Re: super duper uberthread

2014-03-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 11:01 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > > >>> That ain't nuttin'. We started with an 11/45 with 48KB of core memory > > >>> and 2 RK05's (2.2MB removable cartridge disks). > > Ha! At FAU the engineering department had a Data General > Nova with only 8KB of core memory, and an ASR-3

Re: super duper uberthread

2014-03-29 Thread Tom Horsley
> >>> That ain't nuttin'. We started with an 11/45 with 48KB of core memory > >>> and 2 RK05's (2.2MB removable cartridge disks). Ha! At FAU the engineering department had a Data General Nova with only 8KB of core memory, and an ASR-33 TTY with a paper tape attachment as the only I/O device :-).

Re: super duper uberthread

2014-03-29 Thread poma
On 29.03.2014 12:48, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 03:59 +0100, poma wrote: >> On 26.03.2014 23:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 22:42 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: David G. Miller wrote: > The funny thing is that back in the earliest days

Re: super duper uberthread

2014-03-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 03:59 +0100, poma wrote: > On 26.03.2014 23:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 22:42 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> David G. Miller wrote: > >> > >>> The funny thing is that back in the earliest days of Unix, /usr is where > >>> user directories lived

Re: super duper uberthread

2014-03-28 Thread poma
On 26.03.2014 23:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 22:42 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> David G. Miller wrote: >> >>> The funny thing is that back in the earliest days of Unix, /usr is where >>> user directories lived. When K&R ran out of room in / for programs, they >>> loo