Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-04 Thread Andras Simon
Le jeu. 3 oct. 2024 à 13:56, Jonathan Billings a écrit : > > On Oct 3, 2024, at 06:12, Andras Simon wrote: > > > > Should I still uninstall systemd-boot-unsigned? > > > > What still puzzles me is that rpm -V kernel-core-6.10.11 didn't show > > any problem, even though some files it contains were

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-03 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Oct 3, 2024, at 06:12, Andras Simon wrote: > > Should I still uninstall systemd-boot-unsigned? > > What still puzzles me is that rpm -V kernel-core-6.10.11 didn't show > any problem, even though some files it contains were missing. I can > still see this with an earlier fc39 kernel-core that

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-03 Thread Andras Simon
[For the impatient: Jonathan's suggestion worked.] Le jeu. 3 oct. 2024 à 00:03, Jonathan Billings a écrit : > I don’t know if this is the case for you, but I saw a lot of F38->F39 updates > unintentionally install the “sdubby” and “systemd-boot-unsigned” packages. There's no sdubby, but system

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-02 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Oct 1, 2024, at 11:42, Andras Simon wrote: > > A few months ago I upgraded a laptop to Fedora 39 but haven't used it > since, except for updating it a few times. But now I noticed that it > can only boot into an fc38 kernel. (This may have been like this since > upgrading, it's just that I di

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-02 Thread George N. White III
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 2:14 AM Andras Simon wrote: > Le mer. 2 oct. 2024 à 02:31, Tim via users > a écrit : > > > I wonder if you ended up with two /boots at some stage? With the newer > > kernels, etc, installed into the currently unseen one. > > > > Do you have an unmounted /boot partition? >

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-02 Thread Tim via users
Tim: > > I wonder if you ended up with two /boots at some stage? With the newer > > kernels, etc, installed into the currently unseen one. > > > > Do you have an unmounted /boot partition? Andras Simon: > How do I check? mount | grep boot > returns > /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 > /dev/sda2 on /

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-02 Thread Barry
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 16:43, Andras Simon wrote: > > What can/should I do? What is the output of lsblk -f What is the output of find /boot Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to use

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-01 Thread Andras Simon
Le mer. 2 oct. 2024 à 02:31, Tim via users a écrit : > I wonder if you ended up with two /boots at some stage? With the newer > kernels, etc, installed into the currently unseen one. > > Do you have an unmounted /boot partition? How do I check? mount | grep boot returns /dev/sda1 on /boot type

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-01 Thread Tim via users
On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 16:50 +0200, Andras Simon wrote: > A few months ago I upgraded a laptop to Fedora 39 but haven't used it > since, except for updating it a few times. But now I noticed that it > can only boot into an fc38 kernel. (This may have been like this since > upgrading, it's just that

Re: the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-01 Thread George N. White III
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:42 PM Andras Simon wrote: > A few months ago I upgraded a laptop to Fedora 39 but haven't used it > since, except for updating it a few times. But now I noticed that it > can only boot into an fc38 kernel. (This may have been like this since > upgrading, it's just that I

the kernel that is and is not there

2024-10-01 Thread Andras Simon
A few months ago I upgraded a laptop to Fedora 39 but haven't used it since, except for updating it a few times. But now I noticed that it can only boot into an fc38 kernel. (This may have been like this since upgrading, it's just that I didn't notice it.) In fact, there are no fc39 kernels in /boo