Does adding init=/bin/bash on the boot line still work also?
So long as you remount root as rw and mount any other separate
filesystems that are required this also allows a password update and
bypasses any single user mode password requirements.
I know people that prevent these put a password on
On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 23:13 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-08-24 1:04 p.m., Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > Things you do after an su are not logged.
> > Only the su itself is logged.
> >
> > Each command run with sudo is logged.
> >
> > Probably can be circumvented by doing "sudo bash".
> > Good rea
On 2021-08-24 10:16 a.m., John Mellor wrote:
There is one unhandled situation in Fedora 34 and still requires a root
password: You cannot use single-user mode without a root password in
order to fix the issues preventing use of multi-user mode. You have to
set a root password just for this sce
On 2021-08-24 1:04 p.m., Jon LaBadie wrote:
Things you do after an su are not logged.
Only the su itself is logged.
Each command run with sudo is logged.
Probably can be circumvented by doing "sudo bash".
Good reason to not allow shells to be sudo'ed :)
I just do "sudo -i" and work from there
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:34:22PM +0200, François Patte wrote:
Le 2021-08-24 19:03, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
On 2021-08-24 9:50 a.m., François Patte wrote:
Thank you for your explanations. I made some progress in my
investigations: the problem seems to be a change in the "su"
command from f32 to
Le 2021-08-24 19:03, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
On 2021-08-24 9:50 a.m., François Patte wrote:
Thank you for your explanations. I made some progress in my
investigations: the problem seems to be a change in the "su" command
from f32 to f34: my personnal umask is 0077 and I use to log as root
using
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:43:10AM -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 8/24/21 11:03 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
umask isn't an environment variable. It's a kernel setting for the
process. Why are you using "su" anyway instead of "sudo"? (I don't
know if that will change anything regarding the umask, but i
On 8/24/21 11:03 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
umask isn't an environment variable. It's a kernel setting for the
process. Why are you using "su" anyway instead of "sudo"? (I don't
know if that will change anything regarding the umask, but it's better
to not have a root password.)
I can't speak f
On 2021-08-24 1:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-08-24 9:50 a.m., François Patte wrote:
Thank you for your explanations. I made some progress in my
investigations: the problem seems to be a change in the "su" command
from f32 to f34: my personnal umask is 0077 and I use to log as root
usin
On 2021-08-24 9:50 a.m., François Patte wrote:
Thank you for your explanations. I made some progress in my
investigations: the problem seems to be a change in the "su" command
from f32 to f34: my personnal umask is 0077 and I use to log as root
using the command "su -". Until f32 this way of do
Le 2021-08-24 15:17, Jonathan Billings a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:28:17AM +0200, François Patte wrote:
The only file talking of umask is /etc/bashrc:
if [ $UID -gt 199 ] && [ "`id -gn`" = "`id -un`" ]; then
umask 002
else
umask 022
fi
I don't understand the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:28:17AM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> The only file talking of umask is /etc/bashrc:
>
> if [ $UID -gt 199 ] && [ "`id -gn`" = "`id -un`" ]; then
>umask 002
> else
>umask 022
> fi
>
> I don't understand the meaning
It means:
If your UI
Le 2021-08-24 11:29, Tim via users a écrit :
François Patte:
I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for
root is 0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34?
Samuel Sieb:
All my F34 systems have a umask of 0022 for root, so it must be
something specific to yours.
The
François Patte:
>> I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for
>> root is 0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34?
Samuel Sieb:
> All my F34 systems have a umask of 0022 for root, so it must be
> something specific to yours.
The first thing that sp
199 ] && [ "`id -gn`" = "`id -un`" ]; then
umask 002
else
umask 022
fi
I don't understand the meaning
I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for root
is 0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34?
All my
"`id -un`" ]; then
umask 002
else
umask 022
fi
I don't understand the meaning
I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for root is
0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34?
All my F34 systems have a umask of 0022 for root, so
02
else
umask 022
fi
I don't understand the meaning
I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for root is
0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34?
Thank you.
On Monday, August 23, 2021, 04:46:48 PM EDT, François Patte
wrote:
Bonjour,
W
Check: /etc/bashrc, /etc/profile, /root/.bash_profile and /root/.bashrc,
in that order
On Monday, August 23, 2021, 04:46:48 PM EDT, François Patte
wrote:
Bonjour,
What is the default umask for root?
Until now I thought it was 0022, but, today I can see it is 0077
Has
Bonjour,
What is the default umask for root?
Until now I thought it was 0022, but, today I can see it is 0077
Has something been changed somewhere in my install? Where?
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris
19 matches
Mail list logo
