A quick trip to the dustbin of Internet History, perhaps?
Use ssh and ask the question again if you have problems.
{^_^}
On 2012/03/04 17:35, don fisher wrote:
I am running f16 and am trying to get NFS so work. I can ping the site, but when
I try and telnet to it I receive "Name or service not
On 5 March 2012 01:35, don fisher wrote:
> I am running f16 and am trying to get NFS so work. I can ping the site, but
> when I try and telnet to it I receive "Name or service not known".
>
> What does telnet require that ping does not?
>
From other people's replies it sounds like they think you'
On 5 March 2012 01:48, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
>> On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What does telnet require that ping does not?
>>
>>
>> A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
>
> Yep. Try SSH. Besides being nine
On 03/05/2012 11:51 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> systemctl restart nfs-idmap.service
I too use that URL. It doesn't mention one thing...
The one thing that sometimes ends up being a gotcha is non-matching
Domain = lines in /etc/idmapd.conf between client and server.
--
Do not condemn the judgm
On 03/05/2012 11:49 AM, don fisher wrote:
> I think it claims UDP instead of TCP and mountvers=3. Does mountvers=3
> => nfsv3?
Yes
FWIW, I've dropped the portions of my brain needed to work on nfsv3.
When I need refreshing after not having setup NFS for a long time I go
to
http://www.crazys
On 03/04/12 20:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/05/2012 11:16 AM, don fisher wrote:
On 03/04/12 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher:
Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off.
I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux
SELINUX has nothi
On 03/04/2012 05:35:17 PM, don fisher wrote:
> I am running f16 and am trying to get NFS so work. I can ping the
> site,
> but when I try and telnet to it I receive "Name or service not
> known".
>
> What does telnet require that ping does not?
>
> Thanks
> don
As I understand, you've disabled
Slight change, but after editing the iptables, I was able to mount my
nfs file system. But umount will not work. It says:
umount /dfpc57
umount.nfs: /dfpc57: not found
umount.nfs: /dfpc57: not found
But df says:
dfpc57:/ nfs 678G 184G 460G 29% /dfpc57
Also mtab has what I inter
On 03/05/2012 11:16 AM, don fisher wrote:
> On 03/04/12 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher:
>>> Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off.
>>> I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux
>>
>> SELINUX has nothing to do with the fir
On 03/04/12 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher:
Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off.
I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux
SELINUX has nothing to do with the firewall
Thanks. I did not understand what was going on. I di
On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, don fisher wrote:
> Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off.
You have the firewall turned off on the system running the NFS service?
Are you setting up NFSv3 or NFSv4?
--
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own.
You
On 03/05/2012 09:59 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> I'd guess the firewall on the RHEL4 system isn't blocking the
> connection, so the connection to port 23 is simply rejected, while the
> F16 system's firewall is blocking it, so that system pretends like
> it's not there.
That is probably true.
Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher:
> Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off.
> I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux
SELINUX has nothing to do with the firewall
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On 03/04/12 18:59, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/05/2012 09:37 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
What does telnet require that ping does not?
A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
Right
I k
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/05/2012 09:37 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
>> On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What does telnet require that ping does not?
>>
>> A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
>>
>
> Right
>
> I know this is tangential, b
On 03/04/12 18:48, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
What does telnet require that ping does not?
A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
Yep. Try SSH. Besides being nine quintillion times more
On 03/05/2012 09:37 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
>
>>
>> What does telnet require that ping does not?
>
> A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
>
Right
I know this is tangential, but this reminded me of something interesting
I noticed recently.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
>
>>
>> What does telnet require that ping does not?
>
>
> A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
Yep. Try SSH. Besides being nine quintillion times more secure, it's
generally included by def
On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote:
What does telnet require that ping does not?
A running telnet daemon on the destination host.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gu
I am running f16 and am trying to get NFS so work. I can ping the site,
but when I try and telnet to it I receive "Name or service not known".
What does telnet require that ping does not?
Thanks
don
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
20 matches
Mail list logo
