Re: First NFS entry in fstab not mounting at boot

2010-05-17 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
BadMagic writes: > On 05/17/2010 12:16 AM, Tim wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 22:05 +1000, BadMagic wrote: >>> Basically, whichever entry goes first, doesn't get mounted. >> Are the clients connecting to the network using network manager? >> Perhaps the network isn't up at the time the first mou

Re: First NFS entry in fstab not mounting at boot

2010-05-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 02:08 -0400, Chris Kloiber wrote: > In this case you might even want to add _netdev. > > _netdev > The filesystem resides on a device that requires network access > (used to prevent the system from attempting to mount these > filesystems until the net

Re: First NFS entry in fstab not mounting at boot

2010-05-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 00:46 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > echo "NETWORKWAIT=yes" >> /etc/sysconfig/network > > reboot > > I'm not sure why networkwait isn't the default. Running without it > causes quite a bit of the stuff that relies on the network to fail. Yes, all the fun of watch

Re: Can Windows and Linux co-exist?

2010-05-17 Thread Markku Kolkka
Timothy Murphy kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika sunnuntai, 16. toukokuuta 2010): > For example, I access MySQL on my server > through http:///phpMyAdmin > and LDAP through http:///phpLDAPadmin . > > But I haven't found a clear account > of how to access these applications from a Windows client.

Re: Can Windows and Linux co-exist?

2010-05-17 Thread Timothy Murphy
Sam Sharpe wrote: >> I'm thinking specifically (at the moment) >> of MySQL, openVPN and openLDAP. >> Is there anywhere an account of how to set up >> a Windows client with a Linux server >> for these applications? >> >> For example, I access MySQL on my server >> through http:///phpMyAdmin >> and

Re: First NFS entry in fstab not mounting at boot

2010-05-17 Thread Karl-Olov Serrander
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > BadMagic writes: >> On 05/17/2010 12:16 AM, Tim wrote: >>> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 22:05 +1000, BadMagic wrote: Basically, whichever entry goes first, doesn't get mounted. >>> Are the clients connecting to the network using network manager? >>

Re: Can Windows and Linux co-exist?

2010-05-17 Thread Timothy Murphy
Genes MailLists wrote: > LDAP itself is cross platform, but specific applications may or may not > be. > > I wonder what exactly LDAP is being used for here - is it network > authentication perhaps ... No. I just use openLDAP for keeping an address book. I'd like to have an address book on my

Re: [OT] replace a word with a multiline with sed

2010-05-17 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On *Thu May 13 16:27:09 UTC 2010*, *Mohamed El Morabity *wrote: > Hi, > > simply using the following pattern for sed? >/TAG/c\ >BLABLA\nBLOBLO > > Thanks. I then also found that it works this way too, probably easier to be read: /TAG/c\ BLABLA\ BLOBLO Anyway, thanks again for helping! G

Re: Can Windows and Linux co-exist?

2010-05-17 Thread Timothy Murphy
Timothy Murphy wrote: >> LDAP itself is cross platform, but specific applications may or may not >> be. > I just use openLDAP for keeping an address book. > I'd like to have an address book on my Linux (CentOS) server > that I can use in kmail and Windows Outlook. Now I can access my openLDAP

anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, can somebody tell me when during boot anacron is started, and where the startscript is located (F12)? All comments are welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedora

Re: Can Windows and Linux co-exist?

2010-05-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I just use openLDAP for keeping an address book. > I'd like to have an address book on my Linux (CentOS) server > that I can use in kmail and Windows Outlook. Can they all write to the address book, or only read from it? One of the things

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Frank Elsner
On Mon, 17 May 2010 15:08:54 +0200 Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, can somebody tell me when during boot anacron is started, and where > the startscript is located (F12)? > > All comments are welcome. Is from FC6 but should be same on F12: /etc/anacrontab /etc/cron.daily/0anacron /etc/cron.monthly/

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 17 May 2010 15:28:51 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote: > Is from FC6 but should be same on F12: Perhaps it should be the same, but in fact it isn't even remotely the same. All the anacron and cron stuff has been completely rejiggered in f12. I've been able to completely disable anacron, but whil

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 05/17/2010 02:08 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, can somebody tell me when during boot anacron is started, and where > the startscript is located (F12)? > > All comments are welcome. > > Kind regards > > Joachim Backes > > http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes > F12 use cronie instead of anacron a

Re: SSH tunnel for ssh traffic

2010-05-17 Thread Bill Davidsen
Christoph Höger wrote: > Hi, > > I need to ssh to some remote VM that sit in a private LAN. For any other > service (e.g. RDP) I'd use ssh tunneling just normal. > But what do I do for ssh traffic? Since ssh is not host agnostic, it > will always complain about localhost having a different RSA key

Re: [389-users] Does 389org expand dynamic groups?

2010-05-17 Thread Rich Megginson
Roberto Polli wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm playing with dynamic groups, but it seems that ldap doesn't evaluate them. > The MemberOf plugin doesn't work with dynamic groups too... > > Do I have to search them programmatically? > Yes. This feature is on our roadmap - http://directory.fedoraproject.

OT: lftp quiet

2010-05-17 Thread Steven Stern
I have a cron job that uses lftp to mirror the contents of a web site onto my system for backup. (SSH/rsync is not an available access method.) lftp -e mirror -u xxx, ftp://site.domain.com There doesn't seem to be a way to add -q as a option at this level. Is there a way to have this run "q

Re: OT: lftp quiet

2010-05-17 Thread bruce
if it doesn't have a "q" option. couldn't you simply run it in the background, and pipe the input/output to dev/null? On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > I have a cron job that uses lftp to mirror the contents of a web site > onto my system for backup.  (SSH/rsync is not an

Re: First NFS entry in fstab not mounting at boot

2010-05-17 Thread BadMagic
On 05/17/2010 08:33 PM, Karl-Olov Serrander wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > >> BadMagic writes: >> >>> On 05/17/2010 12:16 AM, Tim wrote: >>> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 22:05 +1000, BadMagic wrote: > Basically, whichever entry goes

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Robert Nichols
On 05/17/2010 08:52 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 15:28:51 +0200 > Frank Elsner wrote: > >> Is from FC6 but should be same on F12: > > Perhaps it should be the same, but in fact it isn't > even remotely the same. All the anacron and cron stuff > has been completely rejiggered in f12.

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:08:00 -0500 Robert Nichols wrote: > In F12 as distributed, anacron is started once an hour by crond How does cron do that? Does it "just know" that it should run the hourly jobs? The /etc/crontab shipped with f12 has nothing but comments in it... -- users mailing list user

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 17 May 2010 14:57:48 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > How does cron do that? Does it "just know" that it should run > the hourly jobs? The /etc/crontab shipped with f12 has nothing > but comments in it... OK, I finally found /etc/cron.d/0hourly. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: anacron question

2010-05-17 Thread David Bartmess
On 5/17/2010 12:57 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:08:00 -0500 > Robert Nichols wrote: > > >> In F12 as distributed, anacron is started once an hour by crond >> > How does cron do that? Does it "just know" that it should run > the hourly jobs? The /etc/crontab shipped with

Boot from iSCSI SAN

2010-05-17 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I need to use a laptop with an iSCSI target mounted as root. I have done this several times with RHEL but with F12 and F13b it hangs after selecting the device after discovering available targets. I am using tgt from CentOS 5 to export the target, for anyone who's done this successfully, have you

Re: First NFS entry in fstab not mounting at boot

2010-05-17 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Karl-Olov Serrander writes: > On Mon, 17 May 2010, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: >> echo "NETWORKWAIT=yes" >> /etc/sysconfig/network > Is this documented somewhere ? > > It is not in /usr/share/doc/initscripts-9.02.1/sysconfig.txt for Fedora 12 > or /usr/share/doc/initscripts-9.12/sysconfig.txt fo

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Bill Davidsen
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 15 May 2010, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/15/2010 11:22 AM, r...@dwf.com wrote: >>> I want to look at the individual files in a src rpm. >>> How do I 'rip it apart' ?? >> rpm -qpl src.rpm >> >> should show you a list of the files in the RPM. When you "install

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 17 May 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Saturday 15 May 2010, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >>> On 05/15/2010 11:22 AM, r...@dwf.com wrote: I want to look at the individual files in a src rpm. How do I 'rip it apart' ?? >>> >>> rpm -qpl src.rpm >>> >>> should sho

F13 x86_64 RC3 Install reports

2010-05-17 Thread Richard Shaw
I'll try to keep this short without glossing over too much. Installation on HP 8510w workstation laptop (intel Core2Duo w/ 256MB Nvidia Quadro 540M) - Replaced existing F12 install completely (I don't keep important stuff on it and I dual boot w/ XP for work). - Flawless Now on to the messy one..

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Mikkel
On 05/17/2010 04:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Clarify here: I can do all that as the user. What I can't do, until somebody > decides to fix mkinitrd, is to run it as the user. That is my specific > bitch. And I think its perfectly valid. mkinitrd simply will not run for > anybody but root

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday 15 May 2010 10:22:55 am r...@dwf.com wrote: > I want to look at the individual files in a src rpm. > How do I 'rip it apart' ?? > Doing an install doesnt seem to be the answer, It does something, but I > have no idea where the bits and pieces are going. > They are NOT in /usr/src/redhat

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday 17 May 2010 04:12:30 pm Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >Gene Heskett wrote: > >> On Saturday 15 May 2010, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > >>> On 05/15/2010 11:22 AM, r...@dwf.com wrote: > I want to look at the individual files in a src rpm. > How

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Rick Stevens
On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Gene Heskett wrote: >>> On Saturday 15 May 2010, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 05/15/2010 11:22 AM, r...@dwf.com wrote: > I want to look at the individual files in a src rpm. > How do I 'rip it a

resolv.conf, NetworkManager, no ping response on one nameserver

2010-05-17 Thread jackson byers
resolv.conf, NetworkManager, no ping response on one nameserver by...@f12 ~]$ uname -r 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE this is a wired box, no wless router at 192.168.2.1, eth0 presently using static ip 192.168.2.8, but that is recent change from previous dhcp 192.168.2.100 I don't think that change

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Tom H
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> Clarify here: I can do all that as the user. What I can't do, until somebody >> decides to fix mkinitrd, is to run it as the user. That is my specific >> bitch. And I think its perfectly valid.

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > >> On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >>> Clarify here: I can do all that as the user. What I can't do, until somebody >>> decides to fix mkinitrd, is to run it as the user. That is my

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday 17 May 2010 08:40:31 pm Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > >> On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> Clarify here: I can do all that as the user. What I can't do, until > >>> somebody decides to f

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/18/2010 09:52 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010 08:40:31 pm Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Clarify

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 17 May 2010, Mikkel wrote: >On 05/17/2010 04:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Clarify here: I can do all that as the user. What I can't do, until >> somebody decides to fix mkinitrd, is to run it as the user. That is my >> specific bitch. And I think its perfectly valid. mkinitrd simply

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 17 May 2010, Rick Stevens wrote: >On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 17 May 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> Gene Heskett wrote: On Saturday 15 May 2010, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/15/2010 11:22 AM, r...@dwf.com wrote: >> I want to look at the indivi

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 17 May 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: >On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: Clarify here: I can do all that as the user. What I can't do, until somebody decides to fix mkinitrd, is

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 17 May 2010, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >On Monday 17 May 2010 08:40:31 pm Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: >> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> >> On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >>> Clarify here: I can do all that as the user.

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/18/2010 10:42 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Clarify here: I can d

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 17 May 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: >On 05/18/2010 10:42 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 17 May 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 05/18/2010 09:09 AM, Tom H wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 05/17/2010 02:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Clarify here

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Tim
Rick Stevens: >> And this is a bad thing? I, for one, don't want some low-level user >> installing a kernel on my machines. I don't want them installing >> ANYTHING that's global. Gene Heskett: > Repeat after me Rick: "I am the only user of this machine". And that > will likely continue until

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Antonio Olivares
> > Clarify here: I can do all that as the > user. What I can't do, until > > somebody decides to fix mkinitrd, is > to run it as the user. That is my > > specific bitch. And I think its > perfectly valid. mkinitrd simply will > > not run for anybody but root. > >        >     >

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday 17 May 2010 10:14:44 pm Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > Clarify here: I can do all that as the > > > > user. What I can't do, until > > > > > somebody decides to fix mkinitrd, is > > > > to run it as the user. That is my > > > > > specific bitch. And I think its > > > > per

Re: resolv.conf, NetworkManager, no ping response on one nameserver

2010-05-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 18:08 -0700, jackson byers wrote: > I see zero response from ping 206.13.20.12, > while ping 206.13.31.12 , 68.94.156.1 both look ok Same here. > Is this normal? Yes. Many things on the internet completely ignore pings. And many things change their configurations. i.e.

Re: how to 'rip apart' a rpm.

2010-05-17 Thread Antonio Olivares
> > Yes, but Fedora no longer ships mkinitrd and if we > need it, we need to > > download it.  Is there any new documentation(not > the rpm one that exists ) > > on how to build a kernel on Fedora with the dracut in > place of mkinitrd? > > How to enable KMS, and how to install the nouveau > drive

Re: resolv.conf, NetworkManager, no ping response on one nameserver

2010-05-17 Thread Steven Stern
On 05/17/2010 08:08 PM, jackson byers wrote: > resolv.conf, NetworkManager, no ping response on one nameserver > > > by...@f12 ~]$ uname -r > 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE > this is a wired box, no wless > router at 192.168.2.1, > eth0 presently using static ip 192.168.2.8, > but that is recent chan

How to find out which RPM's have been additionally installed?

2010-05-17 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, having the following problem, and found no advice in the forums: After having installed a Fedora version from the DVD, during the lifetime of my system, a lot of packages (from Fedora repo's, or not from there) are additionally installed, without making a note about that transaction. Bu

Re: How to find out which RPM's have been additionally installed?

2010-05-17 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 08:41 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > My question: is there a simple way to find out which packages belong > to > the base version, and which packages have been installed as a later > action? rpm -qa --last -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.

Re: How to find out which RPM's have been additionally installed?

2010-05-17 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Monday 17 May 2010 11:41 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > My question: is there a simple way to find out which packages belong to > the base version, and which packages have been installed as a later action? > How about, # grep -v /var/log/yum.log* where install date is of the form "Mmm dd". Yum/