Am 17.07.2011 14:34, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:19:46 +0930
> Tim wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 07:55 +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote:
>>> why to not have daemon syslogging on a different file like on debian
>>> distro families?
>>
>> Do you mean differently than:
>>
>>
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:19:46 +0930
Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 07:55 +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> > why to not have daemon syslogging on a different file like on debian
> > distro families?
>
> Do you mean differently than:
>
> The SMTP server having its own log file
> The HTTP se
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 07:55 +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> why to not have daemon syslogging on a different file like on debian
> distro families?
Do you mean differently than:
The SMTP server having its own log file
The HTTP server having its own log file
The DHCP server having its own lo
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:27:21 -0600
Santiago Enrique Lemus MartÃnez wrote:
> use
> tail /var/log/messages
yes, I konw, I can let daemon facilty logging on messages or add it tolog on
daemon.log; my question is: why to not have daemon syslogging on a different
file like on debian distro families?
use
tail /var/log/messages
2011/7/16 Maurizio Marini
> One of the first thing u note coming from debian, is that tailing for
> daemon doesn't tail anything :)
> I wonder why redhat never used /var/log/daemon.log ad syslog daemon
> facility; this is not an issue of course, i add it, this is only
One of the first thing u note coming from debian, is that tailing for
daemon doesn't tail anything :)
I wonder why redhat never used /var/log/daemon.log ad syslog daemon
facility; this is not an issue of course, i add it, this is only an historical
question :)
m.
--
users mailing list
users@list
