On 02/16/2010 09:10 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:01 +1030, Tim wrote:
>> No, that's not how such network printers work. They are their own
>> network device, their own print server. They don't need to have a host
>> computer.
>>
> They don't have to but they should to avoi
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:08:40AM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:32 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:12:54PM +, Tim
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:01 +1030, Tim wrote:
> fred smith:
> >> It's NOT a shared printer. it is attached to the LAN with its own IP
> >> address.
>
> Aaron Konstam:
> > Even so it needs to shared on the server that is distributing its
> > services to the rest of the machines. Or are you connec
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:32 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:12:54PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 04:07 -0800, Mike Cloaked w
fred smith:
>> It's NOT a shared printer. it is attached to the LAN with its own IP address.
Aaron Konstam:
> Even so it needs to shared on the server that is distributing its
> services to the rest of the machines. Or are you connecting it to each
> computer independently.
No, that's not how suc
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:46:25PM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:12:54PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 04:07 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> > > > > I don't know if this will help but sometimes I
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:12:54PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 04:07 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> > > > I don't know if this will help but sometimes I have found that a printer
> > > > seems to be shared according to the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:44:11PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > I ran the troubleshooter and it did not turn up anything helpful.
>
> Did it give you the opportunity to save some diagnostic information at
> the end? That would have been useful
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 08:51:16AM -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
>
> fred smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > It's NOT a shared printer. it is attached to the LAN with its own IP
> > address.
> >
> > I ran the troubleshooter and it did not turn up anything helpful.
> >
> > every computer in the house as
he outside world via the host's
nic? I still presume that port 631 needs to be forwarded through to the f12
os running in the VM - maybe this is a problem with networking from the vm?
Is the nic bridged or natted to the VM??
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/weird-F12-pr
d not see the printer? Any
selinux denial I wonder?
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/weird-F12-printing-problem-tp206206p209305.html
Sent from the Fedora Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 11:20 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> I ran the troubleshooter and it did not turn up anything helpful.
Did it give you the opportunity to save some diagnostic information at
the end? That would have been useful to see, as there might well have
been an error message logged that e
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 04:12:54PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 04:07 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> > > I don't know if this will help but sometimes I have found that a printer
> > > seems to be shared according to the Fedora printer admin interface but
> > > does not work - in t
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 04:07 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> > I don't know if this will help but sometimes I have found that a printer
> > seems to be shared according to the Fedora printer admin interface but
> > does not work - in this situation going to localhost:631 in a browser and
> > selecting
;
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
>
--
View this messag
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 22:49 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> going thru the configuration on the one that fails, when I enter the IP
> address and the queue name then click the verify button it immediately
> reports "this print share is accessible", yet after completing the
> configuration, printing a t
I've got two F12 systems here. One is my eeepc, while the other is a VM
in Sun VirtualBox.
I have a networked Brother laser printer. It works fine on the eeepc when
set up as an IPP printer. On the VirtualBox system, cups disables the
printer because it is "inaccessible".
going thru the configura
17 matches
Mail list logo
