13 months from initial release. This goes for all Fedora
releases.
The info below shows my problem.
$ sudo yum -y update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386
| 951 B 00:00
google-chrome
--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 01:28 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> >
> > There was a similar problem 35 years ago with consumer
> video recording and/or playback formats. Ultimately,
> the consumer chose which format it preferred. They
> will, again. It just takes time.
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:22 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> >> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
> >> to use a 32bit browser.
> >
> > Not so. I use 64-bit Ch
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:42:16 -0600
> Greg Woods wrote:
>
> > I believe it is only a matter of (not much) time
> before Linux is
> > targeted.
>
> Linux is already targeted plenty at the server level. Leave
> a
> linux box hooked to the internet with the
On 6/16/2010 5:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:22 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
to u
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 12:28 AM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > There was a similar problem 35 years ago with consumer
> video recording and/or playback formats. Ultimately,
> the consumer chose which format it preferred. They
> will, again. It j
Hi,
so this one has me completely stomped... After upgrading to F13 (though yum
but I also tested with a clean F13 install, same behavior) every flash video
(e.g. youtube) plays significantly faster than it should... A 45 second video
plays in about 12 seconds without any sound at all.
The we
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Sam Sharpe wrot
>
> There is better coverage here:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/linux_game_backdoor/
>
>
Better coverage of a sort, I suppose.
"A warning today that Linux users are not as immune to security threats as
many of them like to believe"
An
On 06/16/2010 06:10 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Tue, 6/15/10, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Linux is already targeted plenty at the server level. Leave
>> a
>> linux box hooked to the internet with the firewall turned
>> off
>> for a few hours and see what happens :-).
>
> Desktop level, too. My
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Steven P. Ulrick <
lists-fed...@afolkey2.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Ed Greshko
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/16/2010 04:54 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So. if somebody could fill the bug report, I would appreciate. It's
> > > > not an
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>>> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
>>> to use a 32bit browser.
>>
>> Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-b
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> This has nothing to do with "who broke what". This has everything to do
> with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux variants, mainstream
> enough for the common person to use.
>
Have you seen Taxi Driver? There's a reply where De Ni
Greetings:
I've got a ThinkPad T61 (Core2Duo-2.5GHz, 4Gb RAM, 250Gb disk) with a
working F11 32-bit install on their own separate boot (1012Mb) and
root (/) partitions. I also dual-boot WinXP when necessary for
work-related tasks. I've got two spare partitions (25Gb and 50Gb) onto
which I wanted t
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not expecting
> because
> > the one in testing -- posted yesterday -- is an earlier kernel? This
> > seems
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:49:29 -0400
Ted Roche wrote:
> Obviously, I missed something in getting this set up. Should I have
> installed the new Grub to the boot partition? Suggestions on
> troubleshooting appreciated.
You should probably do this instead:
title Fedora x86_64
rootnoverify (hd0,7)
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 23:41 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
> > I am trying to upgrade the boxes on a small LAN from FC11 to FC13. The
> > server is now running FC13 and NFS. One of the boxes that is still
> > running FC11 can read & write to the shared direc
I have had a problem with kernel freezes for several months. It started
when I first moved to the 2.6.31 kernel on Fedora 12. At that time it
was relatively infrequent. When the 2.6.32 kernel came out, the problem
became very bad -- every night when cron.daily runs the kernel would
hang. Note that
Robert Myers wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Sam Sharpe wrot
>
>> There is better coverage here:
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/linux_game_backdoor/
>>
>>
> Better coverage of a sort, I suppose.
>
> "A warning today that Linux users are not as immune to security threats as
>
Paul Otheim wrote:
> hadn't seen anything on the list about this, I don't know if Fedora even
> has a package available for this but for all you gamers out there beware.
>
> https://infosecurity.us/?p=15207 (Google Chrome throws a fit about this page
> being a security problem)
>
> or
>
> http
Joe Conway writes:
Upon upgrade to Fedora 13 and the 2.6.33 kernel, the problem has become
better in that I have not seen a hang during the nightly crons. However,
now I can freeze the kernel on demand by copying a large file via ssh
(scp or rsync). Perhaps relevant is that those cron nightly jo
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> BTW: I am subscribed to the Thunderbird list, but I have not had the
> time to follow it recently. As I mentioned before, I have been ignoring
> my friend Google :-)
not having time is very understandable.
may well be that upgrading, as konstantin suggest, may well be a b
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Thanks for suggestion, I've upgraded.. will see if it's any better
welcome.
rawhide is a good way to do upgrade. i hope i works for you and jerry.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:52 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III
> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
>
> > How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:27 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin
> wrote:
>
>
>
> This has nothing to do with "who broke what". This has
> everything to do
> with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux va
I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
indicating the download was finished. Of course it should be 3.1 gigs!
Is the
Bob Goodwin writes:
I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
indicating the download was finished. Of course it should b
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 16 June 2010 04:27, L wrote:
>> this is the output of xrandr at console.
>>
>> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 8192 x 8192
>> LVDS1 connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
>> axis) 331mm x 207mm
>
On 16/06/10 21:17, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>
>>
>> I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
>> http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
>> along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
>> in
On 06/16/2010 05:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Based on the assumption that you are experiencing a kernel crash, there
> are two ways of obtaining diagnostics:
>
> 1) A serial console. Going retro, getting a null-modem adapter, and
> connecting the serial port of the ailing machine with the seri
Joe Conway writes:
On 06/16/2010 05:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
2) Using kexec-tools to set up a recovery kernel. Adding the crashkernel
parameter to your kernel boot prompt, reserving 128MB of your RAM for a
recovery kernel and a small boot image. When your running kernel
crashes, the recove
On 6/16/2010 7:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> ==
> As I said, this is the one installed and linked. This listing is from
> ~/Downloads, not whats installed.
>
>>
>> Ever
On 6/16/2010 7:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>> Gene uses 64-bit Firefox, I think, and he was using the 64bit Flash. I
>> gave him the link. Naively. The 32-bit Flash will work with Firefox and
>> a
On 06/16/2010 03:29 PM, Peter A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so this one has me completely stomped... After upgrading to F13 (though yum
> but I also tested with a clean F13 install, same behavior) every flash video
> (e.g. youtube) plays significantly faster than it should... A 45 second video
> plays in a
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
