On 30/05/10 00:37, g wrote:
--snip--
>
> so, either new web page designs are not being published, i am not getting
> all postings that i should, or show how or other i did not see it.
>
> as i said, such notices should be sent to this list.
>
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-l
I assume the missing i686 libraries for Fedora 13 x64 are in the
pipeline. This caused me a few minor headaches, but could be more like
migraines to those less experienced. Otherwise Fedora 13 seems fine, and
I'll start on kdevelop 4 usage, which I've been long anticipating.
Regards
JB
--
users
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 18:10 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 01:22 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > I'm just wondering why we don't have a tool for yum upgrades that
> > downloads the packages and after OK by the user drops down to single
> > user mode and installs them, at
Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
supposed to be the nightly-builds of the "latest" code. However, a
quick look at the logs shows that those are build once in a week or
even not that "often".
Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
cann
On 30/05/10 09:54, Joshua C. wrote:
--snip--
>
> Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
> cannot understand where the problem is to build every night the isos?
More than likely the Release of F13, has brought the person (singular)
attention elsewhere.
They will pr
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy :
> On 30/05/10 09:54, Joshua C. wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
>> cannot understand where the problem is to build every night the isos?
>
> More than likely the Release of F13, has brought the person (singular)
On 30/05/10 10:04, Joshua C. wrote:
--snip--
>> --
>
>
> I thought this is an automated process?!? I really cannot understand
> why this cannot be done automatically. They've got the space, the
> script and just need to re-compose the isos - which can be done with a
> cron job. It's not that dif
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa writes:
>
>> I never used parted, so if I had to achieve what you want I'd try
>> something
>> completely different.
>
> You have to use something to adjust the size of the ext3 filesystem.
> Growing the underlying mdraid device is not sufficient. Once the
I have just done a clean install of F13 86_64 and it has worked more
smoothly than ever before. The default installation creates a 500 MB
boot partition (ext4), as well as root and home. It's worth reviewing
the sizes because it gives equal shares to these two and you may well
want more for /home.
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Imagine my surprise when I found the capability of setting local addresses
> etc right in NM for a change, and it worked! I didn't have to go hacking
> about to make the new install work with my local network gateways etc.
Not important, but I didn't understand this posting
Terry Polzin wrote:
> Message simply states; Can't write connect type 'vpn' doesn't matter who
> the user is fails for root as well. Worked fine in f12
A very ignorant question, probably - but what exactly is the connection
between NM and OpenVPN?
OpenVPN seems to work equally well for me
wheth
N James Bridge wrote:
> Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
> accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of backing
> up your /home directory.
Does the default installation destroy one's /home partition?
I learned a long time ago never to let Fedora t
On 30/05/10 13:12, Timothy Murphy wrote:
--snip--
>
> Does the default installation destroy one's /home partition?
> I learned a long time ago never to let Fedora touch my partitioning.
> Why can't they just admit that LVM is a bad idea?
> It belongs to a past age when disk-space was limited.
>
I
Alan Evans wrote:
> Preupgrade is complaining that I don't have enough space in
> /boot/upgrade. How much space is needed? Preupgrade is not telling me.
> It *did* tell me that I could continue if I had a wired network
> connection. I do have, so I continued; and then after finally
> downloading a
On 30/05/10 13:16, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Alan Evans wrote:
>
>> Preupgrade is complaining that I don't have enough space in
>> /boot/upgrade. How much space is needed?
For F13 /boot = 500mb
Preupgrade is not telling me.
>> It *did* tell me that I could continue if I had a wired network
>> con
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 06:17 -0500, Steve Berg wrote:
>> I've tried on two different systems, both recent clean installs of Fedora
>> 13 x86_64. Open K3B (V1.91.0), pull in files that I'd like to have an
>> archive of, total size is just under 40GB. Load up a blank BD-
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 12:09 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> Is there an Omega Live version of F-13 [for USB flash drive] to be
>> available and if so when?
>>
>
> I am hoping to do a initial release before next week.
>
I look forward to it.
--
Bill Davidsen
"We have mo
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> What's the appropriate contact to request new feeds at:
> http://planet.fedoraproject.org/infofeed/
>
> Should I file an RFE in bugzilla?
I posted this question recently and got no answer. <4bfc46fd.4020...@tmr.com>
--
Bill Davidsen
"We have more to fear from the bun
On 30 May 2010 13:16, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Alan Evans wrote:
>
>> Preupgrade is complaining that I don't have enough space in
>> /boot/upgrade. How much space is needed? Preupgrade is not telling me.
>> It *did* tell me that I could continue if I had a wired network
>> connection. I do have, so
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> OP: does K3B actually do a burn, or call something else to do it? I've had
> burn problems because Fedora doesn't have genuine cdrecord installed, they
> ship a look-alike which is really named tokem, or hokem, or something like
> that, which doesn't work well on some burner
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 13:43 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> preupgrade is actively maintained and developed by some of the
> smartest contributors to Fedora, so I am certain that if you file bug
> reports about how it's not worked for you they will get fixed.
It strike me that it will be used b
On 30/05/10 14:07, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 13:43 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> preupgrade is actively maintained and developed by some of the
>> smartest contributors to Fedora, so I am certain that if you file bug
>> reports about how it's not worked for you they will get fixed.
>
On Sun, 30 May 2010, N James Bridge wrote:
> Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
> accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of backing
> up your /home directory.
I back up regardless.
If you have a /home partition and do a custom install,
you can te
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Why can't they just admit that LVM is a bad idea?
> It belongs to a past age when disk-space was limited.
LVM is probably useful.
That said, I was innoculated against its virtues when
it was sprung on me as a surprise during an install.
If one has *on
I love the speed of the USB installer from the Live CD...!
But I would also like to stop using so many DVDs for, well everything.
USB drives are much more convenient, portable, durable, and reusable.
My ideal scenario would be able to put the DVD installer ISO onto a
bootable USB stick as well - s
--- On Sun, 5/30/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> From: Bill Davidsen
> Subject: Re: F13 - K3B - Won't burn dual layer BluRay
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Date: Sunday, May 30, 2010, 5:33 AM
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 06:17 -0500, Steve Berg wrote:
> >> I
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:29 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > Why can't they just admit that LVM is a bad idea?
> > It belongs to a past age when disk-space was limited.
>
> LVM is probably useful.
> That said, I was innoculated against its virtues
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy :
> It's also based on tester feedback.
> Package foo doesn't work.
> If Package foo+1 doesn't make it into the build system for a week,
> there's a weeks builds down the swanee.
> That's why eyes rather than automation is used.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Frank Murphy
This is no
On 05/30/2010 01:31 AM, g wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
The original announce was good. Do you know if there was a followup -
with something like 'Hey All - we now have a test version of the new
website - please take a look and let us know ... '
One of the strengths of open source mod
On 30/05/10 15:08, Joshua C. wrote:
--snip--
>
> This is not exactly correct. It foo+1 isn't in the build system then
> the automatic script will throw out an error.
No because how will an auto script know to expect foo+1.
It will accept fooX (the borked one)
An error will only be thrown iirc, i
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> Am I alone in thinking that preupgrade was a nice idea
>> which has never worked perfectly, and which should be quietly dropped?
>
> preupgrade is actively maintained and developed by some of the
> smartest contributors to Fedora, so I am certain that if you file bug
Have you tried just dd'ing the iso to de usb-disk? I know that works
for live-cds, so it might work for the installer dvd as well (I
haven't tried)
Good luck!
2010/5/30, Christopher A. Williams :
> I love the speed of the USB installer from the Live CD...!
>
> But I would also like to stop using
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Christopher A. Williams
wrote:
> I love the speed of the USB installer from the Live CD...!
>
> But I would also like to stop using so many DVDs for, well everything.
> USB drives are much more convenient, portable, durable, and reusable.
> My ideal scenario would
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:33 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > You neglected to say what K3B actually does with this, such as any
> error messages it outputs.
> >
> The error message was included in the first post, wasn't it?
Look again. There was no error message of any kind quoted in the OP's
pos
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:19 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, N James Bridge wrote:
>
> > Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
> > accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of backing
> > up your /home directory.
>
> I back up rega
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 10:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 10:38 AM, g wrote:
> > posting notification and a link to new page design to all list can help in
> > prevention because if someone does complain, it is a simple matter to point
> > out that notice was given and comments were
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 13:16 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Alan Evans wrote:
>
> > Preupgrade is complaining that I don't have enough space in
> > /boot/upgrade. How much space is needed? Preupgrade is not telling me.
> > It *did* tell me that I could continue if I had a wired network
> > connecti
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 07:40 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> Anyone have a how-to/magic incantation to do this? Could we eventually
> make this an option for Fedora installers too?
IIRC the Installation doc has a section on this.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi List,
I created a user by the name test, and after doing with my testing was
going to delete the user using the following command, userdel and also
added '-f' for cleaning out the home without leaving any traces of
'test'. But the command says :
[r...@xbox ~]# userdel -f test
userdel: user
Hi Steven,
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:09, Steven P. Ulrick
wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> > If the output of "/sbin/lspci | grep VGA" is:
> > 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G94 [GeForce 9600
> GT]
> (rev
> > a1)
> >
> > are the correct instructions for installing the propriet
On Sun, 30 May 2010 10:54:37 +0200
"Joshua C." wrote:
> Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
> supposed to be the nightly-builds of the "latest" code. However, a
> quick look at the logs shows that those are build once in a week or
> even not that "often".
>
> Can som
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Imagine my surprise when I found the capability of setting local
>> addresses etc right in NM for a change, and it worked! I didn't have to
>> go hacking about to make the new install work with my local network
>> gateways etc.
>
Hello Everyone,
ich wonder why i am not able to ssh-in in this case:
i have an kvm-'server' running 4 'guests'.
the guests are behind nat (default in kvm?).
running fresh fedora on all machine (host and guest), installed from
live-cd, enabled sshd and made sure system-config-firewall allows
ssh
On Sun, 30 May 2010 19:02:00 +0200
brizly vaan van Ulciputz wrote:
> the guests are behind nat (default in kvm?).
I have never seen the default KVM nat work at all,
and I suspect something about the firewall rules
it constructs interact badly with the firewall
rules I already have on my host, but
hello,
I just had a crash with emarald, however following the steps in the error
reporting wizard I filled in my BugZilla login details and the next thing I see
is a download+install of 38 debug required packages.
now I don't remember giving my root password and it is not possible to install
w
On Saturday, 29 May, 2010 @ 19:44 zulu, KC8LDO scribed:
> I keep getting the Bluetooth file sharing folder reappearing and
> I want to eliminate it - permanently. I'm not using Bluetooth or
> the personal file sharing feature. I erase the folder but it always
> seems to come back. How do I get rid
I have installed the Fedora 13 on my computer today. I am using HCL's 17"
Monitor whose screen resolution is 1024*768 @85 hz. But in Fedora 13, I
can't be able to set my monitor's refresh rate more than 60 hz due to which
the screen is blurring. There is no Xorg.conf file in /etc/X11. Please help
m
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Darr wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 May, 2010 @ 19:44 zulu, KC8LDO scribed:
>
>> I keep getting the Bluetooth file sharing folder reappearing and
>> I want to eliminate it - permanently. I'm not using Bluetooth or
>> the personal file sharing feature. I erase the folder
I see that F13 still has texlive 2007 which is too old for me to use
and collaborate with my colleagues.
So I will install the rpm's from CPAN - the downside is for some reason
R requires the fedora texlive to install and I need R too ...
Can someone help me make and RPM or something that tel
I am trying to build the VirtualBox kernel module. It fails with this
error:
Makefile:159: *** Error: unable to find the sources of your current
Linux kernel. Specify KERN_DIR= and run Make again. Stop.
In /lib/modules/2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE there is a "build" symlink
that links to /usr/src/k
when i installed the guests the was one possible way in the 'advanced
options' with nat. the bridged one for eth0 and eth1 was disabled
(gray).
did i miss something or have to install something do be able to use
bridging? no matter for me if it's nat or bridge, at the end all
mashines should be in
On 05/30/2010 09:34 AM, Andre Costa wrote:
Hi Steven,
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:09, Steven P. Ulrick
mailto:lists-fed...@afolkey2.net>> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> If the output of "/sbin/lspci | grep VGA" is:
> 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G94
[GeForc
Le dimanche 30 mai 2010 à 15:08 -0400, Genes MailLists a écrit :
> I see that F13 still has texlive 2007 which is too old for me to use
> and collaborate with my colleagues.
>
> So I will install the rpm's from CPAN - the downside is for some reason
> R requires the fedora texlive to install and
On 05/30/2010 02:16 PM, Brian Mury wrote:
> I am trying to build the VirtualBox kernel module. It fails with this
> error:
>
> Makefile:159: *** Error: unable to find the sources of your current
> Linux kernel. Specify KERN_DIR= and run Make again. Stop.
>
> In /lib/modules/2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686
On 05/30/2010 03:34 PM, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-April/371585.html
>
> Bis repetita placent...
>
>
Yes I am aware of that - and it has had a few glitches - if it was ready
it would be in updates ... the fedora build seems to b
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 14:47 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> Try 'yum install kernel-PAE-devel'.
I had looked for kernel-PAE-devel in the gnome packagekit application,
it wasn't there. Yum found it. I have no idea why the packagekit
application didn't show it - but now that it is installed, it does sh
On 05/30/2010 03:55 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 03:34 PM, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-April/371585.html
>>
Also the official release seems to be 2009 - also isn't 2010 still in
pre-release ? Or has it been releas
2010/5/30 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 10:54:37 +0200
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>
>> Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
>> supposed to be the nightly-builds of the "latest" code. However, a
>> quick look at the logs shows that those are build once in a week or
>> ev
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy :
> On 30/05/10 15:08, Joshua C. wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> This is not exactly correct. It foo+1 isn't in the build system then
>> the automatic script will throw out an error.
>
> No because how will an auto script know to expect foo+1.
> It will accept fooX (the borked one)
>
On 05/29/2010 01:11 PM, Rich Emberson wrote:
> Yesterday I installed Fedora 13, first on my laptop
> and then my main machine. Both are 64bit with
> nvidia cards.
>
> On the laptop everything went as expected, but on
> the big box I could not install AdobeReader_enu.
>
> When I try:
>
> yum install
Frank Murphy wrote:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-August/msg4.html
>
> "MáirÃn Duffy proposed[13] a few ideas for a new Fedora website design"
that was for fedora 12, and i do not believe it was accepted.
at least i do not recall fedora 12 looking like it an
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I suspect there's a (possibly subconscious) view among many of us that
> website design means "making the website look pretty" and for the most
> part we aren't that bothered. The fact that of course it also refers to
> functionality is something we all need to intern
I tried the 64 bit flash plugin, and while it mostly worked,
several sites just showed an error telling me that I
need a version of flash > 9.
If I install the 32 bit flash from the adobe repo,
those same sites work fine.
Yet both the 64 and 32 bit flash report a version > 10
when I check the ver
Ravi Saini wrote:
> I have installed the Fedora 13 on my computer today. I am using HCL's
> 17" Monitor whose screen resolution is 1024*768 @85 hz. But in Fedora
> 13, I can't be able to set my monitor's refresh rate more than 60 hz due
> to which the screen is blurring. There is no Xorg.conf fi
In F12, the left mouse button over the battery icon opened a dropped down
menu with a "Laptop battery" menu entry. Selecting the menu entry opened a
small dialog with the battery's details, specifically the battery's current
capacity, in watts, its original capacity, in watts, and its current ch
Hi gang!
I installed F13 on my eeepc 901 on Friday. Since I changed the partitioing
scheme, I backed up the whole thing onto a USB HD first so I could restore
my home directory afterwards (in fact I also kept dd images of /dev/sda
and /dev/sdb in case I decided to put F12 back on it later.)
first
> I am thinking that your problem is nouveau must be blacklisted in the
> grub.conf file
>
> http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
>
> See the Fedora 12/13 install guide for the instruction to install
>
> Selinix protection must be lowered to allow the nvidia driver to load and
>
> rdblacklist=nou
Tom Horsley gmail.com> writes:
> Any idea why some sites think the 64 bit flash
> is a version number < 9?
Do you get the same error if flash isn't installed at all?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
> I am thinking that your problem is nouveau must be blacklisted in the
> grub.conf file
>
> http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
Hello Again,
I just checked the instructions at the above link. They seem to be a
simplified
version of what I've already tried.
Steven P. Ulrick
--
users mailing l
On 30/05/10 21:33, g wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-August/msg4.html
>>
>> "MáirÃn Duffy proposed[13] a few ideas for a new Fedora website design"
>
> that was for fedora 12, and i do not believe it was accepted.
>
Work on Fe
Hello everyone,
I'm on Fedora 12 and I'm using an internal soundcard (HDA-Intel) which doesn't
provide, as an input source, the so called "Stereo Mix" (the audio that comes
out of your speakers). I simply would like to record from it for applications
like Audacity and recordmydesktop.
Apparen
On Sun, 30 May 2010 21:39:07 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Any idea why some sites think the 64 bit flash
> > is a version number < 9?
>
> Do you get the same error if flash isn't installed at all?
I just tried it, and I get an "install missing plugins" prompt
from firefox with no flas
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 13:34, Andre Costa wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:09, Steven P. Ulrick > wrote:
>
>> > Hello Everyone,
>> > If the output of "/sbin/lspci | grep VGA" is:
>> > 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G94 [GeForce 9600
>> GT]
>> (rev
>> > a
On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:31:47 -0400
fred smith wrote:
> I'm stumped, anyone got any sage adivce for me?
If selinux is enabled, it wants its mysterious labeling
on /home, and if you create /home later, it may need
fixes to make selinux happy. You could temporarily disable
selinux and see if proble
> > Well, no luck so far... But here are some excerpts from log files
> > that might
> > help someone see what my problem is:
> >
> > First, the output of 'grep -i "nvidia" messages':
> >
> > [r...@localhost log]# grep -i "nvidia" messages
> > May 28 15:27:16 localhost kern
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Note: for Nvidia, ATI, and Intel graphics this probably won't work because the
> enhanced drivers do things as they see fit. There are vendor (closed source)
In my case, a problem is that the radeon driver
is using the preferred frequency, 135 Mhz,
eve
I have a server which houses thousands of audio tracks and materials.
Recently I started using a web application which seems to have a ew
problems with the naming convention used by default.
For example it has a problem with apostrophe signs ('), I want to be
able to create a script which goes to t
The system installed without any error messages, then when I re-boot I see
several error messages, then these messages repeated over and over:
init: tty (/dev/tty2) main process () terminated with status 1
init: tty (/dev/tty2) main process () ended, respawning
init: tty (/dev/tty3) main p
Genes MailLists wrote:
> I see that F13 still has texlive 2007 which is too old for me to use
> and collaborate with my colleagues.
As a matter of interest, what do you need that is not in TeXlive 2007?
I often use LaTeX packages that are not in TeXlive,
but I just get them from one of the CTANs
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 08:19 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 May 2010, N James Bridge wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, I prefer to do a clean install, since it gets rid of
>>> accumulated clutter. That assumes you have a convenient way of back
On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:21:32 + Leonard Adjei wrote:
> I have a server which houses thousands of audio tracks and materials.
> Recently I started using a web application which seems to have a ew
> problems with the naming convention used by default.
> For example it has a problem with apostrophe
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> I see that F13 still has texlive 2007 which is too old for me to use
>> and collaborate with my colleagues.
>
> As a matter of interest, what do you need that is not in TeXlive 2007?
My guess is that there was a change in s
philbrog writes:
The system installed without any error messages, then when I re-boot I see
several error messages, then these messages repeated over and over:
init: tty (/dev/tty2) main process () terminated with status 1
init: tty (/dev/tty2) main process () ended, respawning
init: tt
On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>> Sda1 ext4 /boot is 200 meg and locked, Will not allow me to do anything
>> except format
>
> Supposedly /boot cannot be ext4 as it's not yet supported by Grub, so I
> don't k
On Sat, 29 May 2010, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on my third video card.
>>> The first was a radeon.
>>> After I zapped that one, I had it replaced with
>>> an nvidia card because it had
Whenever a heavy nfs4 file copy or internet file download is done
connectivity is lost and restarting NetworkManager does not fix it.
Only a reboot fixes it.
[ cut here ]
WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:255 dev_watchdog+0xf0/0x192()
Hardware name: A780GM-A
NETDEV WATCHD
On 05/30/2010 09:07 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> I assume the missing i686 libraries for Fedora 13 x64 are in the
> pipeline. This caused me a few minor headaches, but could be more like
> migraines to those less experienced. Otherwise Fedora 13 seems fine, and
> I'll start on kdevelop 4 usa
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>>>
>>> Sda1 ext4 /boot is 200 meg and locked, Will not allow me to do anything
>>> except format
>>
>> Supposedly /boot cann
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 29/05/10 02:22, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Frank Murphy wrote:
>>>
take each one at a time:
yum grouplist "Administration Tools"
> --snip--
>> yum groupinfo 'Administration Tools'
>
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>
>> yum groupinfo 'Administration Tools'
>
> Thanks.
> That does indeed list the packages in each group,
> and confirms that I do not in fact have installed
> the groups listed as such by "yum grouplist",
> after installing fro
On 05/30/2010 06:29 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>>> I see that F13 still has texlive 2007 which is too old for me to use
>>> and collaborate with my colleagues.
>>
>> As a matter of interest, what do you need that is not
> Hello Everyone
> I'm going to try all of this again. This time, I'm going to give a precise,
> blow by blow account of what I am doing:
> 1. "yum update": No Packages marked for Update
> 2. [st...@localhost ~]$ /sbin/lspci | grep VGA
> 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G94 [
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:05:33PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:31:47 -0400
> fred smith wrote:
>
> > I'm stumped, anyone got any sage adivce for me?
Tom:
Yes, disabling selinux removes the problem.
I had looked at the selinux labeling and thought it looked OK, but
appare
I have an existing install (f10) with a root partition and /home partition.
When I boot the install DVD - there is no screen which offers me a
choice whether i want to upgrade or do a fresh install - it -assumes- I
want to install fresh.
Is this a bug or is there an option I need to put in so
> > Hello Everyone
> > I'm going to try all of this again. This time, I'm going to give a
> > precise,
> > blow by blow account of what I am doing:
> > 1. "yum update": No Packages marked for Update
> > 2. [st...@localhost ~]$ /sbin/lspci | grep VGA
> > 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia
On Sunday 30 May 2010 03:53 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
Sda1 ext4 /boot is 200 meg and locked, Will not allow me to do
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010 03:53 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Suvayu Ali
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:33 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:06 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>
> Sda
On 05/30/2010 04:47 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>>> Hello Everyone
>>> I'm going to try all of this again. This time, I'm going to give a precise,
>>> blow by blow account of what I am doing:
>>> 1. "yum update": No Packages marked for Update
>>> 2. [st...@localhost ~]$ /sbin/lspci | grep VGA
>>>
> On 05/30/2010 04:47 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> >>> Hello Everyone
> >>> I'm going to try all of this again. This time, I'm going to give a
precise,
> >>> blow by blow account of what I am doing:
> >>> 1. "yum update": No Packages marked for Update
> >>> 2. [st...@localhost ~]$ /sbin/lspci |
On 05/30/2010 06:02 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>> On 05/30/2010 04:47 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>>
> Hello Everyone
> I'm going to try all of this again. This time, I'm going to give a
>
> precise,
>
> blow by blow account of what I am doing:
> 1. "yum
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
