Re: yum upgrade stuck

On 09/22/2015 04:04 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:16:35 -0600, jd1008 wrote: --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts gnome-shell < 3.16.1 ... How do I resolve this? Hard to say, since gnome-shell should be in the upgrade set. Your system is in a w

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:16:35 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > >>> --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts > >>> gnome-shell < 3.16.1 > >>> ... > >>> How do I resolve this? > >> Hard to say, since gnome-shell should be in the upgrade set. Your > >> system is in a weird state. > > Has

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On 09/20/2015 05:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:41:48 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts gnome-shell < 3.16.1 ... How do I resolve this? Hard to say, since gnome-shell shoul

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 16:45 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > > On 09/20/2015 04:28 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 12:52 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 09/19/2015 08:41 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > > On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: > > > > > --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:41:48 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: > > --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts > > gnome-shell < 3.16.1 > > ... > > How do I resolve this? > > Hard to say, since gnome-shell should be in the upgrade set. Your

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On 09/20/2015 04:28 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 12:52 -0600, jd1008 wrote: On 09/19/2015 08:41 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts gnome-shell < 3.16.1 ... How do I resolve thi

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 12:52 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > > On 09/19/2015 08:41 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: > > > --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts > > > gnome-shell < 3.16.1 > > > ... > > > How do I resolve this? > > > > Hard to say

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On 09/19/2015 08:41 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts gnome-shell < 3.16.1 ... How do I resolve this? Hard to say, since gnome-shell should be in the upgrade set. Your system is in a weird state.

Re: yum upgrade stuck

On 09/19/2015 11:51 AM, jd1008 wrote: --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts gnome-shell < 3.16.1 ... How do I resolve this? Hard to say, since gnome-shell should be in the upgrade set. Your system is in a weird state. As has been suggested several times already, I

yum upgrade stuck

Stuck at: --> Processing Conflict: mutter-3.16.2-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts gnome-shell < 3.16.1 For more then 2 hours :( How do I resolve this? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/use

Re: Preferred method - F18 -> F19: fedup or yum upgrade ?

On 07/25/2013 03:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: But, all that said,_my_ recommendation is still to have a separate /home and do a fresh install preserving that. My recommendation is similar, but slightly different: have a separate /home and a fresh backup. Then try fedup. If it works, great!

Re: Preferred method - F18 -> F19: fedup or yum upgrade ?

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:16:37PM -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: > Per the subject line, what are the views of this community? I've heard some pretty good reports about fedup this time around. It is the official way, and therefore the default recommendation. Doing a yum upgrade should proba

Re: Preferred method - F18 -> F19: fedup or yum upgrade ?

On 07/25/2013 03:16 PM, Max Pyziur issued this missive: Per the subject line, what are the views of this community? yum upgrade is NOT recommended: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum Look at the yellow box. The recommended method is fedup. It works. I'v

Preferred method - F18 -> F19: fedup or yum upgrade ?

Per the subject line, what are the views of this community? Thanks, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mail

Re: yum upgrade

Reindl Harald wrote: >> I would extend Thompson's dictum that "a program should do one thing, >> and do it well" to documentation > > if you want only ONE way to do things switch to Apple OSX I think you misunderstand or misinterpret what Thompson said. There is a big difference between having m

Re: yum upgrade

On Mar 29, 2013 2:58 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > > Am 29.03.2013 22:52, schrieb Richard Vickery: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Reindl Harald > > > wrote: > > > > because OSX and Windows are lcearly not useable for them > > It's only that Linux is far superior because the kernel wa

Re: yum upgrade

Am 29.03.2013 22:52, schrieb Richard Vickery: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > if you want only ONE way to do things switch to Apple OSX > > > When you put it that way, it reminds me what it was like to use Red Hat back > when I

Re: yum upgrade

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > if you want only ONE way to do things switch to Apple OSX > When you put it that way, it reminds me what it was like to use Red Hat back when I made the switch in 1998 - grin, bare it, and patiently work through it - because it was really

Re: yum upgrade

re-install from scratch >> * choose a distribution which fits your ability to flollow > > A. As far as I can see, the document you recommend > starts by advising the reader to do something else, > and gives a link to this alternative method becasue the yum upgrade is more or less fo

Re: yum upgrade

Reindl Harald wrote: >> 3. I looked at the two document mentioned about upgrading Fedora: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum_directly >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F >> >> I found both of them

Re: yum upgrade

Am 29.03.2013 16:39, schrieb Timothy Murphy: > Reindl Harald wrote: >>> CentOS seems able to do it ... >> >> CENTOS HAS NO DIST-UPGRADES AT ALL >> No 5.1 to 5.2 is NOT at dist-upgrade > > 1. CentOS has "minor upgrades" at more or less the same frequency > that Fedora has "major upgrades", > so

Re: yum upgrade

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:39:05 +0100 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Reindl Harald wrote: > > I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to > make it easier to go from one version to the next? seems > like it would help make the process smoother for newbies > > >> C

Re: yum upgrade

Reindl Harald wrote: I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to make it easier to go from one version to the next? seems like it would help make the process smoother for newbies >> CentOS seems able to do it ... > > CENTOS HAS NO DIST-UPGRADES AT ALL > N

Re: yum upgrade

On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 17:02 +0530, Prashanth Kasula wrote: > Dear All, > > I am facing issues with Linux Fedora 16 in case of ssh service, unable to > start audit.d service. > > Please help me in this regart it is a live server very urgent Please don't hijack threads. If you want to start a new

Re: yum upgrade

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:46:03PM +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:41:42 + > Timothy Murphy wrote: > often enough steps you CAN NOT automate > > > > CentOS seems able to do it ... > > > > > > CentOS cannot be dist-upgrade, as RHEL cannot. Neither Scientific Linux. It

Re: yum upgrade

Am 28.03.2013 18:41, schrieb Timothy Murphy: > Reindl Harald wrote: > >>> I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to make it >>> easier to go from one version to the next? seems like it would help >>> make the process smoother for newbies > >> the yum-dist-upgrade is

Re: yum upgrade

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:41:42 + Timothy Murphy wrote: often enough steps you CAN NOT automate > > CentOS seems able to do it ... > > CentOS cannot be dist-upgrade, as RHEL cannot. http://www.unixmen.com/upgrading-from-centos-56-to-centos-6/ -- Regards, Frank http//www.frankly3d.com --

Re: yum upgrade

Reindl Harald wrote: >> I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to make it >> easier to go from one version to the next? seems like it would help >> make the process smoother for newbies > the yum-dist-upgrade is NOT for beginners and if > you read the wiki-page you see

Re: yum upgrade

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:02:00 +0530, Prashanth Kasula wrote: > Dear All, > > I am facing issues with Linux Fedora 16 in case of ssh service, unable to > start audit.d service. > > Please help me in this regart it is a live server very urgent Fedora 16 reached End of Life on 2013-02-12: https:/

Re: yum upgrade

gt; Sorry for the double-posting: > > I've been to the fedora-upgrade (wiki) sites and got confused. Can someone > give me a shortened, simplistic version for stupid people (ie: myself) of > how to use the yum-upgrade command? > > Sincerely, > > Richa

Re: yum upgrade

x > > Am 28.03.2013 11:59, schrieb eoconno...@gmail.com: > > I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to make it > easier to go from one version to the > > next? seems like it would help make the process smoother for > newbies.... > > > >

Re: yum upgrade

...@gmail.com: > I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to make it easier > to go from one version to the > next? seems like it would help make the process smoother for newbies > > - Reply message - > From: "Reindl Harald" > To: >

Re: yum upgrade

I wonder if they'll ever automate the upgrade process? to make it easier to go from one version to the next? seems like it would help make the process smoother for newbies Sent from Eddie's Cell Phone - Reply message - From: "Reindl Harald" To: Subje

Re: yum upgrade

Am 28.03.2013 05:09, schrieb Richard Vickery: > Sorry for the double-posting: > > I've been to the fedora-upgrade (wiki) sites and got confused. Can someone > give me a shortened, simplistic version > for stupid people (ie: myself) of how to use the yum-upgrade command? th

Re: yum upgrade

On 03/28/13 12:09, Richard Vickery wrote: > > I've been to the fedora-upgrade (wiki) sites and got confused. Can someone > give me a shortened, simplistic version for stupid people (ie: myself) of how > to use the yum-upgrade command? Is this the page that con

Re: yum upgrade

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:09:24 -0700 Richard Vickery wrote: > Sorry for the double-posting: > > I've been to the fedora-upgrade (wiki) sites and got confused. Can > someone give me a shortened, simplistic version for stupid people > (ie: myself) of how to use the

Re: yum upgrade

On 03/28/2013 12:09 AM, Richard Vickery wrote: Sorry for the double-posting: I've been to the fedora-upgrade (wiki) sites and got confused. Can someone give me a shortened, simplistic version for stupid people (ie: myself) of how to use the yum-upgrade command? Sincerely, Richard

yum upgrade

Sorry for the double-posting: I've been to the fedora-upgrade (wiki) sites and got confused. Can someone give me a shortened, simplistic version for stupid people (ie: myself) of how to use the yum-upgrade command? Sincerely, Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: PostGIS/Postgresql, was Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

Am 11.03.2013 01:02, schrieb Max Pyziur: > If you follow the discussions on postgis-users, there are pending issues > elsewhere in fedoraproject, that have held > up (don't know why) software more fundamental to the stack. becasue fedora tends to be first and not to be best since a few years wh

PostGIS/Postgresql, was Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 03/10/2013 06:27 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: However, the frustration comes more into play, seeing that in F18 PostGIS 1.5 is distributed along with PostgreSQL 9.2. If you look at the PostGIS Wiki, it says that two will not work together. Compla

Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

Am 11.03.2013 00:43, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: > On 03/10/2013 06:27 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: >> However, the frustration comes more into play, seeing that in F18 >> PostGIS 1.5 is distributed along with PostgreSQL 9.2. If you look at the >> PostGIS Wiki, it says that two will not work together.

Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

On 03/10/2013 06:27 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: However, the frustration comes more into play, seeing that in F18 PostGIS 1.5 is distributed along with PostgreSQL 9.2. If you look at the PostGIS Wiki, it says that two will not work together. Complaining about it here will not get it fixed. In the fu

Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: On 03/10/2013 03:36 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, [...] At this point, I think that it's fair to say that F18 has been the most challenging of all for me since F2: this fedup experience, coupled with mis-matched release of Postgres

Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

Am 10.03.2013 23:58, schrieb Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.: > I can only hope that the transitions from F18 to 19to 20etc. are a > lot less painful than THIS sounds! I had > the most troubel going from 16 to 17.,.but my move from 17 to 18 wasn't > anywhere near as problematic as THIS! the

Re: Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

pecifying the disk setup. So, I decided to a fresh 'Minimal Install' of F17, and proceed to F18 from there. First, I tried fedup (the version that is currently available from updates, not updates-testing); kernel went into panic mode again. Re-installed the F17-minimal again, and

Status of Fedup'ng F17->F18; when in doubt, yum upgrade ...

ed to a fresh 'Minimal Install' of F17, and proceed to F18 from there. First, I tried fedup (the version that is currently available from updates, not updates-testing); kernel went into panic mode again. Re-installed the F17-minimal again, and then did a yum upgrade. Bu

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

Following up on this, I continue to miss sound on this old Dell Precision 650 desktop with a i386 architecture. Any suggestions as to what I should even be looking at? I am not sure if it is a bug, and if so what I should file against. Btw, I did check that the speakers are on and connected. Ra

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:34:59 +0100 Andras Simon wrote: > 2013/1/25, Ranjan Maitra : > > > Funny, I don't see anyone who has reported this problem on F18 in the > If by "this problem" you mean audio problem, then you might have noticed these: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

2013/1/25, Ranjan Maitra : > Funny, I don't see anyone who has reported this problem on F18 in the > archives. If by "this problem" you mean audio problem, then you might have noticed these: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-January/429233.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pi

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:12:52 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:48:04 -0600 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:24:13 -0800 Rick Stevens > > wrote: > > > > > On 01/24/2013 05:57 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:41:57 -0800 Ri

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:48:04 -0600 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:24:13 -0800 Rick Stevens > wrote: > > > On 01/24/2013 05:57 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:41:57 -0800 Rick Stevens > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On 01/24/2013 05:32 PM, Ranjan Mai

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:24:13 -0800 Rick Stevens wrote: > On 01/24/2013 05:57 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:41:57 -0800 Rick Stevens > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/24/2013 05:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I did an upgrade using:

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On 01/24/2013 05:57 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:41:57 -0800 Rick Stevens wrote: On 01/24/2013 05:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: Hello, I did an upgrade using: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18 and

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:41:57 -0800 Rick Stevens wrote: > On 01/24/2013 05:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: > > Hello, > > > > I did an upgrade using: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18 > > > > and it was generally smooth and successf

Re: Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

On 01/24/2013 05:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive: Hello, I did an upgrade using: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18 and it was generally smooth and successful, which generally made me ecstatic, until the two issues (from what I can tell u

Sound gone from yum upgrade from F17->F18

Hello, I did an upgrade using: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18 and it was generally smooth and successful, which generally made me ecstatic, until the two issues (from what I can tell up to now) came up: 1. Sound is gone. I have looked around a

Re: Problem with yum update && yum upgrade

repos.d/nodejs-*.repo Stephen Gallagher and I are working on bringing a full Node.js stack to Fedora proper, hopefully starting with Fedora 18. > sudo yum upgrade --disablerepo=updates-testing > Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit > http://nodejs.tchol.org/stable/f16/x86_64/rep

Re: Problem with yum update && yum upgrade

udo yum upgrade --disablerepo=updates-testing Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit http://nodejs.tchol.org/stable/f16/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] curl#7 - "Couldn't connect" Trying other mirror. No Packages marked for Update Is there any way to comment

Re: Problem with yum update && yum upgrade

On 12/12/2012 05:33 PM, Roger wrote: Error: Package: system-config-date-1.10.5-1.fc16.noarch (updates-testing) Requires: python-slip >= 0.2.21 Disable updates-testing. HTH, HAND. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http

Re: Problem with yum update && yum upgrade

On 12/13/2012 10:51 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:48:32 +1100 Roger wrote: Hi I have been using sudo yum update && yum upgrade every couple of days or so to keep Fedora 16 up to date but this morning have a problem. Note that yum is not apt. yum upgrade is the sam

Re: Problem with yum update && yum upgrade

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:48:32 +1100 Roger wrote: > Hi > I have been using sudo yum update && yum upgrade every couple of days > or so to keep Fedora 16 up to date but this morning have a problem. Note that yum is not apt. yum upgrade is the same as yum --obsoletes update. yum

Problem with yum update && yum upgrade

Hi I have been using sudo yum update && yum upgrade every couple of days or so to keep Fedora 16 up to date but this morning have a problem. It installs some files DKMS uninstall completes yum then cleans up some files and verifies, removes unwanted kernel-devel Skipped (dependency

Re: yum upgrade problem

i will report this in bugzilla because yum did do a half install of the kernel (dosent boot properly, deps problems) and without my consent. to me is easy to detect and fix ( or a least try) but it can be a serious issue if yum goes skynet on a root cli i hope someone with autority see this and sa

Re: yum upgrade problem

On Oct 11, 2012 10:21 PM, "Temlakos" wrote: > > On 10/11/2012 08:51 PM, pringle...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Hi, i sorry if this was already posted in the list; i was a long day and tomorrow holds no promises. >> Today i check for updates (using a cli) and it listed various things to updates (i have

Re: yum upgrade problem

On 10/11/2012 08:51 PM, pringle...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i sorry if this was already posted in the list; i was a long day and tomorrow holds no promises. Today i check for updates (using a cli) and it listed various things to updates (i have updates-testing enable), and some of them was from oth

Re: Yum upgrade R14 -> F15 == No Video

On Mon, 23 May 2011 21:04:26 -0700 john wendel wrote: > Just did an F14 to F15 upgrade with the result being NO VIDEO. > Nothing interesting in the X log, I can see that it was using the > Radeon driver. I also booted a 2.6.39 kernel that I had made which > doesn't have kernel mode setting turned

Yum upgrade R14 -> F15 == No Video

Just did an F14 to F15 upgrade with the result being NO VIDEO. Nothing interesting in the X log, I can see that it was using the Radeon driver. I also booted a 2.6.39 kernel that I had made which doesn't have kernel mode setting turned on, and was able to start the X server, but the video was

Re: Yum Upgrade 11-12 dependency problem with ksysguardd?

On 09/01/2010 08:10 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Tod Thomas wrote: I've upgraded two other machines without a problem. On the third one I get to the end of the dependency check and this appears: Mind giving the full output ? may also be worth trying $ yum update yum PackageKit first to make sure

Re: Yum Upgrade 11-12 dependency problem with ksysguardd?

Tod Thomas wrote: > I've upgraded two other machines without a problem. On the third one I > get to the end of the dependency check and this appears: Mind giving the full output ? may also be worth trying $ yum update yum PackageKit first to make sure the tools used for the update are current.

Yum Upgrade 11-12 dependency problem with ksysguardd?

I've upgraded two other machines without a problem. On the third one I get to the end of the dependency check and this appears: ... ---> Package kdebase-workspace.i686 0:4.3.2-1.fc12 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ksysguardd = 4.3.2-1.fc12 for package: kdebase-workspace-4.3.2-1.fc