On 14/04/2021 02:38, Jack Craig wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:52 AM Tim via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 12:06 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> Oh so now I have learned something new.
>
> I thought that because I was a Domain owner, I had
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:52 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 12:06 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> > Oh so now I have learned something new.
> >
> > I thought that because I was a Domain owner, I had to do the
> > translation from my public IP to my local DNS name
>
> Just to be clear:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:54 PM J.Witvliet--- via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> *From: *"Jack Craig"
> *Date:* Monday, 12 April 2021 at 21:07:07
> *To: *"Community support for Fedora users"
> *Subject:* Re: systemd-resolv
On 13/04/2021 18:52, Tim via users wrote:
You can see that sort of thing with the "dig" tool. If you do a "dig
example.com" you'll get a collection of responses. The "answer"
section is the domain name and numerical IP address for it, that you
queried. The "authority" section will be the autho
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 12:06 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> Oh so now I have learned something new.
>
> I thought that because I was a Domain owner, I had to do the
> translation from my public IP to my local DNS name
Just to be clear:
By "your public IP" do mean the IP for your server that the worl
From: "Jack Craig"
mailto:jack.craig.ap...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, 12 April 2021 at 21:07:07
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
Subject: Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup
Oh so now I have learned so
Oh so now I have learned something new.
I thought that because I was a Domain owner, I had to do the translation
from my public IP to my local DNS name
in as much as networksolutions.com, my domain registrar provider, has
already the IP and host name then
I don't need to provide that so let me t
I'm answering this with a separate response because it goes off in a
different direction. You can decide which way to go without mixing up
all the information together.
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 12:03 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> I think I understand that the primary name server for domain must be
> in
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 12:03 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> OK time to share the real problem here ,it is me. that is to say
> after several decades of computer work I got Parkinson's and that
> forced me to stop working commercially. I didn't want to give up my
> networking all the way so I keep thi
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:20 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:37 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> > I have tried at length to get bind 9 to support proper a split
> > horizon configuration without success.
>
> I remember going through that with you last year. It definitely works,
> a
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:37 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
> I have tried at length to get bind 9 to support proper a split
> horizon configuration without success.
I remember going through that with you last year. It definitely works,
as I did it on my system as I went through it with you.
Do you hav
hi Peter,
thx very much for your time & expertise.
very much appreciated, jackc...
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 4:11 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 08.04.2021 um 22:37 schrieb Jack Craig :
> >
> > This was looking like a good solution until I got down to the end of the
> second article
> > where it
> Am 08.04.2021 um 22:37 schrieb Jack Craig :
>
> This was looking like a good solution until I got down to the end of the
> second article
> where it said, if I understand this correctly, the systemD-resolveD is not
> appropriate for the primary DNS server of a domain.
Indeed, systems-reso
hi list,
I have a small home domain (linuxlighthouse.com) running on fedora 32.
I am trying to set up network services for DNS & HTTPS
I have only the one server that I'm trying to provide all these services
from,
a single host using a static ip from att. i have a cascaded router config
connectin
14 matches
Mail list logo
