IANAL, and I suspect you are not either. YMMV - employment law and
intellectual property law differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
-Original message-
From: Dave Ihnat
Sent: Thu 02-08-2012 07:43
Subject:Re: was criminal use of linux [not] -now: ownership
To
On 08/02/2012 07:04 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi, you have completely destroyed the attributions here, making it
> pretty hard to follow the conversation.
Which is good. Since this is kind of useless on this mailing list.
--
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to b
Once, long ago--actually, on Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 07:26:02PM +1000--Roger
(are...@bigpond.com) said:
> Er... nobody can take ownership over work that you have written,
> Your work is your own, regardless of whether they own the language
> you write it in or not.
True, unless:
1. You contractu
On 2 August 2012 10:26, Roger wrote:
Hi, you have completely destroyed the attributions here, making it
pretty hard to follow the conversation.
Richard Vickery wrote:
> Er... nobody can take ownership over work that you have written, Your work
> is your own, regardless of whether they own the la
Er... nobody can take ownership over work that you have written, Your
work is your own, regardless of whether they own the language you write
it in or not. Where is it stated that Micros[hi]t owns C++? when did
this happen? You can't own something in the free domain? This is like
saying that I
