Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> Is there any counterpart of the old "yum check" where I can verify
>> everything is now ok?
>>
> I don't know what "yum check" did. What are you trying to verify?
From the man page for YUM.
> check Checks the local rpmdb
m Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>>>
>>> [root@mustang ~]# yum check
>>> Loaded plugins: langpacks
>>> elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of
elfutils-libelf(x86-32) = ('0', '0.161', '2.fc21&#
On 03/23/2015 07:28 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:
I tried that but got:
No duplicates to remove
A paradox?
If so, it's not a most delightful paradox, that's for sure. Try this, JIC:
package-cleanup --problems
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscript
On 03/24/15 10:28, Stephen Davies wrote:
> On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
>>> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>>>
>>> [root@mustang ~]# yum check
>>> Loaded plug
On Mar 23, 2015 8:28 PM, "Stephen Davies" wrote:
>
> On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
>>>
>>> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>>>
>>> [root@
On 24/03/15 11:08, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
[root@mustang ~]# yum check
Loaded plugins: langpacks
elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of elfutils-libelf(x86-32)
= (&#
On 03/24/15 08:19, Stephen Davies wrote:
> Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
>
> [root@mustang ~]# yum check
> Loaded plugins: langpacks
> elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of
> elfutils-libelf(x86-32) = ('0', &
Since upgrading from Fedora 20 to 21 (using fedup), I get the following:
[root@mustang ~]# yum check
Loaded plugins: langpacks
elfutils-libs-0.161-2.fc21.i686 has missing requires of
elfutils-libelf(x86-32) = ('0', '0.161', '2.fc21')
elfutils-libs-0.161-6.f
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:56:40 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> I can't remember,
> but used "yum check-update"
> return "no updates available",
> if there was none.
"yum update" does that. "yum check-update" returns zero (False) if no
I can't remember,
but used "yum check-update"
return "no updates available",
if there was none.
[root@]# yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, local, versionlock
#repo checking snipped
[root@]#
yum-3.4.3-132.fc20.noarch
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
Received this from Yum a short time ago.
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Update notice FEDORA-2013-14172 (from updates-testing) is broken, or a
bad duplicate, skipping.
You should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:44:18 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the result of yum check
> I guess that I should fix the issues, but how?
Use "yum" or "repoquery" to search the repositories for the missing
things. Example:
# repoquery --whatp
Hello,
This is the result of yum check
I guess that I should fix the issues, but how?
Waht about ERROR: check all?
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, refresh-packagekit
amaya_wx-11.4.4-0.x86_64 has missing requires of
libcrypto.so.0.9.8()(64bit)
amaya_wx-11.4.4-0.x86_64 has missing requires of
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:30:27AM +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I noticed this:
>
> | # yum check-update
> | Geladene Plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
> | adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B
>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Markus Schönhaber
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I noticed this:
>
> | # yum check-update
> | Geladene Plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
> | adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B
>
On 07/19/2012 04:30 AM, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Hi,
today I noticed this:
| # yum check-update
| Geladene Plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
| adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B
00:00
| google-chrome| 951 B
00:00
Hi,
today I noticed this:
| # yum check-update
| Geladene Plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
| adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B
00:00
| google-chrome| 951 B
00:00 !!!
[...]
What is the meaning of the exclamation
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 19:09 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> The best place files an RFE, for stuff in your wish list:
> http://yum.baseurl.org/
>
> They have a mailing list and roadmap.
Yum-presto isn't currently part of yum. It's a plugin. If you want to
file an RFE, either use
https://fedorahos
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:52 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> At the very least, yum should provide an estimate of the delta download
> size *before* the user is presented with the option for allowing
> download to begin.
Yum-presto did originally do this, but only by doing incredibly hackish
things t
On 08/10/10 17:52, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>
>> There is one suggestion which may help people with low bandwidth or
>> expensive net connections. Yum should have an option to update packages
>> for the one's, it can find only deltas. If a dependency problem occurs
>> then that package can be mentione
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:41:53 -0500 Vikram Goyal
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:31:15PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 23:09 +0200, Dj YB wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
> > > possible.
> > > Is
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:31:15PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 23:09 +0200, Dj YB wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
> > possible.
> > Is it possible to know before you say 'yes' to the update process, what
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 23:09 +0200, Dj YB wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
> possible.
> Is it possible to know before you say 'yes' to the update process, what
> packages are going to be fully downloaded and what packages have deltas?
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Dj YB wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
> possible.
> Is it possible to know before you say 'yes' to the update process, what
> packages are going to be fully downloaded and what packages have deltas?
I am a
On 10/06/2010 05:09 PM, Dj YB wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
> possible.
> Is it possible to know before you say 'yes' to the update process, what
> packages are going to be fully downloaded and what packages have deltas?
I think it
25 matches
Mail list logo
