On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:29:03AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:35:33 +0100, Ralf wrote:
>
> > >> IMO, somebody at Fedora's Release Management hass not done his
> > >> homework.
> > >
> > > See Dave Airlie's post to devel "libdrm vs mesa updates - update group
> > > for
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:35:33 +0100, Ralf wrote:
> >> IMO, somebody at Fedora's Release Management hass not done his
> >> homework.
> >
> > See Dave Airlie's post to devel "libdrm vs mesa updates - update group
> > for bodhi?"
>
> That's not my point:
>
> My point is: Why are package which appare
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i'm assuming this is temporary:
>
> # yum update
> ...
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
> --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
>
> r
On 01/20/2010 12:07 AM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-01-19 08:02:25, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> ...
>> The better question would be: Why had the inconstency this mesa-push
>> has caused not been caught in advance to pushing this package?
>>
>> IMO, somebody at Fedora's Release Management hass not done
On 10-01-19 08:02:25, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
...
> The better question would be: Why had the inconstency this mesa-push
> has caused not been caught in advance to pushing this package?
>
> IMO, somebody at Fedora's Release Management hass not done his
> homework.
See Dave Airlie's post to devel "
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:34:41 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i'm assuming this is temporary:
>
> # yum update
> ...
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
> --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
>
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 12:07 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:05:06 -0500,
> > "Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> > >
> > > i know. what i was wondering about is setting up a koji yum
> > > repo file, leaving it disabled, t
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:07:13 -0500 (EST), Robert wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:05:06 -0500,
> > "Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> > >
> > > i know. what i was wondering about is setting up a koji yum
> > > repo file, leaving it disabled, then
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:05:06 -0500,
> "Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> >
> > i know. what i was wondering about is setting up a koji yum
> > repo file, leaving it disabled, then explicitly having to enable
> > it when i wanted to install/update fr
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:05:06 -0500,
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
>
> i know. what i was wondering about is setting up a koji yum repo
> file, leaving it disabled, then explicitly having to enable it when i
> wanted to install/update from koji. apparently not.
I don't think that is practic
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:49:13 -0500,
> "Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Antonio M wrote:
> >
> > thanks. based on the last time i looked, there's no koji repo
> > file for yum to install, is there? if you want something from
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:49:13 -0500,
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Antonio M wrote:
>
> thanks. based on the last time i looked, there's no koji repo file
> for yum to install, is there? if you want something from koji, it's
> still just manually downloading and runnin
On 01/19/2010 11:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>i've not worked with bodhi before, so i popped over there and i
>> noticed that someone else has already reported this dep problem. i
>> grabbed the libdrm packages from koji and that seems to have solved
>> the update issue. does one then le
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:33:25 -0500 (EST), Robert wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:34:41 -0500 (EST), Robert wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > i'm assuming this is temporary:
> > >
> > > # yum update
> > > ...
> > > mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:34:41 -0500 (EST), Robert wrote:
>
> >
> > i'm assuming this is temporary:
> >
> > # yum update
> > ...
> > mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:34:41 -0500 (EST), Robert wrote:
>
> i'm assuming this is temporary:
>
> # yum update
> ...
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
> --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
I
2010/1/19 Robert P. J. Day :
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Antonio M wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/19 Robert P. J. Day :
>> >
>> > i'm assuming this is temporary:
>> >
>> > # yum update
>> > ...
>> > mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
>> > --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 i
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Antonio M wrote:
> 2010/1/19 Robert P. J. Day :
> >
> > i'm assuming this is temporary:
> >
> > # yum update
> > ...
> > mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package
> > mesa-libGL-7.7-2
2010/1/19 Robert P. J. Day :
>
> i'm assuming this is temporary:
>
> # yum update
> ...
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
> --> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package
> mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
>
> rday
> --
>
>
i'm assuming this is temporary:
# yum update
...
mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libdrm >= 2.4.17-1 is needed by package
mesa-libGL-7.7-2.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
rday
--
=
20 matches
Mail list logo
