Allegedly, on or about 21 September 2013, Pete Stieber sent:
> On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
> MW> MW = Mike Wright wrote:
> MW> MW>
> MW> How did you do that? What a great way
> MW> to follow who is on a thread.
> MW> Seems to me to make it more personal.
> MW>
> MW> Very nic
Am 21.09.2013 00:04, schrieb Mike Wright:
> 09/20/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>> Btw, I do wonder why this laptop will not install past F14what is
>> the problem?
>>
> No idea. Would not install f12 either. Liked f10
this is *not* a helpful reply
what "no idea"?
how far do you come
Am 20.09.2013 22:59, schrieb Mike Wright:
> I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used mostly
> as a scanner/print station.
>
> I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
> fedora-archive.repo:
>
> [archive]
> name=Fedora 14 - i386
> fa
On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW>>> MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW>>> MW>
MW>>> How did you do that? What a great way
MW>>> to follow who is on a thread.
MW>>> Seems to me to make it more personal.
MW>>>
MW>>> Very nice.
On 09/21/2013 10:10 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote:
PS>> I no
On 09/21/2013 10:10 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote:
PS> On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
PS> MW> MW = Mike Wright wrote:
PS> MW> MW>
PS> MW> How did you do that? What a great way
PS> MW> to follow who is on a thread.
PS> MW> Seems to me to make it more personal.
PS> MW>
PS> MW> Very
On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW> MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW> MW>
MW> How did you do that? What a great way
MW> to follow who is on a thread.
MW> Seems to me to make it more personal.
MW>
MW> Very nice.
I noticed this format on the wxWidgets mailing list. I believe one of
09/20/2013 03:36 PM, Pete Stieber wrote:
On 9/20/2013 3:23 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW> Anybody have any idea where the archived
MW> *updates* repo may be?
Going OT.
MW = Mike Wright wrote:
> MW>
How did you do that? What a great way to follow who is on a thread.
Seems to me to make
09/20/2013 02:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
fedora-arc
On 09/20/2013 03:23 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
09/20/2013 02:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update som
On 9/20/2013 3:23 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW> Anybody have any idea where the archived
MW> *updates* repo may be?
http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/updates/
Pete
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
09/20/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Btw, I do wonder why this laptop will not install past F14what is
the problem?
No idea. Would not install f12 either. Liked f10.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:59:20PM -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14,
Did you try the netinstall image? If the problem with the installer is
about the graphics, did you try the basic graphics mode? It is
available under the
Btw, I do wonder why this laptop will not install past F14what is
the problem?
Ranjan
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:39:48 -0700 Rick Stevens
wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
fedora-archive.repo:
[archive]
name=Fedora 14 - i38
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
fedora-archive.repo:
[archive]
name=Fedora 14 - i386
failovermethod=priority
baseurl=http://archives.fedo
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
>
> On 06/22/2012 08:47 PM, Tim wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 14:28 +0200, suvayu ali wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know the details but if this makes all Flash sites start
>>> working reliably on Linux, I would be willing to put up with w
On 06/22/2012 08:47 PM, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 14:28 +0200, suvayu ali wrote:
I don't know the details but if this makes all Flash sites start
working reliably on Linux, I would be willing to put up with work
arounds like using VMs for a year or two.
If by "VM" you mean Windows softw
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 14:28 +0200, suvayu ali wrote:
> I don't know the details but if this makes all Flash sites start
> working reliably on Linux, I would be willing to put up with work
> arounds like using VMs for a year or two.
If by "VM" you mean Windows software working in a virtual machine,
.com/flashplayer/
>
> "NOTE: Adobe Flash Player 11.2 will be the last version to target Linux
> as a supported platform. Adobe will continue to provide security
> backports to Flash Player 11.2 for Linux."
To clear up the confusion, Adobe IS still maintaining the yum r
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
wrote:
> Certain functionality is needed
> now and not in next 10 years, to make Linux (Fedora) the real player in
> OS market.
I believe the reason for dropping support for Flash on linux is Adobe
expects all modern browsers (except Google Ch
On 22.06.2012 10:30, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 04:05 AM, Darlene Wallach wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Frank Murphy
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/05/12 15:57, Andre Robatino wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm not sure what else to do. The
Flash
plugi
On 06/22/2012 04:05 AM, Darlene Wallach wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/05/12 15:57, Andre Robatino wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm not sure what else to do. The Flash
plugin
was updated to 11.2.202.235 about a week ago.
This may be the answer
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/12 15:57, Andre Robatino wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm not sure what else to do. The Flash
>> plugin
>> was updated to 11.2.202.235 about a week ago.
>
>
>
> This may be the answer:
> https://get.adobe.com/flash
On 10/05/12 15:57, Andre Robatino wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm not sure what else to do. The Flash plugin
was updated to 11.2.202.235 about a week ago.
This may be the answer:
https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
"NOTE: Adobe Flash Player 11.2 will be the last version to target
On 05/10/2012 07:11 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> Only on i686. x86_64 users still need to grab the plugin from Adobe.
It's actually back in the "unstable" 64-bit version,
google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1130.1-135886.x86_64.
--
On 05/11/2012 08:11 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/10/2012 11:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>> You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
>> It is built in to chrome and currently at
>> FlashPlayer_11_2_202_235_FlashPlayer in
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 11:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>> You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
>
> It is built in to chrome and currently at
> FlashPlayer_11_2_202_235_FlashPlayer in
> Chrome 18.0.1025.168
Only on i686. x86_64 users st
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3185733 and they promptly
closed it as NotABug. There is an updated RPM at
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ under ".rpm for other Linux" but I'm not sure
if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
providing a yu
".rpm for other Linux" but I'm not
> > sure
> > if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
> > providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
> > people please vote for my bug in the hope of ge
On 05/10/2012 09:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
Mi guess is that Chrome features Flash as an internal component and it
uses Chrome's internal auto-update mechanism?
FC
So you're sayin
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
Mi guess is that Chrome features Flash as an internal component and it
uses Chrome's internal auto-update mechanism?
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On 05/10/2012 11:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
It is built in to chrome and currently at FlashPlayer_11_2_202_235_FlashPlayer
in
Chrome 18.0.1025.168
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
o
".rpm for other Linux" but I'm not
> > sure
> > if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
> > providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
> > people please vote for my bug in the hope of ge
repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
> providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
> people please vote for my bug in the hope of getting someone at Adobe to wake
> up? Thanks.
Adobe drops Flash for Linux except in Google Chrome
http://news.softpedia.co
and they promptly
closed it as NotABug. There is an updated RPM at
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ under ".rpm for other Linux" but I'm not sure
if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept
On 07/17/2011 06:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 17.07.2011 23:35, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
>> I ran:
>>
>> [mlapier@mushroom ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release
>> fedora-release-13-1.noarch
>> fedora-release-14-1.noarch
>> [mlapier@mushroom ~]$
>>
>> [root@mushroom ~]# yum erase fedora-release-13-1.noarch
>
On 07/17/2011 11:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> to makes this shorter:
>
> * what shows "cat /etc/redhat-release"
> * what says "rpm -qa | grep release"
>
> it si not normal that anything is using wrong repos
> if there are no manually crapped repo-files under
> /etc/yum.repos.d/ and the current r
Am 17.07.2011 23:35, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
> I ran:
>
> [mlapier@mushroom ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release
> fedora-release-13-1.noarch
> fedora-release-14-1.noarch
> [mlapier@mushroom ~]$
>
> [root@mushroom ~]# yum erase fedora-release-13-1.noarch
>
> I immediately got an update notice.
>
> Thanks f
to makes this shorter:
* what shows "cat /etc/redhat-release"
* what says "rpm -qa | grep release"
it si not normal that anything is using wrong repos
if there are no manually crapped repo-files under
/etc/yum.repos.d/ and the current release-package
is installed correctly
signature.asc
Descr
On 07/17/2011 12:31 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:29:46 -0400, GTW (Garry) wrote:
>
>>> You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered by the "man rpm"
>>> manual. For example, run
>>>
>>>rpm -v fedora-release
>>
>> I think you mean
>>
>> rpm -q fedora-releas
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:29:46 -0400, GTW (Garry) wrote:
> > You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered by the "man rpm"
> > manual. For example, run
> >
> > rpm -v fedora-release
>
> I think you mean
>
> rpm -q fedora-release
Yes, it was just a typo.
--
users mailing list
use
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 12:20:46 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered by the "man rpm"
> manual. For example, run
>
> rpm -v fedora-release
I think you mean
rpm -q fedora-release
--
Garry Williams
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:10:12 -0400, ML (Mark) wrote:
> I spent some time in Google looking for instructions on how to 'verify
> the version of your "fedora-release" package' but came up empty. Could
> you elucidate this point more thoroughly.
You would learn about RPM and basic queries as cove
On 07/17/2011 04:45 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:29:03 -0400, ML (Mark) wrote:
> > I just tried:
> >
> > [root@mushroom ~]# yum update
> > Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit
> > Found 15 installed debuginfo package(s)
> > Enabling fedora
Hello everyone,
It's really tough to compile gccsense by oneself. Would it be possible
to add it to the yum repo?
Thanks.
Regards,
H Xu
05/04/2011
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On 01/28/2011 05:45 AM, mattias wrote:
> If i have a fedora 13 iso dvd image Can I use the iso as an yum repo?
> I no I can use a physical cd
you can mount and iso image as a 'loop device' and access files same
as if using a burned cd/dvd.
see;
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/
If i have a fedora 13 iso dvd image
Can I use the iso as an yum repo?
I no I can use a physical cd
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
, (google is your friend here)
I think that will help your understanding of how it all comes together.
---
Kind Regards,
Mr Gabriel (bberry mail)
-Original Message-
From: "Rashedul Arefin"
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:15:07
To:
Subject: yum repo
--
users mailing
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 17:29:52 +0100,
Julian Aloofi wrote:
>
> You can use the 'yum localinstall' command for that, or just click on
> the packages and a GUI dialog will pop up.
You don't even need to use the 'localinstall' varient, 'install' will work
as well.
Another route is to create a
Am 10.02.2010 17:15, schrieb Rashedul Arefin:
> Dear All:
>
> I am very new to Fedora. I have installed fedora 12. Is there any way to
> install rpm packages with dependencies from local drive? I have
> downloaded many rpm packages, but I dont know how to install these.
> Any help would be appreci
Dear All:
I am very new to Fedora. I have installed fedora 12. Is there any way to
install rpm packages with dependencies from local drive? I have downloaded
many rpm packages, but I dont know how to install these.
Any help would be appreciable.
Regards
Arefin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
51 matches
Mail list logo
