On 12/15/2014 03:00 PM, poma wrote:
On 14.12.2014 16:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You should be - Why? In case something in rpm changes, packages from
different fedora releases will be incompatible and broken to different
extends, independently of their NEVRs.
YSB - Why? ICSIRC, PFDFRWBIAB to D
On 14.12.2014 16:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> You should be - Why? In case something in rpm changes, packages from
> different fedora releases will be incompatible and broken to different
> extends, independently of their NEVRs.
>
YSB - Why? ICSIRC, PFDFRWBIAB to DE, IOT NEVRs.
ITYM?
--
us
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 21:07:54 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/14/14 18:10, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:00:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/12/14 05:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> Sure, but my question is why does fedup not take care of this downgrade
> >>> and rep
On 12/14/2014 02:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/14/14 18:10, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:00:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/12/14 05:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Sure, but my question is why does fedup not take care of this downgrade and
replace with the F21 packages?
Becau
On 12/14/14 18:10, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:00:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/14 05:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> Sure, but my question is why does fedup not take care of this downgrade and
>>> replace with the F21 packages?
>> Because "fedup" is not meant to be "
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:00:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/12/14 05:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Sure, but my question is why does fedup not take care of this downgrade and
> > replace with the F21 packages?
>
> Because "fedup" is not meant to be "distro-sync".
Even its developer seems to di
On 12/12/14 05:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Sure, but my question is why does fedup not take care of this downgrade and
> replace with the F21 packages?
Because "fedup" is not meant to be "distro-sync". It looks for packages to be
"upgraded" to the highest version available for the requested rele
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:10:21 + Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
>
> > Why does this happen?
>
> Searching for those packages on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates it
> looks like those packages were pushed to stable updates on F20 before F21.
Sure, but my que
Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
> Why does this happen?
Searching for those packages on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates it
looks like those packages were pushed to stable updates on F20 before F21.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscrip
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 04:00:29 + Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
>
> > On a system not fed up from fedup -- not the one that is hosed for now --
> I do the following:
> >
> > sudo yum --releasever=21 distro-sync
> >
> > Dependencies Resolved
> >
> >
>
Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
> On a system not fed up from fedup -- not the one that is hosed for now --
I do the following:
>
> sudo yum --releasever=21 distro-sync
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
>
> Packag
On a system not fed up from fedup -- not the one that is hosed for now -- I do
the following:
sudo yum --releasever=21 distro-sync
Dependencies Resolved
Package Arch Version
12 matches
Mail list logo
