On 05/24/2012 09:58 AM, JD wrote:
> I have in the past, but not recently, as this
> problem is rather recent (past 10 or 15 days ).
> I will give it a shot and get back to you.
OK.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
of the century. --
On 05/24/2012 06:59 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
It's a 2-wire brand router, rebranded as AT&T
And yes, it does have the status page to see
every connected client, it's IP address, ...etc
However, it has no info about each client's
bit rate.
It sort of does on the System Summary page at 192.168.1.
On 05/24/2012 02:14 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 18:58 -0700, JD wrote:
On 05/23/2012 06:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:52 AM, JD wrote:
Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
Yes, the question was asked and I replied moving the laptop
> >> It's a 2-wire brand router, rebranded as AT&T
> >> And yes, it does have the status page to see
> >> every connected client, it's IP address, ...etc
> >> However, it has no info about each client's
> >> bit rate.
> > It sort of does on the System Summary page at 192.168.1.254. You can
> > al
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 18:58 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 06:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 05/24/2012 09:52 AM, JD wrote:
> >> Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
> >> Yes, the question was asked and I replied moving the laptop right
> >> next to the router
On 05/23/2012 06:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:52 AM, JD wrote:
Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
Yes, the question was asked and I replied moving the laptop right
next to the router has no effect on the bit rate.
Sorry if my question wasn't cle
On 05/24/2012 09:52 AM, JD wrote:
> Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
> Yes, the question was asked and I replied moving the laptop right
> next to the router has no effect on the bit rate.
Sorry if my question wasn't clear.
I'm not asking about moving it cl
On 05/23/2012 06:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'm sorry if this has been asked/answered, but the Fedora systemis it a
laptop
that you can take to another location and connect to another AP?
Sorry Ed - I sent my reply too soon wihtout answering the 2nd question.
Yes, the question was asked and
On 05/24/2012 09:50 AM, JD wrote:
> I'm sorry if this has been asked/answered, but the Fedora systemis it a
> laptop
> that you can take to another location and connect to another AP?
And the answer to my second question?
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be mis
On 05/23/2012 06:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:02 AM, JD wrote:
The model number printed on the router (which
doubles up as tv signal decoder) is 3800HGV-B.
Router was supplied by att.
Yes I do have admin access.
Did you try what was suggested by Aaron, as far as status goes?
Yes!
On 05/23/2012 02:56 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:41 -0700, JD wrote:
On 05/23/2012 04:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I looked back through the posts in this thread and, while I may have missed it
due to
the number of posts, I did not see a mention of what make/model of wireless
On 05/24/2012 09:02 AM, JD wrote:
>
> The model number printed on the router (which
> doubles up as tv signal decoder) is 3800HGV-B.
> Router was supplied by att.
> Yes I do have admin access.
Did you try what was suggested by Aaron, as far as status goes?
>
> I was not present at the time they h
On 05/23/2012 02:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/24/2012 12:41 AM, JD wrote:
It's a 2-wire brand router, rebranded as AT&T
And yes, it does have the status page to see
every connected client, it's IP address, ...etc
However, it has no info about each client's
bit rate.
Then, it leads me to ask t
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:41 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 04:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I looked back through the posts in this thread and, while I may have missed
> > it due to
> > the number of posts, I did not see a mention of what make/model of wireless
> > AP you
> > have.
> >
> > My s
On 05/24/2012 12:41 AM, JD wrote:
> It's a 2-wire brand router, rebranded as AT&T
> And yes, it does have the status page to see
> every connected client, it's IP address, ...etc
> However, it has no info about each client's
> bit rate.
Then, it leads me to ask the following.
1. Do you know
On 05/23/2012 04:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I looked back through the posts in this thread and, while I may have missed it
due to
the number of posts, I did not see a mention of what make/model of wireless AP
you
have.
My sample size is small...but the AP's that I've worked with all had a "Statu
On 05/23/2012 05:55 PM, JD wrote:
> The link quality (signal strength) came back up
> after a few minutes, but bit rate remains fixed.
>
> Bit Rate=18 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
> Power Management:off
> Link
On 05/23/2012 02:50 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:43 -0700, JD wrote:
# iwconfig wlan1 rate 54G
^^^
'54M' not 'G'.
John.
Sorry, no effect:
# iwconfig wlan1 rate 54M
# iwconfig wlan1
wlan1 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed
On 05/23/2012 02:15 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:04 -0700, JD wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:12 PM, John Horne wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:43 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> # iwconfig wlan1 rate 54G
^^^
'54M' not 'G'.
John.
--
John Horne Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287
Plymouth University, UK Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 05/23/2012 02:25 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:02 -0700, JD wrote:
I found no settings on the router which
would set the bitrate per wifi client. The other 3
clients are all at 54 Mb/s.
Hi,
Ah. I don't think you mentioned that other clients were working fine.
Are these 802
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:02 -0700, JD wrote:
> I found no settings on the router which
> would set the bitrate per wifi client. The other 3
> clients are all at 54 Mb/s.
>
Hi,
Ah. I don't think you mentioned that other clients were working fine.
Are these 802.11b/g cards or are they 802.11n but f
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:27 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 10:02 AM, JD wrote:
> > On 05/22/2012 02:56 PM, John Horne wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:19 -0700, JD wrote:
> >>> When I take my laptop to starbucks or McDonalds hot spot, even when
> >>> sitting outside, bitrate never
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:04 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 03:12 PM, John Horne wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, JD wrote:
> >> Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
> >>
> >> iwconfig wlan0
> >> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
> >> Mode:Managed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/2012 10:02 AM, JD wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 02:56 PM, John Horne wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:19 -0700, JD wrote:
>>> When I take my laptop to starbucks or McDonalds hot spot, even when
>>> sitting outside, bitrate never is below 54mbps, so
On 05/22/2012 03:12 PM, John Horne wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE
Bit Rat
On 05/22/2012 02:56 PM, John Horne wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:19 -0700, JD wrote:
When I take my laptop to starbucks or McDonalds hot spot,
even when sitting outside, bitrate never is below 54mbps,
sometime is as high as 72mb/s
Hi,
Reading through your messages, you have now said two thi
Bill Davidsen writes:
> Generally people are starting follow the standards, although that's only
> generally:
> mb or mbit bits
> mB bytes x 100
> miB bytes x 1024*1024
> Since a common rate in the 802.11 standard if 54 mbit that's probably right.
What "standards" could they possibly be
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, JD wrote:
> Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
>
> iwconfig wlan0
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
>Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
> 00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE
>Bit Rate=18 Mb/s Tx-Power=27 dBm
>
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:19 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> When I take my laptop to starbucks or McDonalds hot spot,
> even when sitting outside, bitrate never is below 54mbps,
> sometime is as high as 72mb/s
>
Hi,
Reading through your messages, you have now said two things:
1) You used an RTL card and go
Tom Horsley wrote:
Just for curiosity, does anyone actually know for sure
what units the programs involves are calling "mb/s".
Maybe one of them thinks it means megabytes and
another thinks it means megabits :-).
Generally people are starting follow the standards, although that's only
generall
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 22:02 -0700, JD wrote:
> > "Do not over-quote by the hierarchy level in the correspondence.
> > [...] Also remove any irrelevant text."
> >
> > (From the list Guidelines, referenced at the end of every single
> message
> > on this list.)
> >
> > poc
> >
> So, sue me :)
>
Clea
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:30 -0700, JD wrote:
> And besides, what does it really matter?
It wastes storage space and bandwidth. Everyone's.
I don't know the number of members on this list, but you're being
wasteful on a large scale, it's not just an email between you and one or
two people talki
On 05/21/2012 10:45 PM, Jatin K wrote:
On 05/22/2012 10:30 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:53 PM, Jatin K wrote:
On 05/22/2012 05:44 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 0
On 05/22/2012 10:30 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:53 PM, Jatin K wrote:
On 05/22/2012 05:44 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
I think your card
On 05/21/2012 10:02 PM, JD wrote:
So, sue me :)
With an attitude like that, it's getting tempting to *plonk!* you.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedor
On 05/21/2012 09:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:54 -0700, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 08:39 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/21/2012 08:30 PM, JD wrote:
Why do you let the most unimportant things in the world
bug you so much?
I consider it bad manners to waste other people's
On 05/21/2012 09:53 PM, Jatin K wrote:
On 05/22/2012 05:44 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
i
On 05/22/2012 05:44 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
Maybe it's because I'm als
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:54 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 08:39 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 05/21/2012 08:30 PM, JD wrote:
> >> Why do you let the most unimportant things in the world
> >> bug you so much?
> >
> > I consider it bad manners to waste other people's time that way
> > because until
On 05/21/2012 08:39 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/21/2012 08:30 PM, JD wrote:
Why do you let the most unimportant things in the world
bug you so much?
I consider it bad manners to waste other people's time that way
because until I've waded through all of the old, irrelevant material I
have no id
On 05/21/2012 08:30 PM, JD wrote:
Why do you let the most unimportant things in the world
bug you so much?
I consider it bad manners to waste other people's time that way because
until I've waded through all of the old, irrelevant material I have no
idea if there's anything in the post that's
On 05/21/2012 08:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/21/2012 05:14 PM, JD wrote:
My rate remains constant at 18mb/s
For this one line you needed to quote 8.5K of other people's posts?
Please trim your replies in the future so that other people don't have
to wade through so much old stuph!
Hey.. th
On 05/21/2012 05:14 PM, JD wrote:
My rate remains constant at 18mb/s
For this one line you needed to quote 8.5K of other people's posts?
Please trim your replies in the future so that other people don't have
to wade through so much old stuph!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 05/21/2012 05:27 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Just for curiosity, does anyone actually know for sure
what units the programs involves are calling "mb/s".
Maybe one of them thinks it means megabytes and
another thinks it means megabits :-).
That depends on what the coder of iwconfig meant :)
I have
Just for curiosity, does anyone actually know for sure
what units the programs involves are calling "mb/s".
Maybe one of them thinks it means megabytes and
another thinks it means megabits :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
On 05/21/2012 03:31 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.1
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Mana
On 05/21/2012 02:52 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2
On 05/21/2012 02:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
00:AA:BB
On 05/21/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE
Bit Rate=18 Mb
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, JD wrote:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE
Bit Rate=18 Mb/s Tx-Power=27 dBm
Retry long limit:
Any wifi protocol savvy people who can explain this:
iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"Private"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.452 GHz Access Point:
00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE
Bit Rate=18 Mb/s Tx-Power=27 dBm
Retry long limit:7 RTS thr=2346 B Fragment thr=2
53 matches
Mail list logo
